| Literature DB >> 35586099 |
K Hemachandran1, Priti Verma2, Purvi Pareek3, Nidhi Arora4, Korupalli V Rajesh Kumar1, Tariq Ahamed Ahanger5, Anil Audumbar Pise6,7, Rajnish Ratna8.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence is an emerging technology that revolutionizes human lives. Despite the fact that this technology is used in higher education, many professors are unaware of it. In this current scenario, there is a huge need to arise, implement information bridge technology, and enhance communication in the classroom. Through this paper, the authors try to predict the future of higher education with the help of artificial intelligence. This research article throws light on the current education system the problems faced by the subject faculties, students, changing government rules, and regulations in the educational sector. Various arguments and challenges on the implementation of artificial intelligence are prevailing in the educational sector. In this concern, we have built a use case model by using a student assessment data of our students and then built a synthesized using generative adversarial network (GAN). The dataset analyzed, visualized, and fed to different machine learning algorithms such as logistic Regression (LR), linear discriminant analysis (LDA), K-nearest neighbors (KNN), classification and regression trees (CART), naive Bayes (NB), support vector machines (SVM), and finally random forest (RF) algorithm and achieved a maximum accuracy of 58%. This article aims to bridge the gap between human lecturers and the machine. We are also concerned about the psychological emotions of the faculty and the students when artificial intelligence takes control.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35586099 PMCID: PMC9110123 DOI: 10.1155/2022/1410448
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Comput Intell Neurosci
Figure 1Artificial intelligence's role in the educational sector.
Figure 2Ai personalizes higher education system.
Student information-input data to GAN model.
| Student ID | Gender | Department | Specialization | Subject code | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | End result |
|
| |||||||||
| 1 | M | SB | AIML | A7 | 9 | 8 | 2 | 4 | P |
| 2 | F | SB | AIML | A7 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 9 | P |
| 3 | M | ST | CSE | CS23 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 9 | P |
| 369 | F | SB | AIML | A05 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 7 | P |
| 1200 | M | SB | AIML | A8 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5 | F |
| 1204 | F | ST | CSE | CS11 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | P |
| 452 | M | SB | HR | S22 | 10 | 10 | 9 | 10 | P |
| 3 | M | ST | CSE | CS9 | 8 | 2 | 5 | 7 | P |
| 2 | F | SB | AIML | A6 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 5 | F |
Figure 3Data modeling on assessment.
Figure 4Prediction using algorithms on assessment data, initial condition.
Figure 5Prediction using algorithms on assessment data, final condition.
Figure 6Algorithms performance parameters.