| Literature DB >> 35586002 |
Fei Fu1, Xiao Liu1, Sixiang Zhou1.
Abstract
Despite significant interaction between children's psychology and space in welfare institutions, only a handful of empirical studies have focused on it to date. Through the investigation, analysis, and spatial classification of the psychological issues of troubled children in the SOS children's village community in Chengdu, we observed the records for 1 year and used the PHCSS-SD method innovatively to systematically and quantitatively analyze the psychology of troubled children and their perception of public space in the park. Based on the needs of hearing, vision, touch, interaction, and safety of children in distress, we selected nine evaluation factors, including daylighting, interesting pattern, participation, and touchability. Each factor was categorized into five evaluation scales for psychological measurement and analysis to provide a basis for the development of mental health and the optimization of the living environment of children in distress. Based on the SD broken line of public space, we analyzed the advantages and disadvantages of space and affirmed the crucial contributions made by the Chinese government to children's welfare. Overall, this study discusses the strategy of building outdoor public spaces in the SOS children's village community.Entities:
Keywords: SD method; child psychology; children in distress; design strategy; outdoor space
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35586002 PMCID: PMC9108176 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.870288
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Public Health ISSN: 2296-2565
Figure 1Statistics of children in distress in China in 2021.
Height and size table of difficult children of different ages in the “SOS children's village.”
|
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| ||||
| 3 | 13.95 | 95.1 | 13.44 | 94.2 |
| 4 | 15.61 | 102.1 | 15.21 | 101.2 |
| 5 | 17.39 | 108.6 | 16.79 | 107.6 |
| 6 | 18.30 | 111.6 | 17.92 | 110.8 |
| 8 | 19.95 | 116.9 | 19.23 | 115.5 |
| 10 | 21.81 | 132.2 | 20.95 | 130.3 |
| 12 | 23.25 | 150.2 | 22.46 | 146.2 |
Figure 2Child scale.
Figure 3Eysenck personality questionnaire subscale. Source: medical psychology.
Comparison between 83 children in the children's village and Hunan norm (x ± s).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Children in distress | SOS children's Village ( | 11.57 ± 2.76 | 8.29 ± 3.44 | 6.62 ± 2.47 | 8.20 ± 2.92 | 8.16 ± 2.26 | 6.63 ± 1.92 | 49.51 ± 15.77 |
| Ordinary children | Hunan norm ( | 11.97 ± 2.96 | 8.89 ± 3.27 | 6.40 ± 2.81 | 9.35 ± 2.85 | 8.49 ± 2.20 | 7.12 ± 1.89 | 51.98 ± 15.98 |
|
| −1.141 | 1.014 | 0.763 | −3.127 | −0.798 | −1.729 | −1.658 | |
|
| 0.249 | 0.314 | 0.442 | 0.384 | 0.384 | 0.086 | 0.100 | |
x ± s represents the mean ± standard deviation.
Comparison between the SOS children's village's children in distress and Chinese urban children (x ± s).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I Behavior | Male | 11.28 ± 2.62 | 11.94 ± 2.66 | −1.983 | 0.055 |
| Female | 11.96 ± 2.73 | 12.88 ± 2.35 | −1.297 | 0.119 | |
| II Intelligence and school | Male | 9.69 ± 3.66 | 10.73 ± 3.12 | −2.119 | 0.041 |
| Female | 10.28 ± 3.22 | 11.05 ± 3.24 | −3.722 | 0.001 | |
| III Physical appearance | Male | 6.89 ± 2.60 | 7.98 ± 2.89 | −3.096 | 0.004 |
| Female | 6.34 ± 2.35 | 7.97 ± 2.08 | −3.697 | 0.001 | |
| IV Anxious | Male | 8.36 ± 2.94 | 9.41 ± 2.54 | −1.779 | 0.080 |
| Female | 8.13 ± 2.91 | 9.20 ± 2.54 | −2.451 | 0.019 | |
| V Gregarious | Male | 8.20 ± 2.42 | 8.44 ± 2.01 | −1.137 | 0.263 |
| Female | 8.64 ± 2.08 | 9.13 ± 1.78 | −1.727 | 0.093 | |
| VI Happiness and satisfaction | Male | 6.69 ± 1.98 | 7.56 ± 1.65 | −2.418 | 0.020 |
| Female | 6.68 ± 1.89 | 7.64 ± 1.65 | −3.109 | 0.000 | |
| Total score | Male | 51.11 ± 16.22 | 56.62 ± 9.91 | −3.998 | 0.000 |
| Female | 52.03 ± 15.18 | 57.26 ± 9.66 | −4.910 | 0.000 |
x ± s represents the mean ± SD, and t is the value of the t-test, which is used to compare the difference of the mean between the two groups of data; P is the indicator of decreasing reliability of results.
EPQ scores of children in the children's village and comparison with national norm (x ± s).
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| Boys group | 4.69 ± 3.18 | 16.95 ± 3.99 | 9.23 ± 4.97 | 12.90 ± 4.18 |
| Girls group | 1.92 ± 1.52 | 16.11 ± 4.70 | 10.16 ± 5.41 | 14.54 ± 4.13 |
|
| 0.000 | 0.283 | 0.301 | 0.021 |
|
| ||||
| SOS children's village children's group | 4.69 ± 3.18 | 16.95 ± 3.99 | 9.23 ± 4.97 | 12.90 ± 4.18 |
| Norm group | 5.32 ± 2.98 | 18.32 ± 3.75 | 8.53 ± 4.68 | 13.89 ± 4.38 |
|
| 0.225 | 0.038 | 0.384 | 0.146 |
|
| ||||
| SOS children's village children's group | 1.92 ± 1.52 | 16.11 ± 4.70 | 10.16 ± 5.41 | 14.54 ± 4.13 |
| Norm group | 3.78 ± 2.40 | 18.15 ± 3.56 | 8.60 ± 4.90 | 15.81 ± 4.30 |
|
| 0.000 | 0.012 | 0.087 | 0.070 |
Results of correlation analysis between self-awareness and EPQ scales and children's general situation (n = 83).
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| I Behavior | −0.475 | 0.032 | −0.366 | 0.403 |
| II Intelligence and school | −0.263 | 0.362 | −0.403 | 0.465 |
| III Physical appearance | −0.148 | 0.602 | −0.188 | 0.126 |
| IV Anxious | −0.188 | 0.186 | −0.505 | 0.237 |
| V Gregarious | −0.357 | 0.235 | −0.367 | 0.292 |
| VI Happiness and satisfaction | −0.345 | 0.453 | −0.450 | 0.241 |
| Total score | −0.436 | 0.342 | −0.496 | 0.396 |
Space classification of several important outdoor activities in the SOS children's village.
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| A: Large toys, children's life fun pool | 3–6 years | Younger children cannot consciously regulate and control their activities but can play interesting games under their parents' care. Thus, intellectual + physical activity facilities with both fun and exercise are selected, and equipped with a rest corridor for caregivers |
|
| B: Cement playground (basketball court, tennis court, badminton court) | 8–12 years | The area is flat and spacious, equipped with basketball racks and nets to effectively exercise children's physical strength and teamwork ability |
|
| C: General hard fitness equipment area | 6–12 years | The area belongs to children's physical fitness coordination and other exercise areas, equipped with various activity equipment, including rope, chain, slide, and swing |
|
| D: Lawn playground (football field, baseball field, plastic track) | 8-12 years | A circle around the playground dominated by football field is equipped with 200-m red runway and rest seats. The stadium runway is used for children's training and seats for rest |
|
Figure 4Summary of the plane model of children's village.
Figure 5Characteristic diagram of SD factor.
SD factor example classification table.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Interest | Lighting | Spot, light, spot |
| Interesting pattern | Wall painting, blackboard newspaper, stone wall painting | |
| Naturalness | Vegetation season | Wall painting, blackboard newspaper, stone wall painting |
| Vegetation growth | Luxuriant and sparse appearance | |
| Comfort | Song | Radio, music, reading sound |
| Insects singing and birds singing | Birds, sounds | |
| Touchability | Soft soil | Soil quality and hardness |
| Flowers and trees | Category, touch, smell | |
| Security | Protector | Isolation zone, buffer zone, sand pit |
Figure 6Comparison between PHCSS scores of children in distress in Chengdu SOS children's village and Chinese norm scores.
Figure 7Comparative analysis of PHCSS-SD scores between activity space pattern groups.