| Literature DB >> 35585847 |
Jin Xu1, Hongjun Xie2, Liying Liu1, Zhifu Shen3, Lu Yang1, Wei Wei1, Xiaoli Guo1, Fanrong Liang1, Siyi Yu1, Jie Yang1.
Abstract
Objective: Acupuncture has been shown to be effective in the treatment of chronic pain. However, their neural mechanism underlying the effective acupuncture response to chronic pain is still unclear. We investigated whether metabolic patterns in the pain matrix network might predict acupuncture therapy responses in patients with primary dysmenorrhea (PDM) using a machine-learning-based multivariate pattern analysis (MVPA) on positron emission tomography data (PET).Entities:
Keywords: acupuncture; biomarker; machine learning; metabolic; primary dysmenorrhea
Year: 2022 PMID: 35585847 PMCID: PMC9108276 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.884770
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Neurol ISSN: 1664-2295 Impact factor: 4.003
Figure 1Study design and research flow chart.
Figure 2Regions of interest. Sensorimotor network (SMN): bilateral post-central (S1), and bilateral insula. Salience network (SN): the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC), and bilateral dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC). Default mode network (DMN): bilateral inferior parietal cortex (IPC), precuneus, isthmus cingulate cortex (ICC), and posterior cingulate cortex (PCC).
Figure 3Flowchart of the MVPA procedure. (A) Obtaining quantitative information from preprocessed PDG-PET scans. (B) Extracting metabolism data across all voxels in all ROIs. (C) Constructing feature matrixes of the SUVR. (D) Building the SVR model with LOOCV to predict each participant's response to acupuncture. FDG-PET, fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography; LOOCV, leave-one-out cross-validation; ROIs, regions of interest; sMRI, structural magnetic resonance imaging; SUVR, standardized uptake value ratio; SVR, support vector regression.
Demographics and clinical characteristics of each group.
|
|
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| |||
| Age (years) | 24.86 | 1.75 | 24.53 | 2.07 | 0.45 | 0.653 |
| Duration (months) | 90.57 | 36.31 | 97.40 | 34.09 | −0.52 | 0.606 |
| BMI | 19.20 | 1.15 | 19.45 | 1.81 | −0.44 | 0.664 |
| Baseline VAS | 6.07 | 1.07 | 6.00 | 1.20 | 0.17 | 0.867 |
| Baseline SDS | 39.68 | 7.28 | 43.42 | 10.07 | −1.14 | 0.265 |
| Baseline SAS | 41.34 | 5.56 | 40.55 | 7.80 | 0.31 | 0.758 |
| Post-treatment VAS | 3.50 | 1.70 | 5.30 | 1.39 | −3.14 | 0.004 |
| Change VAS | −2.57 | 1.55 | −0.70 | 1.62 | −3.17 | 0.004 |
BMI, body mass index; VAS, visual analog scale; SAS, Self-Rating Anxiety Scale; SDS, Self-Report Depression Scale.
The SUVR in all selected regions of each group.
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
| Salience network | Left dACC | 3.05 | 0.18 | 3.09 | 0.20 | 1.05 | 0.30 |
| Left dlPFC | 2.75 | 0.13 | 2.74 | 0.10 | 0.20 | 0.84 | |
| Right dACC | 2.77 | 0.18 | 2.85 | 0.24 | −1.03 | 0.31 | |
| Right dlPFC | 2.68 | 0.15 | 2.67 | 0.12 | 0.07 | 0.95 | |
| Default mode network | Left IPC | 2.54 | 0.12 | 2.54 | 0.07 | −0.22 | 0.83 |
| Left ICC | 2.50 | 0.09 | 2.50 | 0.14 | −0.10 | 0.92 | |
| Left PCC | 2.67 | 0.10 | 2.69 | 0.11 | −0.45 | 0.66 | |
| Left PCU | 2.52 | 0.11 | 2.48 | 0.10 | 0.87 | 0.39 | |
| Right IPC | 2.58 | 0.10 | 2.55 | 0.09 | 0.72 | 0.48 | |
| Right ICC | 2.47 | 0.17 | 2.52 | 0.11 | −0.98 | 0.34 | |
| Right PCC | 2.63 | 0.12 | 2.70 | 0.10 | −1.73 | 0.10 | |
| Right PCU | 2.54 | 0.09 | 2.56 | 0.08 | −0.48 | 0.64 | |
| Sensorimotor network | Left S1 | 2.17 | 0.08 | 2.17 | 0.09 | 0.03 | 0.98 |
| Left Insula | 2.93 | 0.16 | 2.91 | 0.15 | 0.29 | 0.78 | |
| Right S1 | 2.13 | 0.08 | 2.17 | 0.11 | −0.95 | 0.35 | |
| Right Insula | 2.88 | 0.18 | 2.94 | 0.11 | −0.94 | 0.35 | |
dACC, dorsal anterior cingulate cortex; dlPFC, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex; IPC, inferior parietal cortex; ICC, isthmus cingulate cortex; PCC, posterior cingulate cortex; PCU, precuneus; S1, postcentral.
Figure 4Predicting treatment effects using baseline SUVR patterns in special networks. (A) SUVR pattern in the SMN and DMN as a predictor for the pooled group. (B) SUVR pattern in the DMN as a predictor for the real acupuncture treatment group. DMN, default mode network; SMN, sensorimotor network; SN, salience network; SUVR, standardized uptake value ratio.
The relationship between change of VAS and brain features by using bivariate Pearson correlation analyses.
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Default mode network | Left IPC | 0.29 | 0.12 |
| Left ICC | 0.26 | 0.18 | |
| Left PCC | 0.25 | 0.19 | |
| Left PCU | 0.36 | 0.05 | |
| Right IPC | 0.30 | 0.11 | |
| Right ICC | 0.37 | 0.05 | |
| Right PCC | 0.29 | 0.13 | |
| Right PCU | 0.37 | 0.05 | |
| Salience network | Left dACC | 0.14 | 0.48 |
| Left dlPFC | 0.24 | 0.20 | |
| Right dACC | 0.30 | 0.11 | |
| Right dlPFC | 0.29 | 0.13 | |
| Sensorimotor network | Left S1 | 0.29 | 0.13 |
| Left Insula | 0.34 | 0.08 | |
| Right S1 | 0.32 | 0.09 | |
| Right Insula | 0.32 | 0.09 |
dACC, dorsal anterior cingulate cortex; dlPFC, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex; IPC, inferior parietal cortex; ICC, isthmus cingulate cortex; PCC, posterior cingulate cortex; PCU, precuneus; S1, postcentral.