INTRODUCTION/AIMS: The amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) functional rating scale-revised (ALSFRS-R) is commonly used to track ALS disease progression; however, there are gaps in the literature regarding the extent to which the ALSFRS-R relates to underlying central nervous system (CNS) pathology. The current study explored the association between ALSFRS-R (total and subdomain) scores and postmortem neuropathology (both ALS-specific and comorbid disease). METHODS: Within our sample of 93 military veterans with autopsy-confirmed ALS, we utilized hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA) to identify discrete profiles of motor dysfunction based on ALSFRS-R subdomain scores. We examined whether emergent clusters were associated with neuropathology. Separate analyses of variance and covariance with post-hoc comparisons were performed to examine relevant cluster differences. RESULTS: Analyses revealed significant correlations between ALSFRS-R total and subdomain scores with some, but not all, neuropathological variables. The HCA illustrated three groups: Cluster 1-predominantly diffuse functional impairment; Cluster 2-spared respiratory/bulbar and impaired motor function; and Cluster 3-spared bulbar and impaired respiratory, and fine and gross motor function. Individuals in Cluster 1 (and to a lesser degree, Cluster 3) exhibited greater accumulation of ALS-specific neuropathology and less comorbid neuropathology than those in Cluster 2. DISCUSSION: These results suggest that discrete patterns of motor dysfunction based on ALSFRS-R subdomain scores are related to postmortem neuropathology. Findings support use of ALSFRS-R subdomain scores to capture the heterogeneity of clinical presentation and disease progression in ALS, and may assist researchers in identifying endophenotypes for separate assessment in clinical trials. Published 2022. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.
INTRODUCTION/AIMS: The amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) functional rating scale-revised (ALSFRS-R) is commonly used to track ALS disease progression; however, there are gaps in the literature regarding the extent to which the ALSFRS-R relates to underlying central nervous system (CNS) pathology. The current study explored the association between ALSFRS-R (total and subdomain) scores and postmortem neuropathology (both ALS-specific and comorbid disease). METHODS: Within our sample of 93 military veterans with autopsy-confirmed ALS, we utilized hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA) to identify discrete profiles of motor dysfunction based on ALSFRS-R subdomain scores. We examined whether emergent clusters were associated with neuropathology. Separate analyses of variance and covariance with post-hoc comparisons were performed to examine relevant cluster differences. RESULTS: Analyses revealed significant correlations between ALSFRS-R total and subdomain scores with some, but not all, neuropathological variables. The HCA illustrated three groups: Cluster 1-predominantly diffuse functional impairment; Cluster 2-spared respiratory/bulbar and impaired motor function; and Cluster 3-spared bulbar and impaired respiratory, and fine and gross motor function. Individuals in Cluster 1 (and to a lesser degree, Cluster 3) exhibited greater accumulation of ALS-specific neuropathology and less comorbid neuropathology than those in Cluster 2. DISCUSSION: These results suggest that discrete patterns of motor dysfunction based on ALSFRS-R subdomain scores are related to postmortem neuropathology. Findings support use of ALSFRS-R subdomain scores to capture the heterogeneity of clinical presentation and disease progression in ALS, and may assist researchers in identifying endophenotypes for separate assessment in clinical trials. Published 2022. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.
Authors: Merit Cudkowicz; Michael E Bozik; Evan W Ingersoll; Robert Miller; Hiroshi Mitsumoto; Jeremy Shefner; Dan H Moore; David Schoenfeld; James L Mather; Donald Archibald; Mary Sullivan; Craig Amburgey; Juliet Moritz; Valentin K Gribkoff Journal: Nat Med Date: 2011-11-20 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Leonhard A Bakker; Carin D Schröder; Michael A van Es; Paul Westers; Johanna M A Visser-Meily; Leonard H van den Berg Journal: J Neurol Date: 2017-06-12 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: Milena de Albuquerque; Lucas Melo T Branco; Thiago Junqueira R Rezende; Helen Maia Tavares de Andrade; Anamarli Nucci; Marcondes Cavalcante França Journal: Neuroimage Clin Date: 2017-01-24 Impact factor: 4.881
Authors: Matthew D Cykowski; Suzanne Z Powell; Leif E Peterson; Joan W Appel; Andreana L Rivera; Hidehiro Takei; Ellen Chang; Stanley H Appel Journal: J Neuropathol Exp Neurol Date: 2017-05-01 Impact factor: 3.685
Authors: Anna M Wirth; Andrei Khomenko; Dobri Baldaranov; Ines Kobor; Ohnmar Hsam; Thomas Grimm; Siw Johannesen; Tim-Henrik Bruun; Wilhelm Schulte-Mattler; Mark W Greenlee; Ulrich Bogdahn Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2018-07-30 Impact factor: 4.003