Literature DB >> 35584261

The reliability and responsivity of pain intensity scales in individuals with chronic pain.

Pramote Euasobhon1, Raviwon Atisook1, Kulsiri Bumrungchatudom1, Nantthasorn Zinboonyahgoon1, Nattha Saisavoey2, Mark P Jensen3.   

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Prior research supports the validity and short-term test-retest stability of four commonly used scales for assessing pain intensity (Visual Analogue Scale [VAS], Verbal Rating Scale [VRS-6], 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale [NRS-11], and Face Pain Scale-Revised [FPS-R]). However, the relative stability and ability of these measures to detect changes in pain intensity over longer time periods has not yet been examined, although knowledge regarding these psychometric issues is important for selecting from among these measures. To address this knowledge gap, we administered these scales assessing worst and average pain intensity to 250 chronic pain outpatients on two occasions, four weeks apart. All four scales were found to be valid for detecting decreases in pain, and the VAS, NRS-11, and FPS-R evidenced the most validity for detecting increases in pain. The NRS-11 and VAS evidenced better test-retest stability than the VRS-6 and FPS-R. Age affected the ability of the VRS-6 for detecting improvement in worst pain, as well as the ability of the VAS for detecting worsening in both worst and average pain. However, the psychometric properties of the scales were not influenced by education level. Overall, the NRS-11 emerged as showing the most sensitivity and stability. The FPS-R appears to be a good second choice to consider for samples of individuals who might have difficulty understanding or using the NRS-11.
Copyright © 2022 International Association for the Study of Pain.

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 35584261     DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002692

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain        ISSN: 0304-3959            Impact factor:   6.961


  1 in total

1.  Does kinesio taping plus exercise improve pain and function in patients with knee osteoarthritis?: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Haiyang Wu; Ruoyu Yao; Junhao Wu; Guowei Wen; Yiru Wang
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-09-09       Impact factor: 4.755

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.