Literature DB >> 35584090

Prevalence of timely complementary feeding initiation and associated factors among mothers having children aged 6-24 months in rural north-central Ethiopia: Community based cross-sectional study.

Moges Wubneh Abate1, Adane Birhanu Nigat1, Agimasie Tigabu Demelash1, Tigabu Desie Emiru2, Nigusie Selomon Tibebu2, Chalie Marew Tiruneh2, Amsalu Belete3, Tilahun Kegne Abebe4, Moges Yinges Yitayew5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Complementary foods are defined as any solid or liquid foods other than breast milk offered to children. Timely initiation of complementary foods during infancy is necessary for growth and development. The first two years of life are important period for rapid physical, cognitive and social development that requires optimal nutrition. Currently, there is no study done in this rural community about timely initiation of complementary feeding.
OBJECTIVE: The main aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of timely initiation of complementary feeding among mothers having children aged 6-24 months in Farta district, rural Ethiopia.
METHODS: A community-based cross-sectional study was employed from December 2020 to February 2021 among 570 mothers by using multi-stage sampling techniques. Data were collected using a structured interviewer-administered questionnaire and entered into Epi Data 4.6 then transferred to Statistical Package for Social Science version 25 for analysis. Bivariate and multivariable logistic regression analysis with a 95% confidence interval carried out to determine the association between explanatory and the outcome variables. A P-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS: The prevalence of timely initiation of complementary feeding among mothers having children aged 6-24 months was 51.9%. Institutionaldelivery [(AOR = 2.10, 95% CI: (1.31-3.32)],Keeping livestock [(AOR = 2.21, 95% CI: (1.35, 3.65)], Postnatal follow up [(AOR = 0.60, 95% CI:(0.36, 0.77)],merchants [(AOR = 4.58; 95% CI:1.99, 10.55)], and daily labourer [(AOR = 2.88, 95% CI:(1.50-5.51)] were statistically associated with timely initiation of complementary feeding.
CONCLUSION: This finding revealed that the prevalence of timely initiation of complementary feeding is still low. Factors affecting timely initiations of complementary feeding were home delivery, unable to attend postnatal care follow-up, being housewife and farmers. All health professionals including health extension workers should give special attention to advising and counseling for mothers and their husbands about timely initiation of complementary feeding.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35584090      PMCID: PMC9116650          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.752


Introduction

Background

Complementary foods are defined as any solid or liquid foods other than breast milk, offered to infants [1]. The initiations of solid foods for an infant is known as complementary feeding [2]. Initiations of additional or complementary foods at six months are essential for growth and development of the children [3]. Exclusive breastfeeding for six months should charge by complementary feeding such as offering solid foods [4]. The world health organization (WHO) is recommend exclusive breastfeeding for the first six months of life and mothers should initiate soft, semi-solid, or solid food for their infants at the age of six months [5]. The first two years of life are important and “critical window” for rapid physical, cognitive and social development that requires optimal nutrition [6, 7]. In 2017, the world prevalence of timely initiation of complementary feeding was 64.5% [8]. In the world, near to eleven million infants and young children death reported annually due to the absence of timely initiations of complementary feeding [9]. In developing countries, over two-hundred million children under five years were unable to reach their capacity in cognitive development because of not initated timely complementary feeding [10]. The immediate consequences of poor nutrition during early childhood are increased the chance of morbidity, mortality and delayed mental development [11]. Ethiopia is still faced, undernourished children. This is mainly due to the absence of timely complementary feeding. Currently, there is no study done in rural community of Ethiopia including the study area about timely initiation of complementary feeding. Therefore, this study will be used as a source of information for the policymakers to improve timely initiation to complementary feeding. It also used as baseline data for further research. The main purpose of this study was to assess timely initiation of complementary feeding among mothers having children aged 6–24 months in Farta district, Rural Ethiopia.

Materials and methods

Study area and period

The study was conducted in Farta district, which is one of the 13 districts found in South Gondar zone, Amhara, Ethiopia. It has 36 rural kebeles. There are 8 health centres and 36 health posts providing health service for the district population. The total population of Farta district is 250,731. Of these total populations, 17,664 children were under two years of age.

Study design and source population

A community-based cross-sectional study was conducted among mothers who have Children 6–24 months of age in Farta district, South Gondar zone, Northcentral Ethiopia.

Inclusion criteria

All mothers who were had children aged from six months to two years in Farta district.

Exclusion criteria

Mothers who were seriously ill and unable to provided information during data collection period.

Study variables

Dependent variable

Timely initiation of complementary feeding.

Independent variables

Socio-demographic and economic characteristics (Age of mothers, occupation, educational level, read magazines and income). Maternal reproductive history and health service utilization (ANC follow up, number of visits, PNC follow up, place of delivery, number of live birth, birth interval, number of children delivered at a time).

Operational definition

Timely initiation of complementary feeding

It is the initiation of additional foods for a young children at sixth months of age along with continuing breastfeeding [12].

Sample size, sampling techniques and procedure

By taking the prevalence of timely initiation of complementary feeding 34% [13]. Epi info version 7.2.2.6 was used to calculate the sample by considered confidence interval 95%, power 80% with design effect 1.5. Based on this the sample size was 518. By adding a 10% non-response rate the final sample size was 570. A multi-stage sampling technique was used to select the study participants. First, 8 out of 36 Farta districts were selected randomly using lottery method. There were 2198 households in the selected kebeles having under-two-years-old children. The calculated sample size was proportionally allocated to the selected kebeles based on the number of households. In the second stage, a systematic random sampling technique was used to selected mothers at each selected kebeles. The sampling frame was obtained from the health extension workers at each selected kebeles. Finally, proportionally allocated study participants were selected by using systematic random sampling every 4th interval while the first household was selected by lottery method.

Data collection tool

Structured interviewer-administered questionnaires were used to collect the timely initiation of complementary feeding and its associated factors. The questionnaire was adapted from key indicators recommended by WHO and IYCF strategy of Ethiopia [12, 14]. The questionnaire composed of socio-demographic and economic characteristics, health care, and complementary feeding practice-related variables. It was initially prepared in English and then translated from English to Amharic and re-translated back to English by a language expert to maintain its consistency. Pre-testing was done on 5% of mothers at Ebinat district to check the reliability of the tool. Data were collected by eight health extension workers and two masters nurse supervisors for monitoring the overall data collection process. One day of training was given to data collectors and supervisors.

Data quality assurance, processing and analysis

Adequate training was provided for eight data collectors and two supervisors. The codes were given to the questionnaire. Data collectors and supervisors checked the filled questionnaire for completeness every day. Problems encountered during the study period were discussed in the study team and solved. Subsequently, the data were entered using Epi Data 4.6. The generated data was exported to a statistical package for social sciences (SPSS) version 25. The data was cleaned by visualizing, calculating frequencies, and sorting. The analysis was done with descriptive statistics by using frequency and percentage while bivariate and multivariable regression analysis between dependent and independent variables were performed using binary logistic regression. Hosmer and Lemeshow test was checked for model goodness of fit. During the bivariate analysis0.2 p-values were taken into multivariable regression. A 95% confidence interval (CI) and a P-value of less than 0.05 was taken as a significant association. Results were presented in text and tables.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval was obtained from ethical review board of (blind for peer review) with a protocol number 00310/2020. A formal permission letter was communicated at each level. The participants were well informed about the purpose, the right to refuse and participate in the study. Finally, data was collected after oral and written consent from each respondent.

Results

Socio-demographic and economic characteristics

From a total of 570 samples, 536 mothers were participated in the study with a response rate of 94%. Regarding educational status respondents of the respondents,266 (49.6%) were able to read and write (Table 1).
Table 1

Socio-demographic characteristics of mothers in Farta district (n = 536), Ethiopia, 2021.

VariablesCategoryFrequency (N)Percent (%)
Age of mother in years15–19366.7
20–2515729.3
26–299016.8
> = 3025347.2
Educational status of motherUnable to read and write11521.5
able to read and write26649.6
Primary8616.0
Secondary224.1
Diploma and above478.8
Educational status of spouseUnable to read and write13124.4
able to read and write21740.5
Primary14426.9
Secondary education213.9
Diploma and above234.3
Occupation of motherHousewife27551.3
Keep livestock12122.6
Daily labourer8315.5
Merchant264.9
Governmental employee315.8
Occupation of spouseFarmer40575.6
Governmental employee203.7
Merchant539.9
daily labourer5810.8
Read magazines and books (at least one month)Yes417.6
No49592.4
Monthly income of the household≤500 ETB19235.8
501–1000 ETB17031.7
1001–1500 ETB40.7
1501–2000 ETB8716.2
≥2001 ETB8315.5
Family size in number2–3 family40475.4
4–6 family10319.2
> 6 family295.4

Abbrevation: ETB = Ethiopian Birr.

Abbrevation: ETB = Ethiopian Birr.

Maternal reproductive history and health service utilization

Among the respondents, 315 (58.8%) of the mothers were primiparous. More than half of the mothers 313(58.4%) had ANC follow up (Table 2).
Table 2

Maternal reproductive history and health service utilization of mothers in Farta district, Ethiopia, 2020.

VariablesCategoriesFrequency (N = 536)Percent (%)
Number of live births≤ 231558.8
3–418534.5
≥ 5366.7
Birth interval≤ 2 years27350.9
≥ 3 years26349.1
ANC follow upYes31358.4
No22341.6
Number of ANC follow up1–2 times15929.7
≥ 3 times15428.7
During ANC visit told time to CFYes26568
No12332
Place of current deliveryHome11922.2
Institutional41777.8
PNC follow upYes26248.9
No27451.1
During PNC visit told time to CFYes20037.3
No6211.6
Number of children delivered.143280.6
≥ 110419.4

Abbrevations: ANC = Antenatal care, CF = Complementary Feeding, PNC = Postnatal Care.

Abbrevations: ANC = Antenatal care, CF = Complementary Feeding, PNC = Postnatal Care.

Timely initiation of complementary feeding

From the total participants 278 (51.9%) of mothers were initiated complementary feeding at six months.

Factors associated with timely initiation of complementary feeding

In the multivariable logistic regression analysis, occupations of the mothers, occupation of the spouse, Place of current delivery and PNC follow up were significantly associated with timely initiation of complementary feeding. Those mothers who had not postnatal care follow-up were 40% less likely to initiate timely complementary feeding. Mothers had merchant husbands were4.58 times more likely to initiate timely complementary feeding than mothers whose husband were farmers [(AOR = 4.58; 95% CI: (1.99, 10.55)] (Table 3).
Table 3

Factors associated with timely initiation of complementary feeding among mothers who had 6–24 months children in farta district.

VariablesCategoriesTimely initiation complementary feedingCOR (95% CI)AOR (95%CI)
NoYes
participant occupationHousewife15412111
Keep livestock34873.26 (2.05–5.17)**2.21(1.33–3.68)**
Daily labourer45381.08 (0.66–1.76)0.79 (0.46–1.36)
Merchant8182.86 (1.20–6.81) *1.02 (0.32–3.28)
Employee17141.05 (0.50–2.21)0.97 (0.42–2.22)
Occupation of the spouseFarmer22118411
Employee1370.65 (0.253–1.56)0.54 (0.20–1.45)
Merchant8456.76(3.11–14.70)**4.58(1.99–10.55)**
Daily labourer16423.15 (1.72–5.79)**2.88 (1.50–5.51) **
Place of deliveryHome754411
Institutional1832342.18 (1.43–3.31)**2.10(1.31–3.32)**
PNC follow upYes10415811
No1541200.51 (0.36–0.72)**0.60(0.41–0.89)**

Note: 1 = Reference group,

*P≤ 0.05 = statistically significant,

**P≤ 0.01 = highlystatistically significant

Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness of fit test = 0.57

Abbrevations: AOR = Adjusted odd ratio, CI = Confidence interval, COR = Crude odd ratio

Note: 1 = Reference group, *P≤ 0.05 = statistically significant, **P≤ 0.01 = highlystatistically significant Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness of fit test = 0.57 Abbrevations: AOR = Adjusted odd ratio, CI = Confidence interval, COR = Crude odd ratio

Discussions

The main reason to conduct this study was to assess timely initiation of complementary feeding in Farta district, rural Ethiopia. Mothers who had children 6–24 months were the study participant. The result of this study revealed that the prevalence of timely initiation of complementary feeding was 51.9% [(95% CI; (48%, 56%)]. The timely initiation of complementary feeding practice in this study was higher than findings from Iran(44.8%) [15], Kamba district, Ethiopia (40.4%) [16]. This difference is because of in Iran the study participants were those mothers had children up to two and a half year of life which may prone to recall bias compared to our study. Besides this in Iran low birth weight and multiple birth children were excluded in the study this could also underestimate the finding. The possible reason for variation with Kamba Woreda may be due to difference in the study period since the study in Kamba was done before six year ago and nowadays, the health extension workers play a great role in the dissemination of information about child feeding practice for the community. The finding was lower than the study conducted in Bangladesh (71%) [17], Halaba Kulito (57.8%) [18], Dessie referral hospital(65.1%) [19] and Addis Ababa (83%) [20], Hiwot Fana specialized hospital (60.5%) [21], Mekelle (62.8%) [22], Lalibela (63%) [23], Sodo town, Southern Ethiopia (71.2%) [24]. These incongruent findings are may be due to timely initiation of complementary feeding in Bangladesh included those mothers who initiated feeding in 6–8 months compared with our study exactly at 6 months. Also differences in Addis Ababa, Hiwot Fana hospital, Mekelle and Lalibela were done both in an urban and rural community while our study solely conducted in a rural community may bring this great variation because mothers in urban community are near for accessing information by different media regarding timely initiation of complementary feeding compared to a rural community. The discripances with the study done in Sodo town, Ethiopia may be due to variations in residence, since a study done in Sodo was in urban community this may give better opportunity for timely initiation of complementary feeding while, our study done in rural community may have negative impact by different mechanisms like the community may not be accessed adequate information about timely initiation of complementary feeding. Occupation of mothers, occupation of the spouses, place of delivery and PNC visits were associated with timely initiation of complementary feeding. Occupation of the mother is one of the factors that affect timely initiations of complementary feeding. In this case, those mothers who kept livestock were 2.21 times more likely to initiated timely complementary feeding than a housewife. This is consistent with studies conducted in Kamba and Lalibela districts [16, 23]. The reason may be due to keep livestock mothers usually stay out of home and they may get sufficient information about timely initiation of complementary feeding in contrast to housewife as they stay at home to wean their children early or late initiation of complementary feeding. The occupations of the spouse were also affect timely initiation of complementary feeding. Daily labourer and merchants were more likely to initiated timely complementary feeding compared to farmers. This finding was consistent with a study done in Pakistan [25], Gode district, Ethiopia [26]. This may be happened since merchants has better income and able to provide complementary feeding to their young infants. Beside this merchants and daily labourers may also have better chance of getting information regarding complementary feeding compared with farmers. Postnatal care user mothers’ were more likely to initiated timely complementary feeding to their infants compared to those who did not follow the service. The finding is inline with Axum, Ethiopia [27] and Kamba district, Ethiopia [16]. Mothers who had no postnatal care follow up were start complementary feeding earlier before 6 months or later after 8 months compared to mothers who not followed the PNC care. A postnatal period could be an ideal time to counsel mothers on optimal complementary feeding practiceas studies shown in Mekelle, Ethiopia [22], Addis Ababa [20] and Lalibela District, Ethiopia [23]. Generally, this study has a great impact or benefit for mothers to enhancing their habit of timely initiation of complementary feeding and also helps to reducing malnutrions of the children. Since, there is no study done in rural community of Ethiopia including the study area, this study helps to show the current conditions or figures of complementary feeding for different stakeholders. Finally, this study was mainly focused on the prevalence of timely initiation of complementary feeding. So that types of foods items or food diversities to be initiated were not addressed in this study.

Conclusion

The prevalence of timely introduction of complementary feeding in children aged 6–24 months is low in study setting. This finding was mainly affected by home delivery, unable to attend postnatal care follow-up, being housewife and farmers. This indicates that still, the community did not get adequate information about timely initiation of complementary feeding. It needs great effort and collaborative work from different stakeholders; like ministrey of health, regional health bureau, district health office, non governmental organizations and health care professionals to disseminateing information about the importance of timely initiation of complementary feeding to overcome child malnutrition. All health professionals including health extension workers should give attention to advising and counseling for mothers and their husbands about timely initiation of complementary feeding during antenatal, delivery and post natal period. Further research should be conducted by using qualitative study design to understand deeply socio-cultural and behavioral related factors towards timely initiation of complementary feeding. (DOCX) Click here for additional data file. 15 Dec 2021
PONE-D-21-34084
Prevalence of Timely Complementary Feeding Initiation and Associated Factors among Mothers Having Children Aged 6-24 Months in Rural North-central Ethiopia: Community based Cros-sectional Study
PLOS ONE Dear Dr. ABATE, Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process. Please note that further language improvement is highly indicated in the manuscript to be considered as a sound one. Consider revising the spelling, grammar, diction, and syntax throughout the manuscript for increased clarity to meet the standards for PLOS one publication. 
Please submit your revised manuscript by Jan 29 2022 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file. Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:
A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'. A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'. An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'. If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter. If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols. We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript. Kind regards, Ammal Mokhtar Metwally, Ph.D (MD) Academic Editor PLOS ONE Journal Requirements: When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements. 1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf 2. We suggest you thoroughly copyedit your manuscript for language usage, spelling, and grammar. If you do not know anyone who can help you do this, you may wish to consider employing a professional scientific editing service. Whilst you may use any professional scientific editing service of your choice, PLOS has partnered with both American Journal Experts (AJE) and Editage to provide discounted services to PLOS authors. Both organizations have experience helping authors meet PLOS guidelines and can provide language editing, translation, manuscript formatting, and figure formatting to ensure your manuscript meets our submission guidelines. To take advantage of our partnership with AJE, visit the AJE website (http://learn.aje.com/plos/) for a 15% discount off AJE services. To take advantage of our partnership with Editage, visit the Editage website (www.editage.com) and enter referral code PLOSEDIT for a 15% discount off Editage services.  If the PLOS editorial team finds any language issues in text that either AJE or Editage has edited, the service provider will re-edit the text for free. Upon resubmission, please provide the following: The name of the colleague or the details of the professional service that edited your manuscript A copy of your manuscript showing your changes by either highlighting them or using track changes (uploaded as a *supporting information* file) A clean copy of the edited manuscript (uploaded as the new *manuscript* file) 3. In your Data Availability statement, you have not specified where the minimal data set underlying the results described in your manuscript can be found. PLOS defines a study's minimal data set as the underlying data used to reach the conclusions drawn in the manuscript and any additional data required to replicate the reported study findings in their entirety. All PLOS journals require that the minimal data set be made fully available. For more information about our data policy, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability. Upon re-submitting your revised manuscript, please upload your study’s minimal underlying data set as either Supporting Information files or to a stable, public repository and include the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers within your revised cover letter. For a list of acceptable repositories, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-recommended-repositories. Any potentially identifying patient information must be fully anonymized. Important: If there are ethical or legal restrictions to sharing your data publicly, please explain these restrictions in detail. Please see our guidelines for more information on what we consider unacceptable restrictions to publicly sharing data: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-unacceptable-data-access-restrictions. Note that it is not acceptable for the authors to be the sole named individuals responsible for ensuring data access. We will update your Data Availability statement to reflect the information you provide in your cover letter. 4. We note that you have stated that you will provide repository information for your data at acceptance. Should your manuscript be accepted for publication, we will hold it until you provide the relevant accession numbers or DOIs necessary to access your data. If you wish to make changes to your Data Availability statement, please describe these changes in your cover letter and we will update your Data Availability statement to reflect the information you provide. 5. Your ethics statement should only appear in the Methods section of your manuscript. If your ethics statement is written in any section besides the Methods, please move it to the Methods section and delete it from any other section. Please ensure that your ethics statement is included in your manuscript, as the ethics statement entered into the online submission form will not be published alongside your manuscript. [Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.] Reviewers' comments: Reviewer's Responses to Questions Comments to the Author 1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions? The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented. Reviewer #1: Yes Reviewer #2: Partly Reviewer #3: Yes ********** 2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously? Reviewer #1: Yes Reviewer #2: No Reviewer #3: I Don't Know ********** 3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available? The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified. Reviewer #1: Yes Reviewer #2: Yes Reviewer #3: No ********** 4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English? PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here. Reviewer #1: Yes Reviewer #2: No Reviewer #3: No ********** 5. Review Comments to the Author Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters) Reviewer #1: The whole manuscript is based on a community-based cross-sectional study to discuss the prevalence of complementary feeding initiation and associated factors among mothers having children aged 6-24 Months in rural north-central Ethiopia. The investigation focus on the mother's situation, such as mother’s career, spouse career, mother's age, work environment, birth intervals. Major critique: 1) Authors claimed that it needs great effort to disseminate information regarding the importance of timely initiation of complementary feeding to overcome child malnutrition. But there have been prospective studies on related topics, which may put this article in a insufficient innovation position, such as Complementary Feeding Habits in Children Under the Age of 2 YearsLiving in the City of Adama in theOromia Region in Central Ethiopia:Traditional Ethiopian Food Study, 2021. Other points 2) To explore the prevalence, it would be helpful to discuss th status of children's growth and some specific diseases in the study, such as wasting, stunting, underweight, and low body mass index. 3) The specific food of complementary feeding may add into the study, Including but not limited to vegetables, cereals (teff, wheat, barley), and fruits. 4) The discussion focus comparison between this study and the others’ work, but lack for explaining the innovation and advantage, or their own defects. Reviewer #2: Dear Authors Thanks for the efforts that has been made to accomplish this work. The topic is interesting, however, the selected test is not appropriate to report such results. I would highly suggest asking for consultation to re do the test especially for the factor analysis section. Grammatical check is needed as well and you need to remove some parts or re write it such as dependent and independent variables, operational definition etc. Reviewer #3: The data analysis is incomplete and can be expanded further. There is lack of novelty in the study and researchers should try to explore more variables which may have a relation with the timely initiation of complementary feeding. The overall language needs editing. The flow is not maintained. ********** 6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files. If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public. Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy. Reviewer #1: No Reviewer #2: No Reviewer #3: Yes: Nishtha Kathuria [NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.] While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step. Submitted filename: PONE-D-21-34084.docx Click here for additional data file. 7 Jan 2022 Response to Reviewers PONE-D-21-34084 Prevalence of Timely Complementary Feeding Initiation and Associated Factors among Mothers Having Children Aged 6-24 Months in Rural North-central Ethiopia: Community based Cros-sectional Study Dear Dr. Ammal Mokhtar Metwally, Ph.D (MD) Thank you very much for your ongoing consideration of our manuscript (PONE-D-21-34084) for publication in PLOS ONE. We have revised the manuscript to reflect your (editor) comments and those of the reviewers, and our point-by-point responses are shown on the next few pages. We appreciate the time spent by you and the reviewers, and hope you agree that the revised manuscript is both improved and now suitable for publication. We look forward to hearing from you at your earliest convenience. Yours sincerely, Moges Wubneh Abate Email:wmoges7@gmail.com Editor comments 1. Background: The timely initiation of complementary foods during infancy is necessary for growth and development. In the past years, despite efforts put to increase timely initiation of complementary feeding among lactating mothers in Ethiopia by different stakeholders, the goal is not attain as expected----not clear Authors’ response Thank you dear editor for your insight and we have amended this section. It now reads: Background: Complementary foods are defined as any solid or liquid foods with a nutritional value other than breast milk offered to children. Timely initiation of complementary foods during infancy is necessary for growth and development. The first two years of life are important period for rapid physical, cognitive and social development that requires optimal nutrition. 2. Introduction needs overall improvement and language editing Authors’ response Thank you dear editor for your insight and we have amended this section. It now reads in page4 (paragraph1; line2-10, paragraph 2; line1-4, paragraph3; line1-4 and paragraph4; line2-5). 3. It would be good to depict the relation between mothers reproductive history and health service utilization with initiation of complementary food. Authors’ response Dear editor we accepted your comment, but the authors try to showed the assosation between some of reproductive history like partiy and health service utilizations like ANC, PNC history with initiation of complementary feeding even if; some of these variables had not significant association with timely initiation of complementary feeding. Reviewer #1: The whole manuscript is based on a community-based cross-sectional study to discuss the prevalence of complementary feeding initiation and associated factors among mothers having children aged 6-24 Months in rural north-central Ethiopia. The investigation focus on the mother's situation, such as mother’s career, spouse career, mother's age, work environment, birth intervals. Major critique: 1) Authors claimed that it needs great effort to disseminate information regarding the importance of timely initiation of complementary feeding to overcome child malnutrition. But there have been prospective studies on related topics, which may put this article in a insufficient innovation position, such as Complementary Feeding Habits in Children Under the Age of 2 Years Living in the City of Adama in theOromia Region in Central Ethiopia: Traditional Ethiopian Food Study, 2021. Other points 2) To explore the prevalence, it would be helpful to discuss th status of children's growth and some specific diseases in the study, such as wasting, stunting, underweight, and low body mass index. 3) The specific food of complementary feeding may add into the study, Including but not limited to vegetables, cereals (teff, wheat, barley), and fruits. 4) The discussion focus comparison between this study and the others’ work, but lack for explaining the innovation and advantage, or their own defects. Authors’ response for Reviewer #1 Authors’ response: 1. Dear reviewer, thank you for your insight but the objective of the study done in Adama city was focused on food habits or nutritional status of the children were assessed at the same time where as, our study is focused on howmany of mothers were initiated complementary feeding at 6 months Authors’ response: 2 Dear reviewer thank you for your suggestions but the objective of this study was timely initiations of complementary feeding, not the nutritional status of the children. There are studies done specfically to address nutritional status among children. Example: Undernutrition and associated factors among urban children aged 24–59 months in Northwest Ethiopia: a community based cross sectional study Authors’ response: 3 Thank you dear reviewer for constructive comment but this study was mainly focused does mothers in rural community initiated timely complementary feeding irrespective of food diversity. And also the authors set reccommendation for other researchers in discussion section to include food items page 15; paragraph 5, line 5-7. Authors’ response: 4 Thank you dear reviewer for constructive comments and the authors corrected the comments. Now reads it on page 15; paragraph 5, line 1-7. Reviewer #2: Dear Authors Thanks for the efforts that has been made to accomplish this work. The topic is interesting; however, the selected test is not appropriate to report such results. I would highly suggest asking for consultation to re do the test especially for the factor analysis section. Grammatical check is needed as well and you need to remove some parts or re write it such as dependent and independent variables, operational definition etc. Authors’ response for Reviewer #2 Authors’ response Dear reviewer thank you for your kind words sothat, based on your suggestion we were ask consultation to different researchers. So based on the resarchers recommendation for this study is pereferable to be binary logistic regression test. Grammar errors were checked and corrected accordingly through out the entire manuscripts based on your recommendation. We re-write and amended in dependent and independent variables, operational definition based on reviewer recommandations. Now read it on page 5 and 6 in the manuscript. Reviewer #3: The data analysis is incomplete and can be expanded further. There is lack of novelty in the study and researchers should try to explore more variables which may have a relation with the timely initiation of complementary feeding. The overall language needs editing. The flow is not maintained. Authors’ response for Reviewer #3 Authors’ response Dear reviewer thank you for your comment the objective of this study is mainly focused on howmany of mothers in this rural community of Ethiopia were initiated complementary feeding. Eventhough, there are unexplored variables present in this study; the authors believed that the tested variables are adequate. We have also set recommendation for other researchers to conducting study in this area or tittle in last paragraph of discussion section. The language or grammar errors were corrected as per recommendations of the reviewer in the entire section of the manuscript. We have made amendement on the manuscript flow in the entire section based on your recommendation. Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx Click here for additional data file. 1 Apr 2022 Prevalence of Timely Complementary Feeding Initiation and Associated Factors among Mothers Having Children Aged 6-24 Months in Rural North-central Ethiopia: Community based Cros-sectional Study PONE-D-21-34084R1 Dear Dr. ABATE, We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements. Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication. An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org. If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org. Kind regards, Ammal Mokhtar Metwally, Ph.D (MD) Academic Editor PLOS ONE Additional Editor Comments (optional): A great effort was made by the authors to utilize the feedback that was provided for them to correct for resubmission Reviewers' comments: Reviewer's Responses to Questions Comments to the Author 1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation. Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed ********** 2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions? The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented. Reviewer #2: Yes ********** 3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously? Reviewer #2: Yes ********** 4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available? The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified. Reviewer #2: Yes ********** 5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English? PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here. Reviewer #2: Yes ********** 6. Review Comments to the Author Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters) Reviewer #2: Dear Authors Thanks for considering all comments. This version is much better than previous one. I wish you the good luck in your submission this time. If you need any further clarification please do contact me Cheers ********** 7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files. If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public. Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy. Reviewer #2: Yes: Manal I. Kassab 9 May 2022 PONE-D-21-34084R1 Prevalence of Timely Complementary Feeding Initiation and Associated Factors among Mothers Having Children Aged 6-24 Months in Rural North-central Ethiopia: Community based Cros-sectional Study Dear Dr. Abate: I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department. If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org. If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org. Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access. Kind regards, PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff on behalf of Professor Ammal Mokhtar Metwally Academic Editor PLOS ONE
  14 in total

1.  Determinants of inappropriate complementary feeding practices in infant and young children in Bangladesh: secondary data analysis of Demographic Health Survey 2007.

Authors:  Iqbal Kabir; Mansura Khanam; Kingsley E Agho; Seema Mihrshahi; Michael J Dibley; Swapan K Roy
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Complementary feeding practices: Current global and regional estimates.

Authors:  Jessica M White; France Bégin; Richard Kumapley; Colleen Murray; Julia Krasevec
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  ESPGHAN's 2008 recommendation for early introduction of complementary foods: how good is the evidence?

Authors:  Adriano Cattaneo; Carol Williams; Carmen Rosa Pallás-Alonso; Maria Teresa Hernández-Aguilar; Juan José Lasarte-Velillas; Leonardo Landa-Rivera; Elien Rouw; Mónica Pina; Alessandro Volta; Anne Marie Oudesluys-Murphy
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 4.  Duration of exclusive breast-feeding: introduction of complementary feeding may be necessary before 6 months of age.

Authors:  John J Reilly; Jonathan C K Wells
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.718

5.  [Complementary feeding]

Authors:  E R Giugliani; C G Victoria
Journal:  J Pediatr (Rio J)       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.197

6.  Timely Initiation of Complementary Feeding and Associated Factors among Mothers of Children Aged 6-24 Months in Dessie Referral Hospital, Northeast Ethiopia, 2019.

Authors:  Atsedemariam Andualem; Afework Edmealem; Belachew Tegegne; Lehulu Tilahun; Yitayish Damtie
Journal:  J Nutr Metab       Date:  2020-10-29

7.  WHO Global Consultation on Public Health Intervention against Early Childhood Caries.

Authors:  Prathip Phantumvanit; Yuka Makino; Hiroshi Ogawa; Andrew Rugg-Gunn; Paula Moynihan; Poul Erik Petersen; Wendell Evans; Carlos Alberto Feldens; Edward Lo; Mohammad H Khoshnevisan; Ramon Baez; Benoit Varenne; Tippanart Vichayanrat; Yupin Songpaisan; Margaret Woodward; Siriruk Nakornchai; Chantana Ungchusak
Journal:  Community Dent Oral Epidemiol       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 3.383

8.  Timely initiation of complementary feeding and associated factors among children aged 6 to 12 months in Northern Ethiopia: an institution-based cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Ashenafi Shumey; Meaza Demissie; Yemane Berhane
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  Initiation of complementary feeding and associated factors among children of age 6-23 months in Sodo town, Southern Ethiopia: Cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Tefera Chane; Shimelash Bitew; Tesfa Mekonnen; Wubalem Fekadu
Journal:  Pediatr Rep       Date:  2018-01-03

10.  Prevalence of initiation of complementary feeding at 6 months of age and associated factors among mothers of children aged 6 to 24 months in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Authors:  Shikur Mohammed; Tewodros Getinet; Samrawit Solomon; Andrew D Jones
Journal:  BMC Nutr       Date:  2018-12-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.