BACKGROUND: Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is a cause of acute coronary syndrome that predominantly affects women. Its pathophysiology remains unclear but connective tissue disorders (CTD) and other vasculopathies have been observed in many SCAD patients. A genetic component for SCAD is increasingly appreciated, although few genes have been robustly implicated. We sought to clarify the genetic cause of SCAD using targeted and genome-wide methods in a cohort of sporadic cases to identify both common and rare disease-associated variants. METHODS: A cohort of 91 unrelated sporadic SCAD cases was investigated for rare, deleterious variants in genes associated with either SCAD or CTD, while new candidate genes were sought using rare variant collapsing analysis and identification of novel loss-of-function variants in genes intolerant to such variation. Finally, 2 SCAD polygenic risk scores were applied to assess the contribution of common variants. RESULTS: We identified 10 cases with at least one rare, likely disease-causing variant in CTD-associated genes, although only one had a CTD phenotype. No genes were significantly associated with SCAD from genome-wide collapsing analysis, however, enrichment for TGF (transforming growth factor)-β signaling pathway genes was found with analysis of 24 genes harboring novel loss-of-function variants. Both polygenic risk scores demonstrated that sporadic SCAD cases have a significantly elevated genetic SCAD risk compared with controls. CONCLUSIONS: SCAD shares some genetic overlap with CTD, even in the absence of any major CTD phenotype. Consistent with a complex genetic architecture, SCAD patients also have a higher burden of common variants than controls.
BACKGROUND: Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is a cause of acute coronary syndrome that predominantly affects women. Its pathophysiology remains unclear but connective tissue disorders (CTD) and other vasculopathies have been observed in many SCAD patients. A genetic component for SCAD is increasingly appreciated, although few genes have been robustly implicated. We sought to clarify the genetic cause of SCAD using targeted and genome-wide methods in a cohort of sporadic cases to identify both common and rare disease-associated variants. METHODS: A cohort of 91 unrelated sporadic SCAD cases was investigated for rare, deleterious variants in genes associated with either SCAD or CTD, while new candidate genes were sought using rare variant collapsing analysis and identification of novel loss-of-function variants in genes intolerant to such variation. Finally, 2 SCAD polygenic risk scores were applied to assess the contribution of common variants. RESULTS: We identified 10 cases with at least one rare, likely disease-causing variant in CTD-associated genes, although only one had a CTD phenotype. No genes were significantly associated with SCAD from genome-wide collapsing analysis, however, enrichment for TGF (transforming growth factor)-β signaling pathway genes was found with analysis of 24 genes harboring novel loss-of-function variants. Both polygenic risk scores demonstrated that sporadic SCAD cases have a significantly elevated genetic SCAD risk compared with controls. CONCLUSIONS: SCAD shares some genetic overlap with CTD, even in the absence of any major CTD phenotype. Consistent with a complex genetic architecture, SCAD patients also have a higher burden of common variants than controls.
Authors: Philipp von Hundelshausen; Konrad Oexle; Kiril Bidzhekov; Martin M Schmitt; Michael Hristov; Xavier Blanchet; Harald Kaemmerer; Gabor Matyas; Thomas Meitinger; Christian Weber Journal: Thromb Haemost Date: 2014-12-18 Impact factor: 5.249
Authors: Anas M Alazami; Sarah M Al-Qattan; Eissa Faqeih; Amal Alhashem; Muneera Alshammari; Fatema Alzahrani; Mohammed S Al-Dosari; Nisha Patel; Afaf Alsagheir; Bassam Binabbas; Hamad Alzaidan; Abdulmonem Alsiddiky; Nasser Alharbi; Majid Alfadhel; Amal Kentab; Riza M Daza; Martin Kircher; Jay Shendure; Mais Hashem; Saif Alshahrani; Zuhair Rahbeeni; Ola Khalifa; Ranad Shaheen; Fowzan S Alkuraya Journal: Hum Genet Date: 2016-03-29 Impact factor: 4.132
Authors: Kashish Goel; Marysia Tweet; Timothy M Olson; Joseph J Maleszewski; Rajiv Gulati; Sharonne N Hayes Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2015-05 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Sharonne N Hayes; Esther S H Kim; Jacqueline Saw; David Adlam; Cynthia Arslanian-Engoren; Katherine E Economy; Santhi K Ganesh; Rajiv Gulati; Mark E Lindsay; Jennifer H Mieres; Sahar Naderi; Svati Shah; David E Thaler; Marysia S Tweet; Malissa J Wood Journal: Circulation Date: 2018-02-22 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Haibao Tang; Ewen F Kirkness; Christoph Lippert; William H Biggs; Martin Fabani; Ernesto Guzman; Smriti Ramakrishnan; Victor Lavrenko; Boyko Kakaradov; Claire Hou; Barry Hicks; David Heckerman; Franz J Och; C Thomas Caskey; J Craig Venter; Amalio Telenti Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2017-11-02 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: Jacqueline Saw; Min-Lee Yang; Mark Trinder; Catherine Tcheandjieu; Chang Xu; Andrew Starovoytov; Isabelle Birt; Michael R Mathis; Kristina L Hunker; Ellen M Schmidt; Linda Jackson; Natalia Fendrikova-Mahlay; Matthew Zawistowski; Chad M Brummett; Sebastian Zoellner; Alexander Katz; Dawn M Coleman; Kirby Swan; Christopher J O'Donnell; Xiang Zhou; Jun Z Li; Heather L Gornik; Themistocles L Assimes; James C Stanley; Liam R Brunham; Santhi K Ganesh Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2020-09-04 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Tamiel N Turley; Megan M O'Byrne; Matthew L Kosel; Mariza de Andrade; Rajiv Gulati; Sharonne N Hayes; Marysia S Tweet; Timothy M Olson Journal: JAMA Cardiol Date: 2020-08-01 Impact factor: 14.676
Authors: Andre E Minoche; Claire Horvat; Renee Johnson; Velimir Gayevskiy; Sarah U Morton; Alexander P Drew; Kerhan Woo; Aaron L Statham; Ben Lundie; Richard D Bagnall; Jodie Ingles; Christopher Semsarian; J G Seidman; Christine E Seidman; Marcel E Dinger; Mark J Cowley; Diane Fatkin Journal: Genet Med Date: 2018-07-02 Impact factor: 8.822
Authors: Konrad J Karczewski; Laurent C Francioli; Grace Tiao; Beryl B Cummings; Jessica Alföldi; Qingbo Wang; Ryan L Collins; Kristen M Laricchia; Andrea Ganna; Daniel P Birnbaum; Laura D Gauthier; Harrison Brand; Matthew Solomonson; Nicholas A Watts; Daniel Rhodes; Moriel Singer-Berk; Eleina M England; Eleanor G Seaby; Jack A Kosmicki; Raymond K Walters; Katherine Tashman; Yossi Farjoun; Eric Banks; Timothy Poterba; Arcturus Wang; Cotton Seed; Nicola Whiffin; Jessica X Chong; Kaitlin E Samocha; Emma Pierce-Hoffman; Zachary Zappala; Anne H O'Donnell-Luria; Eric Vallabh Minikel; Ben Weisburd; Monkol Lek; James S Ware; Christopher Vittal; Irina M Armean; Louis Bergelson; Kristian Cibulskis; Kristen M Connolly; Miguel Covarrubias; Stacey Donnelly; Steven Ferriera; Stacey Gabriel; Jeff Gentry; Namrata Gupta; Thibault Jeandet; Diane Kaplan; Christopher Llanwarne; Ruchi Munshi; Sam Novod; Nikelle Petrillo; David Roazen; Valentin Ruano-Rubio; Andrea Saltzman; Molly Schleicher; Jose Soto; Kathleen Tibbetts; Charlotte Tolonen; Gordon Wade; Michael E Talkowski; Benjamin M Neale; Mark J Daly; Daniel G MacArthur Journal: Nature Date: 2020-05-27 Impact factor: 69.504