Literature DB >> 35583872

Association of Gabapentin Use With Pain Control and Feeding Tube Placement Among Patients With Head and Neck Cancer Receiving Chemoradiotherapy.

Sung Jun Ma1, Katy Wang2, Austin J Iovoli1, Kristopher Attwood2, Gregory Hermann3, Mark Farrugia1, Anurag K Singh1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35583872      PMCID: PMC9118041          DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.12900

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Netw Open        ISSN: 2574-3805


× No keyword cloud information.

Introduction

Almost one-half of patients treated with radiotherapy (RT) for oropharyngeal cancer require chronic opioid use to manage oral mucositis (OM) pain.[1] Given the paucity of level 1 evidence for OM pain management, current guidelines allow consideration of prophylactic gabapentin.[2,3] However, the optimal dose remains unclear. In this comparative effectiveness study, we performed a secondary analysis of 2 clinical trials conducted by this research team, hypothesizing that a higher dose of gabapentin would be associated with less opioid use and feeding tube (FT) placement.

Methods

Eligible patients in both studies received concurrent chemoradiotherapy for nonmetastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck and prophylactic oral gabapentin (titrated to 900 mg vs 2700 mg daily in 1 study[4] and 3600 mg daily in the other study). Using the 3600 mg cohort as the reference group, we performed a multivariable competing risks analysis to evaluate time to first use of opioids and a logistic regression analysis to assess FT placement, adjusted for baseline characteristics. This study followed the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) reporting guideline. Additional information is available in eMethods in the Supplement.

Results

Among 92 patients, the median age was 62.1 years (IQR, 55.4-66.4 years); 82 patients were male (89.1%), and 10 (10.9%) were female. Baseline cohort characteristics were well balanced (Table). Most patients tolerated gabapentin per protocol. For example, adverse effects from gabapentin, such as dizziness and drowsiness, were only reported in 1 patient (3.1%) in the 3600 mg cohort (grade 3 dizziness) and 2 patients (6.3%) in the 3600 mg cohort (gabapentin was discontinued because of nausea and vomiting partly associated with RT and low adherence to oral hygiene).
Table.

Baseline Participant Characteristics

CharacteristicNo. (%)P value
Gabapentin, 3600 mgGabapentin, 2700 mgGabapentin, 900 mg
Total participants, No.323129NA
Age, median (IQR), y63.0 (56.8-68.8)62.0 (55.2-65.1)61.9 (54.3-64.6).43
Sex
Male28 (87.5)27 (87.1)27 (93.1).77
Female4 (12.5)4 (12.9)2 (6.9)
Race
Racial minority groupa1 (3.1)1 (3.2)0>.99
White31 (96.9)30 (96.8)29 (100)
ECOG performance status
023 (71.9)23 (74.2)23 (79.3).76
18 (25.0)7 (22.6)6 (20.7)
21 (3.1)1 (3.2)0
BMI, median (IQR)29.3 (26.2-32.4)28.6 (24.3-31.3)29.9 (27.6-32.2).45
Primary disease site
Oropharynx27 (84.4)22 (71.0)21 (72.4).38
Other5 (15.6)9 (29.0)8 (27.6)
AJCC-7 cancer stage
II02 (6.5)0.25
III5 (15.6)9 (29.0)7 (24.1)
IV27 (84.4)20 (64.5)22 (75.9)
Feeding tube before radiotherapy
No31 (96.9)29 (93.5)29 (100).65
Yes1 (3.1)2 (6.5)0
Neck radiotherapy
Unilateral10 (31.3)4 (12.9)5 (17.2).19
Bilateral22 (68.8)27 (87.1)24 (82.8)

Abbreviations: AJCC-7, AJCC Cancer Staging Manual (7th edition); BMI, body mass index (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared); ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; NA, not applicable.

Racial minority groups included Asian or Pacific Islander, Black or African American, and unreported (participants declined to report race).

Abbreviations: AJCC-7, AJCC Cancer Staging Manual (7th edition); BMI, body mass index (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared); ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; NA, not applicable. Racial minority groups included Asian or Pacific Islander, Black or African American, and unreported (participants declined to report race). The multivariable competing risks model revealed the time to first opioid use for additional pain control was greatest in the 3600 mg cohort (Figure). The proportion of patients requiring opioids during RT was also smallest in the 3600 mg cohort (12 patients [37.5%]) vs the 900 mg cohort (27 patients [93.1%]) and the 2700 mg cohort (19 patients [61.3%]; P < .001). Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that, compared with the 3600 mg cohort (3 patients [9.4%]), the 2700 mg cohort (14 patients [45.2%]) had significantly greater odds of FT placement during RT (adjusted odds ratio, 9.9; 95% CI, 2.1-75.7; P = .009); however, the odds were not significantly greater in the 900 mg cohort (6 patients [20.7%]; adjusted odds ratio, 3.6; 95% CI, 0.7-28.1; P = .15).
Figure.

Cumulative Incidence of First Use of Opioid Medication During Radiotherapy Over Time

Multivariable competing risks analysis among cohorts receiving daily doses of gabapentin, 900 mg, 2700 mg, or 3600 mg (reference cohort). Adjusted for age, sex, performance status, body mass index, pretreatment feeding tube placement, primary disease site, cancer stage, and receipt of unilateral vs bilateral neck radiotherapy. The adjusted hazard ratios were 6.6 (95% CI, 3.2-13.6; P < .001) for the 900 mg cohort and 2.4 (95% CI, 1.2-4.8; P = .01) for the 2700 mg cohort compared with the 3600 mg cohort.

Cumulative Incidence of First Use of Opioid Medication During Radiotherapy Over Time

Multivariable competing risks analysis among cohorts receiving daily doses of gabapentin, 900 mg, 2700 mg, or 3600 mg (reference cohort). Adjusted for age, sex, performance status, body mass index, pretreatment feeding tube placement, primary disease site, cancer stage, and receipt of unilateral vs bilateral neck radiotherapy. The adjusted hazard ratios were 6.6 (95% CI, 3.2-13.6; P < .001) for the 900 mg cohort and 2.4 (95% CI, 1.2-4.8; P = .01) for the 2700 mg cohort compared with the 3600 mg cohort.

Discussion

This study is, to our knowledge, the first evaluation of prospective data to suggest that higher doses of gabapentin (900-3600 mg daily) are well tolerated and associated with delayed time to first opioid use for OM pain control. Consistent with our study, Smith et al[5] found that gabapentin decreased pain during RT, but the dose was not increased beyond 900 mg for most patients because early pain relief occurred at this dose; most patients in our study tolerated 3600 mg. Cook et al[6] found no benefit to using 1800 mg of gabapentin daily; patients receiving gabapentin had a higher rate of FT placement than patients receiving placebo (62.1% vs 20.7%). In our study, FT placement rates were comparable between subgroups of the 3600 mg and 900 mg cohorts in which methadone was used for rescue treatment, whereas the rate was significantly worse in the subgroup of the 2700 mg cohort in which hydrocodone and fentanyl were used for rescue treatment. Methadone has been reported to be more effective for OM pain control than hydrocodone and fentanyl.[4] These findings suggest the need for FT placement may not be associated with gabapentin dose alone but with the overall efficacy of pain management, including rescue regimens. Despite having well-balanced baseline cohort characteristics, this study remains an unplanned secondary analysis of 2 consecutive prospective clinical trials. Nevertheless, prophylactic gabapentin with 3600 mg daily was well tolerated and eliminated the need for opioids during RT in 62.5% of patients. Although gabapentin, 3600 mg, daily has been adopted as the standard regimen of the Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, additional studies are warranted to further investigate its role in pain control.
  5 in total

1.  Randomized Phase 3, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of Prophylactic Gabapentin for the Reduction of Oral Mucositis Pain During the Treatment of Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Andrew Cook; Ankit Modh; Haythem Ali; Jawad Sheqwara; Steven Chang; Tamer Ghanem; Suhael Momin; Vivian Wu; Samantha Tam; Sarah Money; Xiaoxia Han; Lamis Fakhoury; Benjamin Movsas; Farzan Siddiqui
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2021-11-20       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Preventive use of gabapentin to decrease pain and systemic symptoms in patients with head and neck cancer undergoing chemoradiation.

Authors:  Derek K Smith; Anthony Cmelak; Ken Niermann; Michael Ghiam; Diane Lou; Jill Gilbert; Michael K Gibson; Deborah Hawkins; Barbara A Murphy
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2020-08-07       Impact factor: 3.147

3.  Risk of Chronic Opioid Use After Radiation for Head and Neck Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Sondos Zayed; Cindy Lin; R Gabriel Boldt; Jinka Sathya; Varagur Venkatesan; Nancy Read; Lucas C Mendez; Dwight E Moulin; David A Palma
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-10-26

4.  A single-institution, randomized, pilot study evaluating the efficacy of gabapentin and methadone for patients undergoing chemoradiation for head and neck squamous cell cancer.

Authors:  Gregory M Hermann; Austin J Iovoli; Alexis J Platek; Chong Wang; Austin Miller; Kristopher Attwood; Daniel J Bourgeois; Anurag K Singh
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 6.921

5.  MASCC/ISOO clinical practice guidelines for the management of mucositis secondary to cancer therapy.

Authors:  Sharon Elad; Karis Kin Fong Cheng; Rajesh V Lalla; Noam Yarom; Catherine Hong; Richard M Logan; Joanne Bowen; Rachel Gibson; Deborah P Saunders; Yehuda Zadik; Anura Ariyawardana; Maria Elvira Correa; Vinisha Ranna; Paolo Bossi
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 6.860

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.