Aitor Nogales1,2, John Steel3, Wen-Chun Liu4,5,6, Anice C Lowen3, Laura Rodriguez1,7, Kevin Chiem1,8, Andrew Cox1, Adolfo García-Sastre4,5,9,10,11, Randy A Albrecht4,5, Stephen Dewhurst1, Luis Martínez-Sobrido1,8. 1. Department of Microbiology and Immunology, School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Rochestergrid.16416.34, Rochester, New York, USA. 2. Animal Health Research Centre (CISA), Centro Nacional Instituto de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA, CSIC), Madrid, Spain. 3. Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Emory University School of Medicinegrid.471395.d, Atlanta, Georgia, USA. 4. Department of Microbiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinaigrid.59734.3c, New York, New York, USA. 5. Global Health and Emerging Pathogens Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinaigrid.59734.3c, New York, New York, USA. 6. Biomedical Translation Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan. 7. Agencia Española de Medicamentos y Productos Sanitarios, Madrid, Spain. 8. Texas Biomedical Research Institutegrid.250889.e, San Antonio, Texas, USA. 9. Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinaigrid.59734.3c, New York, New York, USA. 10. The Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinaigrid.59734.3c, New York, New York, USA. 11. Department of Pathology, Molecular and Cell-Based Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinaigrid.59734.3c, New York, New York, USA.
Abstract
Influenza A viruses (IAV) remain emerging threats to human public health. Live-attenuated influenza vaccines (LAIV) are one of the most effective prophylactic options to prevent disease caused by influenza infections. However, licensed LAIV remain restricted for use in 2- to 49-year-old healthy and nonpregnant people. Therefore, development of LAIV with increased safety, immunogenicity, and protective efficacy is highly desired. The U.S.-licensed LAIV is based on the master donor virus (MDV) A/Ann Arbor/6/60 H2N2 backbone, which was generated by adaptation of the virus to growth at low temperatures. Introducing the genetic signature of the U.S. MDV into the backbone of other IAV strains resulted in varying levels of attenuation. While the U.S. MDV mutations conferred an attenuated phenotype to other IAV strains, the same amino acid changes did not significantly attenuate the pandemic A/California/04/09 H1N1 (pH1N1) strain. To attenuate pH1N1, we replaced the conserved leucine at position 319 with glutamine (L319Q) in PB1 and analyzed the in vitro and in vivo properties of pH1N1 viruses containing either PB1 L319Q alone or in combination with the U.S. MDV mutations using two animal models of influenza infection and transmission, ferrets and guinea pigs. Our results demonstrated that L319Q substitution in the pH1N1 PB1 alone or in combination with the mutations of the U.S. MDV resulted in reduced pathogenicity (ferrets) and transmission (guinea pigs), and an enhanced temperature sensitive phenotype. These results demonstrate the feasibility of generating an attenuated MDV based on the backbone of a contemporary pH1N1 IAV strain. IMPORTANCE Vaccination represents the most effective strategy to reduce the impact of seasonal IAV infections. Although LAIV are superior in inducing protection and sterilizing immunity, they are not recommended for many individuals who are at high risk for severe disease. Thus, development of safer and more effective LAIV are needed. A concern with the current MDV used to generate the U.S.-licensed LAIV is that it is based on a virus isolated in 1960. Moreover, mutations that confer the temperature-sensitive, cold-adapted, and attenuated phenotype of the U.S. MDV resulted in low level of attenuation in the contemporary pandemic A/California/04/09 H1N1 (pH1N1). Here, we show that introduction of PB1 L319Q substitution, alone or in combination with the U.S. MDV mutations, resulted in pH1N1 attenuation. These findings support the development of a novel LAIV MDV based on a contemporary pH1N1 strain as a medical countermeasure against currently circulating H1N1 IAV.
Influenza A viruses (IAV) remain emerging threats to human public health. Live-attenuated influenza vaccines (LAIV) are one of the most effective prophylactic options to prevent disease caused by influenza infections. However, licensed LAIV remain restricted for use in 2- to 49-year-old healthy and nonpregnant people. Therefore, development of LAIV with increased safety, immunogenicity, and protective efficacy is highly desired. The U.S.-licensed LAIV is based on the master donor virus (MDV) A/Ann Arbor/6/60 H2N2 backbone, which was generated by adaptation of the virus to growth at low temperatures. Introducing the genetic signature of the U.S. MDV into the backbone of other IAV strains resulted in varying levels of attenuation. While the U.S. MDV mutations conferred an attenuated phenotype to other IAV strains, the same amino acid changes did not significantly attenuate the pandemic A/California/04/09 H1N1 (pH1N1) strain. To attenuate pH1N1, we replaced the conserved leucine at position 319 with glutamine (L319Q) in PB1 and analyzed the in vitro and in vivo properties of pH1N1 viruses containing either PB1 L319Q alone or in combination with the U.S. MDV mutations using two animal models of influenza infection and transmission, ferrets and guinea pigs. Our results demonstrated that L319Q substitution in the pH1N1 PB1 alone or in combination with the mutations of the U.S. MDV resulted in reduced pathogenicity (ferrets) and transmission (guinea pigs), and an enhanced temperature sensitive phenotype. These results demonstrate the feasibility of generating an attenuated MDV based on the backbone of a contemporary pH1N1 IAV strain. IMPORTANCE Vaccination represents the most effective strategy to reduce the impact of seasonal IAV infections. Although LAIV are superior in inducing protection and sterilizing immunity, they are not recommended for many individuals who are at high risk for severe disease. Thus, development of safer and more effective LAIV are needed. A concern with the current MDV used to generate the U.S.-licensed LAIV is that it is based on a virus isolated in 1960. Moreover, mutations that confer the temperature-sensitive, cold-adapted, and attenuated phenotype of the U.S. MDV resulted in low level of attenuation in the contemporary pandemic A/California/04/09 H1N1 (pH1N1). Here, we show that introduction of PB1 L319Q substitution, alone or in combination with the U.S. MDV mutations, resulted in pH1N1 attenuation. These findings support the development of a novel LAIV MDV based on a contemporary pH1N1 strain as a medical countermeasure against currently circulating H1N1 IAV.
Influenza A viruses (IAV) are enveloped viruses that contain a genome comprising eight single-stranded negative-sense RNA segments (1, 2). IAV are classified based on the antigenic properties of the two viral surface glycoproteins, hemagglutinin (HA) and neuraminidase (NA). Currently, only two IAV subtypes (H1N1 and H3N2) circulate in humans and result in seasonal influenza epidemics of mild to severe respiratory illness with instances of fatal outcomes (3–7). Despite global vaccination campaigns, which represent the most cost-effective strategy to prevent IAV infections (4, 5, 7–13), it is estimated that seasonal influenza infections are still responsible for approximately 4 million cases of severe disease and 500,000 deaths worldwide yearly (14–16) [https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/influenza-(seasonal)]. In addition, zoonotic IAV can cause sporadic pandemics of severe consequences (17–24).There are two major types of licensed IAV vaccines for clinical application: inactivated influenza vaccines (IIV) and live-attenuated influenza vaccines (LAIV). IIV mainly induce humoral but not cell-mediated immune responses (25–34). Therefore, IIV offers limited protection if the seasonal vaccines do not antigenically match the predicted circulating IAV strains (9, 10, 13, 15). Furthermore, the immunogenicity and protective efficacy of IIV is reduced in immunocompromised patients and elderly individuals (35–37). On the other hand, LAIV have the potential to elicit broader protection because they induce both humoral and cell-mediated immune responses (5, 9, 10, 27, 38). Moreover, since LAIV are delivered nasally, they induce strong mucosal immunity at the site of infection (8, 35, 39). Finally, due to their induction of a cross-reactive cell-mediated immunity, which targets conserved viral proteins, LAIV confer more efficient protection against heterologous IAV strains, which is important in the case of antigenic mismatch between vaccine and circulating strains (9, 10, 27–34, 40–43). Unfortunately, because safety concerns, the U.S.-licensed LAIV remains restricted to < 2-year-old healthy, nonpregnant persons. In addition, the increased levels of IAV preexisting immunity in the >50-year-old adults can also limit the LAIV uptake (4, 8, 44). As a result, many individuals who are at high risk for severe influenza are unable to receive LAIV or vaccine efficacy is poor. Therefore, the development of a novel LAIV with improved immunogenicity, safety, and protective efficacy is highly desirable.Current LAIV leverage the temperature gradient between the human upper and lower respiratory tract (URT and LRT, respectively), and are characterized by cold-adapted (ca), temperature-sensitive (ts) and attenuated (att) phenotypes. LAIV replicate in the cooler URT, where they induce protective immune responses, but LAIV do not replicate in the LRT due to the elevated temperatures, which limits the potential risk of pulmonary damage and disease (5, 38, 45–47). The A/Ann Arbor/6/60 H2N2 master donor virus (MDV) used to manufacture currently licensed U.S. LAIV was generated by passaging the virus at gradually reduced temperatures, thereby selecting mutants that replicate efficiently at low temperatures (ca) but not at elevated temperatures (ts) (5, 7, 9, 10, 38, 48–50). Five mutations within the viral replicative machinery have been shown to be responsible for the ts, ca, and att phenotype of the U.S. A/Ann Arbor/6/60 H2N2 LAIV MDV: the viral polymerase subunits PB2 (N265S) and PB1 (K391E, D581G, and A661T); and the viral nucleoprotein, NP (D34G) (5, 38, 45, 48–50).A concern with this U.S. MDV is that it is based on a virus isolated in 1960 and a more contemporary MDV might be more effective to prevent infection with contemporary IAV strains. Reverse genetics methods can be used to introduce mutations into circulating IAV genomes in order to generate novel LAIV (5, 7, 38), including improved MDV (9, 10, 45). We have previously shown that the ts, ca, and att mutations of the A/Ann Arbor/6/60 H2N2 MDV were able to transfer the same phenotype into A/Puerto Rico/8/34 H1N1 (PR8) (10, 51), A/canine/NY/dog23/09 H3N8 (42, 43, 52), and A/equine/Ohio/1/03 H3N8 (46, 47). However, these mutations were not able to transfer the same ca, ts, and att phenotype to the pandemic A/California/04/09 H1N1 (pH1N1) (9, 53), limiting the potential use of this contemporary IAV strain as an MDV for LAIV development (53).In order to develop a safer MDV based on currently circulating pH1N1, we selected the known ca, ts, and att mutations of the A/Ann Arbor/6/60 H2N2 MDV in combination with the substitution of the conserved leucine at position 319 in PB1 by glutamine (L319Q) (54, 55). Previous work examining the phenotypic stability of wild-type IAV containing single gene segments from LAIV showed that the PB2 gene of LAIV in the genetic background of a seasonal H3N2 virus had a high degree of ts, which was associated with a novel mutation in PB1 (PB1 319Q) (56). In addition, a recent study has showed that PB1 L319Q substitution confers enhanced ts and att phenotype on the genetic background of a PR8 LAIV (55). Therefore, we generated recombinant pH1N1 viruses containing either PB1 L319Q alone or in combination with the mutations of the A/Ann Arbor/6/60 H2N2 MDV and evaluated their in vitro viral replication phenotypes, as well as their virulence and transmission phenotypes in ferrets and guinea pigs, respectively. Notably, the single amino acid substitution L319Q in the backbone of pH1N1 resulted in a ts phenotype in vitro, which was associated with reduced levels of virulence and transmission in vivo. Moreover, the ts and att phenotypes observed in vitro and in vivo were more pronounced when L319Q was combined with the mutations from the A/Ann Arbor/6/60 H2N2 MDV. These results demonstrate the feasibility of generating a safe and attenuated MDV based on the backbone of the contemporary pH1N1, which could be used to update LAIV as a medical countermeasure against currently circulating pH1N1 IAV strains. In addition, this strategy could also be used for the further clinical development of LAIV in <2-year-old children.
RESULTS
Generation and characterization of recombinant pH1N1 viruses.
To generate the recombinant pH1N1 viruses as candidate MDV, we modified the pH1N1 reverse genetics plasmids to encode the ts, ca, att mutations of the A/Ann Arbor/6/60 H2N2 MDV PB2 (N265S) and PB1 (K391E, E581G, and A661T) and/or the PB1 L319Q mutation (Fig. 1). No mutation was introduced in the viral NP since pH1N1 NP already encodes a G at position 34. In total we generated six pH1N1 viruses (Fig. 1), containing different gene constellations: pH1N1 WT (Fig. 1A), pH1N1 LAIV (Fig. 1B), pH1N1PB2 WT/PB1 LAIV (Fig. 1C), pH1N1PB2 WT/PB1 L319Q (Fig. 1D), pH1N1PB2 WT/PB1 LAIV+L319Q (Fig. 1E), and pH1N1PB2 LAIV/PB1 LAIV+L319Q (Fig. 1F).
FIG 1
Schematic representation of the PB2 and PB1 viral segments in the different pH1N1 viruses. The PB2 and PB1 viral segments of pH1N1 WT (A), pH1N1 LAIV (B), pH1N1PB2 WT/PB1 LAIV (C), pH1N1PB2 WT/PB1 L319Q (D), pH1N1PB2 WT/PB1 LAIV+L319Q (E), and pH1N1PB2 LAIV/PB1 LAIV+L319Q (F) viruses are shown. PB2 (N265) and PB1 (L319, K391, E581, and A661) WT amino acid residues are indicated in black. PB2 (S265) and PB1 (E391, G581, and T661) LAIV amino acid changes are indicated in red. PB1 Q319 is shown in blue.
Schematic representation of the PB2 and PB1 viral segments in the different pH1N1 viruses. The PB2 and PB1 viral segments of pH1N1 WT (A), pH1N1 LAIV (B), pH1N1PB2 WT/PB1 LAIV (C), pH1N1PB2 WT/PB1 L319Q (D), pH1N1PB2 WT/PB1 LAIV+L319Q (E), and pH1N1PB2 LAIV/PB1 LAIV+L319Q (F) viruses are shown. PB2 (N265) and PB1 (L319, K391, E581, and A661) WT amino acid residues are indicated in black. PB2 (S265) and PB1 (E391, G581, and T661) LAIV amino acid changes are indicated in red. PB1 Q319 is shown in blue.To evaluate the effect of the amino acid changes introduced in the PB2 or PB1 genes on viral polymerase complex activity, a minigenome (MG) assay was performed at three different temperatures (33°C, 37°C, and 39°C) (Fig. 2). To that end, pDZ ambisense plasmids encoding pH1N1 polymerase complexes (pDZ-PB2WT or PB2LAIV, -PB1 or PB1LAIV or -PB1L319Q or pDZ-PB1LAIV+L319Q, -PA, - and NP), were transiently co-transfected into human 293T cells, together with two viral (v)RNA-like reporter plasmids encoding green fluorescent protein (GFP) and Gaussia luciferase (Gluc) driven by a human RNA polymerase I promoter, and an expression plasmid constitutively expressing Cypridina luciferase (Cluc) under an SV40 promoter (SV40-Cluc), to normalize transfection efficiencies. Then, GFP (Fig. 2A), and Gluc and Cluc (Fig. 2B) expression levels were determined at 48 h posttransfection (p.t.) using fluorescence microscopy and luciferase assays, respectively. At 39°C, we observed a significant reduction for both GFP and Gluc expression levels, when a PB1 plasmid containing the L319Q substitutions was included in the polymerase complex. Indeed, MG activity at 39°C was similar for polymerase complexes containing either the full set of LAIV mutations (pH1N1 LAIV) or the single PB1 L319Q mutation (pH1N1PB2 WT/PB1 L319Q). When the LAIV and PB1 L319Q mutations were combined, MG activity was greatly reduced at all temperatures (33°C, 37°C), and undetectable at 39°C (pH1N1PB2 LAIV/PB1 LAIV+L319Q).
FIG 2
Effect of PB2 and PB1 mutations on pH1N1 polymerase activity at different temperatures. Human 293T cells were transiently co-transfected, using LPF2000, with the indicated combination of ambisense pDZ expression plasmids encoding the minimal requirements for viral genome replication and gene transcription (pDZ-PB2 or PB2LAIV, -PB1 or PB1LAIV or -PB1L319Q or pDZ-PB1LAIV+L319Q, -PA, and -NP), together with vRNA-like reporter plasmids encoding GFP or Gluc under the control of the human polymerase I promoter and the SV40-Cluc expression plasmid to normalize transfection efficiencies. The MG activity was evaluated at 48 h after transfection by GFP expression under a fluorescence microscope (A) or luminescence using a microplate reader (B). Gluc activity was normalized to that of Cluc, and the data were represented as relative activity considering the activity of pH1N1 WT at each indicated temperature as 100%. Data represent the means and SD of the results determined from triplicate wells. *, P < 0.05 (WT plasmids versus other plasmid combinations) using Student's t test (n = 3 per time point), n.s. not significant. Scale bar, 100 μm.
Effect of PB2 and PB1 mutations on pH1N1 polymerase activity at different temperatures. Human 293T cells were transiently co-transfected, using LPF2000, with the indicated combination of ambisense pDZ expression plasmids encoding the minimal requirements for viral genome replication and gene transcription (pDZ-PB2 or PB2LAIV, -PB1 or PB1LAIV or -PB1L319Q or pDZ-PB1LAIV+L319Q, -PA, and -NP), together with vRNA-like reporter plasmids encoding GFP or Gluc under the control of the human polymerase I promoter and the SV40-Cluc expression plasmid to normalize transfection efficiencies. The MG activity was evaluated at 48 h after transfection by GFP expression under a fluorescence microscope (A) or luminescence using a microplate reader (B). Gluc activity was normalized to that of Cluc, and the data were represented as relative activity considering the activity of pH1N1 WT at each indicated temperature as 100%. Data represent the means and SD of the results determined from triplicate wells. *, P < 0.05 (WT plasmids versus other plasmid combinations) using Student's t test (n = 3 per time point), n.s. not significant. Scale bar, 100 μm.To assess whether the introduced mutations from the A/Ann Arbor/6/60 H2N2 MDV conferred a ts phenotype and to evaluate the specific contribution of the PB1 L319Q substitution, we performed a multicycle virus growth assay at different temperatures (33°C, 37°C, and 39°C) and compared the results to those for the pH1N1 WT virus (Fig. 3). For this purpose, MDCK cells were infected at a low multiplicity of infection (MOI 0.001 PFU/cell), and viral titers in cell culture supernatants were determined at 24, 48, 72 or 96 h postinfection (p.i.) (Fig. 3). Although pH1N1 WT and pH1N1 LAIV replicated to significantly higher titers at 33°C at 24 h p.i., all viruses reached similar levels of replication at the peak of infection (48 to 72 h) (Fig. 3). However, the virus containing only the PB1 L319Q mutation (pH1N1PB2 WT/PB1 319Q) exhibited significantly delayed replication at all temperatures, compared to pH1N1 WT and pH1N1 LAIV (see reference 24 h p.i. Time points; Fig. 3). Furthermore, viruses containing both the PB1 L319Q mutation and the PB1 LAIV mutations (pH1N1PB2 WT/PB1 LAIV+L319Q and pH1N1PB2 LAIV/PB1 LAIV+L319Q) exhibited undetectable levels of replication at all-time points, at both 37°C and 39°C (Fig. 3). These data show that the PB1 L319Q mutation, alone, is able to confer a ts phenotype on pH1N1, and that combining the PB1 L319Q substitution with the mutations of the A/Ann Arbor/6/60 H2N2MDV conferred the strongest ts phenotype to pH1N1.
FIG 3
Replication of the pH1N1 viruses in MDCK cells. Cell culture supernatants of MDCK cells infected at a low MOI (0.001) with the indicated WT and mutant viruses at 33°C, 37°C, and 39°C were analyzed at the indicated times p.i. (24, 48, 72 and 96 h) by plaque assay. Data represent the means and SD of the results determined from triplicate wells. The dashed line indicates the limit of detection (LOD) (200 PFU/mL). *, P < 0.05 (pH1N1 WT versus pH1N1 mutants) using Student's t test, n.s. not significant. n.d, nondetected. &, Virus detected in one of the triplicates.
Replication of the pH1N1 viruses in MDCK cells. Cell culture supernatants of MDCK cells infected at a low MOI (0.001) with the indicated WT and mutant viruses at 33°C, 37°C, and 39°C were analyzed at the indicated times p.i. (24, 48, 72 and 96 h) by plaque assay. Data represent the means and SD of the results determined from triplicate wells. The dashed line indicates the limit of detection (LOD) (200 PFU/mL). *, P < 0.05 (pH1N1 WT versus pH1N1 mutants) using Student's t test, n.s. not significant. n.d, nondetected. &, Virus detected in one of the triplicates.
Replication and pathogenicity of recombinant pH1N1 viruses in ferrets.
Since we observed that the amino acid substitution L319Q had a negative impact in virus replication at higher (37°C or 39°C) temperatures in vitro (Fig. 3), we further assessed the viral replication and pathogenicity of these recombinant pH1N1 viruses in ferrets (Fig. 4). Groups of ferrets were infected with 107 PFU of each virus, and nasal washes (Fig. 4A) or oropharyngeal swabs (Fig. 4B) were collected to examine viral replication on 1-day postinfection (d.p.i.) and 3 d.p.i. In addition, all infected ferrets were euthanized on 4 d.p.i. and virus distribution in the upper respiratory tract (URT) nasal turbinate (Fig. 4C) and olfactory bulb (Fig. 4D); and lower respiratory tract (LRT) trachea (Fig. 4E), and the upper left (UL, Fig. 4F) or lower left (LL, Fig. 4G) lungs were also determined. This analysis allowed us to evaluate viral replication and the effect of the A/Ann Arbor/6/60 H2N2 MDV and L319Q mutations, alone or in combination, in a gradient of temperatures, from lower to higher, in the URT or LRT, respectively. Titers of pH1N1 viruses containing the PB1 L319Q mutation (pH1N1PB2 WT/PB1 L319Q, pH1N1PB2 WT/PB1 LAIV+L319Q and pH1N1PB2 LAIV/PB1 LAIV+L319Q) were consistently lower than those of pH1N1 WT and pH1N1 LAIV in both nasal washes (Fig. 4A) and oropharyngeal swabs (Fig. 4B) at 1 d.p.i. However, all viruses displayed similar viral titers at 3 d.p.i. in tissue samples collected at sacrifice (4 d.p.i.), titers of pH1N1 viruses containing the PB1 L319Q mutation were lower than those of pH1N1 WT and pH1N1 LAIV in the LRT (trachea and lung) (Fig. 4E–G). However, no significant differences in viral titers were observed in samples from the URT (Fig. 4C and 4D). These results suggest that that the PB1 L319Q mutation confers a ts and att phenotype on pH1N1, which is consistent with our in vitro data (Fig. 2 and 3).
FIG 4
Characterization of the pH1N1 WT and mutant viruses in ferrets. Three to five 4-month-old castrated male Fitch ferrets were inoculated with 107 PFU of the indicated WT and mutant pH1N1 viruses. Viral titers were measured by plaque assay in nasal washes (A) and oropharyngeal swabs (B) on 1 d.p.i. and 3 d.p.i. as well as in the nasal turbinate (C), olfactory bulb (D), trachea (E); and UL (F) or LL (G) lungs on day 4 p.i. Dashed lines indicate the limit of detection (LOD; 10 PFU/mL). Data in A–B were compared to animals infected with the pH1N1 WT virus and analyzed by two-way ANOVA, followed by a Sidak’s multiple comparison test (multiple time points). Data in C–G were compared to pH1N1 WT virus-infected animals with one-way ANOVA followed by a Dunnett’s multiple comparison test (single time point). The asterisks refer to the level of significance. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ****, P < 0.0001.
Characterization of the pH1N1 WT and mutant viruses in ferrets. Three to five 4-month-old castrated male Fitch ferrets were inoculated with 107 PFU of the indicated WT and mutant pH1N1 viruses. Viral titers were measured by plaque assay in nasal washes (A) and oropharyngeal swabs (B) on 1 d.p.i. and 3 d.p.i. as well as in the nasal turbinate (C), olfactory bulb (D), trachea (E); and UL (F) or LL (G) lungs on day 4 p.i. Dashed lines indicate the limit of detection (LOD; 10 PFU/mL). Data in A–B were compared to animals infected with the pH1N1 WT virus and analyzed by two-way ANOVA, followed by a Sidak’s multiple comparison test (multiple time points). Data in C–G were compared to pH1N1 WT virus-infected animals with one-way ANOVA followed by a Dunnett’s multiple comparison test (single time point). The asterisks refer to the level of significance. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ****, P < 0.0001.In addition to measuring viral titers in tissue homogenates, the upper right lungs of ferrets infected with WT or mutant pH1N1 viruses were also collected at 4 d.p.i., formalin-fixed, embedded, and stained with a pH1N1 polyclonal antibody for immunohistochemical examination of virus distribution and analysis of histopathological changes (Fig. 5A). The pH1N1 viruses containing the PB1 L319Q substitution (i.e., pH1N1PB2 WT/PB1 L319Q, pH1N1PB2 WT/PB1 LAIV+L319Q and pH1N1PB2 LAIV/PB1 LAIV+L319Q) showed lower levels of viral replication in the trachea and lung (LRT). Moreover, animals infected with these PB1 L319Q mutant pH1N1 viruses exhibited reduced pathological changes compared to pH1N1 WT or pH1N1 LAIV (e.g., reduced inflammatory infiltrates and necrosis/fibrin deposition), along with lower composite clinical scores (Fig. 5B). These results echoed our virus replication data of the lungs in Fig. 4, implying that pH1N1 viruses containing either PB1 L319Q alone or in combination with the mutations of the A/Ann Arbor/6/60 H2N2 MDV acquired attenuated phenotypes in ferrets.
FIG 5
Histopathological analyses of ferrets infected with the WT or LAIV pH1N1 viruses. (A) On day 4 p.i., lung tissue from healthy control ferrets or ferrets infected with different pH1N1 viruses in Fig. 4 were collected and sections were then analyzed using pH1N1-specific polyclonal antibody and imaged using a Zeiss AxioImager.Z2M. The scale bar denotes 50 μm. Red arrows highlight areas of pH1N1 antigen staining. (B) Composite clinical histopathology scores of controls or virus-infected ferret lungs were assigned by a blinded veterinary pathologist. Each dot indicates one individual ferret. The black line indicates the geometric mean of the composite clinical scores of each group.
Histopathological analyses of ferrets infected with the WT or LAIV pH1N1 viruses. (A) On day 4 p.i., lung tissue from healthy control ferrets or ferrets infected with different pH1N1 viruses in Fig. 4 were collected and sections were then analyzed using pH1N1-specific polyclonal antibody and imaged using a Zeiss AxioImager.Z2M. The scale bar denotes 50 μm. Red arrows highlight areas of pH1N1 antigen staining. (B) Composite clinical histopathology scores of controls or virus-infected ferret lungs were assigned by a blinded veterinary pathologist. Each dot indicates one individual ferret. The black line indicates the geometric mean of the composite clinical scores of each group.
Replication and transmission efficacy of recombinant pH1N1 viruses in guinea pigs.
An important safety criterion for LAIV implementation is that the virus does not transmit from vaccinated individuals to contacts, which are not fit to receive LAIV, such as immunocompromised people. Therefore, we next evaluated the ability of the recombinant pH1N1 viruses to transmit and their ability to prevent pH1N1 WT transmission after vaccination. For these experiments, we used the guinea pig model of IAV transmission (57–59). Because limitations in the number of available animals, the recombinant pH1N1PB2 LAIV/PB1 LAIV+L319Q was not evaluated, given that the levels of replication and attenuation displayed in culture cells and ferrets (Fig. 3 and 4, respectively) were similar to those of pH1N1PB2 WT/PB1 LAIV+L319Q, which was included in the assay. Animals were inoculated intranasally with 104 PFU of pH1N1 WT, pH1N1 LAIV, pH1N1PB2 WT/PB1 LAIV, pH1N1PB2 WT/PB1 L319Q, and pH1N1PB2 WT/PB1 LAIV+L319Q. Then, at 24 h after infection, one naive guinea pig was exposed to each infected animal by placement in the same cage (57–59). We collected nasal lavage samples from all animals on alternating d.p.i. to follow the kinetics of viral growth in the infected animals and the rate of transmission to exposed cage mates (Fig. 6A). All pH1N1 viruses replicated in the inoculated guinea pigs (dotted lines), and on 4 d.p.i. we observed increasing viral titers in exposed cage mates (solid lines) for pH1N1 WT, pH1N1 LAIV and pH1N1PB2 WT/PB1 LAIV. In contrast, replication of pH1N1PB2 WT/PB1 LAIV+L319Q was delayed in inoculated guinea pigs (Fig. 6F). Similarly, transmission of viruses containing the PB1 319Q mutation to exposed cage mates was either delayed (pH1N1PB2 WT/PB1 L319Q) (Fig. 6E) or abrogated entirely (pH1N1PB2 WT/PB1 LAIV+L319Q) (Fig. 6F).
FIG 6
Infection and transmission of WT and mutant pH1N1 viruses in guinea pigs. (A) Schematic representation of the experimental design: Guinea pigs were infected (n = 4) with 104 PFU of pH1N1 WT (B), pH1N1 LAIV (C), pH1N1PB2 WT/PB1 LAIV (D), pH1N1PB2 WT/PB1 L319Q (E), or pH1N1PB2 WT/PB1 LAIV+L319Q (F) virus. Then, at 24 h p.i., each infected guinea pig (dashed line) was placed in a cage with one uninfected guinea pig (solid lines). Nasal washes were collected for 8 days at 48-h intervals, starting at day 2 p.i. for the inoculated animals (24 h post-contact), and virus titers determined by plaque assay (PFU/mL). Dashed horizontal lines indicate the LOD (10 PFU/mL).
Infection and transmission of WT and mutant pH1N1 viruses in guinea pigs. (A) Schematic representation of the experimental design: Guinea pigs were infected (n = 4) with 104 PFU of pH1N1 WT (B), pH1N1 LAIV (C), pH1N1PB2 WT/PB1 LAIV (D), pH1N1PB2 WT/PB1 L319Q (E), or pH1N1PB2 WT/PB1 LAIV+L319Q (F) virus. Then, at 24 h p.i., each infected guinea pig (dashed line) was placed in a cage with one uninfected guinea pig (solid lines). Nasal washes were collected for 8 days at 48-h intervals, starting at day 2 p.i. for the inoculated animals (24 h post-contact), and virus titers determined by plaque assay (PFU/mL). Dashed horizontal lines indicate the LOD (10 PFU/mL).Next, we evaluated whether vaccinated guinea pigs were protected against a homologous challenge with pH1N1 WT (Fig. 7). To that end, animals from the transmission experiment (Fig. 6; inoculation or contact), were challenged 21 days after initial infection with 104 PFU of pH1N1 WT and viral replication in nasal washes was evaluated for 8 days at 48 h intervals, starting from 2 d.p.i. A group of mock-vaccinated animals was included as a control. All animals positive for the presence of virus in Fig. 6 (both inoculated and contact groups for pH1N1 WT, pH1N1 LAIV, pH1N1PB2 WT/PB1 LAIV, and pH1N1PB2 WT/PB1 L319Q; and the inoculated group for pH1N1PB2 WT/PB1 LAIV+L319Q) were fully protected against pH1N1 WT challenge since virus growth was not detected at any time point analyzed (Fig. 7). Cage mates (contacts) of animals vaccinated with pH1N1PB2 WT/PB1 LAIV+L319Q were not protected against challenge with pH1N1 WT (Fig. 7B), as was expected because pH1N1PB2 WT/PB1 LAIV+L319 was not transmitted between animals (Fig. 6F).
FIG 7
Vaccinated guinea pigs are protected against homologous challenge with pH1N1 WT. Guinea pigs from the transmission experiment shown in Fig. 6 were challenged 21 days later with 104 PFU of pH1N1 WT. One group of mock-vaccinated animals was included as a control. To evaluate viral replication, nasal washes were collected for 8 days at 48-h intervals, starting from 2-day p.i., and virus titers were determined by plaque assay (PFU/mL). Dashed lines indicate the LOD (10 PFU/mL). &, Virus detected in one out of the 4 guinea pigs. The same mock control group has been included in both panels (A) and (B).
Vaccinated guinea pigs are protected against homologous challenge with pH1N1 WT. Guinea pigs from the transmission experiment shown in Fig. 6 were challenged 21 days later with 104 PFU of pH1N1 WT. One group of mock-vaccinated animals was included as a control. To evaluate viral replication, nasal washes were collected for 8 days at 48-h intervals, starting from 2-day p.i., and virus titers were determined by plaque assay (PFU/mL). Dashed lines indicate the LOD (10 PFU/mL). &, Virus detected in one out of the 4 guinea pigs. The same mock control group has been included in both panels (A) and (B).
DISCUSSION
A single amino acid change in PB2 (N265S), three substitutions in PB1 (K391E, E581G and A661T) and a mutation in NP (D34G) account for the ts, ca and att phenotype of the current U.S. A/Ann Arbor/6/60 H2N2 MDV (5, 7, 9, 10, 38, 48–50). In addition, we and others have shown that the amino acid substitutions responsible for the ts, ca, and att of the A/Ann Arbor/6/60 H2N2 MDV can confer the same phenotype to other IAV strains (10, 42, 43, 46, 47, 51, 52). However, these mutations fail to attenuate strains of IAV such as some avian influenza viruses and the pH1N1 (9, 38, 53, 60). In order to overcome this reduced attenuation, it may be necessary to introduce additional mutations into the genome background of pH1N1 to generate an updated MDV suitable for use in LAIV capable of protecting against contemporary circulating H1N1 strains. For instance, we have shown that the ts, ca, att mutations from the Russian A/Leningrad/17/57 H2N2 MDV confer a greater ts, and att phenotype to pH1N1 than the mutations of the U.S. A/Ann Arbor/6/60 H2N2 MDV (9). In addition to the amino acid changes located in the viral segments of the current licensed human LAIV, genetic studies using different IAV strains have identified other amino acid residues in the viral polymerase complex (PB2, PB1, and PA) and viral NP associated with a ts and att phenotype (38).In this study, we replaced the conserved leucine at PB1 residue 319 with glutamine (55) into pH1N1, either alone or in combination, with the other A/Ann Arbor/6/60 H2N2 MDV mutations in PB2 and PB1 (Fig. 1). First, the effect of the A/Ann Arbor/6/60 H2N2 MDV and/or PB1 L319Q mutations on viral polymerase activity was evaluated using a MG assay (Fig. 2). We observed a reduction in polymerase activity when a PB1 plasmid containing the LAIV+L319Q substitutions was incorporated in the polymerase complex, and this reduction was more significant at higher temperatures. Next, we generated recombinant pH1N1 viruses containing different PB2 and PB1 combinations (pH1N1 WT, pH1N1 LAIV, pH1N1PB2 WT/PB1 LAIV, pH1N1PB2 WT/PB1 L319Q, pH1N1PB2 WT/PB1 LAIV+L319Q, and pH1N1PB2 LAIV/PB1 LAIV+L319Q) and evaluated their replication in vitro (Fig. 3) and in two relevant animal models for IAV infection and transmission: ferrets (Fig. 4 and 5) and guinea pigs (Fig. 6 and 7), respectively.The PB1 L319Q substitution, alone, was sufficient to increase the ts phenotype of pH1N1 in culture cells in both MG (Fig. 2) and virus replication assays (Fig. 3). Moreover, viruses containing PB1 L319Q were also attenuated in ferrets (Fig. 4 and 5) and exhibited reduced transmission in guinea pigs (Fig. 6 and 7). Notably, we observed an enhancement of the ts, and att phenotypes in pH1N1 when we combined the A/Ann Arbor/6/60 H2N2 MDV mutations with the PB1 L319Q substitution. Consistent with this, the replication of pH1N1 viruses containing the PB1 L319Q amino acid change was reduced in the LRT of ferrets (Fig. 4), suggesting that the PB1 L319Q substitution, alone, can confer an att phenotype in this pH1N1 strain (and that it can increase the att phenotype of pH1N1 LAIV). Moreover, our guinea pig data showed that pH1N1PB2 WT/PB1 LAIV+L319Q was not detectably transmitted from experimentally-infected animals to naive cage mates (Fig. 6).In order to understand better the basis for the observed effect of the PB1 L319Q substitution, we examined available crystal structures of the IAV RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) complex. For this purpose, we used the recently reported IAV polymerase heterotrimer structure for A/Northern Territory/60/68 H3N2 (PDB ID 6RR7) (61) as a reference model, since it possesses >97% amino acid identity with the pH1N1 virus polymerase (PB2: 97%, PB1: 98% and PA: 97%). We analyzed the location of the A/Ann Arbor/6/60 H2N2 MDV mutations, and the PB1 L319Q substitution (Fig. 8). We observed that amino acid residue 319 in PB1 is located near the interface between the PB1 and PA subunits, and in close physical proximity to PB1 residue 391 (a mutation present in the A/Ann Arbor/6/60 H2N2 MDV). Therefore, the amino acid change PB1 L319Q could affect polymerase complex formation and/or stability. Further studies will be necessary to test this hypothesis, and to gain a better mechanistic understanding of how PB1 L319Q enhances the ts, att phenotypes of pH1N1 containing the A/Ann Arbor/6/60 H2N2 MDV mutations. However, a recent study has suggested that a PR8 virus containing PB1 L319Q and PB2 N265S amino acid changes has propensity to generate high levels of semi-infectious particles at 39°C, while this did not occur at 33°C (54). In addition, viruses containing the LAIV mutations alone also demonstrated this same effect (54). Chen et al. has also showed that the attenuating mutations of LAIV altered IAV M1 protein levels and virion morphology in a temperature-sensitive manner (62).
FIG 8
Structure of the IAV polymerase complex. The IAV polymerase heterotrimer complex bound to 3′ and 5′ vRNA promoters and capped RNA primer complex (PDB code 6RR7) is shown in four different views (A–D) using the same coloring code: PA (brown), PB1 (blue), and PB2 (green). The 3′ and 5′ vRNA promoters, and capped RNA primer, are colored in orange, magenta and black, respectively. The locations of the A/Ann Arbor/6/60 H2N2 MDV PB2 265 (green) and PB1 391, 581, and 661 (dark blue) mutations; and the PB1 319 residue (light blue) are shown on the background of the polymerase complex colored in red.
Structure of the IAV polymerase complex. The IAV polymerase heterotrimer complex bound to 3′ and 5′ vRNA promoters and capped RNA primer complex (PDB code 6RR7) is shown in four different views (A–D) using the same coloring code: PA (brown), PB1 (blue), and PB2 (green). The 3′ and 5′ vRNA promoters, and capped RNA primer, are colored in orange, magenta and black, respectively. The locations of the A/Ann Arbor/6/60 H2N2 MDV PB2 265 (green) and PB1 391, 581, and 661 (dark blue) mutations; and the PB1 319 residue (light blue) are shown on the background of the polymerase complex colored in red.Collectively, the results reported here demonstrate that the mutations responsible for the ts, ca, and att phenotypes of the A/Ann Arbor/6/60 H2N2 MDV fail to confer the same phenotype on pH1N1. However, by combining them (in whole or in part) with the PB1 L319Q mutation, they can confer robust att and ts phenotypes on pH1N1. Moreover, PB1 L319Q alone can confer a substantial level of in vivo attenuation on pH1N1 virus. Future studies will determine whether the PB1 L319Q mutation can also attenuate other IAV strains, including avian influenza viruses that are not attenuated by the mutations of the A/Ann Arbor/6/60 H2N2 MDV (9, 38, 53, 60). Finally, our data support the feasibility of using PB1 L319Q to attenuate contemporary virus backbones as the basis for creating an updated MDV that may improve the efficacy and safety of LAIV, by better matching the vaccine to currently circulating virus strains. However, reversion of the ts, ca, or att phenotypes of LAIV strains may occur during vaccine production and a more pathogenic virus could be generated by reversion of amino acid changes, or by the introduction of compensatory mutations associated with enhanced virulence in the LAIV. Therefore, studies to evaluate the genetic and phenotypic stability of new MDV candidates should be carried out to confirm the stability of the LAIV.Vaccine immunogenicity and safety are determined by characteristics of both the vaccine and the host. For instance, current LAIV are contraindicated for most people who are severely immunocompromised. Therefore, there is a necessity to develop alternative LAIV with better safety profiles to target population that does not fit requirements to receive current LAIV. So, PB1 L319Q amino acid change could be combined with other mutations to generate more attenuated viruses, but still able to induce potent humoral and cellular responses against circulating IAV strains. Such strategy could also facilitate the clinical development of LAIV for the <2-year-old children.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Cells and viruses.
Human embryonic kidney 293T (293T; ATCC CRL-11268) and Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK; ATCC CCL-34) cells were grown at 37°C (and air enriched with 5% CO2) in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM; Mediatech, Inc.) supplemented with 5% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Atlanta Biologicals) and 1% penicillin (100 units/mL)–streptomycin (100 μg/mL)–2 mM l-glutamine (P-S-G; Mediatech, Inc.). Recombinant wild-type (WT) and LAIV pandemic A/California/4_NYICE_E3/2009 H1N1 (pH1N1) have been previously described (53, 63–67).
Rescue of recombinant pH1N1 viruses.
Ambisense pDZ-PB2LAIV and pDZ-PB1LAIV plasmids containing the temperature-sensitive (ts), cold-adapted (ca), and attenuated (att) mutations of the A/Ann Arbor/6/60 H2N2 MDV in PB2 (N265S) and PB1 (K391E, D581G, and A661T), respectively, were previously described (53). To generate the recombinant pH1N1 viruses containing PB1 L319Q, ambisense plasmids pDZ-PB1L319Q or pDZ-PB1LAIV+L319Q were generated using standard molecular cloning methods. Recombinant pH1N1 viruses were recovered as previously (68–70). Briefly, cocultures (1:1) of human 293T and MDCK cells in 6-well plates were co-transfected in suspension with 1 μg of each of the ambisense plasmids (pDZ-PB2 or PB2LAIV, -PB1 or PB1LAIV or -PB1L319Q or pDZ-PB1LAIV+L319Q, -PA, -HA, -NP, -NA, -M and -NS) using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen). At 12 h p.t., transfection medium was replaced with DMEM containing 0.3% bovine serum albumin (BSA), 1% P-S-G, and 0.5 μg/mL of N-tosyl-L-phenylalanine chloromethyl ketone (TPCK)-treated trypsin (Sigma). At 72 h p.t., cell culture supernatants were collected, clarified, and used to infect fresh monolayers of MDCK cells (106 cells/well, 6-well plate format). At 3–4 d.p.i., recombinant viruses were plaque purified and scaled up in MDCK cells (68). Virus stocks were produced at 33°C and titrated by plaque assay (PFU/mL) on MDCK cells (68, 69). Virus stocks were confirmed by sequencing (ACGT Inc.) the PB2 and PB1 open reading frames (ORFs) using purified total RNA (TRIzol reagent, Invitrogen) from infected MDCK cells (106 cells/well, 6-well plate format).
Minigenome (MG) assays.
To evaluate the effect of WT and mutant PB2 and PB1 proteins on viral polymerase activity, a MG assay was performed as previously described (42, 53). Briefly, human 293T cells (5 × 105 cells/well, 12-well plate format, triplicates) were transiently co-transfected in suspension, using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen), with 125 ng of each ambisense pDZ plasmids (pDZ-PB2 or PB2LAIV, -PB1 or PB1LAIV or -PB1L319Q or pDZ-PB1LAIV+L319Q, -PA, - and NP), together with 250 ng of two reporter viral (v)RNA-like expression pPOL-I plasmids encoding GFP or Gluc driven by a human RNA polymerase I promoter (53, 71). A Cluc-encoding plasmid under the simian virus 40 promoter (SV40-Cluc, 50 ng) was included to normalize transfection efficiencies (72, 73). Cells transfected in the absence of pDZ NP were used as a negative control. At 6 h p.t., cells were placed at 33°C, 37°C, or 39°C, and viral replication and transcription were evaluated at 48 h p.t. GFP was imaged using a fluorescence microscope, while Gluc and Cluc expression levels were determined using Biolux Gaussia or Cypridina luciferase assay kits (New England BioLabs) and a microplate reader. The mean value and standard deviation (SD) were calculated using Microsoft Excel software.
Virus growth kinetics.
To evaluate virus replication properties in tissue culture cells, confluent monolayers of MDCK cells (4 × 105 cells/well, 12-well plate format, triplicates) were infected at an MOI of 0.001 PFU/cell. After 1 h of virus adsorption at room temperature, cells were overlaid with DMEM containing 0.3% BSA, 1% P-S-G, and 1 μg/mL of TPCK-treated trypsin. Cells were incubated at 33°C, 37°C, or 39°C, and cell culture supernatants were collected at the indicated times (24, 48, 72 and 96 h.p.i.) to determine the viral titers by standard plaque assay (PFU/mL) as described below.
Plaque assays.
Confluent monolayers of MDCK cells (106 cells/well, 6-well plate format, triplicates) were infected as indicated above and after 1 h virus adsorption at room temperature, cells were overlaid with agar-containing culture medium and incubated at 33°C for 3 days. Then, cells were fixed with 4% formaldehyde, the overlays were removed, and cells were stained with crystal violet (68, 69).
Ferret immunization.
All ferret experiments were performed in accordance with an animal protocol (IACUC-2017-0136) approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (ISMMS) All ferrets were housed in a temperature- and relative humidity-controlled Animal Biosafety Level 2 (ABSL-2) facility. All procedures were performed as previously described (74). Briefly, 4-month-old influenza virus-seronegative outbred castrated male Fitch ferrets were purchased from Triple F Farms (Gillett, PA, USA). Animals were randomly assigned to the infection or control groups. Groups of ferrets (n = 3 for each group, except for group inoculated with pH1N1PB2 WT/PB1 LAIV+L319Q, where 5 animals were used) were infected with either pH1N1 WT virus or pH1N1 LAIV groups (pH1N1 LAIV, pH1N1PB2 WT/PB1 LAIV, pH1N1PB2 WT/PB1 L319Q, pH1N1PB2 WT/PB1 LAIV+L319Q, or pH1N1PB2 LAIV/PB1 LAIV+L319Q) at a dosage of 107 PFU per animal. A PBS control group was included as a negative control. To examine the pathogenicity of the WT or LAIV pH1N1 viruses, nasal wash and oropharyngeal swab samples were collected from anesthetized ferrets on 1 d.p.i. and 3 d.p.i. On 4 d.p.i., ferrets were euthanized by exsanguination followed by intracardiac injection of Sleepaway euthanasia solution (Fort Dodge, Sodium Pentobarbital). Tissue specimens (olfactory bulbs, nasal turbinates, trachea, upper left (UL), and lower left (LL) lungs) were collected from each individual ferret to quantify viral titers by plaque assay. The upper right lung of each ferret was collected, perfused, and fixed with 10% Formalin for immunohistochemistry (IHC) stain.
Ferret histopathology evaluation.
Histopathology and blinded scoring were performed by the Comparative Pathology Laboratory (CPL) at ISMMS. Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) lung specimens obtained from pH1N1 WT or pH1N1 LAIV (pH1N1 LAIV, pH1N1PB2 WT/PB1 LAIV, pH1N1PB2 WT/PB1 L319Q, pH1N1PB2 WT/PB1 LAIV+L319Q, or pH1N1PB2 LAIV/PB1 LAIV+L319Q)-infected, or mock-treated ferrets were cut into 5 μm sections and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) for histopathological assessment. In addition, we used an A/California/04/09 H1N1 polyclonal antibody for IHC stain to examine the virus distributions in the lung. All sections were evaluated by a veterinary pathologist who was blinded to the infection groups. According to the extent of epithelial degeneration, damage, and/or necrosis, and the level of inflammation, it was scored as 0 (None), 1 (Mild), 2 (Moderate), 3 (Marked), and 4 (Severe). Transmitted-light brightfield images were captured by a Zeiss Axio Imager.Z2 microscope and processed with the ZEISS ZENpro microscope software.
Guinea pig immunization.
All work with guinea pigs was approved by the Emory Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (protocol number PROTO201700595). Female Hartley strain guinea pigs were obtained from Charles River Laboratories. Intranasal inoculation and nasal lavage were performed as described (57–59). Prior to intranasal inoculation and nasal lavage, the guinea pigs were sedated with a mixture of ketamine and xylazine (30 mg/kg of body weight and 4 mg/kg, respectively). Animals were inoculated (n = 4) with 104 PFU of the indicated viruses diluted in PBS. Following inoculation and recovery from sedation, animals were housed in Caron 6040 environmental chambers set to 10°C and 20% relative humidity. At 24 h p.i. of the donor animals, contact guinea pigs were introduced into the same cage with the donor animals. Virus replication was evaluated by determining viral titers in the nasal washes collected at 2, 4, 6, and 8 d.p.i. by plaque assay as described above.
Statistical analysis.
Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Corporation) was necessary to perform some of the calculations, and to visualize the raw data. GraphPad Prism software (v8.0.1) was used to perform the indicated statistical analysis.
Authors: Laura Rodriguez; Aitor Nogales; Emma C Reilly; David J Topham; Pablo R Murcia; Colin R Parrish; Luis Martinez Sobrido Journal: Virology Date: 2017-02-03 Impact factor: 3.616
Authors: Brenda L Tesini; Preshetha Kanagaiah; Jiong Wang; Megan Hahn; Jessica L Halliley; Francisco A Chaves; Phuong Q T Nguyen; Aitor Nogales; Marta L DeDiego; Christopher S Anderson; Ali H Ellebedy; Shirin Strohmeier; Florian Krammer; Hongmei Yang; Sanjukta Bandyopadhyay; Rafi Ahmed; John J Treanor; Luis Martinez-Sobrido; Hana Golding; Surender Khurana; Martin S Zand; David J Topham; Mark Y Sangster Journal: J Virol Date: 2019-04-03 Impact factor: 5.103
Authors: Lisa A Grohskopf; Leslie Z Sokolow; Karen R Broder; Sonja J Olsen; Ruth A Karron; Daniel B Jernigan; Joseph S Bresee Journal: MMWR Recomm Rep Date: 2016-08-26
Authors: Haitian Fan; Alexander P Walker; Loïc Carrique; Jeremy R Keown; Itziar Serna Martin; Dimple Karia; Jane Sharps; Narin Hengrung; Els Pardon; Jan Steyaert; Jonathan M Grimes; Ervin Fodor Journal: Nature Date: 2019-09-04 Impact factor: 49.962