| Literature DB >> 35582925 |
Xiao Li1, Feng Xu1, Ling-Yun Wu1, Juan Guo1, Qi He1, Zheng Zhang1.
Abstract
Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35582925 PMCID: PMC9189334 DOI: 10.1111/jcmm.17350
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cell Mol Med ISSN: 1582-1838 Impact factor: 5.295
Comparison among different MDS subsets
| MDS‐RS with SF3B1 mutations A | MDS‐RS with TP53 mutations B | MDS (without RS) with TP53 mutations C |
A vs. B |
A vs. C |
B vs. C | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Case number | 67 | 21 | 63 | |||
| Median age (years) (range) | 67 (34–89) | 71 (55–81) | 65 (18–84) | 0.197 | 0.068 | 0.021 |
| Sex (M:F) | 2.2 | 2.5 | 1.3 | 0.810 | 0.174 | 0.246 |
| WHO classification | ||||||
| MDS‐RS (SLD) ( | 26 (38.8) | 5 (23.8) | None | 0.209 | ||
| MDS‐RS (MLD) ( | 27 (40.3) | 10 (47.6) | None | 0.553 | ||
| MDS‐RS (EB/CMML) ( | 14 (21.0) | 6 (28.6) | None | 0.464 | ||
| MDS‐SLD+MLD ( | 28 (44.4) | |||||
| ≥MDS‐EB/CMML ( | 35 (55.6) | |||||
| Median RS % in erythroblasts | Mean 39.9% Median 42% (5%–87%) |
Mean 39.8% Median 32% (15%–78%) | None | 0.806 | ||
| IPSS scoring | ||||||
| ≤1.0 ( | 58/64 (90.6) | 7/21 (33.3) | 20/63 (31.7) | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.893 |
| ≥1.5 ( | 6/64 (9.4) | 14/21 (66.7) | 43/63 (68.3) | |||
| Bi‐allelic TP53 alterations ( | 11/21 (52.4) | 21/63 (33.3) | 0.120 | |||
| Chromosome | ||||||
| Normal ( | 35/64 (54.7) | 2/21 (9.5) | 8/63 (12.7) | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.697 |
| Abnormal ( | 25/64 (39.1) | 4/21 (19.0) | 17/63 (27.0) | 0.093 | 0.148 | 0.467 |
| Complex ( | 4/64 (6.2) | 15/21 (71.4) | 38/63 (60.3) | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.361 |
| With 5q‐/7q‐; ‐5、‐7 | 4/64 (6.2) | 13/21 (61.9) | 37/63 (58.7) | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.797 |
Means the denominator changed from 67 to 64 because of 3 failure chromosome analysis.
VAF ≥ 60% were defined as bi‐allelic alterations.
FIGURE 1Feature of MDS‐RS without SF3B1. (A) Distribution of TP53 mutations in MDS with RS and without RS. (B) Co‐occurrence of TP53 with other mutations in different groups. (C) Change of gene mutations and RS before and after decitabine in a RCMD‐RS patient. (D) TP53‐mutated MDS‐RS patients had obviously shorter overall survival than SF3B1‐mutated MDS‐RS patients. (E) No difference was observed between MDS‐RS and non‐MDS‐RS patients with TP53 mutations even though grouped according to TP53 mutation status