| Literature DB >> 35582059 |
Tri Yudani Mardining Raras1, Almira Fahrinda2, Dwi Yuni Nurhidayati3, Hidayat Sujuti1, Sumarno Reto Prawiro3.
Abstract
Background: Development a granuloma model resembling latent tuberculosis in vitro is needed with a fast and efficient time to be used as an effective therapy. This study aimed to form efficient granulomas, increase cellular immunity and humoral immunity, and evaluate growth on media using recombinant protein antibody Ag38kDa, Rifampicin, and a combination of both. Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cell (PBMC) in vitro is derived from a healthy individual separated from monocytes and lymphocytes. Materials and methods: Monocytes are matured into macrophages and then combined macrophages and lymphocytes to the Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI) medium. Flow cytometry analysis was used to count the number of cells, and cytokine levels were measured using ELISA. The result from the treatment was planted on the Lowenstein-Jensen medium.Entities:
Keywords: Antibody; Lymphocyte; Macrophage; Mycobacterium tuberculosis; Recombinant; Rifampicin
Year: 2022 PMID: 35582059 PMCID: PMC9097312 DOI: 10.21010/Ajid.v16i2.8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Afr J Infect Dis ISSN: 2006-0165
Figure 1Microscopic view of granuloma formation in PBMC culture (400x magnification). A = Control; B = Treatment of Mtb bacterial Infection; C = Ag38kDa Recombinant Antibody Treatment; D = rifampicin treatment; E = Combination treatment of recombinant antibodies and Rifampicin. Green arrow = Macrophages, red arrow = Lymphocytes, blue arrow = Granuloma Fig 1 a and c are not visible.
The results of ANOVA analysis of cellular immunity in PBMC cultures a Sign. is considered significant if p-value < 0.05
| Treatment | Th1 | Th2 | Th17 | Treg | Macrophage | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean±SD | Sig. | Mean±SD | Sig. | Mean±SD | Sig. | Mean±SD | Sig. | Mean±SD | Sig. | |
|
| 96.42 ± 0.80 |
| 88.84 ± 2.61 |
| 51.72 ± 2.09 |
| 95.05 ± 2.62 |
| 47.39 ± 3.87 |
|
|
| 88.79 ± 2.30 | 87.90 ± 2.30 | 45.13 ± 4.24 | 90.36 ± 2.48 | 39.38 ± 1.54 | |||||
|
| 55.68 ± 4.65 | 85.49 ± 4.60 | 32.03 ± 2.44 | 82.15 ± 7.10 | 35.90 ± 1.12 | |||||
|
| 74.84 ± 3.11 | 86.84 ± 3.64 | 41.14 ± 2.24 | 90.31 ± 2.55 | 41.68 ± 1.00 | |||||
|
| 98.91 ± 0.43 | 85.28 ± 2.44 | 45.34 ± 3.69 | 95.08 ± 1.49 | 57.21 ± 0.94 | |||||
Figure 2Total Cellular Immunity treated with Ag38kDa recombinant protein antibody (AB), Rifampicin (RF), and the combination of Ag38kDa recombinant protein antibody with Rifampicin (AB&RF) compared with control and Mtb infection in PBMC culture. We analyzed the data using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Games-howel post hoc test as validation *P<0,05 compared to control and Infection Mtb group.
Figure 3Humoral immunity from the treated groups with Ag38kDa recombinant protein antibody (AB), Rifampicin (RF), and the combination of recombinant antibody with Rifampicin (AB&RF) compared to control and Mtb infection.
Figure 4The growth of Mtb on LJ medium. Sample were taken from all groups: without the administration of bacteria ; Mtb infection group; Ag38kDa recombinant protein antibody group; the rifampicin group; group given a combination of recombinant antibodies with Rifampicin.
The results of ANOVA analysis of humoral immunity in PBMC cultures.
| Treatment | IL-4 | TNF-a | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean±SD | Sig. | Mean±SD | Sig. | |
|
| 83.89 ± 8.89 |
| 674.15 ± 146.49 |
|
|
| 87.81 ± 11.61 | 581.18 ± 75.51 | ||
|
| 86.95 ± 9.47 | 944.01 ± 210.38 | ||
|
| 90.80 ± 7.96 | 815.33 ± 290.20 | ||
|
| 81.72 ± 5.15 | 629.96 104.50 | ||
a Sign. is considered significant if p-value < 0.05. There is no significant differences among the treatment As the sign is absent throughout the table.