Literature DB >> 35582049

Hypereosinophilic syndrome presenting as acute ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction, and arterial involvement: A case report.

Ran-Ran Sun1, Tuan-Zhi Chen1, Min Meng2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Simultaneous cerebral and myocardial infarction with arterial involvement has not been reported in hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES). Here, we report a patient with HES that was also associated with acute ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction, and arterial involvement of the left common carotid artery, vertebral arteries, posterior cerebral artery, and coronary artery. CASE
SUMMARY: A 64-year-old male patient was admitted with headache and right lower extremity weakness. Laboratory tests indicated eosinophilia. Brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed bilateral and multiple acute infarcts in the border zones. Electrocardiography revealed that T wave was inverted and that the concentration of troponin I was significantly elevated above normal levels. Cardiac echocardiography showed an ejection fraction of 69% with mitral and tricuspid mild regurgitation. Computed tomography angiography detected multiple and localized instances of mild stenosis in the left common carotid artery bifurcation, bilateral vertebral arteries (V5 segment), and the posterior cerebral artery (P2 segment). These were observed together with multiple non-calcified and mixed plaques as well as luminal stenosis in the left circumflex artery, left anterior descending artery, and right coronary artery. The patient was treated with oral methylprednisolone and clopidogrel, after which the absolute eosinophil count fell rapidly to a normal level. After one month, a second brain MRI showed a partial reduction in the size and number of the lesions.
CONCLUSION: HES can masquerade as ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction, and arterial vascular involvement. The patient reported here recovered very quickly when his eosinophil blood count returned to normal. Early diagnosis and rapid reduction of eosinophils may lead to a good prognosis. ©The Author(s) 2022. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arterial involvement; Case report; Hypereosinophilic syndrome; Ischemic stroke; Myocardial infarction

Year:  2022        PMID: 35582049      PMCID: PMC9048563          DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i11.3547

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Clin Cases        ISSN: 2307-8960            Impact factor:   1.337


Core Tip: Hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES) is characterized by unexplained eosinophilia in the blood and tissues. Neurologic and cardiac involvement in patients with HES is common and variable. Eosinophil-mediated arterial vascular involvement is a rare manifestation of HES. This rare case of HES was accompanied by acute ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction and arterial vascular involvement. Early diagnosis and rapid reduction of eosinophils may lead to a good prognosis.

INTRODUCTION

Hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES) is characterized by unexplained eosinophilia in the blood and tissues, and is associated with a variety of clinical manifestations[1]. It has long been thought that HES is associated with multiple organ dysfunctions, ranging from minor skin involvement to serious and even life-threatening cardiovascular, hematologic, and neurologic manifestations[2]. Neurologic involvement in patients with HES is common and highly variable, and includes the occurrence of peripheral neuropathy, encephalopathy, and stroke[3]. Cardiac involvement may lead to the development of thrombi, resulting a transient ischemic attack or embolic stroke with associated sequelae[4]. However, eosinophil-mediated arterial vascular involvement is a rare manifestation of HES. Most HES patients present with organ involvement showed normal cranial computed tomography angiogram (CTA) or magnetic resonance angiography[3,5,6]. Here, we report a rare case of HES accompanied by the simultaneous occurrence of acute ischemic stroke and myocardial infarction (MI), as well as arterial vascular involvement of the left common carotid artery, vertebral arteries, posterior cerebral artery, and coronary artery.

CASE PRESENTATION

Chief complaints

A 64-year-old male patient without any cerebrovascular risk factors was admitted to our hospital with a headache and right lower extremity weakness that lasted for two days.

History of present illness

The patient had a history of toothache, smoking, and alcohol consumption.

History of past illness

Until hospitalization, the patient was not burdened with any significant cardiovascular comorbidity.

Personal and family history

The patient had no pertinent family history of heart disease or other illnesses.

Physical examination

The results of a physical examination showed right lower extremity weakness (4-/5 strength) and dystaxia.

Laboratory examinations

Routine laboratory tests revealed significant leucocytosis (12.36 × 109/L) and an elevated eosinophil count (6.89 × 109/L, 55.7% of leukocytes) in the peripheral blood. The results of a blood clotting test, urine and stool routine examination, virus screening, liver and renal function examination, and immunological function examination were normal. The antinuclear antibodies, anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies, and tumor markers were also negative. Molecular genetic analysis of fusion gene mutation (Fip1-like 1-platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha) was also negative. Bone marrow aspirate results were compatible with HES, showing no sign of myelodysplasia, hemoparasite, or atypical cells. Cerebrospinal fluid analysis revealed that the levels of white blood cells, proteins, and glucose were normal. Acid-fast staining and India ink staining of cerebrospinal fluid were negative. Electrocardiography (ECG) revealed that the T wave was inverted and the concentration of troponin I (0.644 ng/mL) was significantly elevated. The clinical history and examination results of this patient showed no sign of parasitic infection, neoplasm, vasculitis, or allergy.

Imaging examinations

A CT scan of the chest was normal. Abdominal ultrasound revealed multiple hepatic cysts. Brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) detected bilateral and multiple acute infarcts in the border zones, which were located in the cortical and subcortical areas (Figure 1A-C). CTA of the head and neck revealed multiple and localized mild instances of stenosis in the left common carotid artery bifurcation, bilateral vertebral arteries (V5 segment), and posterior cerebral artery (P2 segment) (Figure 1D-F). Cardiac echocardiography showed an ejection fraction of 69% with mitral and tricuspid mild regurgitation. Coronary CTA showed multiple non-calcified, mixed plaques and luminal stenoses in the left circumflex artery, left anterior descending artery, and right coronary artery (Figure 1G-I). The results of cardiac examination supported the diagnosis of non-ST-elevated MI.
Figure 1

Brain magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography angiography at admission. A: Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); B: T2-weighted MRI; C: Fluid-attenuated inversion recovery revealed multiple acute infarcts in the bilateral border zones; D-I: Computed tomography angiogram (CTA) of the head and neck revealed mild stenosis in the (D) bilateral vertebral arteries, (E) left common carotid artery bifurcation, and (F) the posterior cerebral artery. Coronary CTA showed mild stenosis in the (G) right coronary artery, (H) left anterior descending artery, and (I) the left circumflex artery.

Brain magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography angiography at admission. A: Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); B: T2-weighted MRI; C: Fluid-attenuated inversion recovery revealed multiple acute infarcts in the bilateral border zones; D-I: Computed tomography angiogram (CTA) of the head and neck revealed mild stenosis in the (D) bilateral vertebral arteries, (E) left common carotid artery bifurcation, and (F) the posterior cerebral artery. Coronary CTA showed mild stenosis in the (G) right coronary artery, (H) left anterior descending artery, and (I) the left circumflex artery.

FINAL DIAGNOSIS

The patient was diagnosed with HES, accompanied with multiple cerebral infarctions and acute MI.

TREATMENT

The patient was treated with oral methylprednisolone (1 mg/kg/d) and clopidogrel (75 mg/d) for 7 d, and responded well to the treatment. The absolute eosinophil count (0.18 × 109/L, 1.8% of leukocytes) fell to a normal level within 7 d.

OUTCOME AND FOLLOW-UP

The patient was discharged after two weeks and continued taking low-dose prednisone. The ECG at discharge showed a normal T wave. The troponin I was 0.455 ng/mL during hospitalization and 0.012 ng/mL at discharge. After one month, a second brain MRI showed a partial reduction in the size and number of the lesions (Figure 2A-C). After one year, another brain MRI showed cerebromalacia in multiple areas of the lesions (Figure 2D-F). The follow-up of this patient was satisfactory in that he remained asymptomatic while on low-dose prednisone.
Figure 2

Brain magnetic resonance imaging during follow-up. A-C: Brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at one month of follow-up showed a reduced size and number of lesions compared with the results at admission; D-F: Brain MRI at one year of follow-up showed cerebromalacia in multiple areas of the lesions.

Brain magnetic resonance imaging during follow-up. A-C: Brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at one month of follow-up showed a reduced size and number of lesions compared with the results at admission; D-F: Brain MRI at one year of follow-up showed cerebromalacia in multiple areas of the lesions.

DISCUSSION

HES comprises a group of disorders characterized by the abnormal accumulation of eosinophils in the peripheral tissues or blood, independent of known secondary causes of eosinophilia (e.g., parasitic infection)[4]. In 2010, new diagnostic criteria of HES were proposed: An absolute eosinophil count of more than 1500/mm3 on at least two occasions or marked blood eosinophilia and prominent tissue eosinophilia associated with symptoms; exclusion of secondary causes of eosinophilia, such as neoplasms, hypoadrenalism, chemical- or drug-induced eosinophilia, allergic diseases, and viral or parasitic infection. Advances in diagnostic and therapeutic approaches have prompted a re-evaluation of the definition and classification of HES[7]. More than half of the patients with HES in one study (27 of 52) had neurologic dysfunction[8]. Stroke represents the most devastating neurological consequence of HES, which is characterized by a distinct pattern of both internal and external border zone infarcts[2]. In the patient reported here, eosinophilic involvement resulted in multiple cerebral infarctions and acute MI. Acute cerebral infarctions in the border zones were the first presenting symptom in this case. Meanwhile, the patient suffered from ischemic ECG changes, troponin I elevation, and mild valve regurgitation in echocardiography, which supported the diagnosis of MI. As a rare complication of HES, MI occurs as the result of endomyocardial fibrosis[9]. CTA of the head and neck, as well as the coronary artery showed multiple arterial stenoses in this case. Single arterial stenosis or occlusion has been only occasionally reported in patients with HES. Chang et al[10] reported a 43-year-old male patient with HES presenting with ischemic stroke and segmental stenosis of the right posterior cerebral artery resulting from direct eosinophilic toxicity. Li et al[11] described a middle-aged woman with idiopathic HES presenting with bilateral middle cerebral artery occlusion and progressive multiple cerebral infarction. Our patient suffered from multiple arterial vascular damage involving the left common carotid artery, vertebral arteries, posterior cerebral artery, and coronary artery. Eosinophilic toxicity to the vascular wall, via either arterial or venous vessels, was considered the pathological consequence of eosinophil accumulation[10]. Eosinophils have direct cytotoxic activity through the local release of toxic substances, including pro-inflammatory cytokines, reactive oxygen species, enzymes, arachidonic acid-derived factors, and cationic proteins[10,12]. The mechanism of eosinophilia-associated stroke remains unknown. The major etiology is cardiac embolism. More than half of cases with HES show a sign of cardiac involvement in echocardiography, which is a common source of thromboembolism with thrombi formation in damaged endocardium[13,14]. With the development of thromboembolism, patients with HES may experience a transient ischemic attack or embolic stroke as the initial presenting symptom[15]. Eosinophilia may damage the myocardium and endocardium, and therefore contribute to cardiac embolism by releasing eosinophilic granule contents, such as eosinophilic cationic protein and major basic protein[14]. Generally, eosinophilic myocarditis can be divided into three stages, which may occur simultaneously: (1) Acute necrosis/myocarditis stage-eosinophilic infiltration of the myocardium associated with myocardial necrosis due to the release of toxic cationic proteins from degranulated eosinophils; (2) thrombosis stage-thrombosis at both ventricles where the ventricular outflow tract and subvalvular regions are associated with a significant risk of embolic complications; and (3) fibrotic stage-fibrosis replaces the thrombus formed on denuded myocardium and often requires surgical intervention[9,16]. The clinical records and laboratory tests of this case indicated that eosinophilia-induced cardioembolism and vascular wall damage may have been the main cause of cerebral infarction. Unfortunately, cardiac MRI and endocardial biopsy were not performed. Despite advances in noninvasive imaging methods (e.g., echocardiography and cardiac MRI), endomyocardial biopsy remains the gold standard for the diagnosis of HES, especially in patients at the early stages of myocardial infiltration. Corticosteroids are the most widely used medication to reduce eosinophil levels in patients with HES. If the patient presents with significant end-organ damage, corticosteroid treatment should be initiated immediately. An antiplatelet agent was used to reduce the risk of embolization in this case, however, the use of antiplatelet agents or anticoagulants alone is not recommended. The rapid reduction of eosinophil count is essential for preventing thromboembolic events and end-organ damage in patients at risk.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, neurologic and cardiac complications occurred almost simultaneously in this case. Thus, the early diagnosis and treatment of HES are crucial for the prevention of widespread cardioembolism and subsequent irreversible, life-threatening cerebrovascular complications. Long-term follow-up and ongoing surveillance are important for monitoring the progression of the disease. Clinicians should be cognizant of HES patients presenting with cerebral infarction in the border zone. Early diagnosis and prompt treatment with corticosteroids are required.
  16 in total

1.  Clinical and echocardiographic features of hypereosinophilic syndromes.

Authors:  S R Ommen; J B Seward; A J Tajik
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2000-07-01       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 2.  Distal ischemia as the initial presentation of hypereosinophilic syndrome-related arterial involvement: A case study and literature review.

Authors:  Julien Rohmer; Matthieu Groh; Maxime Samson; Jonathan London; Marie Jachiet; Diane Rouzaud; Romain Paule; Felipe Suarez; Guillaume Lefèvre; Fleur Cohen; Olivier Lambotte; Antoinette Perlat; Philip Bielefeld; Loïc Guillevin; Jean-Emmanuel Kahn; Benjamin Terrier
Journal:  Autoimmun Rev       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 9.754

3.  ANCA-Negative Churg-Strauss Syndrome Presenting as Acute Multiple Cerebral Infarcts: A Case Report.

Authors:  Klearchos Psychogios; Ilias Evmorfiadis; Spyros Dragomanovits; Athanasios Stavridis; Konstantinos Takis; Loukas Kaklamanis; Pantelis Stathis
Journal:  J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 2.136

Review 4.  Hypereosinophilic syndrome with central nervous system involvement: Two case reports and literature review.

Authors:  Hao Chen; Hafiz Khuram Raza; Jia Jing; Dayong Shen; Peng Xu; Su Zhou; Jie Zu; Xinxin Yang; Wei Zhang; Shenyang Zhang; Fang Hua; Guiyun Cui
Journal:  Brain Inj       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 2.311

5.  Clinical features of fifteen patients with the hypereosinophilic syndrome.

Authors:  C J Spry; J Davies; P C Tai; E G Olsen; C M Oakley; J F Goodwin
Journal:  Q J Med       Date:  1983

Review 6.  Acute eosinophilic myocarditis: diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  Houman Rezaizadeh; Monica Sanchez-Ross; Edo Kaluski; Marc Klapholz; Bunyad Haider; Christine Gerula
Journal:  Acute Card Care       Date:  2010-03

Review 7.  Refining the definition of hypereosinophilic syndrome.

Authors:  Hans-Uwe Simon; Marc E Rothenberg; Bruce S Bochner; Peter F Weller; Andrew J Wardlaw; Michael E Wechsler; Lanny J Rosenwasser; Florence Roufosse; Gerald J Gleich; Amy D Klion
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 10.793

8.  Hypereosinophilic syndrome with recurrent strokes: a case report.

Authors:  Wei-Lun Chang; Huey-Juan Lin; He-Hsiung Cheng
Journal:  Acta Neurol Taiwan       Date:  2008-09

Review 9.  The hypereosinophilic syndrome revisited.

Authors:  Florence Roufosse; Elie Cogan; Michel Goldman
Journal:  Annu Rev Med       Date:  2001-12-03       Impact factor: 13.739

Review 10.  (A Critical Appraisal of) Classification of Hypereosinophilic Disorders.

Authors:  Jean Emmanuel Kahn; Matthieu Groh; Guillaume Lefèvre
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2017-12-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.