Literature DB >> 35581393

Quantification of gastric tube perfusion following esophagectomy using fluorescence imaging with indocyanine green.

Philipp von Kroge1, Detlef Russ2, Jonas Wagner3, Rainer Grotelüschen3, Matthias Reeh3, Jakob R Izbicki3, Oliver Mann3, Sabine H Wipper4, Anna Duprée3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Anastomotic leakage (AL) remains a prevalent and life-threatening complication after esophagectomy. Gastric tube perfusion assessment using indocyanine green fluorescence imaging (ICG-FI) has been published in several studies and appears to be a promising tool to reduce AL rates by changing the surgical approach, namely by an intraoperative evaluation of the anastomosis localization.
METHODS: In this study, gastric tube perfusion was quantified by using ICG-FI in 20 high-risk patients undergoing esophagectomy. From a time-dependent fluorescence intensity curve, the following three parameters were evaluated: slope of fluorescence intensity (SFI), background subtracted peak fluorescence intensity (BSFI), and time to slope (TTS).
RESULTS: The values between pyloric region and tip showed a similar downward trend and SFI and BSFI significantly correlated with the distance to the pyloric region. SFI and BSFI were significantly decreased at the tip of the gastric tube. The placement of anastomosis in an area with homogenous fluorescence pattern was correlated with no AL in 92.9% of cases. An inhomogeneous fluorescence pattern at anastomotic site was a risk factor for the occurrence of an AL (p < 0.05). Reduction of perfusion up to 32% using SFI and up to 23% using BSFI was not associated with AL.
CONCLUSION: ICG-FI can be used to quantify the gastric tube perfusion by calculating SFI, BSFI, and TTS. The anastomosis should be created in areas with homogeneous fluorescence pattern. A reduction in blood flow of up to 32% can be accepted without causing an increased rate of insufficiency.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anastomotic leakage; Esophagectomy; Fluorescent imaging; Gastric tube perfusion; Indocyanine green

Year:  2022        PMID: 35581393     DOI: 10.1007/s00423-022-02546-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg        ISSN: 1435-2443            Impact factor:   3.445


  24 in total

1.  Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for esophageal or junctional cancer.

Authors:  P van Hagen; M C C M Hulshof; J J B van Lanschot; E W Steyerberg; M I van Berge Henegouwen; B P L Wijnhoven; D J Richel; G A P Nieuwenhuijzen; G A P Hospers; J J Bonenkamp; M A Cuesta; R J B Blaisse; O R C Busch; F J W ten Kate; G-J Creemers; C J A Punt; J T M Plukker; H M W Verheul; E J Spillenaar Bilgen; H van Dekken; M J C van der Sangen; T Rozema; K Biermann; J C Beukema; A H M Piet; C M van Rij; J G Reinders; H W Tilanus; A van der Gaast
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Risk factors and consequences of anastomotic leakage after Ivor Lewis oesophagectomy†.

Authors:  Elke Van Daele; Dirk Van de Putte; Wim Ceelen; Yves Van Nieuwenhove; Piet Pattyn
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2015-10-03

3.  Hybrid Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer.

Authors:  Christophe Mariette; Sheraz R Markar; Tienhan S Dabakuyo-Yonli; Bernard Meunier; Denis Pezet; Denis Collet; Xavier B D'Journo; Cécile Brigand; Thierry Perniceni; Nicolas Carrère; Jean-Yves Mabrut; Simon Msika; Frédérique Peschaud; Michel Prudhomme; Franck Bonnetain; Guillaume Piessen
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2019-01-10       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 4.  Transthoracic Anastomotic Leak After Esophagectomy: Current Trends.

Authors:  Carrie E Ryan; Alessandro Paniccia; Robert A Meguid; Martin D McCarter
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Cancer statistics, 2010.

Authors:  Ahmedin Jemal; Rebecca Siegel; Jiaquan Xu; Elizabeth Ward
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 508.702

6.  Cancer statistics, 2020.

Authors:  Rebecca L Siegel; Kimberly D Miller; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 508.702

7.  Predictors of anastomotic leak after esophagectomy: an analysis of the society of thoracic surgeons general thoracic database.

Authors:  Edmund S Kassis; Andrzej S Kosinski; Patrick Ross; Katherine E Koppes; James M Donahue; Vincent C Daniel
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 4.330

8.  Surgical complications and long-term survival after esophagectomy for cancer in a nationwide Swedish cohort study.

Authors:  M Rutegård; P Lagergren; I Rouvelas; R Mason; J Lagergren
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-04-06       Impact factor: 4.424

9.  Global incidence of oesophageal cancer by histological subtype in 2012.

Authors:  Melina Arnold; Isabelle Soerjomataram; Jacques Ferlay; David Forman
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 23.059

10.  Minimally invasive oesophagectomy: preliminary results after introduction of an intrathoracic anastomosis.

Authors:  Frans van Workum; Frits J H van den Wildenberg; Fatih Polat; Johannes H W de Wilt; Camiel Rosman
Journal:  Dig Surg       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 2.588

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.