Almut Bindewald-Wittich1,2, Joanna Dolar-Szczasny3, Sandrine H Kuenzel4, Leon von der Emde4, Maximilian Pfau4, Robert Rejdak3, Steffen Schmitz-Valckenberg2,4, Thomas Ach2, Jens Dreyhaupt5, Frank G Holz6. 1. Augenkompetenz Zentren, Heidenheim/Bopfingen, Germany. 2. Department of Ophthalmology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany. 3. Chair and Department of General and Pediatric Ophthalmology, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland. 4. John A. Moran Eye Center, Department of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA. 5. Institute of Epidemiology and Medical Biometry, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany. 6. Department of Ophthalmology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany. Frank.Holz@ukbonn.de.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pigment epithelial detachments (PEDs) occur in association with various chorioretinal diseases. With respect to the broad clinical spectrum of PEDs we describe fundus autofluorescence (FAF) characteristics of PEDs. METHODS: Ninety-three eyes of 66 patients (mean age 71.9 ± 11.1) with uni- or bilateral PED ( ≥ 350 µm) were included in a retrospective cross-sectional study. PEDs were secondary to age-related macular degeneration (n = 79), central serous chorioretinopathy (n = 7), polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (n = 2), pattern dystrophy (n = 3) or idiopathic PED (n = 2). FAF images were recorded using confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (488 nm excitation wavelength, detection of emission >500 nm). Diagnosis of PED was confirmed using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. A qualitative FAF grading system was established, and grading was performed by two independent readers. RESULTS: PEDs showed highly variable characteristics on FAF imaging. FAF within the area of PED was found to be irregular/granular (n = 59, 63.4%), increased (n = 28, 30.1%), decreased (n = 3, 3.2 %), or normal (n = 3, 3.2%). Accompanying FAF changes included condensation of macular pigment (n = 67, 72.0%), focally increased FAF at the PED apex (n = 14, 15.1%) or elsewhere (n = 52, 55.9%), focally decreased FAF (n = 23, 24.7%), a cartwheel-like pattern (n = 10, 10.8%), a doughnut sign (n = 6, 6.5%), and a halo of decreased FAF encircling the PED (completely n = 20, 21.5% or incompletely n = 20, 21.5%). CONCLUSIONS: PEDs show a variety of abnormal patterns on FAF imaging. These changes in FAF signals may be secondary to morphological and metabolic alterations within corresponding retinal layers and do not necessarily correspond with the underlying PED subtype or a specific pathology.
BACKGROUND: Pigment epithelial detachments (PEDs) occur in association with various chorioretinal diseases. With respect to the broad clinical spectrum of PEDs we describe fundus autofluorescence (FAF) characteristics of PEDs. METHODS: Ninety-three eyes of 66 patients (mean age 71.9 ± 11.1) with uni- or bilateral PED ( ≥ 350 µm) were included in a retrospective cross-sectional study. PEDs were secondary to age-related macular degeneration (n = 79), central serous chorioretinopathy (n = 7), polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (n = 2), pattern dystrophy (n = 3) or idiopathic PED (n = 2). FAF images were recorded using confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (488 nm excitation wavelength, detection of emission >500 nm). Diagnosis of PED was confirmed using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. A qualitative FAF grading system was established, and grading was performed by two independent readers. RESULTS: PEDs showed highly variable characteristics on FAF imaging. FAF within the area of PED was found to be irregular/granular (n = 59, 63.4%), increased (n = 28, 30.1%), decreased (n = 3, 3.2 %), or normal (n = 3, 3.2%). Accompanying FAF changes included condensation of macular pigment (n = 67, 72.0%), focally increased FAF at the PED apex (n = 14, 15.1%) or elsewhere (n = 52, 55.9%), focally decreased FAF (n = 23, 24.7%), a cartwheel-like pattern (n = 10, 10.8%), a doughnut sign (n = 6, 6.5%), and a halo of decreased FAF encircling the PED (completely n = 20, 21.5% or incompletely n = 20, 21.5%). CONCLUSIONS: PEDs show a variety of abnormal patterns on FAF imaging. These changes in FAF signals may be secondary to morphological and metabolic alterations within corresponding retinal layers and do not necessarily correspond with the underlying PED subtype or a specific pathology.