| Literature DB >> 35580859 |
Emil Andersen1, Christian R Juhl2, Emma T Kjøller1, Julie R Lundgren2, Charlotte Janus2, Yasmin Dehestani1, Marte Saupstad1, Lars R Ingerslev1, Olivia M Duun2, Simon B K Jensen2, Jens J Holst1,2, Bente M Stallknecht2, Sten Madsbad3, Signe S Torekov2, Romain Barrès1,4.
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION: Does diet-induced weight loss improve semen parameters, and are these possible improvements maintained with sustained weight loss? SUMMARY ANSWER: An 8-week low-calorie diet-induced weight loss was associated with improved sperm concentration and sperm count, which were maintained after 1 year in men who maintained weight loss. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Obesity is associated with impaired semen quality. Weight loss improves metabolic health in obesity, but there is a lack of knowledge on the acute and long-term effects of weight loss on semen parameters. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This is a substudy of men with obesity enrolled in a randomized, controlled, double-blinded trial (the S-LITE trial). The trial was conducted between August 2016 and November 2019. A total of 56 men were included in the study and assigned to an initial 8-week low-calorie diet (800 kcal/day) followed by randomization to 52 weeks of either: placebo and habitual activity (placebo), exercise training and placebo (exercise), the Glucagon Like Peptide 1 (GLP-1) analogue liraglutide and habitual activity (liraglutide) or liraglutide in combination with exercise training (combination). PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING,Entities:
Keywords: GLP-1 agonist; liraglutide; male reproduction; obesity; semen quality; spermatozoa; weight loss
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35580859 PMCID: PMC9247415 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deac096
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Hum Reprod ISSN: 0268-1161 Impact factor: 6.353
Figure 1.Schematic overview of the study design. The exercise program was designed to meet the World Health Organization (WHO) recommendations on physical activity for health of a minimum of 150 min per week of moderate-intensity aerobic physical activity or 75 min per week of vigorous-intensity aerobic physical activity, or an equivalent combination of both.
Clinical characteristics before (T0) and after an 8-week low-calorie diet-induced weight loss (T1) (n = 47).
| Time of sampling | ||
|---|---|---|
| Characteristic | T0 (n = 47) | T1 (n = 47) |
| Age (years) | 41 (range 20–63) | |
| Weight (kg) | 122.3 (±13.7) |
|
| BMI (kg/m2) | 37.0 (±2.8) |
|
| Waist circumference (cm) | 119.3 (±8.4) |
|
| Hip circumference (cm) | 118.5 (±6.8) |
|
| Waist:hip ratio | 1.01 (±0.07) |
|
| Fat percentage (%) | 34.1 (±3.9) |
|
| Plasma CRP (mg/l) | 2.4 (±2.3) |
|
| HbA1c (mmol/mol) | 35.8 (±3.5) |
|
| HbA1c (%) | 6.0 (±0.5) |
|
| Plasma cholesterol (mmol/l) | 4.8 (±0.9) |
|
| Plasma cholesterol HDL (mmol/l) | 1.1 (±0.2) |
|
| Plasma cholesterol LDL (mmol/l) | 3.0 (±0.9) |
|
| Plasma cholesterol VLDL (mmol/l) | 0.8 (±0.4) |
|
| Plasma triglyceride (mmol/l) | 1.7 (±0.8) |
|
| Semen volume (ml) | 2.5 (±1.3) | 2.6 (±1.7) |
| <1.5 ml, n [% of all] | 11 [23] | 14 [30] |
| Sperm concentration (million/ml) | 78.5 (±74.9) |
|
| <15 million/ml, n [% of all] | 8 [17] | 6 [13] |
| Sperm count (million/ejaculate) | 191.2 (±189.4) |
|
| <39 million/ejaculate, N [% of all] | 11 [23] | 9 [19] |
| Sperm motility (%) | 33.3 (±20.2) | 31.5 (±20.4) |
| <40%, N [% of all] | 30 [64] | 32 [68] |
| Motile sperm count (million/ejaculate) | 71.3 (±90.9) | 83.7 (±115.7) |
| <1 million/ejaculate, N [% of all] | 6 [15] | 1 [2] |
Data are represented as mean (±SD) unless otherwise noted. Statistical values are highlighted in bold.
Difference versus T0 analysed with Student’s t-test (Wilcoxon signed rank test where appropriate).
Contains missing numbers.
CRP, C-reactive protein; HbA1c, haemoglobin A1c; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; VLDL, very low-density lipoprotein.
Figure 2.Effect of weight loss on semen parameters. Difference in semen parameters before (T0), and after an 8-week low-calorie diet-induced weight loss (T1) in men with obesity (n = 47). Differences between groups were calculated with Student’s t-test. *P < 0.05 versus T0.
Clinical characteristics of the two weight loss maintaining groups: poor maintainers (n = 19) and good maintainers (n = 18) before (T0) and after 52 weeks (T2).
| Poor maintainers (n = 19) | Good maintainers (n = 18) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Characteristic | T0 | T2 | T0 | T2 |
| Age (years) | 45 (range 28–63) | 37 (range 19–60) | ||
| Weight (kg) | 121.3 (±12.9) |
| 124.3 (±15.5) |
|
| BMI (kg/m2) | 37.4 (±3) |
| 36.2 (±2.1) |
|
| Waist circumference (cm) | 119.6 (±9.6) |
| 118.6 (±8.3) |
|
| Hip circumference (cm) | 116.9 (±6.8) |
| 113.8 (±6.3) |
|
| Waist:hip ratio | 1.02 (±0.08) |
| 0.99 (±0.08) |
|
| Body-fat percentage (%) | 33.5 (±3.7) |
| 34 (±3.8) |
|
| Plasma CRP (mg/l) | 2.3 (±2.5) | 3.6 (±8.9) | 2.5 (±2.2) |
|
| HbA1c (mmol/mol) | 36.7 (±3.3) |
| 34.8 (±4.1) |
|
| HbA1c (%) | 6.2 (±0.5) |
| 5.9 (±0.6) |
|
| Plasma cholesterol (mmol/l) | 4.6 (±0.8) | 4.6 (±0.8) | 4.8 (±0.9) |
|
| Plasma cholesterol HDL (mmol/l) | 1.1 (±0.2) |
| 1.1 (±0.3) |
|
| Plasma cholesterol LDL (mmol/l) | 2.7 (±0.7) | 2.7 (±0.7) | 3.1 (±0.9) |
|
| Plasma cholesterol VLDL (mmol/l) | 0.9 (±0.4) |
| 0.6 (±0.2) |
|
| Plasma triglyceride (mmol/l) | 1.9 (±0.9) |
| 1.3 (±0.5) |
|
| Semen volume (ml) | 2.8 (±1.6) | 2.2 (±1.1) | 2.7 (±1.2) | 3.0 (±1.2) |
| Sperm concentration (million/ml) | 96.9 (±59.0) | 90.6 (±78.6) | 52.0 (±56.1) |
|
| Sperm count (million/ejaculate) | 235.2 (±160.4) | 186.4 (±142.9) | 154.3 (±191.1) |
|
| Sperm motility (%) | 39.9 (±16) | 29.7 (±17.2) | 36.0 (±24.5) | 22.3 (±14.9) |
| Motile sperm count (million/ejaculate) | 73.6 (±52.4) | 47.9 (±44.4) | 65.2 (±100.3) | 56.9 (±72.3) |
Data are represented as mean (±SD) unless otherwise noted. Statistical values are highlighted in bold.
Difference versus T0 analysed with Student’s t-test (Wilcoxon signed rank test where appropriate).
Contains missing numbers.
CRP, C-reactive protein; HbA1c, haemoglobin A1c; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; VLDL, very low-density lipoprotein.
Figure 3.Substantial maintenance of weight loss after 52 weeks is associated with improved sperm concentration and sperm count. Difference in semen parameters after an 8-week low-calorie diet-induced weight loss followed by 52 weeks intervention (T2) compared to baseline (T0). Groups were based on weight loss after 52 weeks. Poor maintainers (red) had a weight loss of less than 11.7 kg after 52 weeks (n = 19). Good maintainers (blue) had a weight loss of more than 11.7 kg after 52 weeks (n = 18). Differences between groups were calculated with mixed-effects analysis using Turkey’s multiple comparisons test. Black bars indicate 95% CIs. Dots indicate individual observations. *P = <0.05 versus T0.