Literature DB >> 35580757

Pre-operative prevalence of asymptomatic carriers of COVID-19 in hospitals in Catalonia during the first wave after the resumption of surgical activity.

Marcos de Miguel Negro1, Anna González Tallada1, Miriam de Nadal2, Alfons Biarnes Suñé1, Susana Manrique Muñoz1, Magda Campins Martí3, Astrid Álvarez Pérez4, Jordi Castellnou Ferré5, Ana Pedregosa Sanz6, Gal la Rouras Hurtado6, Javier Martínez Cabañero7, Esteban Osorio Salazar8, Antonio Montero Matamala8, Judit Saludes9, Alessandra Verónica Binagui Buitureira10, Carla Farré Tebar11, Maria Laura Baumgartner Lucero11, Montserrat Cadena Serramitja12, Marta Lacambra Basil12, Ana Faura13, Néstor Fabián Ibáñez Trujillo13, Rocío Delgado García14, Francisco Javier Santiveri Papiol15, Fernando Escolano Villén15, Ana Tejedor Navarro16, Carme Deiros García16, Fernando Remartínez Fernández17, Javier Tobito Ramírez17, María Lluisa Moret Ferrón18, Óscar Salmerón Zafra18, Xènia Isern Domingo19, Naiara Villalba Blanco20.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic led to the cancellation of non-essential surgical procedures in March 2020. With the resumption of surgical activity, patients undergoing surgery were one of the first population groups to be systematically tested for PCR. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 carriers after the resumption of non-essential surgical activity.
METHODS: Retrospective multicenter observational study of patients scheduled for surgery or undergoing emergency surgery in Catalonia between 20 April and 31 May 2020. The microbiological results of preoperative PCR tests and clinical records were reviewed, and an epidemiological survey was conducted on patients with positive PCR for SARS-CoV-2.
RESULTS: A total of 10,838 patients scheduled for surgery or who underwent emergency surgery were screened for COVID-19. One hundred and eighteen patients (1.09%) were positive for SARS-CoV-2 in the 72 h prior to surgery. The prevalence of asymptomatic carriers was 0.7% (IC95%: 0.6%-0.9%). The first week of the study presented the highest prevalence of asymptomatic carriers [1.9% (CI95%:1.1%-3.2%)].
CONCLUSIONS: The low levels of asymptomatic carriers of COVID-19 infection obtained in the surgical population of hospitals in Catalonia after the resumption of surgical activity, shows that most patients were able to undergo surgical procedures without the risks of COVID-19 associated complications in the perioperative period.
Copyright © 2021 AEC. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Asintomático; Asymptomatic; COVID-19; Periodo preoperatorio; Preoperative period; Prevalence; Prevalencia; SARS-CoV-2

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35580757      PMCID: PMC9107105          DOI: 10.1016/j.cireng.2022.05.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cir Esp (Engl Ed)        ISSN: 2173-5077


Introduction

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by SARS-CoV-2 was declared a global pandemic by the World Health Organization (WHO) on March 11, 2020. The clinical manifestations of SARS-CoV-2 infection are extremely variable and can range from severe life-threatening disease to paucisymptomatic or asymptomatic forms. The incubation period ranges from 2 to 14 days after exposure to the virus, and the first symptoms appear within the first 5 days of exposure in 50% of cases. Transmission from asymptomatic or presymptomatic subjects has been clearly documented, and the proportion of asymptomatic infections is between 0.13% and 41%, according to different studies4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9. Spain has been one of the European countries most severely affected by the COVID-19 pandemic during the first wave10, 11. The results of the Seroepidemiological Survey of SARS-CoV-2 Virus Infection in Spain (ENE-COVID) conducted between April 27 and May 11, 2020, showed a global seroprevalence in Spain of 5%. In Catalonia, the prevalence by province was 7% in Barcelona, ​​3.8% in Lleida, 2.6% in Girona and 1.4% in Tarragona. The exponential increase in cases caused restrictive policies to be initiated as part of the ‘state of alarm’ declared in Spain on March 14 to reduce the risk of transmission of SARS-CoV-213, 14. Likewise, the COVID-19 pandemic posed a great challenge for the healthcare system in Spain. Due to the patient overload of hospitals in March 2020, non-essential surgical procedures were cancelled, and surgery units were converted into COVID-19 wards and intensive care units in order to treat the disease. Furthermore, the lack of availability of diagnostic tests at the beginning of the pandemic meant that there was no standardized screening of most of the population with clinical suspicion of infection in the absence of serious symptoms or requiring hospital admission. In this regard, real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in nasopharyngeal samples is currently the gold standard for diagnosing patients with active SARS-CoV-2 infection. As surgical activity gradually restarted, hospitals resumed scheduled surgical activity. In this phase, the authorities proposed PCR screening strategies in different groups, including patients who were going to undergo surgery. Following the recommendations established by the Ministry of Health, most hospitals added PCR testing with a nasopharyngeal sample to their preoperative protocols as screening for active SARS-CoV-2 infection in the 72 h prior to a scheduled surgery and in the immediate preoperative period in the case of urgent surgery15, 16. This meant that patients who underwent surgery were one of the first population groups in whom PCR testing became universalized. The application of screening protocols using PCR was generalized in all hospitals in Catalonia. Given the limited information available on the number of asymptomatic carriers (AC), the data generated in the preoperative screening can provide important information on the epidemiological situation in Catalonia in the period immediately after the resumption of surgical activity. The main objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 carriers in the surgical population in Catalonia after the restart of scheduled activity during the first wave of the pandemic.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective multicenter observational study of patients who were either scheduled for surgery or underwent urgent surgery in 17 hospitals in Catalonia between April 20 and May 31, 2020 (6 weeks). The hospitals were classified by groups based on the number of beds: 5 hospitals had less than 200 beds, 9 between 200 and 500 beds, 2 between 500 and 1000, and one more than 1000 beds. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Hospital Vall d'Hebron (Barcelona, ​​Spain) (Ethics Committee approval number [PR(AG)331/2020]). The study start date of April 20 was chosen because it was the date that scheduled surgical activity was restarted in most medical centers after having been suspended due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Since then, surgical activity was resumed and hospital protocols as well as the recommendations of the Ministry of Health have been followed15, 16, and all hospitals in Catalonia have performed PCR tests using nasopharyngeal samples from all patients requiring scheduled or urgent surgery in order to screen for active SARS-CoV-2 infection. The PCR test is performed 72 h prior to scheduled surgery or immediately before surgery in the case of urgent surgery. To determine the COVID-19 positivity rate, we evaluated all patients who underwent a scheduled or urgent surgical procedure during the study period. Using hospital records, we identified patients who underwent urgent or scheduled surgery and who had a PCR test for SARS-CoV-2 in the 72 h prior to surgery (target population). The microbiological results of the PCR tests were reviewed, and based on the result, the patients were classified as infected or not infected by SARS-CoV-2. Patients with a positive PCR result for SARS-CoV-2 were surveyed by telephone in order to obtain the necessary information to determine the presence of symptoms compatible with the disease and known risk factors. The questionnaire collected data on possible sources of infection and characteristics of the subjects and specifically registered all the information necessary to detect AC (without clinical criteria for COVID-19 infection). According to the WHO definition of a suspected case, individuals were classified as symptomatic if they presented fever or acute respiratory symptoms at any time during the previous 14 days. In the absence of either, the subject was considered asymptomatic. Likewise, the medical files of patients with positive PCR for SARS-CoV-2 were reviewed to rule out any previously confirmed clinical diagnosis of COVID-19.

Statistical analysis

The prevalence of asymptomatic COVID-19 carriers was calculated in patients who had undergone scheduled or urgent surgery, according to laboratory results (PCR), for each of the study weeks and by hospital groups according to the number of beds. Prevalence was expressed as a percentage with its corresponding 95% confidence interval. The results were expressed as mean and standard deviation for continuous variables, and as frequency and percentage for qualitative variables. To study the possible relationship between qualitative variables, the Pearson chi-squared test or Fisher’s exact test was used, while the Student’s t-test was used to study the relationship between a quantitative variable and a dichotomous qualitative variable. To analyze the evolution of AC prevalence throughout the 6 weeks of the study, the Mantel-Haenszel linear trend test was used. P values ​​<.05 were considered statistically significant. The statistical study was performed with the SPSS 20.0 statistical package (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY) and R version 3.6.8 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing).

Results

A total of 10 838 patients scheduled for surgery or requiring urgent surgery were screened for COVID-19. Table 1 shows the number of PCR performed, listed by hospital groups. In total, 118 patients (1.09%) were positive for SARS-CoV-2 in the 72 h prior to surgery. Among them, 66.1% (78/118) had no symptoms in the 14 days prior to screening, so the prevalence of AC between April 20 and May 31, 2020 was 0.7% (95% CI: 0.6%–0.9%). A downward trend in the prevalence of AC was observed between the first week and the sixth week of the study (P < .001). Thus, the highest prevalence of AC was in the first week (1.9% [95% CI: 1.1%–3.2%]), while the lowest was in the sixth week [0.4% (95% CI: 0.2%–0.7%)] (Fig. 1 ). The prevalence of AC appears in Fig. 2 by hospital groups, according to the number of beds.
Table 1

SARS-CoV-2 PCR tests performed per week in each hospital group according to number of beds.

Hospital groups by n of hospital bedsN of hospitalsApril 20–April 26April 27–May 10May 4–May 10May 11–May 17May 18–May 24May 25–May 31Total
PCR donePCR donePCR donePCR donePCR donePCR donePCR done
n = 730n = 883n = 1347n = 2108n = 2721n = 3049n = 10 838
<200 beds5591041792953523381327
200–500 beds94114947761279163518256410
500–1000 beds21111441542373524011399
>1000 beds11491512382973824851702
Fig. 1

Prevalence of asymptomatic carriers of SARS-CoV-2 during the study period.

The vertical lines represent the 95% confidence interval.

Fig. 2

Prevalence of asymptomatic carriers of SARS-CoV-2 by hospital groups according to the number of beds.

The vertical lines represent the 95% confidence interval.

SARS-CoV-2 PCR tests performed per week in each hospital group according to number of beds. Prevalence of asymptomatic carriers of SARS-CoV-2 during the study period. The vertical lines represent the 95% confidence interval. Prevalence of asymptomatic carriers of SARS-CoV-2 by hospital groups according to the number of beds. The vertical lines represent the 95% confidence interval. Regarding patients with positive PCR, the prevalence of patients with symptoms compatible with COVID-19 was 0.4% (95%CI: 0.3%–0.5%). Among the 40 symptomatic cases, 19 (47.5%) had changes in the radiographic images consistent with pneumonia, and fever and cough were the most frequent symptoms. Two patients died during the study period. 45% of symptomatic patients underwent urgent surgery, compared to 50% of AC (P = .6). Meanwhile, 32.5% of symptomatic patients had previous contact with a confirmed case, and 40% did not know the source of infection. The clinical characteristics of the symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with positive PCR test results appear in Table 2 .
Table 2

Clinical characteristics of asymptomatic and symptomatic patients with positive PCR result for SARS-CoV-2 (n = 118).

Asymptomatic group (n = 78)Symptomatic group (n = 40)P
Age (yrs), mean (SD)55 ± 2358 ± 180.5
Risk factors
 Cardiovascular disease17 (21.8)9 (22.5)0.9
 Hypertension34 (43.6)15 (37.5)0.6
 Diabetes mellitus14 (17.9)9 (22.5)0.6
 COPD10 (12.8)3 (7.5)0.4
 Neoplasm19 (23.9)11 (27.5)0.6
 Immunosuppression7 (8.9)3 (7.5)0.8
 Pregnancy10 (12.8)9 (22.5)0.3
 Urgent surgery39 (50)18 (45)0.6



Preoperative symptoms
 Cough0 (0)21 (52.5)<0.001
 Dyspnea0 (0)16 (40)<0.001
 Fever0 (0)25 (62.5)0.001
 Anosmia0 (0)12 (30)<0.001
 Ageusia0 (0)11 (27.5)<0.001
 Nausea/vomiting0 (0)15 (37.5)<0.001
 Throat pain0 (0)12 (30)0.001
 Shivering0 (0)9 (22.5)0.002



Preoperative radiography result0.009*
 Pathological8 (10.2)17 (42.5)
 Normal39 (50)11 (27.5)
 Not done31 (39.8)13 (32.5)



Type of contact0.03*
 Contact with confirmed case12 (15.4)13 (32.5)
 Contact with symptomatic person7 (9)11 (27.5)
 Unknown contact59 (75.6)16 (40)



Mortality0 (0)2 (2.5)

Values expressed as frequencies (percentages) unless otherwise indicated.

SD: standard deviation; COPD: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

p < 0.05.

Clinical characteristics of asymptomatic and symptomatic patients with positive PCR result for SARS-CoV-2 (n = 118). Values expressed as frequencies (percentages) unless otherwise indicated. SD: standard deviation; COPD: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. p < 0.05.

Discussion

Using routine nasopharyngeal PCR testing before scheduled and urgent surgery, the results of our study indicate that the prevalence of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 carriers in the surgical population of Catalonia was 0.7% (95%CI: 0.6%–9%) during the 6-week period when surgical activity restarted after the initial peak of the pandemic in early April 2020. The rate of asymptomatic infections reported in different studies varies considerably, ranging between 0.13% and 41%4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9. Most of these studies were conducted in small population groups or were seroprevalence studies. As for other studies using preoperative PCR in the surgical population after the resumption of activity, Gruskay et al, in a study of 99 patients scheduled for trauma surgery, found 8% AC, while Singer et al published a 0.13% preoperative AC rate in a single-center study that included 4751 patients. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first multicenter study conducted in Spain of preoperative screening for SARS-CoV-2 infection before scheduled elective or urgent surgery. Our results also show that 1.07% of patients had a positive preoperative PCR result for SARS-CoV-2, and 34.6% of these presented symptoms compatible with COVID-19. This indicates that 65.4% of the patients diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 were asymptomatic at the time of the PCR, which implies that these patients could have undergone surgery while infected, which could be associated with a high risk of postoperative COVID-19–related complications. We must bear in mind that this is a period of time in which the use of PCR tests in Spain was limited by the scarce availability of these tests, which meant that they were used mainly in patients with acute respiratory symptoms and a high degree of clinical suspicion. Thus, patients who were scheduled for surgery or who underwent emergency surgery were one of the first population groups to be universally tested with PCR. Carrying out these tests in surgical patients allowed us to determine the prevalence of AC in this population group at a time when few data were available on the prevalence of AC in the general population. In this context, the identification of asymptomatic patients with a positive SARS-CoV-2 result is a critical point to control the spread of the disease, protect health workers, and maximize the care required by patients who undergo surgical procedures. Furthermore, as Spain had already had 43 days of ‘state of alarm’ status and total confinement measures (except for essential workers) at the start of the study, the low prevalence of positive patients could indicate the effectiveness of the measures adopted to halt the spread of the pandemic. The downward trend in the prevalence of AC observed between the first and sixth week of the study would indicate that there was a drop in the population transmission of the virus, which was more accentuated as more time passed after the ‘state of alarm’ had been declared. All this indicates that the results of the PCR tests in patients who underwent surgery between April 20 and May 31, 2020, is very useful and could serve as a knowledge base in the event that similar restrictions were necessary due to the evolution of the pandemic. When interpreting our data, we must consider the characteristics of our target population. Patients scheduled for surgery at the hospitals that participated in the study may inherently represent a population at lower risk of COVID-19 infection. This group of patients likely includes fewer subjects from nursing homes and community living facilities, where the known prevalence of COVID-19 is higher. Furthermore, patients awaiting surgical procedures can also practice stricter social distancing to avoid exposure to COVID-19 that could interfere with the scheduling of surgical procedures. In addition, it is likely that the prevalence of AC obtained in our study may be underestimated since the sensitivity of PCR techniques is below 90%, and there may be false negative results18, 19. However, it is considered the test of reference to diagnose SARS-CoV-2 infection. The rapid development of tests for SARS-CoV-2 has included the combination of genetic, antigen and serological tests. The first two are useful for the diagnosis of the disease in the acute phase or in the presymptomatic phase, while antibodies are not detected until 7-12 days after the onset of symptoms. The better reliability achieved with the new rapid antigen tests compared to those that were marketed during the first wave of the pandemic opens up a possible future strategy for faster and more efficient preoperative screening. In conclusion, our study found very low rates of asymptomatic carriers of COVID-19 infection (prevalence 0.7%) in the surgical population of hospitals in Catalonia. These results indicate that, during the study period, most patients were able to undergo surgical procedures without the perioperative risk of complications associated with COVID-19, and with a low probability of exposure for healthcare workers and other hospitalized patients. In the first wave of the pandemic, the scarce data available on AC due to the limited availability of PCR tests mean that the results obtained in this study can serve as a knowledge base in the context of new increases in COVID-19 incidence that once again require suspending surgical activity.

Funding

This present study has received no specific funding from public, commercial or non-profit organizations.

Conflicts of interests

None.
  15 in total

1.  Prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 Among Patients Admitted for Childbirth in Southern Connecticut.

Authors:  Katherine H Campbell; Jean M Tornatore; Kirsten E Lawrence; Jessica L Illuzzi; L Scott Sussman; Heather S Lipkind; Christian M Pettker
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  The Promise and Peril of Antibody Testing for COVID-19.

Authors:  Jennifer Abbasi
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 3.  Clinical testing for COVID-19.

Authors:  Stephanie Ward; Andrew Lindsley; Josh Courter; Amal Assa'ad
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 10.793

4.  Surgical Management of Patients With COVID-19 Infection. Recommendations of the Spanish Association of Surgeons.

Authors:  Jose Mose Balibrea; Josep Mose Badia; Inés Rubio Pérez; Esteban Martín Antona; Estíbaliz Álvarez Peña; Sandra García Botella; Mario Álvarez Gallego; Elena Martín Pérez; Sagrario Martínez Cortijo; Isabel Pascual Miguelañez; Lola Pérez Díaz; Jose Luis Ramos Rodriguez; Eloy Espin Basany; Raquel Sánchez Santos; Victoriano Soria Aledo; Ruth López Barrachina; Salvador Morales-Conde
Journal:  Cir Esp (Engl Ed)       Date:  2020-04-03

5.  Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China.

Authors:  Chaolin Huang; Yeming Wang; Xingwang Li; Lili Ren; Jianping Zhao; Yi Hu; Li Zhang; Guohui Fan; Jiuyang Xu; Xiaoying Gu; Zhenshun Cheng; Ting Yu; Jiaan Xia; Yuan Wei; Wenjuan Wu; Xuelei Xie; Wen Yin; Hui Li; Min Liu; Yan Xiao; Hong Gao; Li Guo; Jungang Xie; Guangfa Wang; Rongmeng Jiang; Zhancheng Gao; Qi Jin; Jianwei Wang; Bin Cao
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  The utility of chest computed tomography (CT) and RT-PCR screening of asymptomatic patients for SARS-CoV-2 prior to semiurgent or urgent hospital procedures.

Authors:  Aditya S Shah; Lara A Walkoff; Ronald S Kuzo; Matthew R Callstrom; Michael J Brown; Michael L Kendrick; Bradly J Narr; Elie Berbari
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 3.254

Review 7.  Detection of COVID-19: A review of the current literature and future perspectives.

Authors:  Tianxing Ji; Zhenwei Liu; GuoQiang Wang; Xuguang Guo; Shahzad Akbar Khan; Changchun Lai; Haoyu Chen; Shiwen Huang; Shaomei Xia; Bo Chen; Hongyun Jia; Yangchao Chen; Qiang Zhou
Journal:  Biosens Bioelectron       Date:  2020-07-21       Impact factor: 10.618

8.  The Incubation Period of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) From Publicly Reported Confirmed Cases: Estimation and Application.

Authors:  Stephen A Lauer; Kyra H Grantz; Qifang Bi; Forrest K Jones; Qulu Zheng; Hannah R Meredith; Andrew S Azman; Nicholas G Reich; Justin Lessler
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 9.  The epidemiology and pathogenesis of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak.

Authors:  Hussin A Rothan; Siddappa N Byrareddy
Journal:  J Autoimmun       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 7.094

10.  Low prevalence (0.13%) of COVID-19 infection in asymptomatic pre-operative/pre-procedure patients at a large, academic medical center informs approaches to perioperative care.

Authors:  Jennifer S Singer; Eric M Cheng; Douglas A Murad; Annabelle de St Maurice; O Joe Hines; Daniel Z Uslan; Omai Garner; Johnathan Pregler; Susan V Bukata; Michael A Pfeffer; Robert A Cherry
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2020-08-14       Impact factor: 3.982

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.