Literature DB >> 35580654

Inferior cellular and humoral immunity against Omicron and Delta variants of concern compared with SARS-CoV-2 wild type in hemodialysis patients immunized with 4 SARS-CoV-2 vaccine doses.

Moritz Anft1, Arturo Blazquez-Navarro2, Michael Frahnert3, Lutz Fricke3, Toni L Meister4, Toralf Roch2, Ulrik Stervbo1, Stephanie Pfaender4, Timm H Westhoff1, Nina Babel5.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35580654      PMCID: PMC9107179          DOI: 10.1016/j.kint.2022.05.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Kidney Int        ISSN: 0085-2538            Impact factor:   18.998


× No keyword cloud information.
To the editor: With the dominance of the most recent severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variant of concern Omicron (B.1.1.529), the question arises, what is the reason for its high contagiousness in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)–vaccinated dialysis patients compared with the previous SARS-CoV-2 variants Delta and wild type? The objective of this study was, therefore, to analyze humoral and cellular immunity directed against the Omicron variant of concern compared with the wild-type or Delta variant of concern in hemodialysis patients (n = 42; Supplementary Table S1) immunized with 4 doses of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. Titers of neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) against wild type, Delta, and Omicron were estimated by SARS-CoV-2 spike-protein (S-protein) pseudovirus assays. T-cell immunity reactive against wild-type, Delta-derived, and Omicron-derived S-protein was analyzed by multiparameter flow cytometry (Supplementary Figure S1). The analyses were performed 8 to 9 weeks following the fourth doses. The hemodialysis patients had a clear seroconversion after 4 doses of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, with a significantly higher titer of NAb against wild type compared with Delta or Omicron S-protein (median [interquartile range]-50% Neutralizing Dose [ND50] = 2117 [663-2560], 759 [276-2560], and 439 [160-1180], respectively). Interestingly, the NAb titer against Delta was significantly higher compared with Omicron-specific NAb (Figure 1 a). Although the number of patients with a detectable S-protein–reactive CD4 T-cell response was nearly identical (40–41 of 42 patients; Supplementary Table S2), the magnitude of response was significantly lower against Omicron- and Delta-derived S-protein compared with wild type (Figure 1b). In contrast, significantly fewer patients showed a detectable S-protein–reactive CD8 T-cell response against Omicron but not Delta compared with wild type (P = 0.0304, Fisher exact test; Supplementary Table S2), although the magnitude of response was not different between all 3 SARS-CoV-2 variants (Figure 1c).
Figure 1

Comparison of humoral and cellular immunity directed against spike protein (S-protein) derived from Omicron, Delta, and wild-type (WT) variants of concern in hemodialysis patients vaccinated with 4 mRNA coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine doses. (a) Isolated serum from hemodialysis patients was analyzed for Omicron-, Delta-, and WT-specific neutralizing antibodies (50% Neutralizing Dose [ND50]). (b–f) Isolated peripheral blood mononuclear cells from hemodialysis patients were stimulated for 16 hours with 1 μg/ml severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) S-protein overlapping peptide pools from WT (dark red box plots), Delta (light red box plots), or Omicron (blue box plots). S-protein–reactive T helper cells were identified as life/dead-marker–CD3+CD4+CD137+CD154+ (b), and S-protein–reactive cytotoxic T cells were identified as life/dead-marker–CD3+CD8+CD137+ (c). Within the S-protein–reactive CD4 T-cell population, antibodies against interferon-γ (IFN-γ) (d), interleukin-2 (IL-2) (e), and tumor necrosis factor (TNF) (f) were used to detect T helper cell 1 cytokine-producing T helper cells. Groups were compared using 2-sided, unpaired Mann-Whitney U test; P ≤ 0.050 was defined as significant.

Comparison of humoral and cellular immunity directed against spike protein (S-protein) derived from Omicron, Delta, and wild-type (WT) variants of concern in hemodialysis patients vaccinated with 4 mRNA coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine doses. (a) Isolated serum from hemodialysis patients was analyzed for Omicron-, Delta-, and WT-specific neutralizing antibodies (50% Neutralizing Dose [ND50]). (b–f) Isolated peripheral blood mononuclear cells from hemodialysis patients were stimulated for 16 hours with 1 μg/ml severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) S-protein overlapping peptide pools from WT (dark red box plots), Delta (light red box plots), or Omicron (blue box plots). S-protein–reactive T helper cells were identified as life/dead-marker–CD3+CD4+CD137+CD154+ (b), and S-protein–reactive cytotoxic T cells were identified as life/dead-marker–CD3+CD8+CD137+ (c). Within the S-protein–reactive CD4 T-cell population, antibodies against interferon-γ (IFN-γ) (d), interleukin-2 (IL-2) (e), and tumor necrosis factor (TNF) (f) were used to detect T helper cell 1 cytokine-producing T helper cells. Groups were compared using 2-sided, unpaired Mann-Whitney U test; P ≤ 0.050 was defined as significant. With regard to the functionality, the frequency of Omicron and Delta S-protein–reactive CD4+ T cells producing T helper cell 1 cytokines interferon-γ and tumor necrosis factor was significantly lower compared with wild-type S-protein–reactive CD4+ T cells (Figure 1d and f). In line with the results from the general populations, , hemodialysis patients show a clearly decreased humoral and cellular immune response against Omicron compared with SARS-CoV-2 wild type after 4 doses of vaccination. Of interest, Omicron-specific NAb titer was significantly lower compared with Delta-specific NAb, explaining the more efficient evasion of Omicron from neutralizing antibodies and its efficient spread in vaccinated individuals. Because the humoral immune response of dialysis patients strongly benefits from a fourth compared with a third vaccination, an adjustment of the vaccination procedure should be recommended.

Data Statement

The data will be available on request.
  5 in total

1.  The Omicron variant is highly resistant against antibody-mediated neutralization: Implications for control of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Markus Hoffmann; Nadine Krüger; Sebastian Schulz; Anne Cossmann; Cheila Rocha; Amy Kempf; Inga Nehlmeier; Luise Graichen; Anna-Sophie Moldenhauer; Martin S Winkler; Martin Lier; Alexandra Dopfer-Jablonka; Hans-Martin Jäck; Georg M N Behrens; Stefan Pöhlmann
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2021-12-24       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  Three doses of BNT162b2 vaccine confer neutralising antibody capacity against the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant.

Authors:  Kevin K Ariën; Leo Heyndrickx; Johan Michiels; Katleen Vereecken; Kurt Van Lent; Sandra Coppens; Betty Willems; Pieter Pannus; Geert A Martens; Marjan Van Esbroeck; Maria E Goossens; Arnaud Marchant; Koen Bartholomeeusen; Isabelle Desombere
Journal:  NPJ Vaccines       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 7.344

3.  Inferior humoral and sustained cellular immunity against wild-type and omicron variant of concern in hemodialysis patients immunized with 3 SARS-CoV-2 vaccine doses compared with 4 doses.

Authors:  Okan Cinkilic; Moritz Anft; Arturo Blazquez-Navarro; Toni L Meister; Toralf Roch; Ulrik Stervbo; Stephanie Pfaender; Timm H Westhoff; Nina Babel
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 18.998

4.  Comparable neutralisation evasion of SARS-CoV-2 omicron subvariants BA.1, BA.2, and BA.3.

Authors:  Prerna Arora; Lu Zhang; Cheila Rocha; Anzhalika Sidarovich; Amy Kempf; Sebastian Schulz; Anne Cossmann; Bernhard Manger; Eva Baier; Björn Tampe; Onnen Moerer; Steffen Dickel; Alexandra Dopfer-Jablonka; Hans-Martin Jäck; Georg M N Behrens; Martin S Winkler; Stefan Pöhlmann; Markus Hoffmann
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2022-04-12       Impact factor: 25.071

5.  Divergent SARS-CoV-2 Omicron-reactive T and B cell responses in COVID-19 vaccine recipients.

Authors:  Corine H GeurtsvanKessel; Daryl Geers; Katharina S Schmitz; Anna Z Mykytyn; Mart M Lamers; Susanne Bogers; Sandra Scherbeijn; Lennert Gommers; Roos S G Sablerolles; Nella N Nieuwkoop; Laurine C Rijsbergen; Laura L A van Dijk; Janet de Wilde; Kimberley Alblas; Tim I Breugem; Bart J A Rijnders; Herbert de Jager; Daniela Weiskopf; P Hugo M van der Kuy; Alessandro Sette; Marion P G Koopmans; Alba Grifoni; Bart L Haagmans; Rory D de Vries
Journal:  Sci Immunol       Date:  2022-03-25
  5 in total
  2 in total

1.  Improved SARS-CoV-2 Neutralization of Delta and Omicron BA.1 Variants of Concern after Fourth Vaccination in Hemodialysis Patients.

Authors:  Cho-Chin Cheng; Louise Platen; Catharina Christa; Myriam Tellenbach; Verena Kappler; Romina Bester; Bo-Hung Liao; Christopher Holzmann-Littig; Maia Werz; Emely Schönhals; Eva Platen; Peter Eggerer; Laëtitia Tréguer; Claudius Küchle; Christoph Schmaderer; Uwe Heemann; Lutz Renders; Ulrike Protzer; Matthias Christoph Braunisch
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-16

2.  SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in haemodialysis patients: Insides from a prospective study comparing mRNA and viral vector vaccines.

Authors:  Louise Füessl; Ulf Schönermarck
Journal:  Lancet Reg Health Eur       Date:  2022-09-13
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.