Literature DB >> 3558026

Prognostic factors in carcinoma of the prostate--analysis of RTOG study 75-06.

M V Pilepich, J M Krall, W T Sause, R J Johnson, H H Russ, G E Hanks, C A Perez, M Zinninger, K L Martz.   

Abstract

A total of 566 evaluable patients were accessioned to a phase III RTOG study of extended field irradiation in carcinoma of the prostate from 1976 to 1983. Eligible patients were those with locally advanced disease, either clinical Stage C or clinical Stage A2 or B with pelvic lymph node involvement. The treatment consisted of irradiation of the regional lymphatics followed by a boost to the prostate. The data have been analyzed extensively to identify variables of potential prognostic significance. The assessed factors include tumor size, clinical stage, the degree of histological differentiation, nodal status, serum acid phosphatase status, hormonal management status, age, and race. These factors have been assessed as to their interdependence and correlation with the clinical course (study endpoints) using univariate analyses and Cox's Regression model. Significant interdependence of tumor size and Gleason score and tumor size and acid phosphatase was identified. The population receiving hormonal management either prior to or during radiotherapy had a significantly higher proportion of high grade tumors. Correlation of the assessed variables and the study endpoints (local control, incidence of distant metastases, NED survival, survival) singled out the degree of histological differentiation as the most powerful prognostic factor for all the endpoints. Age proved a useful predictor of local control (younger patients failed at a significantly higher rate), as did tumor size. Elevation of serum acid phosphatase correlated well with the incidence of metastatic disease but was not a useful predictor of survival. Tumor size and hormonal management status correlated well with the incidence of metastatic disease but only when analyzed separately from other factors. Their prognostic value was absent when Cox regression analysis was applied. Nodal status did not correlate well with any of the study endpoints, indicating then that in patients with clinical Stage C disease, treated with definitive radiotherapy to the prostate and regional lymphatics, this parameter may have limited prognostic usefulness. Although patients who received concomitant hormonal management had a significantly higher proportion of high grade lesions, their clinical course fared favorably in comparison with the population not receiving concomitant hormonal management. This may indicate a beneficial effect of adjuvant hormonal treatment which needs to be tested in a prospective study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3558026     DOI: 10.1016/0360-3016(87)90007-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  5 in total

Review 1.  One is the new six: The International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) patient-focused approach to Gleason grading.

Authors:  John R Srigley; Brett Delahunt; Lars Egevad; Hemamali Samaratunga; John Yaxley; Andrew J Evans
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 2.  Management of prostate cancer patients with lymph node involvement: a rapidly evolving paradigm.

Authors:  Gilles Créhange; Chien Peter Chen; Charles C Hsu; Norbert Kased; Fergus V Coakley; John Kurhanewicz; Mack Roach
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 12.111

3.  Overview of randomized controlled treatment trials for clinically localized prostate cancer: implications for active surveillance and the United States preventative task force report on screening?

Authors:  Mack Roach; Kimberly Thomas
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2012-12

Review 4.  Goserelin. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic efficacy in prostate cancer.

Authors:  R N Brogden; D Faulds
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 3.923

5.  The significance of erythrocyte sedimentation rate as a prognostic factor for patients with prostate cancer: Gunma Urological Oncology Study Group investigation.

Authors:  K Imai; T Suzuki; M Kobayashi; H Yamanaka; Y Tomaru; J Sato
Journal:  Jpn J Cancer Res       Date:  1990-10
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.