Literature DB >> 35579806

Artificial Intelligence in Pharmacovigilance: An Introduction to Terms, Concepts, Applications, and Limitations.

Jeffrey K Aronson1.   

Abstract

The tools of artificial intelligence (AI) have enormous potential to enhance activities in pharmacovigilance. Pharmacovigilance experts need not be AI experts, but they should know enough about AI to explore the possibilities of collaboration with those who are. Modern concepts of AI date from Alan Turing's work, especially his paper on "the imitation game", in the late 1940s and early 1950s. Its scope today includes computational skills, including the formulation of mathematical proofs; visual perception, including facial recognition and virtual reality; decision making by expert systems; aspects of language, such as language processing, speech recognition, creative composition, and translation; and combinations of these, e.g. in self-driving vehicles. Machines can be programmed with the ability to learn, using neural networks that mimic cognitive actions of the human brain, leading to deep structural learning. Limitations of AI include difficulties with language, arising from the need to understand context and interpret ambiguities, which particularly affect translation, and inadequacies of databases, requiring careful preparation and curation. New techniques may cause unforeseen difficulties via unexpected malfunctioning. Relevant terms and concepts include different types of machine learning, neural networks, natural language programming, ontologies, and expert systems. Adoption of the tools of AI in pharmacovigilance has been slow. Machine learning, in conjunction with natural language processing and data mining, to study adverse drug reactions in databases such as those found in electronic health records, claims databases, and social media, has the potential to enhance the characterization of known adverse effects and reactions and detect new signals.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35579806     DOI: 10.1007/s40264-022-01156-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Saf        ISSN: 0114-5916            Impact factor:   5.606


  36 in total

1.  Medication errors: definitions and classification.

Authors:  Jeffrey K Aronson
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Prediction of adverse drug reactions using drug convolutional neural networks.

Authors:  Anjani Sankar Mantripragada; Sai Phani Teja; Rohith Reddy Katasani; Pratik Joshi; Masilamani V; Raj Ramesh
Journal:  J Bioinform Comput Biol       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 1.122

3.  Comparing deep learning architectures for sentiment analysis on drug reviews.

Authors:  Cristóbal Colón-Ruiz; Isabel Segura-Bedmar
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2020-08-17       Impact factor: 6.317

4.  Mastering the game of Go without human knowledge.

Authors:  David Silver; Julian Schrittwieser; Karen Simonyan; Ioannis Antonoglou; Aja Huang; Arthur Guez; Thomas Hubert; Lucas Baker; Matthew Lai; Adrian Bolton; Yutian Chen; Timothy Lillicrap; Fan Hui; Laurent Sifre; George van den Driessche; Thore Graepel; Demis Hassabis
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Classification of the Severity of Adverse Drugs Reactions.

Authors:  Raphaël Chauvet; Cédric Bousquet; Agnès Lillo-Lelouet; Ilan Zana; Ilan Ben Kimoun; Marie-Christine Jaulent
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2020-06-16

6.  Is Watson for Oncology per se Unreasonably Dangerous?: Making A Case for How to Prove Products Liability Based on a Flawed Artificial Intelligence Design.

Authors:  Xavier Frank
Journal:  Am J Law Med       Date:  2019-05

Review 7.  What is the scale of prescribing errors committed by junior doctors? A systematic review.

Authors:  Sarah Ross; Christine Bond; Helen Rothnie; Sian Thomas; Mary Joan Macleod
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2008-10-23       Impact factor: 4.335

8.  A meta-analysis of Watson for Oncology in clinical application.

Authors:  Zhou Jie; Zeng Zhiying; Li Li
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Artificial Intelligence for Unstructured Healthcare Data: Application to Coding of Patient Reporting of Adverse Drug Reactions.

Authors:  Louis Létinier; Julien Jouganous; Mehdi Benkebil; Alicia Bel-Létoile; Clément Goehrs; Allison Singier; Franck Rouby; Clémence Lacroix; Ghada Miremont; Joëlle Micallef; Francesco Salvo; Antoine Pariente
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2021-05-08       Impact factor: 6.875

View more
  2 in total

1.  Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning for Safe Medicines.

Authors:  Andrew Bate; Yuan Luo
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 5.228

Review 2.  Integration of Privacy Protection and Blockchain-Based Food Safety Traceability: Potential and Challenges.

Authors:  Moyixi Lei; Longqin Xu; Tonglai Liu; Shuangyin Liu; Chuanheng Sun
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2022-07-28
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.