Literature DB >> 35579522

Radiomic Analysis: Study Design, Statistical Analysis, and Other Bias Mitigation Strategies.

Chaya S Moskowitz1, Mattea L Welch1, Michael A Jacobs1, Brenda F Kurland1, Amber L Simpson1.   

Abstract

Rapid advances in automated methods for extracting large numbers of quantitative features from medical images have led to tremendous growth of publications reporting on radiomic analyses. Translation of these research studies into clinical practice can be hindered by biases introduced during the design, analysis, or reporting of the studies. Herein, the authors review biases, sources of variability, and pitfalls that frequently arise in radiomic research, with an emphasis on study design and statistical analysis considerations. Drawing on existing work in the statistical, radiologic, and machine learning literature, approaches for avoiding these pitfalls are described. © RSNA, 2022.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35579522      PMCID: PMC9340236          DOI: 10.1148/radiol.211597

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   29.146


  70 in total

1.  Why do so many prognostic factors fail to pan out?

Authors:  S G Hilsenbeck; G M Clark; W L McGuire
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  Racial Disproportionality in Covid Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Daniel B Chastain; Sharmon P Osae; Andrés F Henao-Martínez; Carlos Franco-Paredes; Joeanna S Chastain; Henry N Young
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-08-11       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 3.  How to read and review papers on machine learning and artificial intelligence in radiology: a survival guide to key methodological concepts.

Authors:  Burak Kocak; Ece Ates Kus; Ozgur Kilickesmez
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Influence of inter-observer delineation variability on radiomics stability in different tumor sites.

Authors:  Matea Pavic; Marta Bogowicz; Xaver Würms; Stefan Glatz; Tobias Finazzi; Oliver Riesterer; Johannes Roesch; Leonie Rudofsky; Martina Friess; Patrick Veit-Haibach; Martin Huellner; Isabelle Opitz; Walter Weder; Thomas Frauenfelder; Matthias Guckenberger; Stephanie Tanadini-Lang
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 4.089

Review 5.  A review of original articles published in the emerging field of radiomics.

Authors:  Jiangdian Song; Yanjie Yin; Hairui Wang; Zhihui Chang; Zhaoyu Liu; Lei Cui
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2020-04-12       Impact factor: 3.528

Review 6.  A Deep Look Into the Future of Quantitative Imaging in Oncology: A Statement of Working Principles and Proposal for Change.

Authors:  Olivier Morin; Martin Vallières; Arthur Jochems; Henry C Woodruff; Gilmer Valdes; Steve E Braunstein; Joachim E Wildberger; Javier E Villanueva-Meyer; Vasant Kearney; Sue S Yom; Timothy D Solberg; Philippe Lambin
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  Machine Learning methods for Quantitative Radiomic Biomarkers.

Authors:  Chintan Parmar; Patrick Grossmann; Johan Bussink; Philippe Lambin; Hugo J W L Aerts
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 8.  Reporting Recommendations for Tumor Marker Prognostic Studies (REMARK): An Abridged Explanation and Elaboration.

Authors:  Willi Sauerbrei; Sheila E Taube; Lisa M McShane; Margaret M Cavenagh; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  Gender imbalance in medical imaging datasets produces biased classifiers for computer-aided diagnosis.

Authors:  Agostina J Larrazabal; Nicolás Nieto; Victoria Peterson; Diego H Milone; Enzo Ferrante
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Meningioma Radiomics: At the Nexus of Imaging, Pathology and Biomolecular Characterization.

Authors:  Lorenzo Ugga; Gaia Spadarella; Lorenzo Pinto; Renato Cuocolo; Arturo Brunetti
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 6.575

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.