| Literature DB >> 35578668 |
Palanisamy Prakash1, Kuppusamy Selvam1, Ekambaram Gayathiri2, Thangaraj Pratheep3, Rengarajan Manivasagaperumal4, Priya Kumaravel5, Saravanan Balameena6.
Abstract
The novel coronavirus 2019 is spreading around the world and causing serious concern. However, there is limited information about novel coronavirus that hinders the design of effective drug. Bioactive compounds are rich source of chemo preventive ingredients. In our present research focuses on identifying and recognizing bioactive chemicals in Lantana camara, by evaluating their potential toward new coronaviruses and confirming the findings using molecular docking, ADMET, network analysis and dynamics investigations.. The spike protein receptor binding domain were docked with 25 identified compounds and 2,4-Ditertbutyl-phenol (-6.3kcal/mol) shows highest docking score, its interactions enhances the increase in binding and helps to identify the biological activity. The ADME/toxicity result shows that all the tested compounds can serve as inhibitors of the enzymes CYP1A2 and CYP2D6. In addition, Molecular dynamics simulations studies with reference inhibitors were carried out to test the stability. This study identifies the possible active molecules against the receptor binding domain of spike protein, which can be further exploited for the treatment of novel coronavirus 2019. The results of the toxicity risk for phytocompounds and their active derivatives showed a moderate to good drug score.Entities:
Keywords: 2D, Two Dimensional; 3D, Three dimensional; ADME/T; ADME/T, Absorption Distribution Metabolism and Extraction Toxicity; BP, Biological process; Docking; GC-MS, Gas Chromatography-mass spectrography; GO, Gene Ontology; LC, Lantana camara; MD, Molecular Dynamic; MF, Molecular Function; Molecular Dynamic; Network analysis; PDB, Protein Data Bank; RMSD, Root mean square deviations; RMSF, Root means square fluctuation; SAR, Specific Absorption Rate; SARs-CoV; SPC, Simple point charge; SSE, Secondary structure elements; VS, Virtual Screening
Year: 2022 PMID: 35578668 PMCID: PMC9095257 DOI: 10.1016/j.nexus.2022.100080
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Energy Nexus ISSN: 2772-4271
Fig. 1Phytocompound compositions structure of Lantana camara leaf.
Docking score results of 25 compounds with antiviral protein target
| S.NO | NAME BIO ACTIVE COMPOUNDS | Binding energy in |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | DODECANE | -5.0 |
| 2 | Tetradecane | -5.2 |
| 3 | 2,4-DITERT-BUTYLPHENOL | -6.3 |
| 4 | HEXATRIACONTANE | -4.9 |
| 5 | EICOSANOIC ACID, METHYL ESTER | -5.6 |
| 6 | n-Hexadecanoic acid | -5.0 |
| 7 | Behenic alcohol | -5.3 |
| 8 | Heneicosane | -5.4 |
| 9 | 9,12-OCTADECADIENOIC ACID (Z,Z)-, METHYL ESTER | -6.0 |
| 10 | E,E,Z-1,3,12-Nonadecatriene-5,14-diol | -6.1 |
| 11 | 2-HEXADECEN-1-OL, 3,7,11,15-TETRAMETHYL-, [R-[R*,R*-(E)]]- 18 22.478 1602201 3.37 694357 3.67 9-Octadecenoic acid, (E)- | -5.4 |
| 12 | Oleic Acid | -5.3 |
| 13 | 9-OCTADECENOIC ACID (Z)- | -5.8 |
| 14 | Ethyl Oleate | -5.6 |
| 15 | 1-Heneicosanol | -5.5 |
| 16 | Dotriacontane | -4.8 |
| 17 | 1-Heptacosanol | -5.3 |
| 18 | 7-Hexadecenal, (Z)- | -5.5 |
| 19 | Hexadecanedinitrile | -1.2 |
| 20 | Heptadecane | -5.5 |
| 21 | 2-Methylhexacosane | -5.5 |
| 22 | Undec-10-ynoic acid, undec-2-en-1-yl ester | -1.8 |
| 23 | 1H-INDENE, 1-HEXADECYL-2,3-DIHYDRO- | -5.8 |
| 24 | 2-Methylhexacosane | -5.3 |
| 25 | Hexadecanoic acid, 2-hydroxy-1-(hydroxymethyl)ethyl ester | -5.7 |
Fig. 2Three dimensional structure of spike protein receptor binding domine (ID: 6W41).
Fig. 3Three dimensional structure of 2,4-Ditert-butylphenol interact with targeted protein.
Fig. 4Protein and ligand interactions plot.
ADMET screening of selected compounds derivative of Lantana camara
| S.No | Compounds name | CYP2D6 inhibitor | CYP3A4 inhibitor | Total Clearance | Renal OCT2 substrate | AMES toxicity | Max. tolerated dose (human) | hERG I inhibitor | hERG II inhibitor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hexadecanoic acid, 2-hydroxy-1 (hydroxymethyl)ethyl ester | Yes | No | 2.004 | No | No | 0.332 | No | No |
| 2 | 9-octadecenoic acid (Z)- | No | No | 1.936 | No | No | 1.936 | No | No |
| 3 | 7-Hexadecenal, (Z)- | No | No | 1.884 | No | No | 0.013 | No | No |
| 4 | E,E,Z-1,3,12-Nonadecatriene-5,14-diol | No | No | 2.152 | No | No | -0.096 | No | No |
| 5 | 2,4-Ditert-Butylphenol | No | No | 0.759 | No | No | 0.42 | No | No |
ADMET Screening of selected compounds derivatives of Lantana camara
| S.No | Compounds name | Oral Rat Acute Toxicity (LD50) | Oral Rat Chronic Toxicity (LOAEL) | Hepatotoxicity | Skin Sensitisation | T. | Minnow toxicity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hexadecanoic acid, 2-hydroxy-1 (hydroxymethyl)ethyl ester | 1.537 | 2.722 | No | Yes | 0.608 | -0.487 |
| 2 | 9-octadecenoic acid (Z)- | 1.429 | 3.187 | Yes | Yes | 0.701 | -1.31 |
| 3 | 7-Hexadecenal, (Z)- | 1.478 | 1.172 | No | Yes | 1.963 | -1.07 |
| 4 | E,E,Z-1,3,12-Nonadecatriene-5,14-diol | 1.504 | 2.911 | No | Yes | 1.895 | -0569 |
| 5 | 2,4-Ditert-Butylphenol | 2.351 | 1.696 | No | Yes | 1.572 | 0.006 |
ADMET Screening of selected compounds derivatives.
| S.No | Compound name | Water solubility | CaCo2 permeability | Human Intestinal absorption | Skin Permeability | P-Glycoprotein substrate | P-glycoprotein I inhibitor | P-glycoprotein II inhibitor | VDss (human) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hexadecanoic acid, 2-hydroxy-1 (hydroxymethyl)ethyl ester | -5.334 | 0.439 | 90.277 | -2.797 | No | Yes | No | -0.261 |
| 2 | 9-octadecenoic acid (Z)- | -5.862 | 1.57 | 92.329 | -2.723 | No | No | No | -0.587 |
| 3 | 7-Hexadecenal, (Z)- | -7.144 | 1.485 | 92.839 | -2.398 | No | No | No | 0.458 |
| 4 | E,E,Z-1,3,12-Nonadecatriene-5,14-diol | -6.14 | 1.586 | 90.725 | -2.675 | No | No | No | 0.276 |
| 5 | 2,4-Ditert-Butylphenol | -3.924 | 1.666 | 92.034 | -2.301 | No | No | No | 0.611 |
Fig. 5Toxicity level for 2,4-Ditert-butylphenol interact with targeted ligand.
ADMET screening of selected compounds derivatives for Lantana camara.
| S.No | Compounds name | Fraction unbound (Human) | BBB permeability | CNS Permeability | CYP2D6 substrate | CYP3A4 substrate | CYP1A2 inhibitor | CYP2C19 inhibitor | CYP2C9 inhibitor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hexadecanoic acid, 2-hydroxy-1 (hydroxymethyl)ethyl ester | 0.201 | -0.263 | -3.316 | No | No | No | No | No |
| 2 | 9-octadecenoic acid (Z)- | 0.054 | -0.142 | -1.6 | No | Yes | Yes | No | No |
| 3 | 7-Hexadecenal, (Z)- | 0.085 | 0.809 | -1.511 | No | Yes | Yes | No | No |
| 4 | E, E, Z-1,3,12-Nonadecatriene-5,14 diol | 0.107 | -0.426 | -1.981 | No | Yes | Yes | No | No |
| 5 | 2,4-Ditert Butylphenol | 0.044 | 0.478 | -848 | No | Yes | Yes | No | No |
Fig. 6(a-c) SAR-Cov19 target PPI network (27nodes 11edges) Protein-protein interaction network of targets related to viral protein. The colored nodes represent candidate proteins, and colored lines represent protein interaction High trust is described as a rating greater or equal to 0.839. TMRSS2, TMRSS4,AR,NKX3, and 1XQ8, as well as were two separate nodes with strong trust levels. (d) gene ontology (GO) enrichment analysis.
Fig. 7Protein Cα atoms (A) time dependent RMSD plot, (B) RMSF plot over the 50 ns trajectory.
Fig. 8Protein secondary structure prediction over the 50 ns MD simulation (A) Apo-protein, (B) ligand bound protein complex.
Fig. 9Total number of contacts between protein and ligand analysis 50 ns.