| Literature DB >> 35578581 |
Benjamin S C Wade1, Joana Loureiro1, Ashish Sahib1, Antoni Kubicki1, Shantanu H Joshi1, Gerhard Hellemann2, Randall T Espinoza2, Roger P Woods1,2, Eliza Congdon2, Katherine L Narr1,2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Ketamine is a rapidly-acting antidepressant treatment with robust response rates. Previous studies have reported that serial ketamine therapy modulates resting state functional connectivity in several large-scale networks, though it remains unknown whether variations in brain structure, function, and connectivity impact subsequent treatment success. We used a data-driven approach to determine whether pretreatment multimodal neuroimaging measures predict changes along symptom dimensions of depression following serial ketamine infusion.Entities:
Keywords: Default mode network; functional connectivity; machine learning; major depressive disorder; serial ketamine infusion
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35578581 PMCID: PMC9527672 DOI: 10.1017/S0033291722001313
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Psychol Med ISSN: 0033-2917 Impact factor: 10.592
Demographic and clinical outline
| Patients | Controls | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 60 | 19 | ||
| Age, mean ( | 40.1 (11.1) | 28.2 (6.8) | <0.0001 |
| Sex, male/female | 30/30 | 8/11 | 0.73 |
| Lifetime illness duration, years, mean ( | 24.8 (15.9) | N/A | – |
| Current illness duration, years, mean ( | 4.0 (5.9) | N/A | – |
| Number of lifetime depressive episodes, mean ( | 6.8 (14.4) | N/A | – |
| Bipolar disorder, yes/no | 3/57 | N/A | – |
| Clinical rating scales | |||
| HDRS-17 baseline, mean ( | 18.9 (4.6) | 2.6 (5.1) | <0.0001 |
| HDRS-17 change, mean ( | −10.6 (6.3) | −0.2 (2.1) | <0.0001 |
| QIDS-SR baseline, mean ( | 16.1 (4.8) | 4.2 (6.2) | <0.0001 |
| QIDS-SR change, mean ( | −9.5 (5.1) | −0.5 (1.3) | <0.0001 |
| IDS-C baseline, mean ( | 30.5 (7.4) | 5.1 (9.4) | <0.0001 |
| IDS-C change, mean ( | −17.6 (10.7) | −0.5 (2.7) | <0.0001 |
| HDRS-17 responder/non-responder, | 37/23 | N/A | – |
| HDRS-17 remitter/non-remitter, | 30/30 | N/A | – |
| Medication history | |||
| Current SSRI use, yes/no | 18/42 | N/A | – |
| Current SNRI use, yes/no | 18/42 | N/A | – |
| Current MAOI use, yes/no | 2/58 | N/A | – |
| Current lithium use, yes/no | 1/59 | N/A | – |
| Current benzodiazepine use, yes/no | 16/44 | N/A | – |
| Current antipsychotic use, yes/no | 13/47 | N/A | – |
| Current use of any medication, yes/no | 48/12 | N/A | – |
| Education level, | |||
| High school or equivalent | 3 | 0 | – |
| Some college | 23 | 3 | – |
| Bachelor's | 23 | 9 | – |
| Masters' | 14 | 3 | – |
| Professional or doctoral | 6 | 3 | – |
| Abbreviations: HDRS: Hamilton Depression Rating Scale; QIDS: Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology; IDS: Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology; SSRI: Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor; SNRI: Serotonin and Norepinephrine Reuptake Inhibitor; MAOI: Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitor | |||
Three participants reported uncertain illness durations and were excluded from this calculation.
Thirty-five participants reported more episodes than they could count and were excluded from this calculation.
One patient and one control had incomplete data on education level.
Subscales of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale
| HDRS-17 items | HDRS-6 | Core mood and anhedonia | Somatic disturbances | Insomnia |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Depressed mood | X | X | ||
| Feelings of guilt | X | X | ||
| Suicide | ||||
| Insomnia, early | X | |||
| Insomnia, middle | X | |||
| Insomnia, late | X | |||
| Work and activities | X | X | ||
| Psychomotor retardation | X | X | ||
| Agitation | X | |||
| Anxiety, psychic | X | X | ||
| Anxiety, somatic | X | |||
| Somatic symptoms, GI | X | |||
| Somatic symptoms, general | X | X | ||
| Genital symptoms | X | |||
| Hypochondriasis | X | |||
| Weight loss | X | |||
| Insight |
Fig. 1.Boxplots of cross-validated model performance. (a) Shows distributions of the sums-of-squares formulation of the coefficient of determination (R2) in test data across 100 iterations of cross-validation while (b) shows the normalized root mean squared error of predictions across cross-validations.
Model performance
| Outcome | NRMSE | Adjusted | |
|---|---|---|---|
| HDRS-17 | −0.06 | 0.34 | 0.20 |
| HDRS-6 | 0.19 | 0.30 | 0.02 |
| CMA | 0.27 | 0.29 | 0.02 |
| SOD | −0.15 | 0.36 | 0.72 |
| INS | −0.01 | 0.34 | 0.29 |
| QIDS-SR | −0.01 | 0.35 | 0.07 |
| IDS-C-M | 0.04 | 0.33 | 0.06 |
| RRSB | −0.17 | 0.36 | 0.72 |
| RRSR | 0.01 | 0.33 | 0.02 |
Fig. 2.Partial dependence plots showing the expected change in symptoms (y-axis) for observed values of informative imaging predictors (x-axis) while averaging other predictors. Associations between pretreatment values of the most informative predictors and expected symptom changes are shown for (a) HDRS-6 (top row) and core mood and anhedonia (middle row) symptoms. The bottom row illustrates the location of the right posterior insula area 2 (PoI2), right anterior cingulate/medial prefrontal cortex (BA 10r), and right superior longitudinal fasciculus (SLF). Figure (b) illustrates the same for the rumination response scale: reflection associations with the posterior cingulate (v23ab subdivision), superior parietal cortex (7PL subdivision), and the granular insular cortex.