| Literature DB >> 35578269 |
Devine Jackson1, Joshua Walum1, Priyanka Banerjee2, Brandon W Lewis1, Y S Prakash3,4, Venkatachalem Sathish2, Zhaohui Xu5,6, Rodney D Britt7,8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Corticosteroids remain a key therapy for treating children with asthma. Patients with severe asthma are insensitive, resistant, or refractory to corticosteroids and have poorly controlled symptoms that involve airway inflammation, airflow obstruction, and frequent exacerbations. While the pathways that mediate corticosteroid insensitivity in asthma remain poorly defined, recent studies suggest that enhanced Th1 pathways, mediated by TNFα and IFNγ, may play a role. We previously reported that the combined effects of TNFα and IFNγ promote corticosteroid insensitivity in developing human airway smooth muscle (ASM).Entities:
Keywords: Airway smooth muscle; Corticosteroids; IFNγ; TNFα
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35578269 PMCID: PMC9109364 DOI: 10.1186/s12931-022-02046-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Respir Res ISSN: 1465-9921
Fig. 1TNFα/IFNγ augments chemokine secretion that is insensitive to corticosteroids. A Cells were treated for 3, 6, 12, or 24 h. CCL5 and CXCL10 secretion are further increased by TNFα/IFNγ. B In contrast to TNFα or IFNγ alone, TNFα/IFNγ-induced CCL5 and CXCL10 secretion are insensitive to fluticasone propionate (FP) treatment. C JAK inhibition significantly reduces CCL5 and CXCL10 secretion. Data are presented as means ± SE, n = 3–5 individual ASM samples. *p < 0.05, significant difference from control; #p < 0.05, significant difference from TNFα alone; $p < 0.05, significant effect of FP or JAK inhibitor I
Fig. 2Principal Component Analysis of RNA-seq data. A The Eigencor plot shows effect of age, gender, fluticasone propionate (FP) and cytokine treatment on principal components. Significant effects were observed cytokine treatment (PC1), gender and age (PC2), and FP treatment (PC3). The scale bar represents Eigenvalues (− 1 to 1, with 0 having no correlation). adjusted p value < 0.05, ***indicates significant effect. B Percentage of variation for each principal component is shown in the Scree plot. C Principal Component Analysis plot for PC1 vs PC2, which together account for ~ 70% variation, is plotted
Fig. 3Differential gene expression and pathway analysis in response to fluticasone propionate (FP) alone. A Volcano plot for differentially expressed genes in FP vs. control. The total number of significantly up-regulated and down-regulated genes are stated. Volcano plots are represented by plotting -log10 (adjusted p value) and log2 fold change B Top 10 KEGG and Reactome terms. Enrichment is represented by plotting -log10 (adjusted p value)
Gene expression of notable corticosteroid sensitive genes
| Gene symbol | Gene Name | FP | TNFα | FP + TNFα | IFNγ | FP + IFNγ | TNFα/IFNγ | FP + TNFα/IFNγ | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Log2 Fold Change | FDR | Log2 Fold Change | FDR | Log2 Fold Change | FDR | Log2 Fold Change | FDR | Log2 Fold Change | FDR | Log2 Fold Change | FDR | Log2 Fold Change | FDR | ||
| ALDH1L1 | aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 family member L1 | 8.76 | 0.0000 | -1.53 | 0.6620 | 2.02 | 0.2446 | 2.35 | 0.3112 | 7.14 | 0.0000 | − 3.74 | 0.2402 | 1.20 | 0.4478 |
| ALOX15B | arachidonate 15-lipoxygenase type B | 8.55 | 0.0000 | 1.89 | 0.4977 | 8.02 | 0.0016 | 3.82 | 0.1974 | 7.37 | 0.0001 | 7.31 | 0.0006 | 11.37 | 0.0000 |
| FKBP5 | FKBP prolyl isomerase 5 | 5.70 | 0.0002 | 0.004 | 0.9944 | 4.73 | 0.0014 | 2.52 | 0.0387 | 6.23 | 0.0001 | 2.12 | 0.0020 | 3.65 | 0.0000 |
| IL6 | interleukin 6 | − 2.54 | 0.0042 | 6.39 | 0.0007 | 4.02 | 0.0062 | 1.84 | 0.0573 | − 1.46 | 0.0314 | 4.67 | 0.0006 | 1.69 | 0.0752 |
| KLF15 | Kruppel like factor 15 | 3.76 | 0.0017 | − 1.43 | 0.0165 | 2.17 | 0.045 | − 0.40 | 0.5341 | 2.58 | 0.0014 | − 3.96 | 0.0021 | − 3.96 | 0.0021 |
| MMP1 | matrix metallopeptidase 1 | − 4.06 | 0.0002 | 3.58 | 0.0185 | − 2.46 | 0.0148 | − 0.29 | 0.7233 | − 2.87 | 0.0003 | 4.24 | 0.0000 | − 0.63 | 0.3018 |
| PER1 | period circadian regulator 1 | 2.83 | 0.0002 | 0.76 | 0.0689 | 2.49 | 0.0075 | 0.25 | 0.3944 | 2.46 | 0.0006 | 0.8007 | 0.0308 | 2.65 | 0.0005 |
| PTGS2 | prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase 2 | − 2.73 | 0.0285 | 3.19 | 0.0025 | − 1.50 | 0.2433 | 1.78 | 0.0004 | -0.52 | 0.4137 | 5.22 | 0.0002 | 1.92 | 0.0044 |
| TNFSF15 | TNF superfamily member 15 | − 2.90 | 0.0036 | 5.19 | 0.0149 | 1.39 | 0.290 | 0.25 | 0.8182 | -2.20 | 0.1297 | 5.56 | 0.0008 | 2.3002 | 0.0327 |
| ZBTB16 | zinc finger and BTB domain containing 16 | 9.80 | 0.0002 | − 0.68 | 0.6542 | 9.54 | 0.0032 | 2.29 | 0.5185 | 9.39 | 0.0000 | 0.04 | 0.9606 | 9.01 | 0.0002 |
Fig. 4Differential gene expression and pathway analysis in response to TNFα and fluticasone propionate (FP). Volcano plots for differentially expressed genes in A TNFα vs. control, B FP + TNFα vs. control, and C FP + TNFα vs. TNFα are displayed. Volcano plots are represented by plotting -log10 (adjusted p value) and log2 fold change. The total number of significantly up-regulated and down-regulated genes are stated. Top 10 D KEGG and Reactome terms and E enriched transcription factor motifs. Enrichment is represented by plotting -log10 (adjusted p value)
Fig. 5Differential gene expression and pathway analysis in response to IFNγ and fluticasone propionate (FP). Volcano plots for differentially expressed genes in A IFNγ vs. control, B FP + IFNγ vs. control, and C FP + IFNγ vs. IFNγ are displayed. The total number of significantly up-regulated and down-regulated genes are stated. Volcano plots are represented by plotting -log10 (adjusted p value) and log2 fold change. Top 10 D KEGG and Reactome terms and E enriched transcription factor motifs. Enrichment is represented by plotting -log10 (adjusted p value)
Fig. 6Differential gene expression and pathway analysis in response to TNFα/IFNγ and fluticasone propionate (FP). Volcano plot for differentially expressed genes in A TNFα/IFNγ vs. control, B TNFα/IFNγ vs. TNFα, C TNFα/IFNγ vs. IFNγ, D FP + TNFα/IFNγ vs. control, E FP + TNFα/IFNγ vs. TNFα/IFNγ are displayed. The total number of significantly up-regulated and down-regulated genes are stated. Volcano plots are represented by plotting -log10 (adjusted p value) and log2 fold change. Top 10 F KEGG and Reactome terms and G enriched transcription factor motifs. Enrichment is represented by plotting -log10 (adjusted p value)
Gene Expression of Notable Corticosteroid Insensitive Genes
| Gene symbol | Gene Name | FP | TNFα | FP + TNFα | IFNγ | FP + IFNγ | TNFα/IFNγ | FP + TNFα/IFNγ | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Log2 Fold Change | FDR | Log2 Fold Change | FDR | Log2 Fold Change | FDR | Log2 Fold Change | FDR | Log2 Fold Change | FDR | Log2 Fold Change | FDR | Log2 Fold Change | FDR | ||
| CCL5 | C–C motif chemokine ligand 5 | − 1.01 | 0.5441 | 9.41 | 0.0003 | 4.0 | 0.0056 | 2.25 | 0.0484 | 0.54 | 0.5766 | 13.41 | 0.0000 | 11.86 | 0.0001 |
| CCL8 | C–C motif chemokine ligand 8 | − 3.04 | 0.3309 | 2.97 | 0.0495 | 1.24 | 0.4297 | 6.40 | 0.0002 | 5.16 | 0.0006 | 11.68 | 0.0000 | 10.04 | 0.0000 |
| CD38 | CD38 molecule | 0.32 | 0.835 | 5.37 | 0.0013 | 3.93 | 0.0100 | 5.91 | 0.0000 | 5.09 | 0.0002 | 10.92 | 0.0001 | 10.95 | 0.0001 |
| CXCL10 | C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 10 | − 0.14 | 0.9090 | 6.63 | 0.0005 | 2.95 | 0.0243 | 5.74 | 0.0004 | 4.23 | 0.0126 | 13.69 | 0.0000 | 13.5 | 0.0000 |
| CXCL11 | C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 11 | − 0.23 | 0.8111 | 5.61 | 0.0007 | 2.23 | 0.1134 | 5.79 | 0.0003 | 6.84 | 0.0000 | 13.33 | 0.0000 | 13.351 | 0.0000 |
| CXCL9 | C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 9 | 0.03 | 0.9683 | 2.10 | 0.0292 | 1.34 | 0.3096 | 5.34 | 0.0028 | 5.65 | 0.0011 | 13.77 | 0.0000 | 5.65 | 0.0000 |
| IRF8 | interferon regulatory factor 8 | − 0.08 | 0.9876 | 1.63 | 0.3988 | 3.85 | 0.0466 | 6.05 | 0.0011 | 6.18 | 0.0007 | 10.77 | 0.0000 | 10.16 | 0.0001 |
| ISG15 | ISG15 ubiquitin like modifier | − 0.99 | 0.2039 | 3.94 | 0.0020 | 0.84 | 0.4926 | 3.64 | 0.0003 | 3.70 | 0.0025 | 5.69 | 0.0003 | 5.36 | 0.0011 |
| Orai1 | ORAI calcium release-activated calcium modulator 1 | − 0.13 | 0.6608 | 0.97 | 0.0660 | 0.61 | 0.0508 | 0.14 | 0.5912 | -0.14 | 0.6397 | 2.47 | 0.0004 | 1.92 | 0.0008 |
| VCAM1 | vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 | −3.56 | 0.0015 | 6.31 | 0.0011 | 3.38 | 0.0374 | 2.56 | 0.0000 | 0.95 | 0.0114 | 8.22 | 0.0003 | 7.55 | 0.0006 |
Fig. 7Co-expression analysis using CEMiTool. A Gene set enrichment analysis identified two modules, M1 and M4, that were found to be significant. Module activity for each treatment group is indicated by the dot size and color. The scale bar represents normalize enrichment score (NES). B Profile plots for M1 and M4. The black line represents mean gene expression within the module amongst each treatment group
Fig. 8Gene enrichment analysis and interaction networks. A Over representation analysis identified pathways that are significantly enriched in modules 1 and 4. Notable pathways include IFN responses (M1) and TNFα and NFκB signaling in M4. Enrichment for each pathway is represented in the scale bar and plotted as -log10 (adjusted p value). B Gene networks for M1 and M4 are shown as connected gene hubs. Network connectivity and interactions are identified by node size and color intensity. Gene co-expression and interactions for each network hub are differentiated by color
Functional annotation for top interaction networks
| Module | Co-expression Network Hub Gene | Number of Interactions | Number of Annotation Clusters | Top Functional Annotation Clusters within Co-expression Network |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| M1 | CIT, Citron Rho-Interacting Serine/Threonine Kinase | 1350 | 54 | rRNA Processing, mRNA splicing, RNA binding, ATP binding, viral nucleoprotein |
| LGALS9, Galectin | 444 | 43 | viral transcription, Cell–cell adhesion, nucleotide binding, protein folding, endoplasmic reticulum, mitochondrion, ER-Golgi transport | |
| VCAM1, Vascular Cell Adhesion Molecule 1 | 412 | 29 | cell–cell adhesion, RNA-binding, protein folding, actin binding | |
| ISG15, ISG15 Ubiquitin-like Modifier | 164 | 19 | cadherin binding, ATP-binding, glycolytic process, actin binding, MHC class II protein complex binding | |
| SOCS1, Suppressor of Cytokine Signaling 1 | 86 | 24 | ATP binding, MAPK cascade, tyrosine-protein kinase, JAK/Stat signaling pathway | |
| M4 | HCK, HCK Proto-Oncogene, Src Family Tyrosine Kinase | 67 | 14 | ATP binding, PI3K-Akt signaling, unfolded protein response, protein tyrosine kinase activity |
| TNFAIP3, TNF Alpha Induced Protein 3 | 50 | 17 | NFκB signaling, toll like receptor signaling, ubiquitin-protein transferase activity, CD40 receptor complex, TNF signaling | |
| BDKRB1, Bradykinin Receptor 1 | 30 | 2 | Membrane, endoplasmic reticulum | |
| MYH11, Myosin Heavy Chain 11 | 19 | 5 | cytoskeleton, motor protein, myosin, cell division | |
| CCL5, C–C Motif Chemokine Ligand 5 | 15 | 3 | chemokine activity, leukocyte chemotaxis |