| Literature DB >> 35577928 |
Takahiro Ishikawa1,2, Ikuko Sakai3, Ayumi Amemiya3, Ryou Komatsu3, Shoko Sakuraba3, Shiroh Isono4.
Abstract
Utilizing automatic daily body weight (BW) measurements may be helpful for assessing nutritional status and detecting underlying diseases particularly in older people who require nursing care. This preliminary study aimed to verify effectiveness of eating assistance for maintaining BW in older people using a contact-free load cells under the bed (Bed Sensor System: BSS). BW was measured every night for 3 months in eight nursing home older people with severe cognitive and physical dysfunctions. Body composition of the subject's trunk and each limb was measured using a segmented multi-frequency bioelectrical impedance analyzer (BIA). A monthly BW loss was estimated as a slope of linear regression of the daily BW plot. BSS successfully measured daily BW for the study period in all participants. The 4 residents with eating assistance gained slightly more weight, while the 4 residents without eating assistance lost weight. There was a significant difference between the two groups in the monthly BW change (- 0.79 ± 0.51 kg/month versus 0.20 ± 0.49 kg/month, P = 0.030). None of the BIA-derived parameters was associated with the monthly BW change. BSS revealed effectiveness of eating assistance to maintain BW in nursing home residents with severe cognitive and physical dysfunctions.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35577928 PMCID: PMC9110330 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-12291-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.996
Participants’ background variables and results of body composition analysis.
| Subject | Age (years) | Gender | Levels of care need | Need for eating assistance | Physical disability for daily life | Severity of dementia | Height (cm) | Body weight at admission (kg) | Body Mass Index (kg/m2) | Skeletal Muscle Index (kg/m2) | Body fat (%) | Basal metabolic rate (kcal/day) | Calorie intake (kcal/day) | Calorie intake (kcal/standard weight) | Calorie intake/basal metabolic rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | 79 | Female | 4 | No | Moderate | Moderate | 145.2 | 42.1 | 20.0 | 8.04 | 22.6 | 1087 | 1500 | 32.3 | 1.38 |
| S2 | 86 | Female | 4 | No | Mild | Moderate | 145.5 | 37.4 | 17.7 | 7.56 | 11.8 | 1078 | 1400 | 30.1 | 1.30 |
| S3 | 84 | Female | 4 | No | Mild | Moderate | 144.6 | 50.6 | 24.2 | 7.19 | 40.3 | 1018 | 1500 | 32.6 | 1.47 |
| S4 | 88 | Female | 5 | No | Moderate | Moderate | 155.8 | 44.7 | 18.4 | 7.95 | 17.3 | 1183 | 1500 | 28.1 | 1.27 |
| S group | 84 ± 4 | 148 ± 5 | 43.7 ± 5.5 | 20.2 ± 2.9 | 7.68 ± 0.39 | 23.0 ± 12.3 | 1092 ± 68 | 1475 ± 50 | 31.0 ± 2.1 | 1.36 ± 0.09 | |||||
| A1 | 97 | Female | 5 | Yes | Moderate | Severe | 140.0 | 47.1 | 24.0 | 7.86 | 37.9 | 1038 | 1100 | 25.5 | 1.06 |
| A2 | 95 | Female | 4 | Yes | Moderate | Moderate | 140.8 | 35.8 | 18.1 | 7.16 | 24.2 | 1013 | 1400 | 32.1 | 1.38 |
| A3 | 87 | Female | 5 | Yes | Moderate | Severe | 147.3 | 41.3 | 19.0 | 6.71 | 26.1 | 1012 | 1200 | 25.1 | 1.19 |
| A4 | 80 | Male | 5 | Yes (PEG) | Severe | Mild | 171.2 | 59.2 | 20.2 | 6.02 | 40.1 | 1118 | 1300 | 20.2 | 1.16 |
| A group | 90 ± 8 | 150 ± 15 | 45.9 ± 10.0 | 20.3 ± 2.6 | 6.94 ± 0.77 | 32.1 ± 8.1 | 1045 ± 50 | 1250 ± 129 | 25.7 ± 4.8 | 1.20 ± 0.13 | |||||
| P value | 0.253 | 1.00 | 0.207 | 0.698 | 0.720 | 0.900 | 0.159 | 0.342 | 0.045 | 0.078 | 0.123 | 0.190 |
Figure 1Comparison of monthly weight change between nursing home residents with (A-group) and without (S-group) eating assistance.