Literature DB >> 35577684

Adverse events after BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccination in health care workers and medical students in Japan.

Takahiro Namiki1, Shihoko Komine-Aizawa2, Kazuhide Takada3, Chika Takano3, Quang Duy Trinh3, Satoshi Hayakawa3.   

Abstract

To control the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the promotion of vaccination is important. However, adverse reactions following vaccination remain a concern. To investigate adverse events in the vaccinated Japanese population, we conducted a survey-based study among health care workers, including medical doctors and nurses; other medical staff; and medical university faculty, staff, and students in a single medical school and affiliated hospital in Japan. In addition, we analyzed the association of different adverse events with individual factors (e.g., age, sex) by performing network analysis. While young age and female sex are often considered risk factors for more severe adverse events, the regression models showed neither age nor sex was associated with local injection-site reactions after the second dose in this study. In contrast to local reactions, systemic adverse events were associated with young age and female sex. However, myalgia was unique in that it was not associated with younger age even though the network analysis showed that myalgia was consistently related to arthralgia and belonged to the group of systemic events after both the first and second vaccine doses. Further study is needed to ensure safe and effective vaccination to aid in controlling the COVID-19 pandemic.
Copyright © 2022 Japanese Society of Chemotherapy and The Japanese Association for Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adverse event; COVID-19; Vaccination; mRNA vaccine

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35577684      PMCID: PMC9091261          DOI: 10.1016/j.jiac.2022.05.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Infect Chemother        ISSN: 1341-321X            Impact factor:   2.065


Note

Vaccination is one of the most critical methods to control outbreaks of infectious diseases. Several effective vaccines for COVID-19 have been developed, some of which have an efficacy of as much as 95%, and many countries have implemented vaccination programs [1]. However, various adverse reactions might occur following vaccination [[2], [3], [4]], and these vaccine-associated adverse reactions can cause vaccine hesitancy [5,6]. Therefore, to investigate adverse events in the vaccinated Japanese population, we conducted a survey-based study in a single medical school and affiliated hospital in Japan. We conducted a cross-sectional survey using Google Forms from June 9 to June 21, 2021. The survey subjects were medical students, faculty members, and staff at Nihon University School of Medicine; nursing students and teachers at Nihon University Nursing School; pharmacy students and faculty members at Nihon University School of Pharmacy; and hospital staff of Nihon University Itabashi hospital and Nihon University Hospital. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Nihon University School of Medicine (Approval number: P21-06-0). All procedures were performed in accordance with the guidelines of our institutional ethics committee and adhered to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. To examine which individual characteristics were associated with a specific adverse event, generalized linear models with logistic regression were constructed using R version 4.1.0 [7]. Age was analyzed as a continuous numerical variable, and the odds ratio (OR) of age represented a positive correlation if the OR>1, no correlation if the OR = 1, and a negative correlation if the OR<1. The OR for sex was obtained by comparison of females to males. All regression models were evaluated by the Hosmer–Lemeshow test. A p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant for all analyses. We performed a network analysis to analyze in detail the relationship between each individual adverse event. For building networks, generalization of the Ising model presented with the IsingFit package of R [8] was used. This model is a binary equivalent of Gaussian approximation methods that applies to only two-state data; interactions are considered pairwise, and the data need to be cross-sectional [[8], [9], [10]]. Overall, we obtained 1756 responses, after the exclusion of people who did not consent and inconsistent vaccination status reports; 1711 of these responses were deemed appropriate for the analysis. Eighteen (1.1%) responders had never been vaccinated with BNT162b2, 1687 (98.5%) were vaccinated at least once and 1656 (96.8%) were vaccinated twice. The basic characteristics of the responders is given in Table 1 .
Table 1

Characteristics of BNT162b2-vaccinated responders (n = 1687).

Characteristics
Age in year
 1 Mean33.1
 2 Range18–74
 3 SE13.7
Sex (%)
 Male825 (48.9)
 Female856 (50.7)
 Other3 (0.2)
Occupation (%)
 1 Doctor325 (19.3)
 2 Nurse73 (4.3)
 3 Student823 (48.8)
 4 Other454 (26.9)
Use of regular medication382 (22.6)
Underlining/past medical disorders (%)
 Any kind of allergy341(20.2)
 Allergic reaction to previous vaccine(s)34 (2.0)
 Diabetes mellitus9 (0.5)
 Hypertension10 (0.6)
 Cardiovascular disorder17 (1.0)
 Cerebrovascular accident2 (0.1)
 Immune-mediated inflammatory disease23 (1.4)
 Malignancy22 (1.3)
 Asthma39 (2.3)
 Atopic dermatitis7 (0.4)
 Nonmalignant obstetrical and/or gynecological disorder23 (1.4)
 Nonasthmatic respiratory disorder23 (1.4)
 Gastrointestinal disorder28 (1.7)
 Hepatobiliary and/or pancreatic disorder13 (0.8)
 Urological disorder2 (0.1)
Characteristics of BNT162b2-vaccinated responders (n = 1687). The basic data are shown in Fig. 1 . A total of 90.8% (n = 1531) and 86.7% (n = 1436) of participants experienced local and/or systemic adverse events after the first and second doses, respectively. The regression models showed that the total adverse events after the first dose were associated with female sex (OR = 1.93, p = 1.37 × 10-6) (Table 2 ). The total adverse events after the second dose of BNT162b2 were associated positively with female sex (OR = 2.19; p = 6.05 × 10-6) and negatively with age (OR = 0.98, p = 3.25 × 10-3) (Table 2). The most common local reaction was pain at the site of vaccine administration (post-first dose, 82.5%; post-second dose, 77.5%) (Fig. 1). Female sex was associated with local adverse events, such as pain, redness, itching, and swelling after the first dose of the vaccine (Table 2). However, the associations disappeared after the second dose (Table 2). Local adverse events were most frequent between 12 and 24 h after vaccination (data not shown).
Fig. 1

The networks after the first and second doses of BNT162b2. Each circle (node) represents an adverse event. The number given near a circle represents the count of observed events, and within the parenthesis is its fraction in the total count of vaccinated persons for each dose. In networks of events after the first dose (A) and after the second dose (B), there were 3 common clusters of adverse events: (1) fatigue, headache, fever, myalgia, chills and arthralgia; (2) local swelling, local redness and local itching; and (3) abdominal pain and diarrhea. For the other events, there were inconsistencies among community distributions between the two networks, possibly due to the lack of observations, and there was also low strength of the nodes in the two networks (C). Ab; abdominal pain, Ar; arthralgia, Ch; chills, Di; diarrhea, Fa; fatigue, Fe; fever, Fl; facial flushing, He; headache, It; local itching, Ly; lymphadenopathy, My; myalgia, Na; nausea/vomiting, Pa; local pain, Ph; pharyngeal pain/irritation, Re; local redness, Sw; local swelling.

Table 2

The association age and sex and to adverse events after the first and the second dose of BNT162b2.

VariablesOR95%CIVIFZ-valueP-value
Total eventsFirstAge0.990.98–1.001.02−1.350.177
Sex (female) §1.931.48–2.521.024.831.37 × 10−6 *
SecondAge0.980.97–0.991.05−2.9433.25 × 10−3 *
Sex (female) §2.191.57–3.091.024.536.05 × 10−6 *
Local painFirstAge1.000.99–1.011.02−0.640.52
Sex (female) §1.591.22–2.071.013.46.50 × 10−4 *
SecondAge0.980.97–1.001.17−2.765.85 × 10−3 *
Sex (female) §1.190.88–1.601.071.120.26
Local rednessFirstAge0.990.08–0.211.05−1.915.64 × 10−2
Sex (female) §1.470.97–1.001.012.252.46 × 10−2 *
SecondAge0.990.97–1.011.03−1.150.25
Sex (female) §1.270.77–2.051.060.970.33
ItchFirstAge0.980.96–1.001.01−1.550.12
Sex (female) §2.681.55–4.841.013.416.44 × 10−4 *
Secondage0.990.95–1.032.79−0.560.57
Sex (female) §0.970.49–1.911.19−8.30 × 10−20.903
Local swellingFirstAge0.980.96–1.002.73−2.561.04 × 10−2 *
Sex (female) §1.791.39–2.311.114.468.04 × 10−6 *
SecondAge0.980.96–1.012.66−1.400.16
Sex (female) §1.020.70–1.501.150.120.90
FatigueFirstAge0.970.96–0.992.85−3.231.25 × 10−3 *
Sex (female) §1.821.39–2.401.154.301.71 × 10−5 *
SecondAge0.970.96–0.982.93−4.371.25 × 10−5 *
Sex (female) §1.521.20–1.911.163.524.35 × 10−4 *
HeadacheFirstAge0.950.93–0.982.69−3.781.54 × 10−4 *
Sex (female) §1.841.26–2.701.133.131.77 × 10−3 *
SecondAge0.960.95–0.982.79−4.881.09 × 10−6 *
Sex (female) §2.051.60–2.631.175.631.76 × 10−8 *
MyalgiaFirstAge1.041.00–1.084.552.113.50 × 10−2 *
Sex (female) §2.261.28–4.141.122.756.05 × 10−3 *
SecondAge1.000.98–1.022.92−0.190.85
Sex (female) §1.750.02–0.171.192.775.67 × 10−3*
ChillFirstAge0.920.88–0.9602.30−3.781.55 × 10−4 *
Sex (female) §1.610.85–3.151.131.450.15
SecondAge0.980.98–1.821.07−3.682.37 × 10−4 *
Sex (female) §1.431.10–1.871.052.628.85 × 10−3 *
FeverFirstAge0.950.92–0.962.78−3.682.32 × 10−4 *
Sex (female) §1.380.94–2.031.111.6459.95 × 10−2
SecondAge0.980.97–0.992.71−2.943.26 × 10−3 *
Sex (female) §1.721.37–2.161.164.653.34 × 10−6 *
ArthralgiaFirstAge0.990.96–1.011.01−1.230.22
Sex (female) §1.710.94–3.221.011.738.33 × 10−2
SecondAge0.970.96–0.992.82−2.648.24 × 10−3 *
Sex (female) §2.151.57–2.971.184.712.48 × 10−6 *
Nausea/vomitFirstAge0.990.94–1.042.36−0.540.59
Sex (female) §4.231.50–13.831.282.599.62 × 10−3 *
SecondAge0.950.92–0.971.28−3.672.46 × 10−4 *
Sex (female) §1.901.03–3.631.102.004.53 × 10−2 *
DiarrheaFirstAge0.990.96–1.021.08−0.700.49
Sex (female) §3.491.37–10.741.042.431.51 × 10−2 *
SecondAge0.950.90–1.003.01−1.905.79 × 10−2
Sex (female) §1.670.82–3.481.191.400.16
Abdominal painFirstAge0.930.83–1.032.38−1.240.22
Sex (female) §3.100.90–14.411.091.659.85 × 10−2
SecondAge0.910.85–0.963.10−2.913.57 × 10−3 *
Sex (female) §3.301.43–8.611.192.648.33 × 10−3 *
LymphadenopathyFirstAge0.970.91–1.021.10−1.102.716E-01
Sex (female) §2.490.64–13.221.131.2220.22
SecondAge0.990.96–1.011.10−0.950.34
Sex (female) §2.251.15–4.641.052.302.15 × 10−2 *
Facial flushFirstAge1.020.96–1.083.810.630.53
Sex (female) §2.280.85–6.851.121.580.11
SecondAge0.980.93–1.023.01−1.060.29
Sex (female) §1.590.77–3.391.171.230.22

CI; confidence interval, OR; odds ratio, VIF; variance inflation factor. § sex was comparison of female to male, * statistical significance.

The networks after the first and second doses of BNT162b2. Each circle (node) represents an adverse event. The number given near a circle represents the count of observed events, and within the parenthesis is its fraction in the total count of vaccinated persons for each dose. In networks of events after the first dose (A) and after the second dose (B), there were 3 common clusters of adverse events: (1) fatigue, headache, fever, myalgia, chills and arthralgia; (2) local swelling, local redness and local itching; and (3) abdominal pain and diarrhea. For the other events, there were inconsistencies among community distributions between the two networks, possibly due to the lack of observations, and there was also low strength of the nodes in the two networks (C). Ab; abdominal pain, Ar; arthralgia, Ch; chills, Di; diarrhea, Fa; fatigue, Fe; fever, Fl; facial flushing, He; headache, It; local itching, Ly; lymphadenopathy, My; myalgia, Na; nausea/vomiting, Pa; local pain, Ph; pharyngeal pain/irritation, Re; local redness, Sw; local swelling. The association age and sex and to adverse events after the first and the second dose of BNT162b2. CI; confidence interval, OR; odds ratio, VIF; variance inflation factor. § sex was comparison of female to male, * statistical significance. Similar to the results of previous reports, BNT162b2 vaccination was associated with various systemic events in our study (Fig. 1). Although local adverse events slightly decreased from 83.9% to 79.3% after the second dose, the incidence of systemic adverse events increased from 30.0% to 72.2% (Fig. 1). The most frequent systemic events were fatigue, fever, and headache. The frequency of these events increased after the second dose of the vaccine, from 19.6% to 53.6%, 8.6% to 48.8%, and 9.2% to 33.6%, respectively. The average self-reported maximum fever temperature was 37.7 °C (SD = 0.6) after the first dose and 38.2 °C (SD = 0.7) after the second dose. Regression analysis revealed that younger age was associated with fatigue, headache, fever, chills, arthralgia, nausea/vomiting, and abdominal pain after the second dose (Table 2). Female sex increased the odds for several events, such as fatigue, headache, fever, chills, arthralgia, nausea/vomiting, abdominal pain, myalgia, and lymphadenopathy. Extra-injection site adverse events appeared as early as an hour after vaccination and were the most frequent 12–24 h after vaccination (data not shown). Interestingly, myalgia was unique in that it was not associated with younger age even though the network analysis showed that myalgia was consistently related to arthralgia and belonged to the group of systemic events after both the first and second vaccine doses. One of the most serious adverse events was an anaphylactic reaction. In the present study, 5 (0.3%) and 1 (0.0%) participants reportedly had anaphylactic reactions after the first and second doses of the vaccine, respectively. There were 3 common groups of adverse events: (1) fatigue, headache, fever, myalgia, chills and arthralgia (systemic event group); (2) local swelling, local redness and local itching (local event group); and (3) abdominal pain and diarrhea (gastrointestinal event group) (Fig. 1). Other adverse events changed groups between the first and the second networks. The strongest connection was seen between abdominal pain and diarrhea in both networks, and the connections between fatigue and headache, between arthralgia and myalgia, and between chills and fever were consistently strong in both networks. There was no significant difference in the overall strengths and structures of the two networks (p = 0.075 and 0.86 respectively). In this study, we investigated adverse events associated with the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine among staff and students affiliated with a single medical institute in Japan. We also investigated the relationship between the adverse events after the first and second vaccinations. Previous reports showed that adverse events after vaccination were stronger in females than in males and in younger persons than in older persons [2,4]. Our results were generally consistent with these reports; however, local events after the second dose were mostly unrelated to age and sex. This was also shown clearly in the post-second dose network analysis, in which these local events formed a distinct community. Interestingly, although the network analysis revealed that myalgia belonged to the systemic event community and had a strong correlation with arthralgia after both the first and the second doses, it was not associated with younger age. In fact, myalgia after the first dose was positively correlated with age. This could be related to the fact that the vaccine was delivered directly into the muscle tissue. Direct exposure to mRNA and tissue damage caused by needle insertion might have contributed to a different reaction pattern that was not influenced by age. In addition, vaccination via intramuscular injection has not been popular in Japan. Furthermore, local reactions might be affected by anatomical sites or procedures [11]; thus, the frequency and strength of local reactions could be investigated in multicenter studies. The network analysis revealed that the symptoms of each adverse reaction were divided into three major groups, such as local, systemic and gastrointestinal event groups. In particular, abdominal pain and diarrhea formed a separate group after both the first and second doses. After the second dose, facial flushing, pharyngeal pain/irritation and nausea/vomiting were included in this group. The change in groups between the first and second doses could be attributable to the lack of observation, as shown by the low strength value for these events after the first dose. In this study, the frequency of fever increased after the second dose of the vaccine, from 8.6% to 48.8%. The frequency of fever in Japan seems higher than in overseas reports [4,12]. While most overseas surveys define fever as 38 °C or higher, we based our data on participants' self-reports. In Japan, some people consider a body temperature of 37 °C or higher or an increase in body temperature above one's normal temperature to be a fever. Therefore, the rate of fever in Japan may have been higher than in overseas data. Since normal body temperature differs from person to person, we considered that surveying subjective symptoms rather than body temperature would better reflect the severity of adverse reactions. Moreover, fever is also an early symptom of COVID-19, thus the participants might be nervous about their fever. Although the mRNA vaccine is a novel vaccine platform [13], we have already used a variety of vaccines for the control of various infectious diseases, and the adverse reactions are different for each vaccine. Therefore, we should carefully observe the inoculants or patients after vaccination. There are some limitations to our research. This study was conducted in a limited number of people in a single institution. Importantly, those who did not experience any events or who experienced mild events after vaccination(s) may have been less likely to answer the questionnaire; therefore, the frequency and severity of events could have been overestimated. However, the frequency of major events observed in our study was not significantly divergent from those in previous reports, and these forms of biases were unlikely to be significant enough to invalidate our results. In conclusion, vaccination with the BNT162b2 vaccine was associated with various adverse events, as reported previously [2,3]. Reporting and analysis of COVID-19 vaccine data by sex or gender are still lacking [14]. Further study is needed to delineate the causative relationship between observed events and vaccination to improve the management of adverse events and the social acceptance of the COVID-19 vaccine during the current pandemic.

Author contribution statement

Conceptualization, Takahiro Namiki, Shihoko Komine-Aizawa, Kazuhide Takada, Chika Takano, Quang Duy Trinh, and Satoshi Hayakawa; Data curation, Takahiro Namiki, Shihoko Komine-Aizawa, and Kazuhide Takada; Formal analysis, Takahiro Namiki; Investigation, Takahiro Namiki, Shihoko Komine-Aizawa, and Kazuhide Takada; Methodology, Takahiro Namiki, Shihoko Komine-Aizawa; Project administration, Shihoko Komine-Aizawa; Supervision, Satoshi Hayakawa; Visualization, Takahiro Namiki, Shihoko Komine-Aizawa, and Kazuhide Takada, Writing—original draft, Takahiro Namiki, Shihoko Komine-Aizawa; Writing—review & editing, Kazuhide Takada, Chika Takano, Quang Duy Trinh, and Satoshi Hayakawa.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
  12 in total

1.  A new method for constructing networks from binary data.

Authors:  Claudia D van Borkulo; Denny Borsboom; Sacha Epskamp; Tessa F Blanken; Lynn Boschloo; Robert A Schoevers; Lourens J Waldorp
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 2.  mRNA vaccines - a new era in vaccinology.

Authors:  Norbert Pardi; Michael J Hogan; Frederick W Porter; Drew Weissman
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 84.694

3.  Network Analysis of the Multidimensional Symptom Experience of Oncology.

Authors:  Nikolaos Papachristou; Payam Barnaghi; Bruce Cooper; Kord M Kober; Roma Maguire; Steven M Paul; Marilyn Hammer; Fay Wright; Jo Armes; Eileen P Furlong; Lisa McCann; Yvette P Conley; Elisabeth Patiraki; Stylianos Katsaragakis; Jon D Levine; Christine Miaskowski
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-02-19       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  COVID-19 vaccines: comparison of biological, pharmacological characteristics and adverse effects of Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna Vaccines.

Authors:  S A Meo; I A Bukhari; J Akram; A S Meo; D C Klonoff
Journal:  Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 3.507

5.  Establishing a new appropriate intramuscular injection site in the deltoid muscle.

Authors:  Yukari Nakajima; Kanae Mukai; Kana Takaoka; Toshiko Hirose; Keiko Morishita; Takuya Yamamoto; Yuka Yoshida; Tamae Urai; Toshio Nakatani
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine.

Authors:  Fernando P Polack; Stephen J Thomas; Nicholas Kitchin; Judith Absalon; Alejandra Gurtman; Stephen Lockhart; John L Perez; Gonzalo Pérez Marc; Edson D Moreira; Cristiano Zerbini; Ruth Bailey; Kena A Swanson; Satrajit Roychoudhury; Kenneth Koury; Ping Li; Warren V Kalina; David Cooper; Robert W Frenck; Laura L Hammitt; Özlem Türeci; Haylene Nell; Axel Schaefer; Serhat Ünal; Dina B Tresnan; Susan Mather; Philip R Dormitzer; Uğur Şahin; Kathrin U Jansen; William C Gruber
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-12-10       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Impact of age, sex and medical history on adverse reactions to the first and second dose of BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in Japan: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Ryuta Urakawa; Emiko Tanaka Isomura; Kazuhide Matsunaga; Kazumi Kubota; Miho Ike
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 3.090

8.  Vaccine side-effects and SARS-CoV-2 infection after vaccination in users of the COVID Symptom Study app in the UK: a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Cristina Menni; Kerstin Klaser; Anna May; Lorenzo Polidori; Joan Capdevila; Panayiotis Louca; Carole H Sudre; Long H Nguyen; David A Drew; Jordi Merino; Christina Hu; Somesh Selvachandran; Michela Antonelli; Benjamin Murray; Liane S Canas; Erika Molteni; Mark S Graham; Marc Modat; Amit D Joshi; Massimo Mangino; Alexander Hammers; Anna L Goodman; Andrew T Chan; Jonathan Wolf; Claire J Steves; Ana M Valdes; Sebastien Ourselin; Tim D Spector
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 25.071

9.  Reasons for being unsure or unwilling regarding intention to take COVID-19 vaccine among Japanese people: A large cross-sectional national survey.

Authors:  Shuhei Nomura; Akifumi Eguchi; Daisuke Yoneoka; Takayuki Kawashima; Yuta Tanoue; Michio Murakami; Haruka Sakamoto; Keiko Maruyama-Sakurai; Stuart Gilmour; Shoi Shi; Hiroyuki Kunishima; Satoshi Kaneko; Megumi Adachi; Koki Shimada; Yoshiko Yamamoto; Hiroaki Miyata
Journal:  Lancet Reg Health West Pac       Date:  2021-07-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.