Literature DB >> 35577321

It Takes a Village: The Importance of Social Support after Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, a Qualitative Study.

Hermioni L Amonoo1, Emma C Deary2, Lauren E Harnedy3, Elizabeth P Daskalakis2, Lauren Goldschen4, Marie C Desir4, Richard A Newcomb5, Annie C Wang6, Kofi Boateng6, Ashley M Nelson7, Areej El Jawahri8.   

Abstract

Social support is essential to the recovery of patients who have undergone hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). We undertook a qualitative study to explore the specific sources and benefits of social support as experienced by HSCT recipients, as well as their unmet social support needs. We conducted semistructured interviews with 25 HSCT recipients recruited from the Dana Farber Cancer Institute's HSCT database. The interviews explored the sources of support that patients receive, the type of assistance social support networks provide to patients, and unmet needs of social support. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and coded using Dedoose software. The median age of participants was 63 years (range, 22 to 73 years), and 13 (52%) were female, 20 (80%) were white, and 9 (36%) had been diagnosed with acute myelogenous leukemia. Participants reported receiving a majority of support from immediate family and close friends, with the primary benefits of social support including help with essential daily tasks and household chores, and receipt of emotional support. Participants reported occasional support from other patients but highlighted a desire for increased connection with patients who have undergone the same treatment. Participants also communicated a desire for more guidance on how to optimize the support they do receive and the need for more educational resources for caregivers and supporters to enhance understanding of the HSCT process and lessen patient burden. Participants reported relying on support from their family, friends, and other social connections for essential aspects of their recovery and daily living following HSCT. Although there are many benefits from these relationships, patients emphasized the need for more guidance and resources to facilitate post-transplantation aid and support.
Copyright © 2022 The American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Caregivers; Distress; HSCT; Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; Psychological health; Quality of life; Social support; Social well-being; Supportive oncology

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35577321      PMCID: PMC9253072          DOI: 10.1016/j.jtct.2022.05.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplant Cell Ther        ISSN: 2666-6367


  30 in total

1.  Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups.

Authors:  Allison Tong; Peter Sainsbury; Jonathan Craig
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2007-09-14       Impact factor: 2.038

2.  Positive and negative psychosocial sequelae of bone marrow transplantation: implications for quality of life assessment.

Authors:  K Fromm; M A Andrykowski; J Hunt
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  1996-06

3.  Caregiver availability and patient access to hematopoietic cell transplantation: social worker perspectives inform practice.

Authors:  Jaime M Preussler; Lih-Wen Mau; Navneet S Majhail; Margaret Bevans; Emilie Clancy; Carolyn Messner; Leslie Parran; Kate A Pederson; Stacy Stickney Ferguson; Kent Walters; Elizabeth A Murphy; Ellen M Denzen
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2019-03-09       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Facilitated peer support in breast cancer: a pre- and post-program evaluation of women's expectations and experiences of a facilitated peer support program.

Authors:  Sinead Power; Josephine Hegarty
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  2010 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.592

5.  Effectiveness of partner social support predicts enduring psychological distress after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  Christine Rini; William H Redd; Jane Austin; Catherine E Mosher; Yeraz Markarian Meschian; Luis Isola; Eileen Scigliano; Craig H Moskowitz; Esperanza Papadopoulos; Larissa E Labay; Scott Rowley; Jack E Burkhalter; Christine Dunkel Schetter; Katherine N Duhamel
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2011-02

6.  Social support buffers the negative effects of stress in cardiac patients: a cross-sectional study with acute coronary syndrome patients.

Authors:  Simona Wiesmaierova; Dafina Petrova; Antonio Arrebola Moreno; Andrés Catena; José Antonio Ramírez Hernández; Rocio Garcia-Retamero
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2018-12-06

7.  Effect of low perceived social support on health outcomes in young patients with acute myocardial infarction: results from the VIRGO (Variation in Recovery: Role of Gender on Outcomes of Young AMI Patients) study.

Authors:  Emily M Bucholz; Kelly M Strait; Rachel P Dreyer; Mary Geda; Erica S Spatz; Hector Bueno; Judith H Lichtman; Gail D'Onofrio; John A Spertus; Harlan M Krumholz
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 5.501

8.  Loneliness and social isolation during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Tzung-Jeng Hwang; Kiran Rabheru; Carmelle Peisah; William Reichman; Manabu Ikeda
Journal:  Int Psychogeriatr       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 3.878

9.  Radiology Education in the Time of COVID-19: A Novel Distance Learning Workstation Experience for Residents.

Authors:  Casey McRoy; Lakir Patel; Durga Sivacharan Gaddam; Steven Rothenberg; Allison Herring; Jacob Hamm; Lydia Chelala; Joseph Weinstein; Elana Smith; Omer Awan
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2020-08-08       Impact factor: 3.173

10.  Stress-Buffering Role of Social Support during COVID-19.

Authors:  Erica Szkody; Melanie Stearns; Lydia Stanhope; Cliff McKinney
Journal:  Fam Process       Date:  2020-11-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.