| Literature DB >> 35576643 |
Ting Xue1, Benjamin Chiao2, Tianjiao Xu3, Han Li1, Kai Shi4, Ying Cheng4, Yuan Shi1, Xiaoli Guo5, Shanbao Tong5, Menglin Guo5, Soo Hong Chew6, Richard P Ebstein7, Donghong Cui8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There have been mixed reports on the beneficial effects of meditation in cardiovascular disease (CVD), which is widely considered the leading cause of death worldwide.Entities:
Keywords: Advanced multiple proteomics; Cardiovascular health; Heart-brain axis; Tibetan long-term meditation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35576643 PMCID: PMC9118669 DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2022.104026
Source DB: PubMed Journal: EBioMedicine ISSN: 2352-3964 Impact factor: 11.205
Figure 1Overview of sample collection of proteomics, clinical indexes and HRV measurement. (a) Recruitment of Tibetan monks and matched local Tibetans. 505 Tibetan participants including 155 monks and 350 local controls were reviewed. 81 Tibetan monks and 54 local controls agreed to give written informed consent and provide blood. These monks have meditated for a mean time of 18.54 ± 8.41 years (≥ 5 years for each monk). Local controls were non-meditative and were matched with sex, age and dietary habits. The protein quality of plasma samples was tested through SDS-PAGE. Plasma from 78 Tibetan monks and 47 local controls passed the quality control and were used for further analysis. (b) Workflow of two-stage proteomics, clinical and ECG measurement. Three sects (G: Gelug, N: Nyingma and S: Sakya) were involved. 10 Tibetan monks from each sect and 10 matched local controls (C: controls matched with Gelug monks, Z: controls matched with Nyingma and Sakya monks) were selected for DIA analysis. The remaining 75 Tibetan subjects were used for target validation using the parallel PRM technique. All Tibetan plasma samples were subjected to biochemical measurement for clinical indexes. 72 out of 78 Tibetan monks and 34 out of 47 controls were undertaken ECG detection for HRV measurement.
The demographic characteristics for the monks and controls involved in the DIA proteomics analysis.
| Gelug Monks (G, n=10) | Controls (C, n=10) | Nyingma Monks (N, n=10) | Controls | Sakya Monks (S, n=10) | Controls | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex | N | % | N | % | χ2 | N | % | N | % | χ2 | N | % | N | % | χ2 | |||
| Male | 10 | 100 | 10 | 100 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 10 | 100 | 10 | 100 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 10 | 100 | 10 | 100 | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| Mean | SD | Mean | SD | W/T | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | T | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | T | ||||
| Age(y) | 42.70 | 6.63 | 39.30 | 8.31 | T=-1.01 | 0.33 | 40.90 | 7.43 | 44.00 | 10.79 | -0.75 | 0.46 | 38.20 | 8.77 | 44.00 | 10.79 | -1.32 | 0.20 |
| Meditation (y) | 16.80 | 5.96 | 20.00 | 7.03 | 19.90 | 8.14 | ||||||||||||
| BMI | 34.17 | 4.92 | 28.83 | 4.57 | T=-2.47 | 0.03(*) | 29.79 | 5.26 | 24.42 | 3.93 | 2.42 | 0.03(*) | 26.97 | 5.26 | 24.42 | 3.93 | 1.23 | 0.23 |
| SBP (mmHg) | 131.40 | 10.54 | 136.75 | 10.9 | W=50.00 | 0.40 | 125.56 | 14.54 | 128.70 | 14.48 | -0.47 | 0.64 | 139.30 | 20.25 | 128.70 | 14.48 | 1.35 | 0.19 |
| DBP (mmHg) | 83.60 | 8.59 | 84.25 | 8.35 | T=0.16 | 0.87 | 73.11 | 8.81 | 83.50 | 12.53 | -2.07 | 0.054 | 89.10 | 12.84 | 83.50 | 12.53 | 0.99 | 0.34 |
| N | % | N | % | χ2 | N | % | N | % | χ2 | N | % | N | % | χ2 | ||||
| Smoking | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| Alcohol | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| Dietary | N | % | N | % | χ2 | N | % | N | % | χ2 | N | % | N | % | χ2 | |||
| Highland barley | 9 | 90 | 10 | 100 | 1.05 | 0.31 | 8 | 80 | 8 | 80 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 9 | 90 | 8 | 80 | 0.39 | 0.53 |
| Rice | 8 | 80 | 7 | 70 | 0.27 | 0.61 | 8 | 80 | 8 | 80 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 7 | 70 | 8 | 80 | 0.27 | 0.61 |
| Noodles | 4 | 40 | 5 | 50 | 0.20 | 0.65 | 7 | 70 | 8 | 80 | 0.27 | 0.61 | 7 | 70 | 8 | 80 | 0.27 | 0.61 |
| Vegetables | 9 | 90 | 8 | 80 | 0.39 | 0.53 | 7 | 70 | 7 | 70 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 8 | 80 | 7 | 70 | 0.27 | 0.61 |
| Tibetan tea | 2 | 20 | 2 | 20 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 1.05 | 0.31 | 2 | 20 | 1 | 10 | 0.39 | 0.53 |
| Yoghourt | 5 | 50 | 4 | 40 | 0.20 | 0.65 | 5 | 50 | 7 | 70 | 0.83 | 0.36 | 7 | 70 | 7 | 70 | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| Pork/beef | 6 | 60 | 8 | 80 | 0.95 | 0.33 | 8 | 80 | 7 | 70 | 0.27 | 0.61 | 6 | 60 | 7 | 70 | 0.22 | 0.64 |
Life Occupation: Monks sit for a long period of time every day to chant and meditate, without physical activity.
Tibetan controls work, often in some highly active and energy demanding occupations such as shepherds.
Note:
aSince Nyingma and Sakya monks lived in the same geographic region, they shared the same controls (Z).
χ2: Chi-square test; W: Mann-Whitney U test; T: Welch's test or students’ t-test. *P < 0.05.
BMI: Body mass index; SBP: Systolic Pressure; DBP: Diastolic Pressure.
Figure 2Plasma proteome signatures in three types of Tibetan meditations. (a) The proteins quantified across all groups were used for unsupervised hierarchical clustering analysis. Rows were scaled. “Complete” was used as the clustering method. “Correlation” was used for distance calculation. Legend represents z score of protein expression. (b, c) The quantitative proteins in each group were used for principal component analysis to group samples based on different regions. (d) The overlap of differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) of DIA proteomics among three comparison groups. Fold change ≥ |1.3|, P-value < 0.05. (e) The five overlapped DEPs among three comparison groups. Red: up-regulated. Green: down-regulated. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was carried out to investigate the DEPs within each comparison group, adjusted BMI as a covariate. Multiple test correction was not performed for this stage. n = 10 for each group.
Figure 3The details of enriched biological items associated with the cardiovascular system for each type of meditation. Square size and inside numbers represent the number of DEPs involved in this enriched function. The red colour of squares represents the -log10 (P-value) of enrichment significance. Blue: functions associated with atherosclerosis and related processes. Red: functions associated with angiogenesis and related processes. Yellow: functions associated with glycolysis. Green: functions associated with oxidative metabolism. G: Gelug vs Control; N: Nyingma vs Control; S: Sakya vs Control. n = 10 for each group.
The demographic characteristics for the monks and controls involved in PRM proteomics analysis.
| Gelug Monks (G, n=29) | Controls (C, n=17) | Nyingma Monks (N, n=9) | Controls | Sakya Monks (S, n=10) | Controls | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex | N | % | N | % | χ2 | N | % | N | % | χ2 | N | % | N | % | χ2 | |||
| Male | 29 | 100 | 17 | 100 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 9 | 100 | 10 | 100 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 10 | 100 | 10 | 100 | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| Mean | SD | Mean | SD | T | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | T | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | T | ||||
| Age(y) | 39.59 | 9.41 | 49.06 | 15.24 | 2.32 | 0.03 | 39.67 | 6.48 | 40.20 | 8.20 | -0.16 | 0.88 | 40.70 | 7.48 | 40.20 | 8.20 | 0.14 | 0.89 |
| Meditation (y) | 18.28 | 9.18 | 19.33 | 5.48 | 22.80 | 7.45 | ||||||||||||
| BMI | 31.89 | 5.28 | 29.07 | 5.46 | -1.70 | 0.10 | 28.87 | 3.76 | 25.86 | 4.07 | 1.67 | 0.11 | 29.52 | 4.71 | 25.86 | 4.07 | 1.87 | 0.079 |
| SBP (mmHg) | 141.41 | 17.98 | 139.06 | 30.83 | -0.33 | 0.74 | 129.00 | 10.42 | 129.40 | 14.16 | -0.07 | 0.95 | 134.60 | 11.90 | 129.40 | 14.16 | 0.89 | 0.39 |
| DBP (mmHg) | 86.03 | 9.81 | 84.59 | 16.02 | -0.38 | 0.71 | 81.78 | 9.05 | 83.50 | 10.35 | -0.38 | 0.71 | 84.80 | 11.90 | 83.50 | 10.35 | 0.27 | 0.79 |
| N | % | N | % | χ2 | N | % | N | % | χ2 | N | % | N | % | χ2 | ||||
| Smoking | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| Alcohol | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| Dietary | N | % | N | % | χ2 | N | % | N | % | χ2 | N | % | N | % | χ2 | |||
| Highland barley | 29 | 100 | 17 | 100 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 9 | 100 | 9 | 90 | 0.95 | 0.33 | 9 | 90 | 9 | 90 | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| Rice | 21 | 72.41 | 13 | 76.47 | 0.091 | 0.76 | 6 | 66.67 | 7 | 70 | 0.02 | 0.88 | 7 | 70 | 7 | 70 | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| Noodles | 20 | 68.97 | 12 | 70.59 | 0.01 | 0.91 | 5 | 55.56 | 4 | 40 | 0.46 | 0.50 | 7 | 70 | 4 | 40 | 1.82 | 0.18 |
| Vegetables | 24 | 82.76 | 13 | 76.47 | 0.27 | 0.60 | 8 | 88.89 | 6 | 60 | 2.04 | 0.15 | 8 | 80 | 6 | 60 | 0.95 | 0.33 |
| Tibetan tea | 2 | 6.90 | 3 | 17.65 | 1.28 | 0.26 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 1.05 | 0.31 |
| Yoghurt | 19 | 65.52 | 12 | 70.59 | 0.12 | 0.72 | 5 | 55.56 | 5 | 50 | 0.06 | 0.81 | 6 | 60 | 5 | 50 | 0.20 | 0.65 |
| Pork/beef | 19 | 65.52 | 13 | 76.47 | 0.61 | 0.44 | 7 | 77.78 | 8 | 80 | 0.01 | 0.91 | 9 | 90 | 8 | 80 | 0.39 | 0.53 |
Life Occupation: Monks sit for a long period of time every day to chant and meditate, without physical activity.
Tibetan controls work, often in some highly active and energy demanding occupations such as shepherds.
Note:
aSince Nyingma and Sakya monks lived in the same geographic region, they shared the same controls (Z).
χ2: Chi-square test; T: Welch's test or students’ t-test. * P < 0.05.
BMI: Body mass index; SBP: Systolic Pressure; DBP: Diastolic Pressure.
Figure 4PRM validation on the effect of meditation on cardiovascular protection. (a, b) Heatmap of validated DEPs indexing atherosclerosis in Gelug and Nyingma sects. Each square represents the expression ratio of each targeted peptide of this protein for each individual (monks vs controls). Red: up-regulated. Blue: down-regulated. Fold changes≥|1.3|, PBH adjusted < 0.05. Legend represents expression ratio. (c) DEPs in the atherosclerosis network in the Nyingma sect. Coloured: DEPs. (d) Heatmap of validated DEPs involved in atherosclerosis, glycolysis and O2 releasing in Sakya sects. Each square represents the expression ratio of each targeted peptide of this protein for each individual (monks vs controls). Red: up-regulated. Blue: down-regulated. Fold changes≥|1.3|, PBH adjusted < 0.05. (e) Pathways of glycolysis and O2 release (hemoglobin). Proteins marked in grey were those identified and / or validated in DIA and PRM analysis with no significant expression. Proteins in red means up-regulated, and green is down-regulated in both DIA identification and PRM validation. Those not identified in either DIA or PRM were marked in white. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was carried out to investigate the targeted DEPs within each comparison group, adjusted age (if needed) and BMI as covariates. 5% FDR was applied for multiple test correction. n = 29 for G; n = 9 for N; n = 10 for S; n = 17 for C; n = 10 for Z.
Figure 5Clinical measurement of cardiovascular risks in Tibetan monks and matched local controls. (a) The age distribution of monks and controls. G vs C: T = 1.68, P = 0.10. G: M = 40.38, SD = 8.81. C: M = 45.44, SD = 13.78. N vs Z: T = 0.67, P = 0.51. N: M = 40.32, SD = 6.83. Z: M = 42.10, SD = 9.53. S vs Z: T = 0.95, P = 0.35. S: M = 39.45, SD = 8.04. Z: 42.10, SD = 9.53. T: Students’ t-test or Welch's test. (b) The BMI distribution of monks and controls. G vs C: T = -2.65, P = 0.01. G: M = 32.47, SD = 5.22. C: M = 28.98, SD = 5.02. N vs Z: W = 76, P = 0.0078. N: M = 29.27, SD = 4.34. Z: M = 25.14, SD = 3.96. S vs Z: W=119.5, P = 0.030. S: M = 28.25, SD = 5.03. Z: M = 25.14, SD = 3.96. W: Mann-Whitney U test; T: Students’ t-test or Welch's test. (c) Plasma total cholesterol in monks and controls. G vs C: F = 0.79, PBH adjust = 0.78. G: M = 4.79, SD = 1.05. C: M = 4.69, SD = 0.99. N vs Z: F = 9.12, PBH adjust = 0.024. N: M = 4.66, SD = 1.21. Z: M = 5.37, SD = 0.83. S vs Z: F = 4.15, PBH adjust = 0.09. S: M = 4.97, SD = 0.86. Z: 5.37, SD = 0.83. (d) Clinical measures of Apo B. G vs C: F = 2.82, PBH adjust= 0.69. G: M = 0.93, SD = 0.29. C: M = 0.94, SD = 0.27. N vs Z: F = 10.19, PBH adjust = 0.024. N: M = 0.84, SD = 0.25. Z: M = 1.00, SD = 0.22. S vs Z: F = 5.59, PBH adjust = 0.049. S: M = 0.89, SD = 0.18. Z: M = 1.00, SD = 0.22. (e) Clinical measures of LDL-C. G vs C: F = 0.08, PBH adjust = 0.78. G: M = 3.12, SD = 1.02. C: M = 2.89, SD = 0.86. N vs Z: F = 9.12, PBH adjust = 0.024. N: M = 2.95, SD = 0.92. Z: M = 3.59, SD = 0.81. S vs Z: F = 6.20, PBH adjust = 0.049. S: M = 3.08, SD = 0.66. Z: M = 3.59, SD = 0.81. (f) Clinical measures of lipoprotein (a). G vs C: F = 0.15, PBH adjust = 0.78. G: M = 0.23, SD = 0.25. C: M = 0.22, SD = 0.18. N vs Z: F = 4.41, PBH adjust = 0.045. N: M = 0.11, SD = 0.065. Z: M = 0.27, SD = 0.30. S vs Z: F = 1.31, PBH adjust = 0.30. S: M = 0.19, SD = 0.23. Z: 0.27, SD = 0.30. (c-f) Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA). Multiple test corrections have been applied for P-values using Benjamini-Hochberg method. BMI was adjusted as a covariant. Data were represented as mean ± SD. **P < 0.01, *P < 0.05. n = 39 for G; n = 19 for N; n = 20 for S; n = 27 for C; n = 20 for Z.