| Literature DB >> 35576153 |
Nese Sreenivasulu1, Changquan Zhang2, Rhowell N Tiozon3, Qiaoquan Liu4.
Abstract
The eating and cooking quality (ECQ) of rice is critical for determining its economic value in the marketplace and promoting consumer acceptance. It has therefore been of paramount importance in rice breeding programs. Here, we highlight advances in genetic studies of ECQ and discuss prospects for further enhancement of ECQ in rice. Innovations in gene- and genome-editing techniques have enabled improvements in rice ECQ. Significant genes and quantitative trait loci (QTLs) have been shown to regulate starch composition, thereby affecting amylose content and thermal and pasting properties. A limited number of genes/QTLs have been identified for other ECQ properties such as protein content and aroma. Marker-assisted breeding has identified rare alleles in diverse genetic resources that are associated with superior ECQ properties. The post-genomics-driven information summarized in this review is relevant for augmenting current breeding strategies to meet consumer preferences and growing population demands.Entities:
Keywords: amylopectin; amylose; eating and cooking quality; genetics; genome editing; texture
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 35576153 PMCID: PMC9251384 DOI: 10.1016/j.xplc.2021.100271
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plant Commun ISSN: 2590-3462
Figure 1Holistic approaches to eating and cooking quality.
Figure 2Starch biosynthesis and key enzymes with their associated mutants.
Rice mutants and their corresponding properties.
| Mutants | Chr | AAC | Amylopectin CLD | Pasting property | Thermal property | Key information | Refs. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 26.5%–35% (high amylose) | DP ≦ 17 ↓, DP 18–36 ↑, DP ≧ 38 ↑ | – | – | The | ||
| 10 | 5% (very low amylose) | – | – | – | |||
| 2 | 7% (very low amylose) | – | – | – | |||
| 4 | 11.2%–11.9% (low amylose) | DP 9–21 ↓, DP 22–38 ↑, DP ≥ 38 ↓ | HPV: 68–79 (↓) | – | |||
| 5 | 15.2%–16.5% (low amylose) | no significant changes observed | – | – | |||
| 3 | 14.53% (low amylose) | DP 6–8 ↑, DP 9–15 ↓, DP 16–40 ↑ | PV: ↓ | GT: 62.14 ± 0.06 (↓) | |||
| 12 | 15.4% ± 0.3% (low amylose) | DP6–7 ↓, DP 8–14 ↑, DP15–55 ↓ | – | – | |||
| 9 | ∼13% (low amylose) | DP7–9 ↑, DP10–13 ↓, DP14–16 ↑, DP ≥ 17 ↓ | PV: ↓ | – | |||
| 9 | 22.9 ± 0.1 (intermediate amylose) | DP 3–7 ↓, DP 10–19 ↓ | PV: 512.5 ± 0.1 (↓) | ||||
| 5 | 13.8% (low amylose) | DP 6–12 ↑, DP 13–50 ↓ | PV: ↓ | The mutation of | |||
| 2 | 12% (low amylose) | DP 7–17 ↑, DP 18–30 ↓ | PV: ↓ | ||||
| 4 | Value not reported, no significant impact on AAC | DP 7–12 ↑, DP ≤ 13 ↑ | – | The activity of PUL was correlated with the severity of the | |||
| 5 | 19% (low amylose) | DP 5–8 ↑, DP 9–17 ↓, DP 18–38 ↑ | – | ||||
| 6 | 18.9% (low amylose) | DP ≤ 10 ↑, DP 12 to 21 ↓, DP 24 to 34 ↑, DP ≥ 37 ↓ | - | Its mutation did not change the amount of starch but altered the fine structure of amylopectin. | |||
| 6 | Value not reported, no significant impact on AAC | DP 6–7 ↑, DP 8–12 ↓, DP 16–19 ↑ | PV: ↓ | ||||
| 11 | 21.81 ± 1.04 (intermediate amylose) | DP ≤ 8 ↑, DP 8–25 ↑, DP 25–35 ↓, DP 35–67 ↑, DP > 67 ↓ | – | The contents of protein, amylose, and fatty acids were higher in the mutant than in the wild type. | |||
| 11 | 12.24 ± 0.39 (low amylose) | DP 6–7 ↓, DP 8–13 ↑ | – | – | The absence of PDIL1-1 is associated with endoplasmic reticulum stress in the endosperm and underlies floury endosperm formation in the | ||
| 6 | 0%–0.3% (waxy) | DP ≦ 17 ↓, DP 18–36 ↑, DP ≧ 38 ↑ | – | – | The |
DP, Degree of Polymerization; PT, Pasting Temperature; HPV, hot paste viscosity; PV, peak viscosity; CPV, cool paste viscosity; BD, breakdown; SBV, setback viscosity; CSV, consistent viscosity; GT, gelatinization temperature; To, onset temperature ;Tp, peak temperature; Tc, conclusion temperature; ΔHg, gelatinization enthalpy
Figure 3Premium quality monitoring for the rice industry.