Literature DB >> 35575935

5-hmC loss is another useful tool in addition to BAP1 and MTAP immunostains to distinguish diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma from reactive mesothelial hyperplasia in peritoneal cytology cell-blocks and biopsies.

Ziyad Alsugair1, Vahan Kepenekian2,3,4, Tanguy Fenouil5, Olivier Glehen2,3,4, Laurent Villeneuve3,4,6,7, Sylvie Isaac1,3,4, Juliette Hommell-Fontaine1,3,4, Nazim Benzerdjeb8,9,10.   

Abstract

The differentiation between reactive mesothelial hyperplasia (RMH) and diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (DMPM) is challenging especially when applied on peritoneal small samples. The use of BRCA-associated protein 1 (BAP1) and methylthioadenosine phosphorylase (MTAP) immunostains is familiar to identify malignant mesothelial proliferation. Recently, nuclear 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5-hmC) was reported to be a new recognition tool of pleural mesothelial malignancy on surgical specimens. However, application of 5-hmC immunostaining has not yet studied in peritoneal specimens from small biopsies or cytology cell-blocks. The aim was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of this new marker combination to distinguish DMPM from RMH in biopsies and cell-blocks. Seventy-five cases were analyzed; among which, 38 were of cytological specimens including 6 RMH and 32 DMPM, and 37 tissue biopsies with 7 RMH and 30 DMPM. BAP1, MTAP, and 5-hmC immunostains were performed on all cases. RMH cases exhibited a retained staining with all immunostains. Among DMPM, BAP1 was lost in 71.8% of cytology cell-blocks and 66.7% of biopsies. MTAP was lost in 40.6% of cytology cell-blocks and 33.3% of biopsies. 5-hmC was lost in 40.6% of cytology cell-blocks and 30% of biopsies. The combination of BAP1, MTAP, and 5-hmC showed the best accuracy in differential diagnosis between RMH and DMPM (sensitivity = 0.84, specificity = 1 in cytology cell-blocks; sensitivity = 0.90, specificity = 1 in biopsy). The best diagnostic combination in peritoneal cytology effusion fluids and biopsies samples provided by BAP1, MTAP, and 5-hmC should be applied on a diagnostic step-wise algorithm by pathologists involved into the management of DMPM, because of their therapeutic implications.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  5-hmC; Biomarker; Diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma; Mesothelioma; Reactive mesothelial hyperplasia

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35575935     DOI: 10.1007/s00428-022-03336-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Virchows Arch        ISSN: 0945-6317            Impact factor:   4.064


  15 in total

1.  MTAP immunohistochemistry is an accurate and reproducible surrogate for CDKN2A fluorescence in situ hybridization in diagnosis of malignant pleural mesothelioma.

Authors:  David B Chapel; Jefree J Schulte; Kyra Berg; Andrew Churg; Sanja Dacic; Carrie Fitzpatrick; Francoise Galateau-Salle; Kenzo Hiroshima; Thomas Krausz; Nolwenn Le Stang; Stephanie McGregor; Kazuki Nabeshima; Aliya N Husain
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2019-06-23       Impact factor: 7.842

2.  Immunohistochemical detection of MTAP and BAP1 protein loss for mesothelioma diagnosis: Comparison with 9p21 FISH and BAP1 immunohistochemistry.

Authors:  Tomoyuki Hida; Makoto Hamasaki; Shinji Matsumoto; Ayuko Sato; Tohru Tsujimura; Kunimitsu Kawahara; Akinori Iwasaki; Tatsuro Okamoto; Yoshinao Oda; Hiroshi Honda; Kazuki Nabeshima
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2016-12-23       Impact factor: 5.705

3.  BAP1 immunohistochemistry and p16 FISH to separate benign from malignant mesothelial proliferations.

Authors:  Brandon S Sheffield; Harry C Hwang; Anna F Lee; Kim Thompson; Stephanie Rodriguez; Christopher H Tse; Allen M Gown; Andrew Churg
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 6.394

Review 4.  Immunochemistry in the work-up of mesothelioma and its differential diagnosis and mimickers.

Authors:  Wadad S Mneimneh; Yuying Jiang; Aparna Harbhajanka; Claire W Michael
Journal:  Diagn Cytopathol       Date:  2021-03-06       Impact factor: 1.582

5.  Immunohistochemical evaluation of nuclear 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5-hmC) accurately distinguishes malignant pleural mesothelioma from benign mesothelial proliferations.

Authors:  David B Chapel; Aliya N Husain; Thomas Krausz
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 7.842

6.  Usefulness of methylthioadenosine phosphorylase and BRCA-associated protein 1 immunohistochemistry in the diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma in effusion cytology specimens.

Authors:  Kyra B Berg; Andrew M Churg; Simon Cheung; Sanja Dacic
Journal:  Cancer Cytopathol       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 7.  Molecular markers and new diagnostic methods to differentiate malignant from benign mesothelial pleural proliferations: a literature review.

Authors:  Rossella Bruno; Greta Alì; Gabriella Fontanini
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 2.895

8.  High Incidence of Somatic BAP1 alterations in sporadic malignant mesothelioma.

Authors:  Masaki Nasu; Mitsuru Emi; Sandra Pastorino; Mika Tanji; Amy Powers; Hugh Luk; Francine Baumann; Yu-An Zhang; Adi Gazdar; Shreya Kanodia; Maarit Tiirikainen; Erin Flores; Giovanni Gaudino; Michael J Becich; Harvey I Pass; Haining Yang; Michele Carbone
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 15.609

9.  The use of immunohistochemistry in distinguishing reactive from neoplastic mesothelium. A novel use for desmin and comparative evaluation with epithelial membrane antigen, p53, platelet-derived growth factor-receptor, P-glycoprotein and Bcl-2.

Authors:  R L Attanoos; A Griffin; A R Gibbs
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 5.087

10.  Loss of expression of BAP1 is very rare in non-small cell lung carcinoma.

Authors:  Juliana Andrici; Thomas R Parkhill; Jason Jung; Kathryn L Wardell; Brandon Verdonk; Arjun Singh; Loretta Sioson; Adele Clarkson; Nicole Watson; Amy Sheen; Mahtab Farzin; Christopher W Toon; Anthony J Gill
Journal:  Pathology       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 5.306

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.