| Literature DB >> 35574558 |
Xiuchun Yang1, Yuelan Qin2, Wei Mo1, Hua Xiang1, Zhichao Liu1, Jianhua Long2, Bin Xiang1.
Abstract
Jaundice is a detection index in many disease conditions commonly characterized by yellowish staining of the skin and mucous membranes. This work studies the postoperative care outcome in 1,246 patients (669 males and 577 females) with obstructive jaundice who underwent percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD). These patients were admitted to the interventional vascular surgery department of our hospital from February 2017 to February 2022. From the results, frequent wound re-dressing and maintenance of the drainage tube had significant positive influence on wound healing and patient recovery. The data also showed strict adherence by patients to the doctor's recommendation advising them to visit the interventional specialist care clinic in time for wound dressing change and drainage tube maintenance. As a result, there was no significant difference in wound allergy, exudation, redness and loosening among patients. A cross-sectional analysis of the effect of age on recovery revealed variations in the healing pattern (wound loosening and the redness) between patients of different ages although the relationship is not very clear due to the limited sample size. Efficient drainage tube maintenance promoted recovery and prevented the occurrence of related complications such as PTBD tube blockage and biliary tract infection. The establishment of the interventional specialist care clinic used in this study additionally ensures patients' safety, and the incidence of complications have been reduced drastically. These achievements are attributable to the implementation of regular dressing change, drainage tube maintenance and health education for patients with PTBD tube. These practices have also improved on the level of specialty in nursing practice, increased the professional value of nurses and better recognition by the society.Entities:
Keywords: Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD); data analysis; interventional specialist care clinic; obstructive jaundice; postoperative targeted nursing
Year: 2022 PMID: 35574558 PMCID: PMC9094711 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.908909
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Surg ISSN: 2296-875X
Gender and discharge diagnosis analysis.
| Subject | Name | Gender | Amount to | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Woman | Man | |||
| Discharge diagnosis | Malignant obstructive jaundice | 557 | 614 | 1,171 |
| Obstructive jaundice | 7 | 0 | 7 | |
| Hepatolith | 0 | 8 | 8 | |
| Hepatapostema | 0 | 30 | 30 | |
| Hilar cholangiocarcinoma | 5 | 3 | 8 | |
| Liver metastasis of intestinal cancer | 0 | 3 | 3 | |
| Malignant tumor of pancreas ampulla | 2 | 0 | 2 | |
| Cholangiocarcinoma | 1 | 3 | 4 | |
| Gall stone | 1 | 6 | 7 | |
| Biliary obstruction | 0 | 2 | 2 | |
| Carcinoma of head of pancreas, malignant obstructive jaundice | 3 | 0 | 3 | |
| Amount to | 577 | 669 | 1,246 | |
Age statistic analysis.
| Name | Sample size | Statistical value z |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 1,246 | −1.384 | 0.166 |
Gender and wound analysis.
| Gender (mean ± standard deviation) |
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| woman ( | man ( | |||
| wound loosening | 1.95 ± 0.41 | 1.92 ± 0.42 | 0.572 | 0.450 |
| recovered wound | 10.57 ± 3.71 | 10.70 ± 3.54 | 0.195 | 0.659 |
| wound redness | 2.87 ± 1.43 | 3.17 ± 1.66 | 2.813 | 0.095 |
| wound exudation | 8.51 ± 4.06 | 9.02 ± 3.72 | 1.192 | 0.276 |
| wound allergy | 1.87 ± 0.41 | 1.93 ± 0.25 | 0.523 | 0.472 |
Analysis of variance between gender and general situation.
| Gender (mean ± SD) |
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| woman ( | man ( | |||
| Stooling and urination | 9.74 ± 2.24 | 9.70 ± 2.30 | 0.069 | 0.792 |
| Jaundice | 1.85 ± 0.35 | 1.91 ± 0.29 | 3.036 | 0.082 |
| Fatigue | 1.85 ± 0.36 | 1.92 ± 0.28 | 2.429 | 0.121 |
| Abdominalgia | 2.06 ± 0.67 | 2.15 ± 0.59 | 0.463 | 0.498 |
Age and wound Chi-square test statistics process values.
| Item | name | value |
|---|---|---|
| Age * wound loose | Pearson Chi-square | 105.930 ( |
| Continuously correct Yates chi-square | 105.930 ( | |
| Fisher chi-square | - | |
| E ≥ 5 | 69 (54.76%) | |
| 1 ≤ E < 5 | 40 (31.75%) | |
| E < 1 | 17 (13.49%) | |
| Cnt | 126 | |
|
| 1,231 | |
| Df value of degree of freedom | 62 | |
| Age * redness of wound | Pearson chi-square | 87.095 ( |
| Continuously correct Yates chi-square | 87.095 ( | |
| Fisher chi-square | - | |
| E ≥ 5 | 61 (48.41%) | |
| 1 ≤ E < 5 | 45 (35.71%) | |
| E < 1 | 20 (15.87%) | |
| Cnt | 126 | |
|
| 1,201 | |
| Df value of degree of freedom | 62 | |
| Age * wound exudation | Pearson chi-square | 64.641 ( |
| Continuously correct Yates chi-square | 64.641 ( | |
| Fisher chi-square | - | |
| E ≥ 5 | 55 (43.65%) | |
| 1 ≤ E < 5 | 48 (38.10%) | |
| E < 1 | 23 (18.25%) | |
| Cnt | 126 | |
|
| 1,198 | |
| Df value of degree of freedom | 62 | |
| Age * wound allergy | Pearson chi-square | 53.801 ( |
| Continuously correct Yates chi-square | 53.801 ( | |
| Fisher chi-square | - | |
| E ≥ 5 | 45 (35.71%) | |
| 1 ≤ E < 5 | 38 (30.16%) | |
| E < 1 | 43 (34.13%) | |
| Cnt | 126 | |
|
| 1,234 | |
| Df value of degree of freedom | 62 |
* p < 0.05; **p < 0.01.
Figure 1Cross-sectional view of age and wound loosening (0 = none, 1 = yes).
Figure 2Cross-sectional view of age and redness of the wound (0 = none, 1 = yes).
Pearson correlation analysis between age and general situation.
| Urine and stool | jaundice | fatigue | abdominalgia | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | correlation coefficient | 0.060 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.007 |
| 0.050 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 0.941 |
*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01.
Pearson correlation-detailed format.
| Wound allergy | Wound exudation | The wound was red | The wound is loose | The wound is good | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Interval between two visits | correlation coefficient | −0.021 | −0.032 | −0.020 | 0.013 | 0 |
| 0.451 | 0.256 | 0.472 | 0.638 | 0.993 |
*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01.
Summary of Poisson regression analysis results (n = 659).
| item | coefficient of regression | Standard error |
| OR value | OR value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dressing change | 0.122 | 0.012 | 9.936 | 1.129 | 1.103∼1.157 | |
| Drainage tube maintenance | 0.001 | 0.000 | 2.839 | 0.005 | 1.001 | 1.000∼1.001 |
| intercept | 2.067 | 0.037 | 56.496 | 7.900 | 7.354∼8.488 |
Dependent variable: recovered wound.
Independent variables: dressing change and drainage tube maintenance.
McFadden R formula: 0.023.
Pearson correlation-detailed format.
| Treatment Opinion: Dressing change | Treatment Opinion: pipe maintenance | |
|---|---|---|
| Normal drainage | correlation coefficient | 0.089** |
| 0.006 | ||
| Drainage slag | correlation coefficient | −0.109* |
| 0.040 |
*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01.