| Literature DB >> 35574433 |
Anna Valerianova1,2, Mikulas Mlcek2, Tomas Grus3, Jan Malik1, Otomar Kittnar2.
Abstract
Background: Arteriovenous fistulas (AVF) represent a low resistant circuit. It is known that their opening leads to decreased systemic vascular resistance, increased cardiac output and other hemodynamic changes. Possible competition of AVF and perfusion of other organs has been observed before, however the specific impact of AVF has not been elucidated yet. Previous animal models studied long-term changes associated with a surgically created high flow AVF. The aim of this study was to create a simple AVF model for the analysis of acute hemodynamic changes.Entities:
Keywords: animal model; arteriovenous fistula; cerebral oxygenation; coronary artery flow; hyperkinetic circulation; tissue perfusion
Year: 2022 PMID: 35574433 PMCID: PMC9091445 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2022.881658
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Physiol ISSN: 1664-042X Impact factor: 4.755
FIGURE 1Aortocaval arteriovenous fistula created by the connection of two high-diameter ECMO cannulas. Special clamp to regulate the AVF blood flow volume was placed before connecting the ECMO cannulas (in lower right corner). Continuous measurement of AVF flow was performed using an ultrasound probe (arrow) (Transonic, United States). This photo documents clamping of the fistula circuit by the hemostatic forceps for the observation of the hemodynamic stabilization in the final phase of the experiment.
FIGURE 2Scheme of study protocol.
FIGURE 3The acute effects of high-flow AVF on systemic hemodynamics. Opening of a high-flow arteriovenous fistula increases cardiac output (CO) and coronary blood flow at cost of perfusion of other vascular beds (brain, kidneys, peripheral tissues). We did not measure gut perfusion, but it could be influenced too. Increase in CO leads to increase in pulmonary artery pressure. High resistant beds refer to arteries supplying extremities and other striated muscles. Arrows indicate increase/decrease of blood flow.
Hemodynamic changes after AVF creation.
| Parameter | Baseline | AVF |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Qa (L/min) | — | 2.1 ± 0.5 | — |
| HR (/min) | 94 ± 21 | 111 ± 25 |
|
| ART(S) (mmHg) | 117 ± 15 | 107 ± 21 |
|
| ART(D) (mmHg) | 77 ± 13 | 63 ± 15 |
|
| ART(M) (mmHg) | 89 ± 13 | 77 ± 16 |
|
| CVP (mmHg) | 4 ± 2 | 4 ± 2 | 0.11 |
| PASP (mmHg) | 32 ± 10 | 37 ± 8 |
|
| PAMP (mmHg) | 23 ± 7 | 29 ± 9 |
|
| PCWP (mmHg) | 9 ± 4 | 7 ± 4 | 0.32 |
| SvO2 (%) | 59.6 ± 11.6 | 66.1 ± 9.9 |
|
| CO (L/min) | 7.02 ± 2.35 | 9.19 ± 2.99 |
|
| % of CO through AVF | — | 23 ± 4 | — |
| SV (ml) | 76 ± 20 | 84 ± 21 | 0.08 |
| SVR (WU) | 13.3 ± 4.3 | 11.1 ± 3.4 |
|
| PVR (WU) | 3.6 ± 1.4 | 3.3 ± 1.0 | 0.26 |
| LV work (gm) | 86.3 ± 30.9 | 82.1 ± 32.8 | 0.45 |
| RV work (gm) | 19.9 ± 6.5 | 27.2 ± 8.8 |
|
| Carotid flow (ml/min) | 264 ± 137 | 215 ± 105 |
|
| Coronary flow velocity (cm/s) | 21.1 ± 12.2 | 25.5 ± 12.3 |
|
Statistically significant results are in bold. Displayed values are averaged from all subjects. “AVF” data represent measurements obtained after 60 min of opened AVF after reaching stable state. Qa, arteriovenous fistula blood flow; HR, heart rate; ART, systemic arterial blood pressure; S, systolic; D, diastolic; M, mean; CVP, central venous pressure; PASP, pulmonary artery systolic pressure; PAMP, pulmonary artery mean pressure; PCWP, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure; SvO2, hemoglobin saturation in mixed venous blood; CO, cardiac output; SV, stroke volume; SVR, systemic vascular resistance; PVR, pulmonary vascular resistance; WU, Wood units; LV, left ventricle; RV, ight ventricle.
FIGURE 4Time course of hemodynamic parameters after AVF opening. (A) Heart rate, (B) Mean arterial pressure (MAP), (C) Pulmonary artery mean pressure (PAMP), (D) Carotid artery flow. HR and PAMP (A,C) increased immediately after AVF opening and showed a continuous increase afterwards. MAP and carotid artery flow (B,D) dropped rapidly, then rose after the initial dip; the resulting values remained lower than in baseline. Significance of observed changes after AVF opening vs. baselines was calculated at 1, 5 and 15 min after AVF opening. Displayed values are averaged from all subjects. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; †p < 0.001; ‡p < 0.0001.
Changes in tissue perfusion and oxygenation after AVF opening.
| Parameter | Baseline | AVF |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| NIRS (%) | |||
| Head | 63.5 ± 7.8 | 60.4 ± 9.5 |
|
| Front leg | 56.9 ± 5.1 | 54.3 ± 5.4 |
|
| Back | 51.7 ± 7.9 | 49.2 ± 6.4 |
|
| Hind leg | 48.7 ± 6.7 | 45.7 ± 11.4 | 0.13 |
Statistically significant results are in bold. Displayed values are averaged from all subjects. “AVF” data represent measurements obtained after 60 min of opened AVF after reaching stable state. NIRS, near infrared spectroscopy.
FIGURE 5Changes in renal artery flow with increasing Qa. Displayed values were obtained from one subject. Qa was regulated by a clamp on the ECMO set.