| Literature DB >> 35574092 |
Jianrong Guo1, Changdan Shan1, Yifan Zhang1, Xinlei Wang1, Huaying Tian2, Guoliang Han1, Yi Zhang1, Baoshan Wang1.
Abstract
As the area of salinized soils increases, and freshwater becomes more scarcer worldwide, an urgent measure for agricultural production is to use salinized land and conserve freshwater resources. Ornamental flowering plants, such as carnations, roses, chrysanthemums, and gerberas, are found around the world and have high economic, ornamental, ecological, and edible value. It is therefore prudent to improve the salt tolerance of these important horticultural crops. Here, we summarize the salt-adaptive mechanisms, genes, and molecular breeding of ornamental flowering crops. We also review the genome editing technologies that provide us with the means to obtain novel varieties with high salinity tolerance and improved utility value, and discuss future directions of research into ornamental plants like salt exclusion mechanism. We considered that the salt exclusion mechanism in ornamental flowering plants, the acquisition of flowers with high quality and novel color under salinity condition through gene editing techniques should be focused on for the future research.Entities:
Keywords: breeding; ornamental plants; salinized soil; salt tolerance; value
Year: 2022 PMID: 35574092 PMCID: PMC9093713 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2022.854116
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 6.627
Figure 1Graphical summary of the adaptation of ornamental plants to salinized environments. (A) Adaption through ionic homeostasis and osmotic adjustment; (B) Adaption through ROS scavenging; (C) Adaption through salt exclusion, removing and pumping out of cells in roots; (D) Adaption through salt secretion, leaf succulence, photosynthesis protection, and reduction of water loss in shoots. SOS1: Salt Overly Sensitive 1, e.g., CcSOS1 gene from Chrysanthemum crissum; NHX1: vacuolar Na+/H+ antiporter, e.g., IbNHX2 gene from Ipomoea batatas; HKT1: high-affinity K+ transporters, e.g., AlHKT2:1 gene from Aeluropus lagopoides; WRKY: e.g., DgWRKY4 genes of from Dendronthema grandiform; NAC: e.g., DgNAC1 gene from Dendronthema grandiform; ROS: reactive oxygen species; SOD: superoxide dismutase; CAT: catalase; APX: ascorbate peroxidase; POD: peroxidase; GR: glutathione reductase; RC: reaction center. Symbol size represents relative content of ions and organic matter in plant cells.
The detailed experimental conditions of the ornamental flowering plants exposed to salt stress.
| Species | Duration and extent of NaCl stress | Main phenotype | References |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 30 mM/57 days | Mitigated phenotypes in leaves and flowers |
|
| 150 mM/5–6 weeks | Maintained a steady K+/Na+ ratio |
| |
|
| 30–50 mM/60 days | Reduced growth and biomass with no effect on flower production |
|
| 5–7 g L−1/8 weeks | No effect on flower production with reduced growth of plant |
| |
|
| 80 mM/30 days | Inhibited growth and the activities of antioxidant enzymes |
|
|
| More than 200 mM/60 days | Grown well with salt excreting in leaves | |
| 250 mM/2 weeks | High light harvesting efficiencies and low energy dissipation rates |
| |
|
| 4 dS m−1/56 weeks | Greater Na+ storage |
|
|
| 400 mM/5 weeks | Leaf succulence with high ionic accumulation in the vacuoles |
|
|
| 140 mM/28 days | Lower Na+ content in rhizomes than in leaves or roots under saline conditions |
|
|
| 4.5 or 7.5 dS m−1/60 days | Delayed the opening time of the first flower | |
|
| 200 mM/15 days | Reduced stomatal conductance and increased epicuticular wax |
|
|
| 0.4–2.0%/1 week | Increased photosynthetic pigments with a better seedling growth |
|
|
| 7.0–9.8 dS m−1/5 weeks | With no demonstrable growth inhibition |
|
|
| 7.0–9.8 dS m−1/5 weeks | With no demonstrable growth inhibition |
|
|
| 7.0–9.8 dS m−1/5 weeks | With no demonstrable growth inhibition |
|
| 6.1–8.6 g dm−3/12 weeks | Accumulated more proline |
| |
| Lower than 1.976 g L−1/77 days | Accumulated more proline and anthocyanin |
| |
| 40–120 mM/3 days | Accumulated more proline |
| |
| 80 mM/15–30 days | Increased activities of SOD and CAT |
| |
| 300 mM/30 days | Increased activities of SOD and CAT |
| |
|
| 160 mM/10 days | Increased activities of SOD, GR, CAT and contents of proline, Ascorbate, and glutathione |
|
| 88 mM/30 days | Increased activities of SOD |
| |
| 100 mM/10 days | Increased activities of antioxidant, and contents of polyphenol, carotenoid |
| |
|
| 50–100 mM/2 weeks | Increased activities of SOD and APX |
|
|
| 50–100 mM/24 days | Increased activities of SOD, APX and ascorbate, carotenoids |
|
|
| 400 mM/5 weeks | Enhanced salt tolerance |
|
| 400 mM/5 weeks | Enhanced salt tolerance |
| |
| 5.0 or 10.0 dS m−1/65 days | High visual quality was maintained |
| |
| 200 mM/103 days | Higher chlorophyll and K+ content when applying of exogenous GB or proline |
| |
| 200 mM/103 days | Higher chlorophyll and K+ content when applying of exogenous GB or proline |
| |
| 2.0–7.5 dS m−1/60 days | Higher ions in roots than in shoots |
| |
| 2.0–7.5 dS m−1/60 days | Reduced Na+ when older leaves are shed |
| |
| 2.0–7.5 dS m−1/60 days | Increased the succulence index with more Na+ and Cl− in roots |
| |
|
| 10–70 mM/120 days | Higher ions in roots than in shoots |
|
| 40 dS m−1/20 days | Higher Na+ content in roots than shoots |
| |
|
| 4 dS m−1/56 weeks | Higher Na+ content in roots than stems |
|
| 2–15 dS m−1/30 days | Higher Na+ and Cl− content in roots than shoots |
|
Genes involved in salt tolerance of salt-tolerant ornamental flowering plants.
| Gene name | Species | Accession number | Probable function | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| KC525946 | Encoding a cytomembrane Na+/H+ antiporter that transport Na |
|
|
|
| AB439132 | Encoding a cytomembrane Na+/H+ antiporter that transport Na |
|
|
|
| KP896477 | Encoding a cytomembrane Na+/H+ antiporter that transport Na |
|
|
|
| KP896475 | Encoding a cytomembrane Na+/H+ antiporter that transport Na |
|
|
|
| KP896476 | Encoding a cytomembrane Na+/H+ antiporter that transport Na |
|
|
|
| JF933902 | Encoding a tonoplast Na+/H+ antiporter that transport Na |
|
|
|
| EF159151 | Encoding a tonoplast Na+/H+ antiporter that transport Na |
|
|
|
| DQ343304 | Encoding a tonoplast Na+/H+ antiporter that transport Na |
|
|
|
| JN688961 | Encoding a tonoplast Na+/H+ antiporter that transport Na |
|
|
|
| AY730277 | Encoding a tonoplast Na+/H+ antiporter that transport Na |
|
|
|
| MW535306 | Encoding a transporter recirculating Na+ from shoot to root |
|
|
|
| FE529999 | Encoding a kinase-associated protein involving in response to salt tolerance |
|
|
|
| HQ317452 | NAC transcription factor gene that response to salt tolerance |
|
|
|
| KC615358 | WRKY transcription factor gene that response to salt tolerance |
|
|
|
| KJ489416 | Encoding aquaporin involving in salt tolerance |
|
|
|
| KJ756774 | Encoding aquaporin involving in salt tolerance |
|
Figure 2Summary of approaches for the acquisition of novel, salt-tolerant ornamental flowering plant varieties. CcSOS1, cytomembrane Na+/H+ antiporter gene from Chrysanthemum crissum; CmSOS1, cytomembrane Na+/H+ antiporter gene from Chrysanthemum morifolium; CrcSOS1, cytomembrane Na+/H+ antiporter gene from Crossostephium chinense; AjSOS1, cytomembrane Na+/H+ antiporter gene from Artemisia japonica; LfSOS1, cytomembrane Na+/H+ antiporter gene from Leptochloa fusca; LfNHX1, tonoplast Na+/H+ antiporter gene from Leptochloa fusca; IlNHX, tonoplast Na+/H+ antiporter gene from Iris lacteal; HtNHX1 and HtNHX2, tonoplast Na+/H+ antiporter gene from Helianthus tuberosus; AlHKT2:1, high-affinity K+ transporter gene from Aeluropus lagopoides; PsPSK1, a SKP1-like gene homologue from Paeonia suffruticosa; DgNAC1, NAC transcription factor gene from Dendronthema grandiform; DgWRKY4, WRKY transcription factor gene of from Dendronthema grandiform; CpbHLH13, bHLH transcription factor gene from Chimonanthus praecox; and CpMYC2, bHLH transcription factor gene from Chimonanthus praecox.
Figure 3Photos exhibition of some ornamental plants with beautiful flowers.