| Literature DB >> 35574083 |
Alice Gauthey1,2,3, Diana Backes1, Jeff Balland1, Iftakharul Alam4, Damien T Maher5, Lucas A Cernusak4, Norman C Duke6, Belinda E Medlyn1, David T Tissue1, Brendan Choat1.
Abstract
Between late 2015 and early 2016, more than 7,000 ha of mangrove forest died along the coastline of the Gulf of Carpentaria, in northern Australia. This massive die-off was preceded by a strong 2015/2016 El Niño event, resulting in lower precipitation, a drop in sea level and higher than average temperatures in northern Australia. In this study, we investigated the role of hydraulic failure in the mortality and recovery of the dominant species, Avicennia marina, 2 years after the mortality event. We measured predawn water potential (Ψpd) and percent loss of stem hydraulic conductivity (PLC) in surviving individuals across a gradient of impact. We also assessed the vulnerability to drought-induced embolism (Ψ50) for the species. Areas with severe canopy dieback had higher native PLC (39%) than minimally impacted areas (6%), suggesting that hydraulic recovery was ongoing. The high resistance of A. marina to water-stress-induced embolism (Ψ50 = -9.6 MPa), indicates that severe water stress (Ψpd < -10 MPa) would have been required to cause mortality in this species. Our data indicate that the natural gradient of water-stress enhanced the impact of El Niño, leading to hydraulic failure and mortality in A. marina growing on severely impacted (SI) zones. It is likely that lowered sea levels and less frequent inundation by seawater, combined with lower inputs of fresh water, high evaporative demand and high temperatures, led to the development of hyper-salinity and extreme water stress during the 2015/16 summer.Entities:
Keywords: Avicennia marina; El Niño; dieback; hydraulic failure; physiological drought
Year: 2022 PMID: 35574083 PMCID: PMC9094047 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2022.822136
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 5.753
Figure 1Map showing the field site in Queensland (A), a detail of transects and sampling sites with pictures (B) and fractional canopy cover of the field site in 2014 and 2016 (C). In (B), blue triangles represent sites with minimal impact (MI), magenta diamonds sites with intermediate impact (II) and red inverted triangles sites with severe impact (SI). The satellite image was sourced from Google Earth (dated from May 2017). Pictures, taken in August 2018, illustrate the condition of each zones (blue MI, magenta II and red SI). (C) Fractional canopy cover (FCC) was assessed using the Digital Earth Australia fractional cover archives Mangrove dataset. Black triangles and lozenges represent the 2018 sampling sites location.
Figure 2Effect of the degree of impact (MI minimal impact, II intermediate impact and SI severe impact) on predawn water potential (-MPa) (A) and percentage loss of conductivity (B). Mean ± standard error. Letters indicate significant differences from the ANOVA (p < 0.05) between the sites.
Figure 3Vulnerability curve (VC) from A. marina trees sampled on the sites of minimal impact showing the percentage of loss of area (PLA, %) against the water potential (Ψx, -MPa). The average VC (blue) was built from 5 individual VCs (black). The vertical line shows Ψ50 and the dotted lines the 95% confidence intervals for Ψ50.
Figure 4Native embolism measurements with percent loss of conductivity as a function of the water potential in branches sampled at sites of different impact [blue minimal impact (MI), magenta intermediate impact (II), and red severe impact (SI)]. The black sigmoidal curve represents the VC. Points represent an individual measure; triangles and diamonds are the average of these points for each impact class. The dotted lines represent, from left to right, values of Ψ12, Ψ50, Ψ88, extracted from the VC.