Literature DB >> 35574026

Editorial: Endocrine Disruption in Light of Dohad: The Challenges of Contaminants of Emerging Concern in Food and Water.

Marco Aurelio Romano1, Anderson Joel Martino-Andrade2, Paulo Cezar de Freitas Mathias3, Luiz Felipe Barella4, Renata Marino Romano1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  DOHaD (development origins of health and disease); Endocr disrupting chemicals; Endocrine system and disorders; Obesity; alternative methods in toxicity; reproductive toxicity

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35574026      PMCID: PMC9097275          DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2022.898736

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)        ISSN: 1664-2392            Impact factor:   6.055


× No keyword cloud information.
Endocrine-disrupting chemicals are substances capable of interacting with the endocrine system, mimicking, interfering with, or blocking the activity of endogenous hormones. These effects may have consequences in all organisms due to the high interaction of the endocrine system with the central nervous system and peripheral organs (1). An important characteristic of the endocrine system is the U-shaped dose-response curve, in which minimal amounts of hormones have a larger effect on the activation of hormone receptors than higher levels (2). This may act in favor of EDCs due to their lower levels but also because the chemicals are commonly presented in a free form in the blood, ready to interact with the endocrine system (2). The U-shaped dose-response curve commonly presented by EDCs is a challenge for the development and interpretation of data from toxicological assays because these safety tests are based on a linear dose-response. This linearity is the basis of the NOAEL (No Observed Adverse Effect Level) and LOAEL (Lowest Observable Adverse Effect Level). In addition, the phase of life of exposure may have a strong influence on the development of endocrine disruption. Disturbances during embryogenesis, perinatal, and/or peripubertal periods may reprogram the endocrine system with consequences for proper development and healthy adulthood and aging. In this sense, the developmental origin of health and disease (DOHaD) concept is focused on the evaluation of the impact of alterations in the environment during the windows of sensitivity. An important marker of the DOHaD concept was the association between poor nutrition in early life and impairment of glucose metabolism later on: “the thrifty phenotype hypothesis” (3). Since then, concerns about early exposure and later life consequences have also been identified in other physiological systems in response to alterations in diet or exposure to chemical compounds [revised by (4)]. Contaminants of emerging concern are a group of substances, including pharmaceuticals, pesticides, industrial chemicals, surfactants, and personal care products, that are not commonly monitored in the environment but may have the potential to cause toxicity (5). The occurrence of several pharmaceutical compounds in rivers in all regions of the world (6) and the identification of plasticizers in the human placenta (7) and urine of pregnant women (8) are recent examples of the extent of our inefficient methods of waste disposal and elevated use of pharmaceutics during pregnancy. In this sense, this Research Topic aims to explore the association between chemical compounds during windows of sensitivity and the development of diseases in later phases of life or among generations. Currently, the development of alternative methods for the assessment of toxicity is highly encouraged. In this context, Nozari et al. proposed an alternative experimental model in transgenic SR4G zebrafish to evaluate the stress response after exposure to compounds with environmental impacts, such as bisphenol A, vinclozolin, and fluoxetine. Their findings support the use of SR4G transgenic larvae as an in vivo biomonitoring model to screen chemicals for their stress-disrupting potentials. This is important because there is increasing evidence that brief exposures to environmental pollutants modify the stress response and critical coping behaviors for several generations. Montagnini et al. evaluated the transgenerational effect of triclosan exposure, a commonly used antimicrobial agent incorporated into a variety of personal care products and in toys, textiles, and plastics, and overt the development and reproductive parameters. Alterations in spermatogenesis were observed in the second generation (F2) after parental exposure (F0). Their findings reinforce the relevance of the DOHaD concept and the necessity to regulate exposure to common chemical compounds during important windows of development. Mohajer et al. transcended the discussion on the basic paradigm of obesogenesis: excess energy consumption and insufficient physical activity. In this review, new variables are incorporated, increasing the complexity involved in the pathogenesis of obesity: exposure to endocrine chemical disruptors, the interference of these compounds with the endocrine system, the gut microbiome, and the physiology of adipose tissue are explored. This theme is extremely relevant in the DOHaD concept since obesogenic compounds have been shown to cause metabolic disturbances later in life that can even pass into multiple future generations postexposure. The rising rates of obesity and related metabolic diseases are demanding increasing attention on chemical screening efforts and worldwide preventative strategies to keep the public and future generations safe. Finally, Lu et al. integrate the bioinformatics tools of transcriptome-wide association study with chemical-gene-interaction analysis in the evaluation of environmental endocrine disruptors associated with the age at menarche. This multiapproach methodology identified 120 chemicals and 1580 genes significantly correlated with the age at menarche, of which 11 genes were common to the hypothalamus, pituitary, ovary, uterus, and whole blood, expanding the knowledge of genetic and environmental factors related to the onset of female puberty.

Author Contributions

All authors listed have made a substantial, direct, and intellectual contribution to the work and approved it for publication.

Funding

RMR, AJMA and PCFM are fellowship recipients from Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq − Brazil).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
  7 in total

Review 1.  Hormones and endocrine-disrupting chemicals: low-dose effects and nonmonotonic dose responses.

Authors:  Laura N Vandenberg; Theo Colborn; Tyrone B Hayes; Jerrold J Heindel; David R Jacobs; Duk-Hee Lee; Toshi Shioda; Ana M Soto; Frederick S vom Saal; Wade V Welshons; R Thomas Zoeller; John Peterson Myers
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 19.871

2.  Environmental monitoring and the developmental origins of health and disease.

Authors:  Douglas Lopes Almeida; Audrei Pavanello; Lucas Paulo Saavedra; Tais Susane Pereira; Marialba Avezum Alves de Castro-Prado; Paulo Cezar de Freitas Mathias
Journal:  J Dev Orig Health Dis       Date:  2019-05-27       Impact factor: 2.401

Review 3.  Type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus: the thrifty phenotype hypothesis.

Authors:  C N Hales; D J Barker
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 10.122

Review 4.  Plasticenta: First evidence of microplastics in human placenta.

Authors:  Antonio Ragusa; Alessandro Svelato; Criselda Santacroce; Piera Catalano; Valentina Notarstefano; Oliana Carnevali; Fabrizio Papa; Mauro Ciro Antonio Rongioletti; Federico Baiocco; Simonetta Draghi; Elisabetta D'Amore; Denise Rinaldo; Maria Matta; Elisabetta Giorgini
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2020-12-02       Impact factor: 9.621

Review 5.  Acrylamide: A review about its toxic effects in the light of Developmental Origin of Health and Disease (DOHaD) concept.

Authors:  Viviane Matoso; Paula Bargi-Souza; Fernanda Ivanski; Marco A Romano; Renata M Romano
Journal:  Food Chem       Date:  2019-01-17       Impact factor: 7.514

6.  Unexpected, ubiquitous exposure of pregnant Brazilian women to diisopentyl phthalate, one of the most potent antiandrogenic phthalates.

Authors:  Michele Bertoncello Souza; Marcella Tapias Passoni; Claudia Pälmke; Katlyn Barp Meyer; Amanda Caroline Venturelli; Giulia Araújo; Bruno Sanches de Castilhos; Rosana Nogueira Morais; Paulo Roberto Dalsenter; Shanna Helen Swan; Holger Martin Koch; Anderson Joel Martino-Andrade
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 9.621

7.  Pharmaceutical pollution of the world's rivers.

Authors:  John L Wilkinson; Alistair B A Boxall; Dana W Kolpin; Kenneth M Y Leung; Racliffe W S Lai; Cristóbal Galbán-Malagón; Aiko D Adell; Julie Mondon; Marc Metian; Robert A Marchant; Alejandra Bouzas-Monroy; Aida Cuni-Sanchez; Anja Coors; Pedro Carriquiriborde; Macarena Rojo; Chris Gordon; Magdalena Cara; Monique Moermond; Thais Luarte; Vahagn Petrosyan; Yekaterina Perikhanyan; Clare S Mahon; Christopher J McGurk; Thilo Hofmann; Tapos Kormoker; Volga Iniguez; Jessica Guzman-Otazo; Jean L Tavares; Francisco Gildasio De Figueiredo; Maria T P Razzolini; Victorien Dougnon; Gildas Gbaguidi; Oumar Traoré; Jules M Blais; Linda E Kimpe; Michelle Wong; Donald Wong; Romaric Ntchantcho; Jaime Pizarro; Guang-Guo Ying; Chang-Er Chen; Martha Páez; Jina Martínez-Lara; Jean-Paul Otamonga; John Poté; Suspense A Ifo; Penelope Wilson; Silvia Echeverría-Sáenz; Nikolina Udikovic-Kolic; Milena Milakovic; Despo Fatta-Kassinos; Lida Ioannou-Ttofa; Vladimíra Belušová; Jan Vymazal; María Cárdenas-Bustamante; Bayable A Kassa; Jeanne Garric; Arnaud Chaumot; Peter Gibba; Ilia Kunchulia; Sven Seidensticker; Gerasimos Lyberatos; Halldór P Halldórsson; Molly Melling; Thatikonda Shashidhar; Manisha Lamba; Anindrya Nastiti; Adee Supriatin; Nima Pourang; Ali Abedini; Omar Abdullah; Salem S Gharbia; Francesco Pilla; Benny Chefetz; Tom Topaz; Koffi Marcellin Yao; Bakhyt Aubakirova; Raikhan Beisenova; Lydia Olaka; Jemimah K Mulu; Peter Chatanga; Victor Ntuli; Nathaniel T Blama; Sheck Sherif; Ahmad Zaharin Aris; Ley Juen Looi; Mahamoudane Niang; Seydou T Traore; Rik Oldenkamp; Olatayo Ogunbanwo; Muhammad Ashfaq; Muhammad Iqbal; Ziad Abdeen; Aaron O'Dea; Jorge Manuel Morales-Saldaña; María Custodio; Heidi de la Cruz; Ian Navarrete; Fabio Carvalho; Alhaji Brima Gogra; Bashiru M Koroma; Vesna Cerkvenik-Flajs; Mitja Gombač; Melusi Thwala; Kyungho Choi; Habyeong Kang; John L Celestino Ladu; Andreu Rico; Priyanie Amerasinghe; Anna Sobek; Gisela Horlitz; Armin K Zenker; Alex C King; Jheng-Jie Jiang; Rebecca Kariuki; Madaka Tumbo; Ulas Tezel; Turgut T Onay; Julius B Lejju; Yuliya Vystavna; Yuriy Vergeles; Horacio Heinzen; Andrés Pérez-Parada; Douglas B Sims; Maritza Figy; David Good; Charles Teta
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 11.205

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.