| Literature DB >> 35573110 |
Tengfei Song1, Lin Chen1, Dominika Gastol1,2, Bo Dong3,2, José F Marco4, Frank Berry3, Peter Slater3,2, Daniel Reed1,2, Emma Kendrick1,2.
Abstract
O3-type layered oxide materials are considered to be a highly suitable cathode for sodium-ion batteries (NIBs) due to their appreciable specific capacity and energy density. However, rapid capacity fading caused by serious structural changes and interfacial degradation hampers their use. A novel Sn-modified O3-type layered NaNi1/3Fe1/3Mn1/3O2 cathode is presented, with improved high-voltage stability through simultaneous bulk Sn doping and surface coating in a scalable one-step process. The bulk substitution of Sn4+ stabilizes the crystal structure by alleviating the irreversible phase transition and lattice structure degradation and increases the observed average voltage. In the meantime, the nanolayer Sn/Na/O composite on the surface effectively inhibits surface parasitic reactions and improves the interfacial stability during cycling. A series of Sn-modified materials are reported. An 8%-Sn-modified NaNi1/3Fe1/3Mn1/3O2 cathode exhibits a doubling in capacity retention increase after 150 cycles in the wide voltage range of 2.0-4.1 V vs Na/Na+ compared to none, and 81% capacity retention is observed after 200 cycles in a full cell vs hard carbon. This work offers a facile process to simultaneously stabilize the bulk structure and interface for the O3-type layered cathodes for sodium-ion batteries and raises the possibility of similar effective strategies to be employed for other energy storage materials.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35573110 PMCID: PMC9097156 DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.2c00522
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Chem Mater ISSN: 0897-4756 Impact factor: 10.508
Figure 1Structural characterization of the as-synthesized materials. (a) XRD patterns of all samples; Rietveld refinement results of (b) NaNFMO (left) and Sn8%-NaNFMO (right); and (c, d) Na–O–TM structure evolution before and after 8% Sn modification.
Figure 2(a) Cross-sectional SEM image and EDS element mappings of the as-prepared Sn8%-NaNFMO acquired by FIB, and (b) corresponding counts content distribution of elements along the arrow; HRTEM and the corresponding FFT of (c) NaNFMO and (d) Sn8%-NaNFMO; and (e, f) STEM/EDS mapping and corresponding count content of element distribution in a single primary particle of the as-prepared Sn8%-NaNFMO.
Figure 3XPS spectra from the surface of NaNFMO particles with 0, 3, and 8% Sn additions: (a) Ni 2p, (b) Fe 2p, (c) Mn 2p, (d) Mn 3s, (e) C 1s, and (f) O 1s XPS spectra.
Figure 4Electrochemical performance of the as-synthesized materials. (a) Initial charge–discharge curves at room temperature; (b) capacity retention of all of the electrodes after 150 cycles at 75 mA/g (0.5C); (c) average discharge voltage of NaNFMO and Sn8%-NaNFMO at 0.5C; (d) comparison of initial differential capacity (dQ/dV) curves of NaNFMO and Sn8%-NaNFMO at 0.1C; dQ/dV curves of (e) NaNFMO and (f) Sn8%-NaNFMO cathodes under various cycles at 0.5C; (g) capacity voltage curves of the initial two cycles at 0.1C and (h) cycling performance at 0.5C between 1.5 and 4.1 V in the full cell; and (i) GITT curves of NaNFMO and Sn-NaNFMO cathode material in the first cycle within 2.0–4.1 V; Na diffusivity versus the state of charge and discharge calculated by GITT of (j) NaNFMO and (k) Sn8%-NaNFMO.
Figure 5Nyquist plots of (a) NaNFMO and (b) Sn8%-NaNFMO after different cycles. (c) Comparison of fitted impedance for NaNFMO and Sn8%-NaNFMO. (d) Liner fitting of Z′ vs ω–0.5 in the low-frequency region for NaNFMO and Sn8%-NaNFMO samples after 100 cycles.
Figure 6Operando XRD patterns and corresponding 2D contour maps showing the evolution of the main characteristic peaks for (a) Sn8%-NaNFMO and (b) NaNFMO cathodes during the first charge/discharge process between 2.0 and 4.1 V at 0.1C.