| Literature DB >> 35572974 |
Jie Peng1, Ziwei Zhao1, Yihua Zou1, Xuerui Zhang1, Yuan Yang1, Qiujing Huang1, Mingpeng Xu1, Yu Xu1, Peiquan Zhao1.
Abstract
Purpose: To report a modified technique of dry-lensectomy assisted lensectomy in the management of end-stage familial exudative vitreoretinopathy (FEVR) complicated with capsule-endothelial, iris-endothelial adhesion and secondary glaucoma.Entities:
Keywords: capsule-endothelial adhesion; familial exudative vitreoretinopathy; lensectomy; retinal detachment; secondary glaucoma; vitrectomy
Year: 2022 PMID: 35572974 PMCID: PMC9099142 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.850129
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Med (Lausanne) ISSN: 2296-858X
Clinical information of the patients.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
| 1 | M | 2.1 | 37 | 1500 | (+) | NDP c.339 insG/chrX-43809107 | 5 | 5 | OU lensectomy | 8 | 6 | 5 | 6 | (+) | (+) | 21 | remained | remained | / | OU pupillary block with reconstructed AC |
| 2 | M | 2.3 | 38 | 2700 | (+) | FZD4 C226 G>T/chr11-86665902 | 5 | 5 | OU lensectomy | 10 | 26 | 3 | 7 | (–) | (+) | 20 | (–) | deterio- | OU | OD partial retinal reattachment with closed-funnel type; OS pthisis bulbi |
| 3 | F | 4.4 | 40 | 2950 | (–) | LRP5 chr11-68177424/c.G2134A | 1 | 5 | OS lensectomy | 4 | 6 | 5 | 5 | / | (+) | 20 | / | better | OS | OS partial retinal reattachment with open-funnel type |
| 4 | M | 3.6 | 40 | 3300 | (–) | NDP c.134_135delTG/chrX-43817757 43817758 | 4 | 5 | OS lensectomy | 6 | 8 | 7 | 9 | / | (+) | 19 | / | better | / | OS pupillary block with reconstructed AC |
| 5 | F | 3.1 | 39 | 3350 | (–) | FZD4 chr11-86663485/c.A313G | 5 | 1 | OD lensectomy | 8 | 6 | 7 | 6 | (+) | (–) | 18.5 | better | / | / | OD pupillary block with reconstructed AC |
| 6 | F | 3.5 | 39.6 | 2500 | (–) | FZD4 c.1176_1178 | 5 | 5 | OU lensectomy | 10 | 11 | 6 | 6 | (+) | (–) | 17.5 | better | / | OS | OS partial retinal reattachment with open-funnel type |
| 7 | F | 4.1 | 38 | 3100 | (+) | FZD4 chr11 86663050 86663051/c747dupC | 3 | 5 | OS lensectomy | 7 | 18 | 8 | 10 | / | (+) | 16.5 | / | better | / | OS pupillary block with reconstructed AC |
| 8 | M | 5.4 | 40 | 3750 | (+) | ZNF408 chr11-46726357 46726357/c.1083delG | 5 | 1 | OD lensectomy | 7 | 6 | 7 | 6 | (+) | / | 15 | remained | / | / | OD pupillary block with reconstructed AC |
| 9 | M | 2.1 | 37 | 2230 | (–) | NDP chrX-43817758/c.134T>G | 5 | 5 | OU lensectomy | 9 | 8 | 8 | 5 | (+) | (+) | 12.5 | remained | remained | / | OU pupillary block with reconstructed AC |
| 10 | M | 2 | 38 | 4030 | (–) | NDP chrX-43809104/c.343C>T | 5 | 5 | OU lensectomy | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | (+) | (+) | 11.5 | better | better | OU | OD partial retinal reattachment with open-funnel type; OS partial retinal reattachment with closed-funnel type; |
| 11 | F | 2.2 | 39 | 2840 | (–) | LRP5 chr11-68174159/c. | 5 | 5 | OU lensectomy | 7 | 5 | 5 | 8 | (+) | (+) | 11 | better | better | OD | OD partial retinal reattachment with open-funnel type; |
| 12 | F | 3.8 | 37 | 3100 | (–) | LRP5 chr11-68115513/c. | 5 | 5 | OU lensectomy | 3 | 4 | 6 | 4 | (+) | (+) | 10.5 | better | better | OU | OU partial retinal reattachment with open-funnel type with posterior pole nearly reattached. |
| 13 | M | 5.8 | 38 | 2600 | (+) | TSPAN12 chr7-120478883/c. | 4 | 5 | OS lensectomy | 7 | 6 | 8 | 4 | / | (+) | 9 | / | better | / | OS pupillary block with reconstructed AC |
| 14 | M | 1.9 | 39 | 3250 | (–) | FZD4 chr11-86662209/c. | 1 | 5 | OS lensectomy | 6 | 7 | 6 | 5 | / | (+) | 8 | / | better | OS | OS pupillary block with reconstructed AC |
| 15 | M | 4.6 | 41 | 4600 | (–) | LRP5 chr11-68115489/c. | 5 | 4 | OD lensectomy | 9 | 9 | 8 | 10 | (–) | / | 7.5 | / | / | / | OD pupillary block with reconstructed AC |
| 16 | M | 3.3 | 42 | 3850 | (–) | NDP chrX-43809162/c. | 5 | 5 | OD lensectomy. OS lensectomy + vitrectomy + RLF peeling | 6 | 7 | 4 | 9 | (+) | (+) | 4.3 | better | better | OS | OS partial retinal reattachment with open-funnel type with posterior pole nearly reattached. |
No, number; M, male; F, female; GA, gestational age; BW, birth weight; g, gram; OD, oculus dexter; OS, oculus sinister; OU, oculus uterque; FEVR, familial exudative vitreoretinopathy; AC, anterior chamber; RLF, retrolental fibroplasia.
Figure 1The surgical procedures of dry-lensectomy. (A,C,E,G,I,K) Images acquired during the surgery, (B,D,F,H,J,L) schematic diagrams of the procedures. (A,B) A combination of anterior segment anomalies (anterior lens displacement, marked flat anterior chamber (AC), iridocapsular adhesions, capsule-endothelial adhesion with corneal opacification) was noted; (C,D) a limbal incision was made by 20-Gauge MVR blade in a slightly downward manner, starting from the limbus, going through the mid-periphery of the iris and then into the middle of dislocated lens; (E,F) the 23-Gauge vitrector went through the same approach into the lens without anterior chamber irrigation and with cutter off; (G,H) as the vitrector is in the lens, the vitrector started to do the cutting with suction; (I,J) the viscoelastic can be easily injected into the AC to reconstruct the AC; (K,L) the AC maintainer was inserted followed by the lensectomy in a traditional way.
Figure 2Results of the treatment. (A–H) Retcam images of a 4-month-old FEVR patient (Case 3); (A) a combination of anterior segment anomalies (anterior lens displacement, marked AC shallowing, iridocapsular adhesions, capsule-endothelial adhesion with central corneal opacification) were noted; (B) 1-month after the dry-lensectomy assisted surgery, the depth of AC was normal with pupil occlusion; (C) 3 months after the dry-lensectomy assisted surgery, the corneal opacity was reduced; (D) 8 months after the dry-lensectomy assisted surgery, the corneal is nearly transparent, and a second vitrectomy and RLF peeling was performed. (E,F) 1 week after RLF peeling, the retina was partially reattached in an open-funnel manner; (G,H) 6 months after the RLF peeling, the anterior segment was in a stable and good status with clear cornea and round pupil and open-funnel retina. (I–L) Case 16, a 3-month-old male presented with bilateral total RD complicated with corneal opacity and flat AC. Dry-lensectomy combined with vitrectomy and RLF peeling was performed simultaneously. (K,L) 4 months after the surgery, the corneal opacity was limited and reduced, with nearly reattached posterior pole; (M–O) case 12, a 3-month-old FEVR girl received dry-lensectomy assisted surgery and RLF peeling; (M) before the surgery; (N,O) 7 months postoperatively, the corneal opacity was limited and reduced with round pupil and nearly reattached posterior pole. Subretinal exudates were noted; (P) case 11, 7 months after dry-lensectomy assisted lensectomy, the peripheral iridectomy could be seen (red arrow), helping to prevent secondary angle closure or glaucoma caused by pupil block.
Figure 3UBM results of the patients. (A) UBM result of left eye of case 3 (a 3-month-old female's); (B) UBM result of right eye of case 8 (a 5-month-old male). A&B: anterior lens displacement, iridocapsular adhesions, capsule-endothelial adhesion, corneal thickening and edema, and obliterated anterior chamber. (C,D) UBM result the right eye of case 15 (a 4-month-old male). (C) Preoperative UBM images showed shallowing of the AC with a depth of 0.86 mm, and anterior lens displacement. (D) 7 months postoperatively, the AC was reconstructed with a depth of 3.2 mm with AC angle open in this aphakic eye.