| Literature DB >> 35572970 |
Haiming Zhou1, Yuanyuan Wu2,3, Binhua Jiang1, Bowen Li1, Martin Li3, He Tian4, Guanghou Shui4, Sin Man Lam1,4, Timothy Kwok3.
Abstract
Intervention studies with active B vitamin supplementation in cognitively impaired individuals have yielded varying results in randomized controlled trials. In addition, a negative interaction of active B vitamin supplementation with aspirin usage on cognitive outcome was noted, but the molecular basis of the interaction has largely remained unknown. To investigate the metabolic basis of cognitive improvement brought about by active B vitamin supplementation, we conducted an extensive metabolomics analysis covering 302 identified metabolites on the baseline and 24-month serum samples from a cohort of 137 subjects randomly assigned to active supplementation or placebo. Pathway analysis uncovered enhanced gluconeogenesis and War-burg effects underlying cognitive improvement in non-aspirin users supplemented with active B vitamins. In addition, metabolomics revealed that aspirin usage may interact with B vitamin supplementation by altering gut microbial metabolism, particularly in terms of propionate production. Lastly, our omics data suggest that varying capacities to assimilate B vitamins at baseline, possibly mediated by differences in gut microbial composition, may underlie variations in inter-individual responses to active B vitamin supplementation.Entities:
Keywords: B vitamins; aspirin; cognitive impairment; dementia; metabolomics
Year: 2022 PMID: 35572970 PMCID: PMC9091598 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.864152
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Med (Lausanne) ISSN: 2296-858X
FIGURE 1Schematic diagram of clinical study design. Subjects were randomly assigned to active B vitamin supplementation or placebo. Aspirin usage was monitored, which further segregated the subjects into four clinical groups. To examine the molecular basis of differing responses to active B vitamin supplementation, subjects under active B vitamins, non-aspirin group were further segregated into three groups based on cognitive outcome measured by 24-month changes in CDR-SOB. Baseline and 24-month serum samples were analyzed using untargeted metabolomics covering more than 300 identified metabolites.
Clinical cohort summary.
| Active + aspirin | Active + non-aspirin, CDR-SOB increased | Active + non-aspirin, CDR-SOB unchanged | Active + non-aspirin, CDR-SOB decreased | Placebo + aspirin | Placebo + non-aspirin | ||
|
| |||||||
|
| 25 | 22 | 19 | 19 | 27 | 25 | |
| Age [mean (SD)] | 76.5 (6.03) | 76.9 (4.59) | 75.0 (5.34) | 76.8 (4.3) | 77.96 (4.38) | 78.0 (5.81) | 0.4209 |
| Change in CDR-SOB over 24 months [mean (SD)] | 0.60 (1.46) | 1.36 (1.15)* | 0 (0) | −0.71 (0.35)* | −0.17 (0.67) | 0.54 (0.095)* | *Indicates statistical significant changes compared to baseline |
| Sex | 0.6676 | ||||||
| Male | 18 (72%) | 16 (72.8%) | 13 (68.4%) | 11 (57%) | 17 (63%) | 16 (64%) | |
| Female | 7 (28%) | 6 (27.2%) | 6 (31.6%%) | 8 (42.1%) | 10 (37%) | 9 (36%) | |
Differences in age across groups were compared using Welch’s ANOVA. Changes in sex were compared using Chi-square’s test. Longitudinal changes in CDR-SOB were compared using paired t-test.
FIGURE 2Volcano plots illustrate serum metabolite changes at 24-month in selected pairwise comparisons of clinical groups, which included (A) active B vitamin supplementation in non-aspirin users with reduction in CDR-SOB relative to non-aspirin users on placebo; (B) active B vitamin supplementation in non-aspirin users with reduction in CDR-SOB relative to those without changes in CDR-SOB; (C) active B vitamin supplementation in non-aspirin users with reduction in CDR-SOB relative to active B vitamin supplementation in aspirin users; (D) active B vitamin supplementation in aspirin users relative to aspirin users on placebo. Dotplots illustrate changes in the levels in (E) hippuric acid and (F) tetrahydro-aldosterone-3-glucuronide at 24 months. P-values from two-sided Dunn’s tests were displayed.
FIGURE 3Top altered metabolic pathways based on metabolome changes at 24-month in selected pairwise comparisons of clinical groups, which included (A) active B vitamin supplementation in non-aspirin users with reduction in CDR-SOB relative to non-aspirin users on placebo; (B) active B vitamin supplementation in non-aspirin users with reduction in CDR-SOB relative to those without changes in CDR-SOB; (C) active B vitamin supplementation in non-aspirin users with reduction in CDR-SOB relative to active B vitamin supplementation in aspirin users; (D) active B vitamin supplementation in aspirin users relative to aspirin users on placebo.
Summary of top altered pathways.
| Comparisons | Metabolite set | Total | Expected | Hits | Fold | Raw | Direction |
| Active non-aspirin CDR-SOB decreased/Placebo non-aspirin | Gluconeogenesis | 2 | 0.204 | 2 | 9.8 | 0.00947 | Upregulated |
| Warburg effect | 6 | 0.612 | 3 | 4.9 | 0.0133 | Upregulated | |
| Ammonia recycling | 8 | 0.816 | 3 | 3.68 | 0.0332 | Upregulated | |
| Glutamate metabolism | 8 | 0.816 | 3 | 3.68 | 0.0332 | Upregulated | |
| Purine metabolism | 10 | 1.02 | 3 | 2.94 | 0.0633 | Upregulated | |
| Arginine and proline Metabolism | 11 | 1.12 | 3 | 2.68 | 0.082 | Upregulated | |
| Active non-aspirin CDR-SOB decreased/active non-aspirin CDR-SOB unchanged | Spermidine and spermine biosynthesis | 4 | 0.0408 | 1 | 24.51 | 0.0408 | Upregulated |
| Urea cycle | 9 | 0.0918 | 1 | 10.89 | 0.0918 | Upregulated | |
| Active non-aspirin CDR-SOB decreased/active aspirin | Propanoate metabolism | 4 | 0.0816 | 1 | 12.25 | 0.0804 | Upregulated |
| Valine, leucine and Isoleucine Degradation | 5 | 0.102 | 1 | 9.8 | 0.0999 | Upregulated | |
| Active aspirin/placebo aspirin | Phenylalanine and tyrosine metabolism | 5 | 0.102 | 1 | 9.8 | 0.0999 | Downregulated |
FIGURE 4Differences in baseline metabolome profiles between non-aspirin users on active B vitamin supplementation who responded positively (i.e., reduction in CDR-SOB) and negatively (i.e., increase in CDR-SOB) over the intervention period of 24 months. (A–D) OPLS-DA analysis of baseline serum metabolomes between the two groups; (E) Top altered metabolic pathway between the two groups; (F) Heatmap illustrates top altered metabolites based on VIP scores from OPLS-DA analysis.