| Literature DB >> 35572942 |
Yuankun Cai1, Zheng Liu1, Chenguang Jia1, Jingwei Zhao1, Songshan Chai1, Zhengwei Li1, Chengshi Xu1, Tingbao Zhang1, Yihui Ma1, Chao Ma1, Xinjun Chen1, Pucha Jiang1, Wenyuan Zhao1, Jincao Chen1, Nanxiang Xiong1.
Abstract
Background: Sex differences in the outcomes of patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) remain controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate sex differences in the outcomes of patients with aSAH. Method: This study retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of consecutive patients with aSAH, admitted to the Department of Neurosurgery, Wuhan University Zhongnan Hospital, from May 1, 2020 to December 31, 2020. The modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score was used to evaluate the prognosis of patients at discharge. Outcome indicators included cerebral ischemia, hydrocephalus, and mRS ≥ 2 at discharge.Entities:
Keywords: aneurysm; aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH); gender; outcome; propensity adjustment
Year: 2022 PMID: 35572942 PMCID: PMC9103686 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.853513
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Neurol ISSN: 1664-2295 Impact factor: 4.086
The overall characteristics of the patients and the comparison of gender differences.
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 60.5 ± 8.6 | 61.3 ± 8.5 | 60.0 ± 8.5 | 0.032 |
|
| 23.8 ± 3.4 | 23.9 ± 3.6 | 23.6 ± 3.0 | 0.505 |
| <18.5 | 14 (4.9%) | 11 (6.0%) | 3 (3.0%) | 0.044 |
| 18.5 ~ 23.9 | 131 (46.3%) | 80 (43.5%) | 51 (51.5%) | |
| 24 ~ 27.9 | 109 (38.5%) | 68 (37.0%) | 41 (41.4%) | |
| ≥28 | 29 (10.2%) | 25 (13.6%) | 4 (4.0%) | |
|
| ||||
| Hypertension | 162 (57.2%) | 110 (59.8%) | 52 (52.5%) | 0.239 |
| Diabetes | 18 (6.4%) | 15 (8.2%) | 3 (3.0%) | 0.092 |
| Heart disease | 22 (7.8%) | 17 (9.2%) | 5 (5.1%) | 0.209 |
| Smoking | 73 (25.8%) | 7 (3.8%) | 66 (66.7%) | <0.001 |
| Drinking | 60 (21.2%) | 12 (6.5%) | 48 (48.5%) | <0.001 |
| Multiple aneurysms | 49 (17.3%) | 35 (19.0%) | 14 (14.1%) | 0.301 |
|
| <0.001 | |||
| ACA | 56 (19.8%) | 22 (12.0%) | 34 (34.3%) | |
| ICA | 146 (51.6%) | 111 (60.3%) | 35 (35.4%) | |
| MCA | 45 (15.9%) | 28 (15.2%) | 17 (17.2%) | |
| PCA | 36 (12.7%) | 23 (12.5%) | 13 (13.1%) | |
|
| 0.29 | |||
| Craniotomy | 170 (60.1%) | 106 (57.6%) | 64 (64.6%) | |
| Endovascular | 88 (31.1%) | 63 (34.2%) | 25 (25.3%) | |
| Conservative | 25 (8.8%) | 15 (8.2%) | 10 (10.1%) | |
BMI, Body mass index; ICA, Internal carotid arteries; ACA, Anterior cerebral artery; MCA, Middle cerebral artery; PCA, Posterior circulation artery.
p < 0.05, with a statistical difference.
Figure 1The overall distribution of patients' Hunt–Hess grades and mFisher scores.
Comparison of differences in outcomes between male and female patients before and after propensity adjustment.
|
|
|
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
| ||||||
| 0 | 50 (27.2%) | 19 (19.2%) | 0.225 | 43 (25.9%) | 19 (22.9%) | 0.68 |
| 1 | 37 (20.1%) | 19 (19.2%) | 36 (21.7%) | 15 (18.1%) | ||
| 2 | 22 (12.0%) | 19 (19%2) | 19 (11.5%) | 14 (16.9%) | ||
| 3 | 32 (17.4%) | 23 (23.2%) | 30 (18.1%) | 18 (21.7%) | ||
| 4 | 43 (23.4%) | 19 (19.2%) | 38 (22.9%) | 17 (20.5%) | ||
|
| ||||||
| Mortality | 18 (9.8%) | 11 (11.1%) | 0.725 | 16 (9.6%) | 10 (12.0%) | 0.558 |
| Ischemia | 50 (27.2%) | 15 (15.2%) | 0.022 | 47 (28.3%) | 14 (16.9%) | 0.048 |
| Hydrocephalus | 25 (13.6%) | 12 (12.1%) | 0.727 | 24 (14.5%) | 9 (10.8%) | 0.428 |
| Intracranial infection | 1 (0.5%) | 2 (2.0%) | 0.247 | 1 (0.6%) | 2 (2.4%) | 0.218 |
| mRS ≥ 2 | 110 (59.8%) | 44 (44.4%) | 0.013 | 100 (60.241) | 39 (46.988) | 0.047 |
mRS, Modified rankin scale.
p < 0.05, with a statistical difference.
Figure 2Comparison of the proportion of men and women in different age classes before and after propensity score adjustment. Female and male are pre-adjustment and female′ and male′ are post-adjustment.
Multivariate logistic regression analysis of patients with poor prognosis at discharge before propensity adjustment.
|
|
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 1.021 (0.981–1.062) | 0.304 | ||||
| Male | 0.54 (0.267–1.068) | 0.081 | ||||
| Hypertension | 1.22 (0.648–2.302) | 0.537 | ||||
|
| ||||||
| 1 | 1.444 (0.585–3.585) | 0.424 | ||||
| 2 | 1.664 (0.62–4.445) | 0.308 | ||||
| 3 | 5.378 (1.979–15.368) | 0.001 | ||||
| 4 | 9.322 (3.282–28.907) | <0.001 | ||||
|
| ||||||
| Conservative | 3.154 (0.966–10.907) | 0.061 | ||||
| Craniotomy | 1.157 (0.552–2.434) | 0.699 | ||||
|
| ||||||
| ICA | 1.241 (0.503–3.097) | 0.64 | ||||
| MCA | 2.5 (0.89–7.221) | 0.085 | ||||
| PCA | 0.673 (0.193–2.292) | 0.528 | ||||
| Ischemia | 10.261 (3.958–31.182) | <0.001 | ||||
| Hydrocephalus | NA | NA | ||||
ICA, Internal carotid arteries; MCA, Middle cerebral artery; PCA, Posterior circulation artery; NA, Not applicable.
p < 0.05, with a statistical difference.
Multivariate logistic regression analysis of patients with poor prognosis at discharge after propensity adjustment.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Male | 0.625 (0.32–1.196) | 0.159 |
|
| ||
| 1 | 1.521 (0.63–3.712) | 0.352 |
| 2 | 2.374 (0.89–6.474) | 0.087 |
| 3 | 6.797 (2.64–18.642) | <0.001 |
| 4 | 9.972 (3.74–29.07) | <0.001 |
|
| ||
| Conservative | 3.488 (1.02–13.208) | 0.052 |
| Craniotomy | 1.284 (0.63–2.633) | 0.492 |
| Ischemia | 9.219 (3.78–26.332) | <0.001 |
| Hydrocephalus | NA | NA |
NA, Not applicable.
p < 0.05, with a statistical difference.