| Literature DB >> 35572865 |
Masahiro Yanagiya1, Masaaki Sato1, Naohiro Ijiri1, Kimihiko Kobayashi1, Masaaki Nagano1, Chihiro Konoeda1, Kentaro Kitano1, Jun Nakajima1.
Abstract
Background: Virtual-assisted lung mapping (VAL-MAP) is a preoperative bronchoscopic multispot dye-marking procedure to facilitate sublobar lung resection for unidentifiable lung nodules. To increase detectable markings, we performed VAL-MAP using dual staining (VAL-MAP DS) with indocyanine green (ICG) and indigo carmine. This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the modified technique.Entities:
Keywords: Indocyanine green (ICG); thoracic surgery; virtual-assisted lung mapping (VAL-MAP)
Year: 2022 PMID: 35572865 PMCID: PMC9096313 DOI: 10.21037/jtd-21-1829
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Thorac Dis ISSN: 2072-1439 Impact factor: 2.895
Eligibility criteria for VAL-MAP DS with ICG and indigo carmine
| Inclusion criteria |
| (I) A case in which pulmonary malignancy is suspected or diagnosed and the establishment of resection lines other than the typical interlobar fissure is required |
| (II) A case that requires careful determination of resection lines to ensure resection margins because of difficult intraoperative tumor localization. It falls under any of the following: |
| • Lesions that are challenging to identify intraoperatively because of the lesion characteristics including: |
| (i) Lesions containing ground glass opacity in whole or in part |
| (ii) Lesions with a tumor diameter of 5 mm or less |
| (iii) Lesions whose distance from the visceral pleura is greater than the tumor diameter |
| • Lesions that are challenging to identify intraoperatively because of underlying lung conditions: |
| (i) Severe pleural adhesion or anthracosis is anticipated (e.g., past history of open chest surgery or heavy smoking history) |
| (ii) Pre-existing benign nodules that are confusing and misleading (e.g., silicosis, old tuberculosis) |
| • Lesions/conditions judged to require marking for other reasons |
| (III) The consent of the patient or substitute has been obtained |
| Exclusion criteria |
| (I) Allergy to indigo carmine or ICG |
| (II) Pregnancy |
| (III) Bronchoscopy and/or marking cannot be conducted because of existing complications |
| (IV) Other reasons that are judged to be inappropriate for inclusion by the corresponding or participating surgeons/physicians in the study |
VAL-MAP DS, VAL-MAP using dual staining; ICG, indocyanine green.
Figure 1Grading system of intraoperative findings in ICG marking of VAL-MAP. (A) Grade A: invisible. (B) Grade B: visible with a well-defined spot. (C) Grade C: visible but too extensive in coverage. Indigo carmine marking was visible (black dotted circle); however, ICG marking was invisible (A). ICG marking and indigo carmine marking were visible in the same location (B). ICG marking was visible but too extensive (C), compared with indigo carmine marking. ICG, indocyanine green; VAL-MAP, virtual-assisted lung mapping.
Baseline demographics of patients
| Parameter | Data |
|---|---|
| Mean age (years) | 64.0±12.3 |
| Female sex | 11 (55.0%) |
| Ever smoker | 10 (50.0%) |
| Smoking history (pack-years) | 28.2±48.3 |
| Comorbidities | |
| Past history of coronary artery disease | 3 |
| Past history of stroke | 1 |
| Liver cirrhosis | 1 |
| Atrial fibrillation | 1 |
| Past history of nontuberculous mycobacteria | 1 |
| Diabetes mellitus | 1 |
| Autoimmune disease | 1 |
Characteristics of lesions and surgeries
| Characteristics | Data |
|---|---|
| Number of target lesions per patient | |
| 1 | 16 |
| 2 | 2 |
| 3 | 1 |
| 4 | 1 |
| Number of markings per patient | 3.6±1.4 |
| Number of actual markings | 72 |
| Number of markings evaluated intraoperatively | 69 |
| Appearance of lesions on chest CT | |
| Pure GGN | 5 |
| Partly solid GGN | 6 |
| Solid | 15 |
| Cavitary | 1 |
| Diameter of lesions (mm) | 10.0±5.3 |
| Depth from lesions to pleura (mm) | 8.4±7.0 |
| Histopathological diagnosis | |
| Primary lung cancer | 11 |
| Tumor metastatic to lung | 16 |
| Surgical procedure | |
| Wedge resection | 25 |
| Segmentectomy | 2 |
| Surgical approach | |
| VATS | 19 |
| Open thoracotomy | 1 |
CT, computed tomography; GGN, ground-glass nodule; VATS, video-assisted thoracic surgery.
Figure 2Summary of grading evaluation of markings. ICG, indocyanine green.
Reasons for unidentifiable (grade 0) or faint (grade 1) markings
| Reason | Grade 0 | Grade 1 |
|---|---|---|
| Central injection | 6 | 0 |
| Anthracosis | 4 | 9 |
Figure 3An intraoperative image in which indigo carmine markings were hardly identified, but ICG markings were easily identified. (A) Indigo carmine markings were indistinguishable or faint because of anthracosis. (B) ICG markings were clearly visible even with anthracosis. ICG, indocyanine green.
Figure 4Influence of smoking status on ICG marking quality. The distribution of grades of ICG marking significantly differed between lungs with smoking history equal or less than 50 pack-years and those with more than 50 pack-years (P<0.001). ICG, indocyanine green.