Xuehui Wei1, Jianzong Wang1. 1. Center for High Pressure Science and Technology Advanced Research, Beijing 10094, China.
Abstract
EuNi2P2 was studied with a diamond anvil cell (DAC) and X-ray diffraction (XRD). The structural evolution of powder crystal EuNi2P2 under high pressure up to 137 GPa and its single-crystal structure up to 9 GPa were reported. The unique structural phase transition of this 122-type crystal occurred above 70 GPa in powder crystal EuNi2P2. The diffraction data from single-crystal EuNi2P2 revealed the coordinate change of the P atom, and the stability of the crystal at 9 GPa was confirmed. The crystal EuNi2P2 remained stable with a tetragonal phase without obvious symmetry changes during compression to 137 GPa.
EuNi2P2 was studied with a diamond anvil cell (DAC) and X-ray diffraction (XRD). The structural evolution of powder crystal EuNi2P2 under high pressure up to 137 GPa and its single-crystal structure up to 9 GPa were reported. The unique structural phase transition of this 122-type crystal occurred above 70 GPa in powder crystal EuNi2P2. The diffraction data from single-crystal EuNi2P2 revealed the coordinate change of the P atom, and the stability of the crystal at 9 GPa was confirmed. The crystal EuNi2P2 remained stable with a tetragonal phase without obvious symmetry changes during compression to 137 GPa.
There is a rich variety
of compounds similar to the ThCr2Si2-type crystal
(I4/mmm). Its unique tetragonal
structure can accommodate a variety of atoms
with large radius differences, which leads to its special structural
and electromagnetic transitions that occur under high pressure.[1−5] According to previous works on high-pressure study of EuNi2P2, the crystal had no obvious structural change in the
pressure range of 32–45 GPa.[5,6] Interestingly,
this type of crystal often exhibits a transition to a collapsed tetragonal
phase at high pressure, such as EuCo2As2, EuFe2As2, or EuCo2P2. In the phase
transition, the abnormal sharp decrease in the c-axis
parameter has attracted much attention.[3,7,8] The compressibility along the c-axis
is higher than that along the a- and b-axes, and high-pressure-induced amorphization may even occur with
significant compression along the c-axis.[9] In this work, a high-pressure powder crystal
X-ray diffraction (XRD) experiment on EuNi2P2 was carried out to investigate whether there was a similar phase
transition to a collapsed tetragonal phase. We investigated the compressibility
of EuNi2P2 under high pressures up to 137 GPa
at room temperature. The equation of state (EOS) of EuNi2P2 was also evaluated by fitting pressure–volume
data that had been collected and Rietveld refined. Above 66 GPa, the c parameter and crystal volume of EuNi2P2 suddenly changed and a possible phase transformation occurred.The valence state of the rare earth element Eu has always been
a hot topic in physics and is closely related to the transfer of some
4f-electrons to the conduction band and near the Fermi surface.[10] In recent years, EuNi2P2 has been regarded as a rare earth compound with a mixed valence
state, and the valence state of Eu is closely related to both pressure
and temperature.[11] The evolution of the
volume of single-crystal EuNi2P2, which is somewhat
connected to its valence state, is an interesting study.[12] High-pressure study of EuNi2P2 has shown that there is a transition from Eu2+ to Eu3+ and that a new P–P bond parallel to the c-axis can be formed.[5] Additionally,
the electrical resistivity of EuNi2P2 has been
reported to abnormally change above 8 GPa.[6] The changes in the mixed valence state and resistivity under high
pressure may be accompanied by subtle changes in the structure; however,
as reported, there is no obvious change in the structure based on
the powder crystal data. Therefore, by taking advantage of high-pressure
single-crystal XRD,[13] this work conducted
a detailed study on the high-pressure structure of crystal EuNi2P2.
Experimental Details
The EuNi2P2 sample was synthesized using
the tin-flux method.[5,14] The samples used in the two independent
experiments were processed from the same batch of single-crystal samples.
Powder
X-ray Diffraction
The in situ high-pressure
XRD measurement for powder EuNi2P2 was performed
up to 137 GPa, using synchrotron X-rays with a wavelength of 0.3344
Å at 13-ID-D in APS (Argonne National Laboratory). The powder
sample was loaded into a diamond anvil cell (DAC) with a diamond culet
size of 100 μm. A Re chip was used as a gasket, and Au was used
as a pressure marker.[15] Without a pressure-transmitting
medium, the effects of deviatoric stress present at high pressure
will exist.[9,16]
Single-Crystal X-ray Diffraction
For the sample preparation,
EuNi2P2 crystals were processed into 30 μm
blocks for later use. The DAC was used as a pressurizing device with
a diamond culet of 500 μm. A 300 μm diameter hole was
drilled in T301, used as the gasket, to form the sample chamber, and
ruby was used as the pressure marker.[17] In this experiment, we loaded neon as a pressure-transmitting medium
to offer an approximate hydrostatic environment. The light source
used for the experiments was a Bruker D8 VENTURE, a single-crystal
X-ray diffractometer with a Ag Kα IμS microfocus source
(Ag Kα, λ= 0.56087 Å). The collected data were refined
with SHELX through APEX3 and Olex2.[18]
Results and Discussion
Powder Crystal
Figure shows the diffraction patterns
of the powder EuNi2P2 sample at high pressure,
together with those
of the Au and Re phases. No obvious new peaks are observed at pressures
up to 137 GPa, which proves the stability of this series of crystals.[5−7] No phase transitions are observed up to 137 GPa in the XRD experiments.
As shown in Figure , the crystal is refined according to the (I4/mmm, No. 139) symmetry to obtain the lattice parameters
of EuNi2P2 under pressure. Figure shows the evolution of the
lattice parameters during compression and the data from the GSAS and
PowderCell program packages.[19] Since there
was no pressure-transmitting medium, the initial pressure was 40 GPa.
When fitting the volume of the crystal under high pressure using the
third-order Birch–Murnaghan EOS,[20] in which the bulk modulus is B0 and
its pressure derivative is B0′, the Birch–Murnaghan
formulation is valid only when the latter value is sufficiently close
to 4,[21] and two red and blue fitting lines
can be obtained.
Figure 1
Selected
powder synchrotron XRD patterns of EuNi2P2,
with Re and Au pressure markers, up to 137 GPa. X-ray diffraction
patterns of EuNi2P2 at high pressures, which
are indexed to the tetragonal ThCr2Si2-type
structure (I4/mmm).
Figure 2
Rietveld refinements of powder EuNi2P2 (Re,
Au) at 0 and 40 GPa showing that no phase transitions are observed
up to 137 GPa in the XRD experiments. The crystal is refined according
to the (I4/mmm, No. 139) symmetry.
Figure 3
(a) Variations of lattice constants under high pressure.
(b) Pressure
dependence of the unit cell volume compression (V) for the tetragonal phase of EuNi2P2 up to
137 GPa. The red and blue solid curves are the Birch–Murnaghan
EOS fitted to the two phases. The bulk modulus of EuNi2P2 is B0 = 72(3) GPa and 205(13)
GPa. The error for pressure determination gradually increases with
increasing pressure.
Birch–Murnaghan
equation:Selected
powder synchrotron XRD patterns of EuNi2P2,
with Re and Au pressure markers, up to 137 GPa. X-ray diffraction
patterns of EuNi2P2 at high pressures, which
are indexed to the tetragonal ThCr2Si2-type
structure (I4/mmm).Rietveld refinements of powder EuNi2P2 (Re,
Au) at 0 and 40 GPa showing that no phase transitions are observed
up to 137 GPa in the XRD experiments. The crystal is refined according
to the (I4/mmm, No. 139) symmetry.(a) Variations of lattice constants under high pressure.
(b) Pressure
dependence of the unit cell volume compression (V) for the tetragonal phase of EuNi2P2 up to
137 GPa. The red and blue solid curves are the Birch–Murnaghan
EOS fitted to the two phases. The bulk modulus of EuNi2P2 is B0 = 72(3) GPa and 205(13)
GPa. The error for pressure determination gradually increases with
increasing pressure.In this work, to better
compare the bulk modulus of EuNi2P2, we fitted
the obtained volume data to the second-order
Birch–Murnaghan EOS (fixing B0′ = 4).[22,23] The correlation coefficient of B0 and
its pressure derivative B0′ in the first fitting is greater
than 99%, and that in the second fitting is greater than 98%.[24] However, the bulk modulus B0 increases to 205(13), which is not only due to the increase
in atomic packing in the crystal but also related to the increase
in deviatoric stress. The existence of deviatoric stress will reduce
the compressibility of the crystal.[9,16] According
to Figure b, the crystal
shows a rapid volume decrease of approximately 19% with the pressure
increasing from 66 to 80 GPa; at the same time, the drastic decrease
in the lattice parameter c in the crystal is more
than 10% according to Figure a, which indicates a tetragonal phase-to-collapsed tetragonal
phase transition in EuNi2P2 above 66 GPa. The
same type of crystal structure has Eu–Eu exchange interactions
in the ab-plane and a helical antiferromagnetic structure
with the helix axis along the c-axis direction,[25] where c/a is
greater than 2. The material is more compressible along the c-axis under high pressure. Similar to the cases of EuCo2P2, EuCo2As2, and EuFe2As2, in which there is an isostructural collapse
in EuCo2P2 at 3.1 GPa,[3,8] EuCo2As2 at 4.7 GPa, and EuFe2As2 at 8.5 GPa,[7] the above structural collapse
occurs within 15 GPa. The isostructural collapse of this series is
accompanied by negative compressibility of lattice parameter a and reduction of the polar velocity of c, while the high-pressure collapse of EuNi2P2 only shows rapid compression of c, without negative
compressibility of a. According to previous reports,
the bond interaction of the P atom and the change in the electronic
structure might be the main reasons for the collapse under high pressure.[3] Therefore, more detailed research is needed.
Single Crystal
The high-pressure single-crystal diffraction
data are refined to obtain the crystal CIF files within 10 GPa. The
evolution of the high-pressure single-crystal parameters is consistent
with previous work within 45 GPa.[5,6] As shown in Figure , the changes in
the a of EuNi2P2 are relatively
stable, while c fluctuates to some extent, which
may lead to instability of the c-axis changes. The
single-crystal structure is refined with Olex2 to produce the corresponding
CIF files,[18] and the lattice parameters,
lattice volumes, and lengths of Ni–P and P–P bonds at
different pressures are determined with pubICIF.[26] With the Birch–Murnaghan equation,[20] the P–V curve is fitted, and the bulk modulus B0 is obtained as B0 = 103(2) GPa. The
red solid line in Figure is the Birch–Murnaghan EOS fitted to the phase. Compared
to previous reports, the bulk modulus of EuNi2P2 up to 9.02 GPa is smaller in this work; the previously obtained
bulk modulus is B0 = 154.9(6) GPa in the
range of 0–32 GPa[5] and B0 = 147.9(3) GPa in the range of 0–45 GPa.[6] Interestingly, the single-crystal EuCo2As2 under nonhydrostatic pressure exhibits an isostructural
phase transition from 3.2 to 4.7 GPa with a collapsed tetragonal structure,
resulting in a smaller tetragonal structure with bulk modulus B0 = 48(4) up to 4.7 GPa and B0 = 111(2) GPa after the collapse.[3] Single-crystal EuFe2As2, which is layered,
also exhibits a collapsed structural transformation, with a smaller
bulk modulus of 39(1) GPa before the collapse compared to the value
of 134(1) GPa after the collapse.[7] In comparison
with the bulk modulus of the same type of crystal, B0 of single-crystal EuNi2P2 in the
range below 9 GPa of 103(2) GPa has a certain credibility.[23]
Figure 4
Lattice parameters a and c for
the tetragonal phase as a function of pressure; (inset) pressure dependence
of the unit cell volume compression (V) for the tetragonal
phase of single-crystal EuNi2P2 up to a pressure
of 9.02 GPa. The red solid curves are the Birch–Murnaghan EOS
fitted to the phases.
Lattice parameters a and c for
the tetragonal phase as a function of pressure; (inset) pressure dependence
of the unit cell volume compression (V) for the tetragonal
phase of single-crystal EuNi2P2 up to a pressure
of 9.02 GPa. The red solid curves are the Birch–Murnaghan EOS
fitted to the phases.The refined high-pressure
crystal structure was obtained by Vesta,[27] from which the bond lengths and atomic positions
were derived, as shown in Figure . The z fractional coordinate of the
P atom is the unique changed parameter under high pressure, and the
evolution process of the crystal structure under pressure can be better
analyzed by studying the evolution of P, which is also an important
basis for influencing the fluctuation of the mixed valence state of
Eu. The bond length decreases with increasing P atomic coordinate,
as shown in Figure . There are possible mutations in the crystal during compression
due to changes in the valence state that may cause collapsed phase
transformation.[28] Possible structural phase
transitions can be found by meticulously studying the high-pressure
structures.
Figure 5
(Blue squares) z fractional coordinate of the
P atom; (black squares) evolution trend of the P–P bond length
during compression.
(Blue squares) z fractional coordinate of the
P atom; (black squares) evolution trend of the P–P bond length
during compression.Medvedev et al. found
that the resistivity of EuNi2P2 obviously changed
above 8 GPa.[6] For ThCr2Si2-type structure BaTi2Sb2O, a new Sb–Sb
bond appears according to the
Sb p to Ti 3d bands,[29] and the number of
d-electrons is decisive for the order of new bonds.[1] Interestingly, in EuNi2As2, the existence
of Ni vacancies does not affect the crystal structure and related
physical properties,[30] but the change in
the components will change the lattice volume to some extent and affect
the charge transfer efficiency.[31] According
to previous work on EuCo2P2, the crystal structure
underwent a collapsed phase transition under 4.5 GPa, and the high-pressure-induced
redistribution of the electron density to form a new weak P–P
bond. Continuous pressure increased the electron density, and chemical
bonds such as Eu–P and P–P were significantly enhanced.
For EuCo2P2 under high pressure, the P–P
bond was shortened and the electron redistribution was changed, which
eventually led to an obvious change in the crystal microstructure
and properties.[4,8] However, in the single-crystal
experiment, no fine structural abnormalities of EuNi2P2 were found during compression to 9 GPa.As shown in Figure , during compression,
there appears to be an obvious alteration of
the electron density as the pressure increases. This electron density
alteration coincides with the appearance of charge transfer in previous
reports.[3,5−7] Regarding the important
role of the d-electrons, in homologous structure EuFe2P2, both Fe–P and Fe–Fe exhibit covalent and ionic
bond characteristics and Fe 3d-electrons also play an important role
in the electronic structure.[32] The electronic
structure of the Ni (Fe, Co) atom has an important influence on the
bond interaction of the anion.
Figure 6
Electron density distribution of atoms
(Eu, Ni, P) projected perpendicular
to [100].
Electron density distribution of atoms
(Eu, Ni, P) projected perpendicular
to [100].
Conclusions
In
this work, the isostructural phase transition of EuNi2P2 above 66 GPa is found by high-pressure diffraction
measurements, and the change in the P–P bond length is found
to correspond to the coordinate of the P atom according to the single-crystal
XRD experiment. Due to the large deviatoric stress in the nonhydrostatic
environment, the compressibility of EuNi2P2 is
reduced, so we calculated a large bulk modulus B0 of 205(13) GPa. Combined with single-crystal diffraction
data, the symmetry of EuNi2P2 is found to have
good stability but c exhibits a sudden change trend
during compression.
Authors: Florent Occelli; Daniel L Farber; James Badro; Chantel M Aracne; David M Teter; Michael Hanfland; Bernard Canny; Bernard Couzinet Journal: Phys Rev Lett Date: 2004-08-24 Impact factor: 9.161
Authors: Matthew Bishop; Walter Uhoya; Georgiy Tsoi; Yogesh K Vohra; Athena S Sefat; Brian C Sales Journal: J Phys Condens Matter Date: 2010-10-04 Impact factor: 2.333
Authors: Vincent Yannello; Francois Guillou; Alexander A Yaroslavtsev; Zachary P Tener; Fabrice Wilhelm; Alexander N Yaresko; Serguei L Molodtsov; Andreas Scherz; Andrei Rogalev; Michael Shatruk Journal: Chemistry Date: 2019-02-21 Impact factor: 5.236
Authors: S A Medvedev; P Naumov; O Barkalov; C Shekhar; T Palasyuk; V Ksenofontov; G Wortmann; C Felser Journal: J Phys Condens Matter Date: 2014-07-24 Impact factor: 2.333
Authors: U B Paramanik; A Bar; Debarchan Das; N Caroca-Canales; R Prasad; C Geibel; Z Hossain Journal: J Phys Condens Matter Date: 2016-03-18 Impact factor: 2.333
Authors: Walter Uhoya; Georgiy Tsoi; Yogesh K Vohra; Michael A McGuire; Athena S Sefat; Brian C Sales; David Mandrus; Samuel T Weir Journal: J Phys Condens Matter Date: 2010-06-29 Impact factor: 2.333