| Literature DB >> 35572557 |
Yang Zhang1, Shanfeng Hao1, Na Xiao1, Yu Zhang1, Huaquan Wang1, Lijuan Li1, Rong Fu1, Zonghong Shao1.
Abstract
The characteristic feature of immune-related pancytopenia (IRP) is autoantibody-mediated bone marrow (BM) damage and peripheral blood cytopenia. We found that the potential antigen of IRP was Ferritin light chain (FTL) by SEREX (serological analysis of recombinant cDNA expression libraries) in the previous study. In this study, we tried to explore the antigenic epitopes of FTL and verify its antigenicity in IRP. We found the possible FTL epitope: VNLYLQASYTYLSLG by phage random peptide library. Through ELISPOT, it was found that peptide VNLYLQASYTYLSLG can significantly stimulate the production of interleukin-4 and cannot stimulate the production of interferon-γ, which suggested that the peptide can obviously activate Th2 cells. Peptide-major histocompatibility complex tetramer elicited antigen-specific T cell responses. The expression levels of FTL were significantly increased in the patients with untreated IRP (P < 0.05). In conclusion, we found that FTL is the target antigen for some patients with IRP. The peptide of VNLYLQASYTYLSLG is an epitope of the target antigen. The target antigen is abnormally overexpressed on the membrane of BM cells, especially on the surface of CD34+ BM cells of patients with IRP. In addition, it is related to the severity of disease. These results provide a possible new target for the treatment of IRP in the future.Entities:
Keywords: ELISPOT; FTL; antigenic epitopes; pancytopenia; phage random peptide library
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35572557 PMCID: PMC9097271 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.851096
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 8.786
Figure 1(A) The purified antibody of normal controls (lane 2) and patients with untreated IRP (lane 4) assessed by SDS-PAGE. Lane 1, molecular weight markers. Lanes 3 and 5, only a small amount of antibody remained in the flow-through solution of normal controls (lane 3) and patients with untreated IRP (lane 5). (B) Phage biopanning and enrichment after three rounds.
The results of sequencing.
| Clone | Nucleotide sequences | Peptide sequences |
|---|---|---|
| 1D2 | TGGAGTCTTGGGTATACTGGG | WSLGYTG |
| 1A5 | TGGAGTCTTGGGTATACTGGG | WSLGYTG |
| 2C11 | ACGATTTATACTACTTGGCAG | TIYTTWQ |
| 2C9 | TGGAGTCTTGGGTATACTCGG | WSLGYTR |
| 2E9 | ACGATTTATACTACTTGGCAG | TIYTTWQ |
| 2A9 | ACGATTTATACTACTTGGCAG | TIYTTWQ |
| 2B8 | TATACGACTACTTTGACGTAT | YTTTLTY |
| 2B12 | ACGATTTATACTACTTGGCAG | TIYTTWQ |
After sequence analysis, a total of four different clones were obtained. Comprehensive analysis of these four sequences revealed that all peptides contained two amino acids YT. The sequence of the polypeptide was further compared with the FTL amino acid sequence, and the results are as follows:
1D2: WSLGYTG
2C11: TIYTTWQ
2C9: WSLGYTR
2B8: YTTTLTY
FTL antigen sequence:
MSSQIRQNYSTDVEAAVNSLVNLYLQASYTYLSLGFYFDRD802665802665DVALEGVSHFFRELAEEKREGYERLLKMQNQRGGRALFQDIKKPAEDEWGKTPDAMKAAMALEKKLNQALLDLHALGSARTDPHLCDFLETHFLDEEVKLIKKMGDHLTNLHRLGGPEAGLGEYLFERLTLKHD.
Figure 2ELISPOT analysis. (A) IL-4 ELISPOT. The number of spots in experimental group 1 (PBMCs + peptide 1) was significantly higher than that in the negative control well. However, there was no difference in the number of spots in experimental group 2 (PBMCs + peptide 2) compared with the negative control well. (B) IFN-γ ELISPOT. There was no difference in the number of spots between the experimental well (PBMCs + positive peptide 1) and the negative control well.
Figure 3Peptide/HLA-DRB1*15:01 MHC class II tetramer staining for antigen-specific CD4+ T cells analyzed by flow cytometry. The top row plots show PBMCs from patients with untreated IRP (HLA-DRB1*15:01). The image in the middle row shows sample of cells from HLA-DRB1*15:01 normal controls. The bottom row figure shows cell samples from patients with untreated IRP (non–HLA-DRB1*15:01). All plots were derived by gating on CD3-postive and CD4-postive lymphocytes. The first four images in each row are the control group (no tetramer), and the last four ones are the experimental group with tetramer. In the upper right quadrant of the plot, there is a population of antigen-specific CD4+ T cells is visible from cells of patients with untreated IRP (HLA-DRB1*15:01) stained with PE-labeled ProT2 MHC tetramer compared to the control group (black arrows).
Figure 4Analysis of FTL levels in patients with IRP, and the correlation between the expression level of FTL and clinical indicators. (A) Flow cytometry plots of FTL. (B) Results of the FCM assay of FTL on surface of BMMNCs. (C) Results of the FCM assay of FTL on surface of CD34+ BM cells. (D) Results of the FCM assay of FTL on surface of CD235a+ BM cells. (E) Results of the FCM assay of FTL on surface of CD15+ BM cells. (F) Q-PCR analysis of FTL-mRNA. (G) FTL expression level was analyzed by ELISA. (H) Western Blot analysis of FTL protein levels. (I) The correlation between the expression level of FTL and clinical indicators.
Figure 5Levels of FTL and FTH. (A) The expression levels of FTL and FTH on BMMNCs membrane of two patients with IRP. (B) The expression levels of FTL and FTH on the surface of BMMNCs of one case-control group.