| Literature DB >> 35572420 |
Akihiko Hasegawa1, Teruhisa Mihata1,2, Kunimoto Fukunishi1, Akihiro Uchida1, Masashi Neo1.
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to investigate the relationship between Hamada Grade and rotator cuff and long head of the biceps (LHB) pathologies in symptomatic patients with rotator cuff tears (RCTs).Entities:
Keywords: Cuff tear arthropathy; Hamada Grade; Infraspinatus; Long head of biceps; Osteoarthritis; Rotator cuff tear; Shoulder; Subscapularis
Year: 2022 PMID: 35572420 PMCID: PMC9091739 DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2022.01.012
Source DB: PubMed Journal: JSES Int ISSN: 2666-6383
Figure 1Classification of Hamada Grade. (A) Grade 1, the acromiohumeral interval is 6 mm or more. (B) Grade 2, the acromiohumeral interval is less than 6 mm (C) Grade 3, the acromiohumeral interval is less than 6 mm with acetabulization of the acromion. (D) Grade 4A, narrowing of the glenohumeral joint without acetabulization of the acromion. (E) Grade 4B, narrowing of the glenohumeral joint with acetabulization of the acromion. (F) Grade 5, an instance of humeral head collapse.
Figure 2Flowchart of patient inclusion. RCTs, rotator cuff tears.
Patient demographics.
| Grade 1 | Grade 2 | Grade 3 | Grade 4-5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of patients | 210 | 96 | 40 | 30 |
| Sex | 75 M, 135 F | 49 M, 47 F | 20 M, 20 F | 12 M, 18 F |
| Age (y) | 66.3 ± 10.2 | 69.7 ± 8.2 | 70.9 ± 6.9 | 75.5 ± 7.2 |
| Duration of symptoms (mo) | 10.6 ± 17.0 | 14.9 ± 24.6 | 20.0 ± 30.9 | 41.9 ± 40.4 |
M, male; F, female.
P values were calculated by Tukey’s post hoc test.
Values are presented as means ± standard deviations.
Significantly older than Grade 1 (P < .05).
Significantly older than Grade 1 (P < .0001).
Significantly longer than Grade 1 (P < .0001).
Significantly longer than Grade 2 (P < .0001).
Significantly longer than Grade 3 (P = .001).
Number of torn tendons and rotator cuff tear size.
| Grade 1 n = 210 | Grade 2 n = 96 | Grade 3 n = 40 | Grade 4-5 n = 30 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of torn tendons | 1.6 ± 0.6 | 2.2 ± 0.5 | 2.5 ± 0.6 | 3.0 ± 0.7 |
| RCT size, cm | 2.0 ± 0.9 | 3.3 ± 0.9 | 3.8 ± 1.0 | 5.2 ± 1.3 |
| Posterosuperior RCT size, cm | 1.9 ± 0.7 | 3.0 ± 0.7 | 3.3 ± 0.7 | 3.9 ± 0.9 |
| Subscapularis tear size, cm | 0.1 ± 0.4 | 0.2 ± 0.5 | 0.6 ± 0.8 | 1.4 ± 0.9 |
RCT, rotator cuff tear.
Values are presented as means ± standard deviations.
P values were calculated by Tukey’s post hoc test.
Significantly larger than values in Grade 1 (P < .0001).
Significantly larger than values in Grade 2 (P < .0001).
Significantly larger than values in Grade 3 (P < .01).
Significantly larger than values in Grade 2 (P < .05).
Significantly larger than values in Grade 3 (P < .0001).
Characteristics of rotator cuff tear involvement.
| Grade 1 n = 210 (%) | Grade 2 n = 96 (%) | Grade 3 n = 40 (%) | Grade 4-5 n = 30 (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Isolated SSP tear | 112 (53.3) | 4 (4.2) | 1 (2.5) | 0 (0) |
| Multiple tendon tear involving ISP | 93 (44.3) | 91 (94.8) | 39 (97.5) | 30 (100) |
| Multiple tendon tear involving SSc | 27 (12.9) | 21 (21.9) | 22 (55.0) | 23 (76.7) |
| Multiple tendon tear involving TM | 2 (1.0) | 6 (6.3) | 2 (5.0) | 7 (23.3) |
SSP, supraspinatus; ISP, infraspinatus; SSc, subscapularis; TM, teres minor.
Values are presented as number of shoulders, with the percentage in parentheses.
Significantly lower than values in Grade 1 (P < .0001).
Significantly higher than values in Grade 1 (P < .0001).
Significantly higher than values in Grade 2 (P = .0002).
Significantly higher than values in Grade 2 (P < .0001).
Grade of fatty muscle degeneration of rotator cuff muscles.
| Grade 1 n = 210 | Grade 2 n = 96 | Grade 3 n = 40 | Grade 4-5 n = 30 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SSP | 2.0 ± 0.9 | 3.4 ± 0.8 | 3.6 ± 0.6 | 3.9 ± 0.3 |
| ISP | 0.6 ± 0.8 | 2.2 ± 1.3 | 2.6 ± 1.4 | 3.4 ± 0.9 |
| SSc | 0.3 ± 0.7 | 0.6 ± 0.8 | 1.5 ± 1.4 | 2.4 ± 1.3 |
| TM | 0.1 ± 0.3 | 0.4 ± 0.9 | 0.7 ± 1.1 | 1.2 ± 1.4 |
SSP, supraspinatus; ISP, infraspinatus; SSc, subscapularis; TM, teres minor.
Values are presented as means ± standard deviations.
Significantly higher than values in Grade 1 (P < .0001).
Significantly higher than values in Grade 2 (P < .0001).
Significantly higher than values in Grade 3 (P < .0001).
Significantly higher than values in Grade 3 (P = .008).
Significantly higher than values in Grade 3 (P = .03).
Reducibility of rotator cuff tears.
| Grade 1 n = 210 (%) | Grade 2 n = 96 (%) | Grade 3 n = 40 (%) | Grade 4-5 n = 30 (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Posterosuperior RCT (SSP/ISP/TM) | ||||
| Reparable | 162 (77.1) | 15 (15.6) | 4 (10.0) | 0 (0.0) |
| Irreparable | 48 (22.9) | 81 (84.4) | 36 (90.0) | 30 (100) |
| SSc | ||||
| Intact | 183 (87.1) | 74 (77.0) | 18 (45.0) | 7 (23.3) |
| Reparable | 24 (11.4) | 20 (20.8) | 18 (45.0) | 17 (56.7) |
| Irreparable | 3 (1.4) | 2 (2.0) | 4 (10.0) | 6 (20.0) |
RCT, rotator cuff tear; SSP, supraspinatus; ISP, infraspinatus; TM, teres minor; SSc, subscapularis.
Values are presented as number of shoulders, with the percentage in parentheses.
Significantly lower than values in Grade 1 (P < .0001).
Significantly higher than values in Grade 1 (P < .0001).
Significantly lower than values in Grade 1 (P < .0001).
Significantly lower than values in Grade 2 (P = .0002).
Significantly lower than values in Grade 2 (P < .0001).
Significantly higher than values in Grade 1 (P = .0002).
Significantly higher than values in Grade 2 (P = .002).
Condition of the long head of the biceps.
| Grade 1 n = 210 (%) | Grade 2 n = 96 (%) | Grade 3 n = 40 (%) | Grade 4-5 n = 30 (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normal | 142 (67.6) | 30 (31.3) | 7 (17.5) | 3 (10.0) |
| Partial LHB rupture | 56 (26.7) | 43 (44.8) | 23 (57.5) | 7 (23.3) |
| Complete LHB rupture | 12 (5.7) | 23 (24.0) | 10 (25.0) | 20 (66.7) |
LHB, long head of biceps.
Values are presented as the number of shoulders, with the percentage in parentheses.
P values were calculated by Fisher’s exact test.
Significantly lower than values in Grade 1 (P < .0001).
Significantly higher than values in Grade 1 (P = .002).
Significantly higher than values in Grade 1 (P = .0003).
Significantly higher than values in Grade 1 (P < .0001).
Significantly higher than values in Grade 1 (P = .0006).
Significantly higher than values in Grade 2 (P < .0001).
Significantly higher than values in Grade 3 (P = .0007).