| Literature DB >> 35572263 |
Aijing Luo1,2,3,4, Weitao Kong1,3,4, Haiyan He1,3,4, Yuanyuan Li5, Wenzhao Xie1,3,4.
Abstract
Background: In modern society, social media addiction (SMA) has become a serious problem in many countries, including China. Almost every medical care professional has their own social media account. They are also at risk for SMA, but no SMA studies in Chinese medical care professionals have been published. This study aims to investigate the status and influencing factors of SMA among Chinese medical care professionals.Entities:
Keywords: burnout; cross-sectional survey; general self-efficacy; medical care professionals; social media addiction
Year: 2022 PMID: 35572263 PMCID: PMC9097152 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.888714
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Psychol ISSN: 1664-1078
Figure 1Influencing factors model of social media addiction (SMA) in medical care professionals.
CFA test results of Social Networking Service Addiction Scale (SNSAS), Maslach’s Burnout Inventory-General Survey (MBI-GS), and General Self-efficacy Scale (GSES).
| Factor | AVE | CR |
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| Mood modification | 0.560 | 0.792 |
| Salience | 0.587 | 0.810 |
| Tolerance | 0.567 | 0.796 |
| Withdrawal | 0.762 | 0.906 |
| Conflict | 0.564 | 0.771 |
| Relapse | 0.668 | 0.857 |
|
| ||
| Emotional exhaustion | 0.697 | 0.920 |
| Depersonalization | 0.709 | 0.907 |
| Personal accomplishment | 0.570 | 0.888 |
|
| 0.517 | 0.904 |
Figure 2Participant sampling and recruitment process.
Characteristics and SNSAS scores of the respondents.
| Characteristic |
| % | SNSAS score | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | SD | |||
|
| ||||
| Doctor | 228 | 43.93 | 2.94 | 0.90 |
| Nurse | 291 | 56.07 | 2.86 | 0.81 |
|
| ||||
| Male | 125 | 24.08 | 2.82 | 0.90 |
| Female | 394 | 75.92 | 2.92 | 0.83 |
|
| ||||
| 18–25 | 152 | 29.29 | 3.04 | 0.80 |
| 26–30 | 68 | 13.10 | 3.07 | 0.85 |
| 31–40 | 202 | 38.92 | 2.85 | 0.86 |
| 41–50 | 83 | 15.99 | 2.68 | 0.86 |
| >50 | 14 | 2.70 | 2.52 | 0.74 |
|
| ||||
| Single (includes divorced and widowed) | 195 | 37.57 | 3.03 | 0.80 |
| Married | 310 | 59.73 | 2.81 | 0.87 |
|
| ||||
| Without title | 128 | 24.66 | 3.02 | 0.81 |
| Primary title | 125 | 24.08 | 3.02 | 0.91 |
| Middle title | 181 | 34.87 | 2.81 | 0.79 |
| Vice senior title | 70 | 13.49 | 2.66 | 0.92 |
| Senior title | 15 | 2.89 | 2.97 | 0.83 |
|
| ||||
| Extremely unsatisfied | 45 | 8.67 | 3.32 | 0.80 |
| Basically satisfied | 79 | 15.22 | 2.93 | 0.78 |
| Neutral | 245 | 47.21 | 2.86 | 0.85 |
| Basically unsatisfied | 127 | 24.47 | 2.79 | 0.85 |
| Quite satisfied | 23 | 4.43 | 2.94 | 0.93 |
|
| ||||
| Very good | 17 | 3.28 | 2.84 | 0.62 |
| Good | 98 | 18.88 | 3.18 | 0.84 |
| Medium quality | 265 | 51.06 | 2.81 | 0.88 |
| Poor | 95 | 18.30 | 2.94 | 0.79 |
| Very poor | 44 | 8.48 | 2.73 | 0.79 |
|
| ||||
| <1 | 137 | 26.40 | 3.03 | 0.74 |
| 1–3 | 46 | 8.86 | 3.17 | 0.97 |
| 3–5 | 31 | 5.97 | 2.96 | 0.93 |
| >5 | 305 | 58.77 | 2.79 | 0.85 |
Scores on the SNSAS, MBI-GS, and GSES scales.
| Scale | Mean | SD | IQR |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 2.898 | 0.849 | 1.111 |
| Mood modification | 3.210 | 1.048 | 1.500 |
| Salience | 2.812 | 1.012 | 1.500 |
| Tolerance | 3.231 | 1.197 | 2.000 |
| Withdrawal | 2.813 | 1.129 | 2.000 |
| Conflict | 2.813 | 1.138 | 2.000 |
| Relapse | 2.368 | 1.086 | 1.000 |
|
| 2.230 | 0.941 | 1.267 |
| Emotional exhaustion | 2.515 | 1.203 | 1.200 |
| Depersonalization | 1.743 | 1.304 | 1.500 |
| Personal accomplishment | 2.316 | 1.398 | 2.333 |
|
| 2.345 | 0.524 | 2.390 |
SD, standard deviation; IQR, interquartile range.
Distribution of SNSAS scores (n = 519).
| Score | Total | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 357 | 113 | 20 | 519 |
| % | 68.79 | 21.77 | 3.9% | 100 |
SD, standard deviation.
Results of t-test and analysis of variance of SNSAS score.
| Characteristic | SNSAS total | Mood modification | Salience | Tolerance | Withdrawal | Conflict | Relapse | Cohen’s | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 1.031 | 0.431 | 0.684 | 0.316 | 1.027 | 0.358 | 2.261 | 0.091 | |
|
| 0.303 | 0.666 | 0.494 | 0.752 | 0.305 | 0.720 | 0.024 | ||
|
| −1.214 | −1.397 | −1.627 | −1.796 | −0.967 | 0.283 | 0.850 | 0.125 | |
|
| 0.225 | 0.163 | 0.104 | 0.073 | 0.334 | 0.777 | 0.395 | ||
|
| 3.036 | 2.022 | 4.669 | 3.606 | 1.433 | 1.501 | −0.075 | 0.267 | |
|
| 0.003 | 0.044 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.152 | 0.134 | 0.940 | ||
|
| 4.085 | 2.194 | 9.122 | 6.354 | 0.811 | 1.527 | 0.188 | ||
|
| 0.003 | 0.069 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.518 | 0.193 | 0.945 | ||
|
| 3.359 | 3.184 | 6.877 | 3.791 | 1.064 | 2.195 | 0.446 | ||
|
| 0.010 | 0.013 | 0.000 | 0.005 | 0.374 | 0.068 | 0.776 | ||
|
| 4.463 | 2.138 | 6.795 | 5.570 | 2.729 | 2.779 | 1.525 | ||
|
| 0.004 | 0.094 | 0.000 | 0.001 | 0.043 | 0.041 | 0.207 |
p < 0.05;
p < 0.01.
ANOVA, analysis of variance.
Pearson correlation analysis of self-efficacy, income satisfaction, sleep quality, and SNSAS scores.
| C | SNSAS | Mood modification | Salience | Tolerance | Withdrawal | Conflict | Relapse | MBI-GS | GSES | Income satisfaction |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SNSAS | 1 | |||||||||
| Mood modification | 0.751 | 1 | ||||||||
| Salience | 0.858 | 0.589 | 1 | |||||||
| Tolerance | 0.751 | 0.460 | 0.678 | 1 | ||||||
| Withdrawal | 0.843 | 0.466 | 0.613 | 0.584 | 1 | |||||
| Conflict | 0.706 | 0.379 | 0.523 | 0.464 | 0.574 | 1 | ||||
| Relapse | 0.667 | 0.387 | 0.469 | 0.334 | 0.564 | 0.506 | 1 | |||
| MBI-GS | 0.314 | 0.241 | 0.297 | 0.250 | 0.214 | 0.187 | 0.275 | 1 | ||
| GSES | −0.039 | 0.010 | −0.071 | −0.086 | −0.020 | −0.034 | 0.012 | −0.347 | 1 | |
| Income satisfaction | −0.123 | −0.062 | −0.142 | −0.101 | −0.089 | −0.060 | −0.121 | −0.331 | 0.105 | 1 |
| Sleep quality | −0.089 | −0.063 | −0.085 | −0.054 | −0.058 | −0.079 | −0.085 | −0.282 | 0.104 | 0.235 |
p < 0.05;
p < 0.01.
Linear regression analysis of the SNSAS (n = 519).
| B | SE | Beta | t | p | 95% CI | VIF | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constant | 2.654 | 0.234 | − | 11.326 | 0.000 | 2.195–3.113 | − |
| MBI-GS | 0.271 | 0.041 | 0.300 | 6.621 | 0.000 | 0.191–0.351 | 1.197 |
| Sleep quality | −0.022 | 0.041 | −0.024 | −0.536 | 0.592 | −0.103–0.059 | 1.146 |
| Income satisfaction | 0.003 | 0.040 | 0.003 | 0.075 | 0.940 | −0.076–0.082 | 1.195 |
| Age | −0.068 | 0.056 | −0.093 | −1.211 | 0.226 | −0.179–0.042 | 3.400 |
| Professional position | −0.041 | 0.053 | −0.053 | −0.775 | 0.439 | −0.145–0.063 | 2.711 |
| Working years | −0.010 | 0.049 | −0.015 | −0.196 | 0.844 | −0.105–0.086 | 3.327 |
p < 0.01.
Constant: SNSAS score.
Linear regression results between SMA and burnout dimensions.
| Variables | Emotional exhaustion | Cynicism | Reduced personal accomplishment | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Mood modification | 0.203 | <0.01 | 0.158 | <0.01 | 0.087 | <0.01 |
| Salience | 0.163 | <0.01 | 0.172 | <0.01 | 0.161 | <0.01 |
| Tolerance | 0.180 | <0.01 | 0.133 | <0.01 | 0.172 | <0.01 |
| Withdrawal | 0.137 | <0.01 | 0.160 | <0.01 | 0.113 | <0.01 |
| Conflict | 0.116 | <0.01 | 0.134 | <0.01 | 0.107 | <0.01 |
| Relapse | 0.167 | <0.01 | 0.218 | <0.01 | 0.130 | <0.01 |