Literature DB >> 35572081

Posterior Interosseous Nerve Graft: Utilizing External Landmarks and Anthropometric Ratios to Predict Available Length for Digital Nerve Reconstruction in a Cadaveric Study.

Bradley J Vivace1, Swapnil D Kachare2, Luke T Meredith1, Milind D Kachare2, Christina N Kapsalis3, Claude Muresan2, Joshua H Choo2, Morton L Kasdan2, Bradon J Wilhelmi2.   

Abstract

Objective: In digital nerve defects that require grafting, autografts remain the efficacious option. The sensory posterior interosseous nerve (PIN) is an ideal choice as it is of similar caliber to digital nerves and leaves no donor morbidity upon resection. However, a finite length of harvestable PIN exists, and considerable variations of this length have been reported in the literature. There exists no predictive model to estimate this length. We sought to determine a method to accurately predict the available length of PIN based on individual patient anthropometry.
Methods: A cadaveric dissection study was performed in a fresh tissue laboratory. The length of the sensory branch of the PIN and various anthropometric measurements were made in respect to surface anatomy of the ulna to develop a predictable ratio for available PIN donor graft.
Results: A total of 16 specimens were obtained. On average the length of the PIN was 5.7 cm (range: 3.3-9. cm) and the length of the ulna was 25.7 cm (range: 23.5-30.6 cm). The ratio of PIN to ulnar length was 0.222 (r = 0.4651). Using one-fifth the length of the ulna, the mean predicted length of the PIN was 5.14 cm (range: 4.7-6.1 cm). On univariate analysis, there was no significant difference between the measured and predicted PIN length (P = .249).
Conclusion: An anthropometric ratio predicated on reproducible surface anatomy of the ulna is a useful tool in predicting the sensory PIN length. Such a prediction may be a useful in guiding patient discussions concerning surgical options for digital nerve reconstruction.
© 2021 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  digital nerve graft; hand surgery; peripheral nerve; posterior interosseous nerve; ratio; reconstruction

Year:  2021        PMID: 35572081      PMCID: PMC9096857          DOI: 10.1177/2292550321995731

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)        ISSN: 2292-5503            Impact factor:   0.947


  31 in total

1.  The anatomy of the posterior interosseous nerve as a graft.

Authors:  H Elgafy; N A Ebraheim; R A Yeasting
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.230

2.  Anatomical variations of the sural nerve.

Authors:  Pasuk Mahakkanukrauh; Ranida Chomsung
Journal:  Clin Anat       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.414

3.  Proprioception of the wrist following posterior interosseous sensory neurectomy.

Authors:  Ryan W Patterson; Monica Van Niel; Patty Shimko; Carter Pace; William H Seitz
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.230

4.  The Pronator Quadratus and Distal Anterior Interosseous Nerve: A Cadaveric Study.

Authors:  Richard M Hinds; Michael B Gottschalk; John T Capo
Journal:  J Wrist Surg       Date:  2015-08

5.  Variations in the nerves of the thumb and index finger.

Authors:  W A Wallace; R E Coupland
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1975-11

6.  Biostatistics 104: correlational analysis.

Authors:  Y H Chan
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.858

7.  Use of the anterior branch of the medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve as a graft for the repair of defects of the digital nerve.

Authors:  J A Nunley; M R Ugino; R D Goldner; N Regan; J R Urbaniak
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Is there a profit to use the lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve as a graft source in digital nerve reconstruction?

Authors:  Ozgur Pilanci; Asuman Ozel; Karaca Basaran; Adil Celikdelen; Omer Berkoz; Funda Akoz Saydam; Samet Vasfi Kuvat
Journal:  Microsurgery       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 2.425

9.  The accuracy of distal posterior interosseous and anterior interosseous nerve injection.

Authors:  Paul W Grutter; Gregory L Desilva; Robert E Meehan; Stephen P Desilva
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.230

Review 10.  Management of nerve gaps: autografts, allografts, nerve transfers, and end-to-side neurorrhaphy.

Authors:  Wilson Z Ray; Susan E Mackinnon
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2009-04-05       Impact factor: 5.330

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.