| Literature DB >> 35572016 |
Juan Pimentel1,2, Camila Kairuz2, Lilia Suárez2, Andrés Cañón3, Andrés Isaza3, Germán Zuluaga3, Anne Cockcroft1,4, Neil Andersson1,4.
Abstract
Background: Although traditional and cultural health practices are widely used in Colombia, physicians are not trained to address intercultural tensions that arise in clinical practice. Cultural safety encourages practitioners to examine how their own culture shapes their clinical practice and to respect their patients' culture. It requires inviting patients of non-dominant cultures to co-design culturally safe health care. We co-designed a curriculum for cultural safety training of Colombian health professionals.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35572016 PMCID: PMC9099165 DOI: 10.36834/cmej.72675
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Can Med Educ J ISSN: 1923-1202
Characteristics of the study participants (n = 17)
| Stakeholder | Number of participants | Range of age (years) | Sex (women) | Education level | Range of experience (years) | Number of focus groups |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Traditional medicine users – older adults | 4 | 48 - 52 | 4 | University | 21 – 30* | 1 |
| Traditional medicine users – young adults | 3 | 18 – 21 | 3 | University students | 18 – 21* | 1 |
| Medical students | 6 | 23 - 27 | 3 | University | 1 – 2 † | 2 ≠ |
| Intercultural health experts – Colombia ± | 4 | 47 - 59 | 1 | Postgraduate degree | 13 – 33 † | 1 |
* Years of experience using traditional medicine
† Years of intercultural health-related work experience
≠ Three medical students participated in each focus group
± All the experts were physicians working in education and research. Three of them were also practicing clinicians.
Figure 1Three themes and 12 subthemes described by the medical students
Figure 2Two themes and 12 subthemes described by the intercultural health experts
Figure 3Two themes and 12 subthemes described by the intercultural health experts
Figure 4Pedagogical strategy suggested by the intercultural health experts
| No. | Topic | Item | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Title and abstract | |||
| S1 | Title | Concise description of the nature and topic of the study Identifying the study as qualitative or indicating the approach (e.g., ethnography, grounded theory) or data collection methods (e.g., interview, focus group) is recommended | 1 |
| S2 | Abstract | Summary of key elements of the study using the abstract format of the intended publication; typically includes background, purpose, methods, results, and conclusions | 2 |
| Introduction | |||
| S3 | Problem formulation | Description and significance of the problem/phenomenon studied; review of relevant theory and empirical work; problem statement | 3 to 5 |
| S4 | Purpose or research question | Purpose of the study and specific objectives or questions | 5 |
| Methods | |||
| S5 | Qualitative approach and research paradigm | Qualitative approach (e.g., ethnography, grounded theory, case study, phenomenology, narrative research) and guiding theory if appropriate; identifying the research paradigm (e.g., postpositivist, constructivist/ interpretivist) is also recommended; rationaleb | Research design - 5 and 6 |
| S6 | Researcher characteristics and reflexivity | Researchers’ characteristics that may influence the research, including personal attributes, qualifications/experience, relationship with participants, assumptions, and/or presuppositions; potential or actual interaction between researchers’ characteristics and the research questions, approach, methods, results, and/or transferability | Rigour - 9 |
| S7 | Context | Setting/site and salient contextual factors; rationaleb | Participants and setting - 6 |
| S8 | Sampling strategy | How and why research participants, documents, or events were selected; criteria for deciding when no further sampling was necessary (e.g., sampling saturation); rationaleb | Participants and setting - 6 |
| S9 | Ethical issues pertaining to human subjects | Documentation of approval by an appropriate ethics review board and participant consent, or explanation for lack thereof; other confidentiality and data security issues | Ethical approval - 9 |
| S10 | Data collection methods | Types of data collected; details of data collection procedures including (as appropriate) start and stop dates of data collection and analysis, iterative process, triangulation of sources/methods, and modification of procedures in response to evolving study findings; rationaleb | Methods for collecting and analyzing data – 6 to 8 |
| S11 | Data collection instruments and technologies | Description of instruments (e.g., interview guides, questionnaires) and devices (e.g., audio recorders) used for data collection; if/how the instrument(s) changed over the course of the study | Methods for collecting and analyzing data – 6 to 8 |
| S12 | Units of study | Number and relevant characteristics of participants, documents, or events included in the study; level of participation (could be reported in results) | Results – Table 1 |
| S13 | Data processing | Methods for processing data prior to and during analysis, including transcription, data entry, data management and security, verification of data integrity, data coding, and anonymization/deidentification of excerpts | Methods for collecting and analyzing data – 6 to 8 |
| S14 | Data analysis | Process by which inferences, themes, etc., were identified and developed, including the researchers involved in data analysis; usually references a specific paradigm or approach; rationale b | Methods for collecting and analyzing data – 6 to 8 |
| S15 | Techniques to enhance trustworthiness | Techniques to enhance trustworthiness and credibility of data analysis (e.g., member checking, audit trail, triangulation); rationaleb | Rigour - 8 |
| Results/findings | |||
| S16 | Synthesis and interpretation | Main findings (e.g., interpretations, inferences, and themes); might include development of a theory or model, or integration with prior research or theory | Results - 9 to 23 |
| S17 | Links to empirical data | Evidence (e.g., quotes, field notes, text excerpts, photographs) to substantiate analytic findings | Appendix |
| Discussion | |||
| S18 | Integration with prior work, implications, transferability, and contribution(s) to the field | Short summary of main findings; explanation of how findings and conclusions connect to, support, elaborate on, or challenge conclusions of earlier scholarship; discussion of scope of application/ generalizability; identification of unique contribution(s) to scholarship in a discipline or field | Discussion 23 to 30 |
| S19 | Limitations | Trustworthiness and limitations of findings | Limitations - 31 |
| Other | |||
| S20 | Conflicts of interest | Potential sources of influence or perceived influence on study conduct and conclusions; how these were managed | Conflicts of interest - 32 |
| S21 | Funding | Sources of funding and other support; role of funders in data collection, interpretation, and reporting | Funding - 32 |
.
.
| 1. Traditional self-care |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1. Learning objectives |
|---|
| 2. Pedagogical strategy |
| 2.2. |
| 3. Acknowledge and address barriers |
| 1. Strategy |
|---|
| 2. Acknowledge and address difficulties |
|
"Regarding the concept of cold, I have a story to tell. When my kid was born at the hospital, a nurse came and forced me to take a shower. I told her that I did not want to take a shower, and she said 'no mom, you must go inside and take a shower.' I decided to enter the bathroom and open the shower so she could hear the sound of the water. She thought I had taken a shower and let me rest. When I finally got home, I could do my traditional remedies. With my young daughter it was even worse, because I tried to do the same, but the nurse noticed that I was not in the shower -I do not know if they have cameras or something like that-. She yelled at me and asked me to leave the door open. I entered the shower, but I was leaning towards the wall, trying to avoid touching the water, but some drops splashed out on my feet. When I got home, I did my traditional remedies, but on the second day, I got a terrible headache. It was very hard, and I think it was because of the water that splashed out on my feet in the shower. The traditional doctor gave me some plants to treat that." "With one of my pregnancies, I went to see the doctor. I was talking about my diet habit, and I told him about a purge that I did in the second month of the pregnancy… He almost kicked me out of the room! He scolded me severely and told me that that was irresponsible, that it could damage the development of the child, and asked what my intention was, and if I wanted an abortion. He then made me sign a consent form so I would assume all the responsibility of everything. I was very scared." "My child had ear pain once, so I put some drops of |
|
"Now that we are doing home visits in "I am doing my home visits rotation as an intern, and I went to a traditional medicine user household. I was talking about the plants, and a woman told me that "It is clear that I won't give prescriptions of traditional medicine to patients, because I don't know how to do that. But there are small things that we can do, for example, I remember what traditional medicine users say about common cold care. I think it is five days. At the hospital, I could provide advice like ‘keep your child warmly clothed, cover their nose and mouth and don’t expose them to the cold.’ A baby with bronchiolitis is a good example, I can advise the mom, if she is going to transport the baby, ‘please cover them up, keep them warmly clothed.’ Very basic things." |