| Literature DB >> 35571895 |
Rensong Huang1, Meng Zhang1, Yu Tong1, Yaran Teng1, Hui Li1, Wei Wu1.
Abstract
Objectives: Red ginseng is a processed product of Panax ginseng C.A. Meyer, which is one of the widely used medicinal and edible herbs for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Ginsenosides are its main pharmacologically active ingredient. This study aims to clarify the material basis of total ginsenosides of red ginseng (RGW) and verify the activity of RGW in treating lipid metabolism disorders caused by T2DM.Entities:
Keywords: UHPLC-MS; lipid metabolism; red ginseng; short-chain fatty acids; type 2 diabetes mellitus
Year: 2022 PMID: 35571895 PMCID: PMC9094573 DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2022.865070
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Nutr ISSN: 2296-861X
FIGURE 1(A) UHPLC-Q-TOF-MS TIC of total ginsenoside of red ginseng. (B) ESI-Q-TOF-MS/MS spectra of ginsenoside Rc in negative ion mode. (C) ESI-Q-TOF-MS/MS spectra of ginsenoside Re in negative ion mode.
Compounds identified from red ginseng (RGW).
| [M-H]– | Fragment ions of [M-H]– | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
| Peak | Identity | Molecular formula | Measd mass | Calcd mass | Mass accuracy (ppm) | MS (m/z) | MS/MS fragment ions |
| 1 | Re | C48H82O18 | 945.5428 | 945.5422 | −6.77 | 945.5[M-H]– | 783.29[M-H-Glc]– |
| 1 | Rg1 | C42H72O14 | 799.4849 | 799.4843 | 7.63 | 799.5[M-H]– | 637.33[M-H-Glc]– |
| 2 | Rf | C42H72O14 | 799.5206 | 799.5148 | 7.25 | 799.3[M-H]– | 637.39[M-H-Glc]– |
| 3 | Rb1 | C54H92O23 | 1107.6048 | 1107.5951 | 8.76 | 1107.6[M-H]– | 945.49[M-H-Glc]– |
| 4 | Rg2 | C42H72O13 | 783.4964 | 783.4894 | 8.93 | 783.6[M-H]– | 637.51[M-H-Rha]– |
| 5 | Rc | C53H90O22 | 1077.5905 | 1077.5845 | 5.57 | 1077.5[M-H]– | 945.71[M-H-Ara]– |
| 6 | Rb2 | C53H90O22 | 1077.5883 | 1077.5845 | 3.53 | 1077.5[M-H]– | 945.65[M-H-Ara(p)]– |
| 7 | Rb3 | C53H90O22 | 1077.5830 | 1077.5845 | 4.18 | 1077.5[M-H]– | 945.62[M-H-Xyl]– |
| 8 | Rd | C48H82O18 | 945.5361 | 945.5422 | −6.45 | 945.5[M-H]– | 783.46[M-H-Glc]– |
| 9 | Rg3 | C42H72O13 | 783.4957 | 783.4894 | 8.04 | 783.6[M-H]– | 621.70[M-H-Glc]– |
Calibration curves, accuracy, precision, and content for 10 ginsenosides (n = 6).
| Ginsenosides | Calibration curve | R2 | Test range (μg) | Intra-day precision | Inter-day precision | Recovery (%) | RSD | Content (mg/g) |
| Rb1 | 0.9979 | 0.005–0.03 | 1.09 | 1.80 | 103.44 | 1.76 | 23.70 ± 0.08 | |
| Re | 0.9994 | 0.005–0.03 | 2.01 | 2.41 | 100.15 | 2.45 | 9.87 ± 0.32 | |
| Rf | 0.9982 | 0.005–0.03 | 2.09 | 2.06 | 98.89 | 1.88 | 8.01 ± 0.18 | |
| Rb2 | 0.9990 | 0.005–0.03 | 1.75 | 0.99 | 105.23 | 2.25 | 6.78 ± 0.02 | |
| Rb3 | y = 0.3437x + 0.1589 | 0.9992 | 0.005–0.03 | 2.14 | 2.12 | 101.20 | 1.87 | 2.59 ± 0.26 |
| Rc | 0.9986 | 0.005–0.03 | 2.25 | 2.26 | 99.56 | 3.20 | 13.14 ± 0.07 | |
| Rd | 0.9992 | 0.005–0.03 | 2.33 | 2.57 | 102.50 | 1.23 | 9.46 ± 0.85 | |
| Rg3 | 0.9995 | 0.005–0.03 | 1.57 | 1.59 | 99.98 | 1.47 | 7.73 ± 0.47 | |
| Rg2 | 0.9992 | 0.005–0.03 | 2.14 | 2.82 | 98.75 | 2.72 | 4.85 ± 0.39 | |
| Rg1 | 0.9979 | 0.005–0.03 | 1.89 | 1.61 | 103.53 | 1.52 | 8.02 ± 1.21 |
Data were expressed as mean ± SD.
FIGURE 2Pathological characteristics of diabetic rats. (A) Body weight. (B) Fasting blood glucose. Data are expressed as mean ± SD. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 vs. DM; ###p < 0.005 vs. CON (n = 8).
FIGURE 4H&E staining of the hepatic (400 ×). (A) CON; (B) DM; (C) MET; and (D) RGW.
FIGURE 3Effects of RGW on body weight and fasting blood glucose in DM rats. (A) Body weight. (B) Fasting blood glucose. Data are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 8).
Serum biochemical parameters of rats in different groups after being treated for 21 days (n = 8).
| Items | CON | DM | MET | RGW |
| HDL-C (mmol/ml) | 1.00 ± 0.13 | 0.65 ± 0.10 | 1.29 ± 0.24 | 1.16 ± 0.39 |
| LDL-C (mmol/ml) | 0.56 ± 0.16 | 3.05 ± 0.50 | 0.59 ± 0.16 | 0.90 ± 0.54 |
| TG (mmol/ml) | 0.54 ± 0.11 | 2.83 ± 0.19 | 0.71 ± 0.12 | 1.64 ± 0.65 |
| TC (mmol/ml) | 7.49 ± 0.85 | 29.83 ± 6.17 | 8.04 ± 0.32 | 9.07 ± 3.31 |
Data was expressed as mean ± SD. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 vs. CON;
Hepatic biochemical parameters of rats in different groups after being treated for 21 days (n = 8).
| Items | CON | DM | MET | RGW |
| HDL-C (mmol/ml) | 0.27 ± 0.04 | 0.08 ± 0.01 | 0.27 ± 0.05 | 0.29 ± 0.05 |
| LDL-C (mmol/ml) | 0.03 ± 0.01 | 0.32 ± 0.04 | 0.02 ± 0.00 | 0.04 ± 0.01 |
| TG (mmol/ml) | 0.49 ± 0.11 | 0.48 ± 0.14 | 0.35 ± 0.03 | 0.47 ± 0.12 |
| TC (mmol/ml) | 0.12 ± 0.02 | 0.14 ± 0.04 | 0.12 ± 0.01 | 0.11 ± 0.03 |
Data was expressed as mean ± SD. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 vs. CON;
FIGURE 5Effect of RGW on HepG2 cells. *p < 0.05 vs. negative.
FIGURE 6Effect of RGW on lipid metabolism. (A) Blank; (B) negative; (C) positive; (D) RGW 25 μg/ml; (E) RGW 50 μg/ml; and (F) RGW 100 μg/ml.
The content of five short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) in rat stools (n = 8).
| Items | CON | DM | MET | RGW |
| Acetic acid (umol/l) | 347.76 ± 29.86 | 252.66 ± 15.49 | 336.22 ± 19.15 | 316.22 ± 22.79 |
| Propionic acid (umol/l) | 62.33 ± 7.40 | 27.79 ± 5.44 | 48.12 ± 8.65 | 51.16 ± 9.82 |
| Butyric acid (umol/l) | 58.44 ± 15.86 | 35.37 ± 9.68 | 57.36 ± 6.77 | 43.38 ± 4.40 |
| Valeric acid (umol/l) | 12.55 ± 2.09 | 6.52 ± 1.98 | 10.84 ± 2.52 | 9.60 ± 1.42 |
| Isovaleric acid (umol/l) | 14.10 ± 4.13 | 10.89 ± 1.92 | 13.47 ± 2.53 | 13.00 ± 0.74 |
Data was expressed as mean ± SD. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 vs. CON;