| Literature DB >> 35571859 |
Gyeongjun Cho1, Geun-Hye Gang2, Hee-Young Jung3, Youn-Sig Kwak1,4.
Abstract
Orchids live with mycorrhizal fungi in mutualism. This symbiotic relationship plays an essential role in the overall life cycle of orchids from germination, growth, settlement, and reproduction. Among the 1000 species of the orchid, the Korean lady's slipper, Cypripedium japonicum, is known as an endangered species. Currently, only five natural habitats of the Korean lady's slipper remain in South Korea, and the population of Korean lady's slipper in their natural habitat is not increasing. To prevent extinction, this study was designed to understand the fungal community interacting in the rhizosphere of the Korean lady's slipper living in the native and artificial habitats. In-depth analyses were performed to discover the vital mycorrhizal fungi contributing to habitat expansion and cultivation of the endangered orchid species. Our results suggested that Lycoperdon nigrescens contributed most to the increase in natural habitats and Russula violeipes as a characteristic of successful cultivation. And the fungi that helped L. nigrescens and R. violeipes to fit into the rhizosphere community in Korean lady's slipper native place were Paraboeremia selaginellae and Metarhizium anisopliae, respectively. The findings will contribute to restoring and maintaining the endangered orchid population in natural habitats.Entities:
Keywords: Microbial community; mycorrhiza; rhizosphere; symbiosis
Year: 2022 PMID: 35571859 PMCID: PMC9067997 DOI: 10.1080/12298093.2022.2064409
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mycobiology ISSN: 1229-8093 Impact factor: 1.946
Figure 1.Relative abundance of top10 order and family. The two top 10 samples are selected based on the average of all samples in order (A) and in family (B).
Figure 2.Principal coordinates analysis in national habitat. The panels are emphasized by (A) habitat location, (B) sampling time, (C) shoot length, (D) area, (E) population. The place and sampling times are indicated by different colors and the same location samples in different times connect the lines. The characteristics of the measured habitats are indicated by a blue and black gradation.
PERMANOVA of the PCoA results in natural habitats of Cypripedium japonicum.
| Habitant location, PERMANOVA, | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pairs | Sums of Sqs. | F. Model |
|
| Significant |
| Mt. Cheonma vs Mt. Deokyu 1 | 0.3640 | 1.9241 | 0.1614 | 0.1334 | |
| Mt. Cheonma vs Mt. Deokyu 2 | 0.3738 | 1.9448 | 0.1628 | 0.1525 | * |
| Mt. Cheonma vs Hwacheon | 0.5872 | 2.9003 | 0.2248 | 0.0233 | * |
| Mt. Cheonma vs Pocheon | 0.4228 | 2.1609 | 0.1777 | 0.0413 | |
| Mt. Deokyu 1 vs Mt. Deokyu 2 | 0.2225 | 1.2862 | 0.1140 | 1.0000 | |
| Mt. Deokyu 1 vs Hwacheon | 0.3318 | 1.8104 | 0.1533 | 0.2618 | |
| Mt. Deokyu 1 vs Pocheon | 0.2525 | 1.4309 | 0.1252 | 1.0000 | |
| Mt. Deokyu 2 vs Hwacheon | 0.4007 | 2.1510 | 0.1770 | 0.1122 | |
| Mt. Deokyu 2 vs Pocheon | 0.3399 | 1.8933 | 0.1592 | 0.2661 | |
| Hwacheon vs Pocheon | 0.3904 | 2.0573 | 0.1706 | 0.1786 | |
| Sampling time, PERMANOVA, | |||||
| Shoot length (cm), PERMANOVA, | |||||
| Pairs (cm) | |||||
| 20 vs 25 | 0.2407 | 1.1213 | 0.0485 | 0.8184 | |
| 20 vs 35 | 0.3238 | 1.4986 | 0.0638 | 0.1481 | |
| 25 vs 30 | 0.2225 | 1.2862 | 0.1140 | 0.5553 | |
| Population, PERMANOVA, | |||||
| Pairs (population) | |||||
| 18 vs 98 | 0.3640 | 1.9241 | 0.1614 | 0.1266 | |
| 18 vs 8 | 0.3738 | 1.9448 | 0.1628 | 0.1379 | |
| 18 vs 16 | 0.5872 | 2.9003 | 0.2248 | 0.0234 | * |
| 18 vs 196 | 0.4228 | 2.1609 | 0.1777 | 0.0468 | * |
| 98 vs 8 | 0.2225 | 1.2862 | 0.1140 | 1.0000 | |
| 98 vs 16 | 0.3318 | 1.8104 | 0.1533 | 0.2543 | |
| 98 vs 196 | 0.2525 | 1.4309 | 0.1252 | 1.0000 | |
| 8 vs 16 | 0.4007 | 2.1510 | 0.1770 | 0.1107 | |
| 8 vs 196 | 0.3399 | 1.8933 | 0.1592 | 0.2666 | |
| 16 vs 196 | 0.3904 | 2.0573 | 0.1706 | 0.1699 | |
| Habitat area (m2), PERMANOVA, | |||||
| Pairs (m2) | |||||
| 0.8 vs 4 | 0.3640 | 1.9241 | 0.1614 | 0.1322 | |
| 0.8 vs 1 | 0.3738 | 1.9448 | 0.1628 | 0.1438 | |
| 0.8 vs 0.6 | 0.5872 | 2.9003 | 0.2248 | 0.0208 | * |
| 0.8 vs 10 | 0.4228 | 2.1609 | 0.1777 | 0.0439 | * |
| 4 vs 1 | 0.2225 | 1.2862 | 0.1140 | 1.0000 | |
| 4 vs 0.6 | 0.3318 | 1.8104 | 0.1533 | 0.2629 | |
| 4 vs 10 | 0.2525 | 1.4309 | 0.1252 | 1.0000 | |
| 1 vs 0.6 | 0.4007 | 2.1510 | 0.1770 | 0.1081 | |
| 1 vs 10 | 0.3399 | 1.8933 | 0.1592 | 0.2544 | |
| 0.6 vs 10 | 0.3904 | 2.0573 | 0.1706 | 0.1723 | |
PERMANOVA and paired-wise PERMANOVA are performed by the Bray–Curtis distance of the relative abundance in each rhizosphere sample.
Permutations is 99,999 in PERANOVA and paired-wised PERANOVA.
P is calculated by Bonferroni correction.
*0.01 < p ≤ 0.05, or 0.01 < p ≤ 0.05.
**0.001 < p ≤ 0.05, or 0.001 < p ≤ 0.01.
***p ≤ 0.001, or p ≤ 0.001.
Figure 3.Correlation between Lycoperdon nigrescens and Cypripedium japonicum Thunberg population. (A) real values. (B) Ranks. The blue line indicates a regression in ranks. Among 243 Spearman’s ranking correlations of taxonomy and habitat indicators, only L. nigrescens were positively correlated with population. Bonferroni corrected p-value is 0.033 and p-value meaning correlation is 0.634.
Figure 4.Difference abundance between the native habitats and the artificial garden. This analysis was run by DESeq2 package in R. The adjusted p-values were conducted by Bonferroni adjustment. (A) all of the analyzed is zoom in and separated to (B) more in nature, and (C) more in the garden. The criteria for the significant are p < 0.001, and │log2(fold change)│ > 2.
Figure 5.Correlation network among taxonomic groups in the natural habitats. When correlation p-value is under 0.05, top 30 of eigencentrality, Lycopedon and Rusulla are selectively described. Green and yellow lines mean positive and negative correlation and their thickness mean correlation magnitude. The size of the point represents the eigencentrality of a significant network, including all taxonomic groups not plotted in this figure. The top 30 is described by red edge at the point. The filled colors of the points represented the taxonomic levels of the groups.