Literature DB >> 35571599

Judges' experiences with mitigating jurors' implicit biases.

Jacqueline M Kirshenbaum1, Monica K Miller1.   

Abstract

Implicit bias can influence jury decision-making. Training judges about implicit bias is a fairly new endeavor, and not all judges are necessarily aware of these biases. Even when judges are aware that biases exist, they might not know whether or not they should alert jurors to such biases or how to appropriately do so. It is currently unknown how many judges alert jurors to implicit bias (e.g. via instructions or juror orientation). The purpose of this study is to discuss judges' beliefs and practices regarding implicit bias in the courtroom. The findings indicate that the majority of judges (72%) do not alert jurors to implicit bias. Many judges were found to have a lack of awareness or understanding about implicit bias, but many now feel that alerting jurors about bias is important and would like to do so in the future.
© 2020 The Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law.

Entities:  

Keywords:  content analysis; courtroom procedure; implicit bias; judges; juror bias

Year:  2020        PMID: 35571599      PMCID: PMC9103583          DOI: 10.1080/13218719.2020.1837029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychiatr Psychol Law        ISSN: 1321-8719


  10 in total

1.  Aversive racism and selection decisions: 1989 and 1999.

Authors:  J F Dovidio; S L Gaertner
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2000-07

2.  Racial bias in decisions made by mock jurors evaluating a case of sexual harassment.

Authors:  Karl L Wuensch; Matthew W Campbell; Frederick C Kesler; Charles H Moore
Journal:  J Soc Psychol       Date:  2002-10

Review 3.  Racial bias in mock juror decision-making: a meta-analytic review of defendant treatment.

Authors:  Tara L Mitchell; Ryann M Haw; Jeffrey E Pfeifer; Christian A Meissner
Journal:  Law Hum Behav       Date:  2005-12

4.  The effects of defendant race, victim race, and juror gender on evidence processing in a murder trial.

Authors:  Robert Forsterlee; Lynne Forsterlee; Irwin A Horowitz; Ellen King
Journal:  Behav Sci Law       Date:  2006

Review 5.  "Race salience" in juror decision-making: misconceptions, clarifications, and unanswered questions.

Authors:  Samuel R Sommers; Phoebe C Ellsworth
Journal:  Behav Sci Law       Date:  2009 Jul-Aug

6.  Intergroup bias: status, differentiation, and a common in-group identity.

Authors:  J F Dovidio; S L Gaertner; A Validzic
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1998-07

Review 7.  Implicit social cognition: attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes.

Authors:  A G Greenwald; M R Banaji
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  The influence of a defendant's body weight on perceptions of guilt.

Authors:  N A Schvey; R M Puhl; K A Levandoski; K D Brownell
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 5.095

9.  The influence of plaintiff's body weight on judgments of responsibility: the role of weight bias.

Authors:  Darrell E White; Carissa B Wott; Robert A Carels
Journal:  Obes Res Clin Pract       Date:  2013-12-16       Impact factor: 2.288

10.  Attractive but guilty: deliberation and the physical attractiveness bias.

Authors:  Marc W Patry
Journal:  Psychol Rep       Date:  2008-06
  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  Credibility assessments of alibi accounts: the role of cultural intergroup bias.

Authors:  Nir Rozmann; Galit Nahari
Journal:  Psychiatr Psychol Law       Date:  2021-07-19
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.