Literature DB >> 35571596

Characteristics and re-offending outcomes of 'limiting-term' forensic patients found unfit to stand trial in New South Wales, Australia.

Timothy Wu1,2, Sara Singh1, Georgia Lyons1, Olav Nielssen1,3, Richard Kemp2, Anina Johnson4, Kimberlie Dean1,5.   

Abstract

There are little published data on the characteristics or outcomes of offenders found unfit to stand trial who receive a 'qualified finding of guilt' in a Special Hearing in New South Wales (NSW) and are detained for a 'limiting term' (LT) under the supervision of the NSW Mental Health Review Tribunal (MHRT). We examined NSW MHRT records linked to re-offending data, to report on the characteristics and outcomes of 69 LT patients in a cohort spanning two decades. The most common diagnoses were schizophrenia (54%) and intellectual disability (33%). Patients were detained on average for 4.2 years, which is slightly shorter than the average maximum term imposed. Of the 55 people for whom criminal record data were available, 9.1% were charged with an offence during the first year post-release and 60% overall were charged for at least one post-release offence during a follow-up period ranging from 4.7 to 11.1 years.
© 2021 The Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law.

Entities:  

Keywords:  detention; forensic patients; incompetent; limiting term; mental health review tribunal; re-offending; trial; unfit

Year:  2021        PMID: 35571596      PMCID: PMC9103276          DOI: 10.1080/13218719.2020.1837032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychiatr Psychol Law        ISSN: 1321-8719


  7 in total

1.  Outcome of hospitalization for defendants found incompetent to stand trial.

Authors:  R A Nicholson; J L McNulty
Journal:  Behav Sci Law       Date:  1992

2.  Unfit to plead in England and Wales, 1976-88. A survey.

Authors:  D H Grubin
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 9.319

3.  A 21-year retrospective outcome study of New South Wales forensic patients granted conditional and unconditional release.

Authors:  Heather Hayes; Richard I Kemp; Matthew M Large; Olav B Nielssen
Journal:  Aust N Z J Psychiatry       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 5.744

4.  Insanity in bar of trial in Scotland: a State Hospital study.

Authors:  D Chiswick
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  1978-06       Impact factor: 9.319

5.  Characteristics of mentally ill offenders from 100 psychiatric court reports.

Authors:  Yasser A Elsayed; Mohamed Al-Zahrani; Mahmoud M Rashad
Journal:  Ann Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2010-01-14       Impact factor: 3.455

Review 6.  Patient outcomes following discharge from secure psychiatric hospitals: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Seena Fazel; Zuzanna Fimińska; Christopher Cocks; Jeremy Coid
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 9.319

7.  Fitness to plead: Development and validation of a standardised assessment instrument.

Authors:  Penelope Brown; Daniel Stahl; Elizabeth Appiah-Kusi; Rebecca Brewer; Michael Watts; Jill Peay; Nigel Blackwood
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.