Literature DB >> 35571337

The Relationship Between Parametrial Involvement and Parametrial Tissue Removed in Radical Surgery in Early-Stage Cervical Cancer.

Ozer Birge1, Mehmet Sait Bakir1, Selen Dogan1, Hasan Aykut Tuncer1, Tayup Simsek1.   

Abstract

Background: The study aims to evaluate the effect of parametrial dimensions on the prognosis of cases who underwent type 3 radical hysterectomy or radical trachelectomy in early-stage cervical cancer (stage I - IIa).
Methods: Medical reports of patients with early-stage cervical cancer who have undergone surgery between 1998 and 2020 in Akdeniz University Faculty of Medicine Gynecological Oncology Clinic were reviewed retrospectively. A total of 292 cases were identified and included in the study. Demographic characteristics, preoperative examination findings, operation records, and pathology results of the cases were reviewed.
Results: Parametrial involvement was found histopathologically negative in 244 out of 292 patients included in our study, the remaining 48 (16.4%) patients were found to be positive. The mean length of the right and left parametrium in the group with negative parametrium invasion, who had an average follow-up of 131.2 (0.57 - 268.2) months, was 3 cm, while the mean volume of the right and left parametrium was 7.2 (0.52 - 32) cm3 and 6 (0.48 - 34) cm3, respectively. On the other hand, the mean length of the right and left parametrium was 3 (1.5 - 5.5) cm and 3 (1.4 - 7) cm, respectively, while the mean volume of the right parametrium was 5.55 (1.37 - 22) cm3, and the mean volume of the left parametrium was 7.5 (1.35 - 24) cm3 in 48 patients with positive parametrial invasion. No statistically significant difference was detected between the two groups when compared in terms of parametrial sizes and volumes (P values of 0.061, 0.262, 0.391, and 0.468, respectively). Conclusions: Radical surgical approach is necessary to obtain a tumor-free surgical margin in the surgical treatment of early cervical cancer, but the complications leading to morbidity and mortality are also increasing with this radicality. For this reason, we consider that it is important to adapt the dimensions of the removed parametrium according to the factors affecting recurrence in cervical cancer to obtain more appropriate surgical margins with the least complications. Copyright 2022, Birge et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Early-stage cervical cancer; Parametrial dimensions; Radical hysterectomy; Recurrence; Total survival

Year:  2022        PMID: 35571337      PMCID: PMC9076148          DOI: 10.14740/wjon1439

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Oncol        ISSN: 1920-4531


Introduction

Cervical cancer is the second most common cancer with the highest mortality rate, following breast cancer among women worldwide, and patients with advanced stages have a poor prognosis [1-3]. The incidence of cervical uteri cancer differs in distinct geographical regions of the world. It is the most common gynecological cancer all over the world; however, it is the third most common gynecological cancer following endometrial and ovarian cancer in developed countries [4, 5]. This situation reveals that cervical cancer is a more critical problem in developing countries. The lifetime risk and the incidence are reported as 1.1% and 4/100,000 women, respectively [4]. The most critical risk factor is human papillomavirus (HPV) infection. HPV positivity was detected in 99% of invasive cancer cases [6]. Other risk factors include smoking, multiparity, other sexually transmitted infections, immunosuppression, low socioeconomic level, and multi partnership [7]. Type III radical hysterectomy and pelvic/para-aortic lymphadenectomy are the standard care in early-stage cervical cancer (stage I - IIa). However, the risk of recurrence is up to 30% in patients who receive only surgical treatment [5-7]. Parametria intended to be resected in early-stage cervical malignancy are rich in terms of vascular and nerve fibers; and the operation time, requirement for blood transfusion, and postoperative complications of adjacent organs such as bladder and bowel, may increase especially during radical surgery performed to achieve wide tumor-free surgical margins including parametrium. Furthermore, poor obstetric outcomes have been reported even after radical trachelectomy in young patients scheduled for fertility-sparing surgery [8]. When the studies in the literature are reviewed, parametrial invasion (PI) in cervical cancer is not detected at high rates. It is detected between 5.4% and 30.6% in stage Ib1 early-stage cervical cancer and its incidence varies between 0% and 4.5% in tumors less than 2 cm [9, 10]. Therefore, less radical surgical operations such as conization, simple hysterectomy, and simple trachelectomy are preferred instead of parametrectomy in cases with cervical tumors of stage Ib1 and downstage, especially less than 2 cm, because of their better oncological results [11, 12]. The staging of cervical cancer depends on preoperative imaging together with gynecological examination and assessment of pathology reports after recent radical surgery. Especially in early-stage cervical cancers, disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) vary depending on the status of lymph node, parametrium, surgical margin, lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI), cervical stromal invasion, histological type, grade, and tumor size; and the prognosis is poorly affected due to these parameters [12-14]. The patients without these risk factors are defined as a low-risk group. The risk of PI in these cases is below 2% [9, 10]. Therefore, it should be aimed to analyze the length × width × depth measurements of the extracted parametrial dimensions and reveal the effect of the obtained volumetric surgical specimen below specific dimensions on recurrence to reduce morbidity and mortality by avoiding radical surgeries. In this study, we aim to re-evaluate the pathology reports of patients who have undergone surgery for early-stage cervical cancer and try to reveal the epidemiological features and oncological survival effects depending on the three-dimensional measurements of the parametrium for the first time due to the lack of publications on this subject in the literature.

Materials and Methods

The medical records of 292 patients with early-stage (stage I - IIa) cervical tumors operated in Akdeniz University Gynecological Oncology Clinic between 1998 and 2020 were retrospectively analyzed following receiving approval from Akdeniz University Ethics Committee with the decision number KAEK-924 dated September 12, 2020. The study was conducted in compliance with the ethical standards of the responsible institution on human subjects as well as with the Helsinki Declaration. Following reviewing the medical records of our patients, 244 (83,6%) cases without parametrium involvement and 48 (16,4%) cases with parametrium involvement were detected. Therefore, our study was designed according to the results of these two groups. Written informed consent of all cases was obtained for both study and publication. The patients were staged according to the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2018 staging system following reviewing the clinical examination, radiological imaging, and pathology reports. Cases with tumors below 4 cm up to stage Ia2 and IIb and without parametrial involvement are included in the study. Patients at stage Ia1, receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy, undergoing fertility-sparing surgery, with parametrium involvement at stage IIb and above, with second primary cancer, and who refuse treatment were excluded. In the cases up to stage IIb, whose parametrium was clinically and radiologically tumor-free and lymph node involvement negative, patients were then reclassified according to FIGO 2018 staging system depending on the postoperative histopathological results, and these patients were included in the study [4]. Age at diagnosis, gravida, parity, body mass index, preoperative cancer antigen 125 (CA-125) level, initial complaint, HPV status, education level, contraceptive use, smoking status, histopathological diagnosis, tumor dimensions in the pathology report, presence of cervical stromal invasion, presence of lymphovascular stromal invasion, parametrial dimensions in two-dimensional (cm2) and three-dimensional volume (cm3), pelvic and para-aortic lymph node status, tumor stage, type of surgery, surgical margin status, adjuvant therapy, follow-up protocol, recurrence, DFS, OS were recorded. Pelvic examination, transvaginal ultrasonography (USG), tumor markers, cervical smear, cervical and endocervical biopsies, and pelvic magnetic resonance (MR) imaging were used in the preoperative period. Surgical treatment was modified depending on the extent of the tumor and frozen consultation results. Radical hysterectomy and bilateral pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy (BPPLND) were performed in all cases. In addition, biopsies were obtained in case of suspicion of malignancy during exploration and macroscopic tumoral growths were resected. The surgical specimens were examined by the members of the Pathology Department of our hospital who are experienced in gynecological oncology. The cases were staged according to the latest FIGO 2018 system [4]. Patients were called for follow-up visits every 3 months in the first postoperative year, and every 6 months for the next 5 years. A comprehensive physical examination, gynecological examination, pelvic/transvaginal USG, serum CA-125 level, and hemogram were performed at each visit. Computed tomography (CT), chest X-ray, and laboratory tests were requested every year. Relapses detected during the follow-up period were determined by imaging methods and pathological examinations in patients considered necessary. Mean, standard deviation, median, min - max values, and frequencies were used for descriptive statistics by evaluating whether there was a normal distribution or not. Categorical data were expressed as numbers and percentages (%). Parametric methods were used in the analysis of normally distributed variables, and nonparametric methods were used in the analysis of non-normally distributed variables. The dependent t-test was used in the pairwise comparison of independent groups from parametric methods. Mann-Whitney U test was used for pairwise comparison of independent groups from nonparametric methods. Pearson Chi-square, continuity, and Fisher’s exact tests were used to compare categorical data. DFS and OS were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method, and both groups were compared using log-rank analysis. Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) 26 program was used to analyze the data. It was considered statistically significant when the P values in all tests were less than 0.05.

Results

Parametrial involvement was found histopathologically negative in 244 out of 292 patients included in our study, the remaining 48 (16.4%) patients were found to be positive. The mean age of the parametrium negative group was 49.9 ± 11.1 years and 54.6 ± 12.8 in the parametrium-positive group; there was a statistically significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.010). There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding gravida, parity, body mass index, and CA-125 levels. The results of both groups were similar in terms of cigarette smoking, which is a risk factor for cervical cancer, and no statistical difference was found (P = 0.775). Postcoital bleeding (38.5% and 33.3%, respectively) was the most common initial complaint in both groups. HPV was found positive in 22 (9%) patients in the parametrium-negative group, six (12.5%) cases with positive HPV test were detected in the parametrium-positive group and this was not statistically significant (P = 0.630). The majority of our patient population did not use contraception. The intrauterine device (IUD) was the most common contraceptive method in the parametrium-negative group. In contrast, oral contraceptive (OC) drug was the most common contraceptive method in the parametrium-positive group, and there was no statistical significance in terms of contraception for the two groups (P = 0.447). When the two groups were compared in terms of education level, a statistically significant difference was found in the parametrium-negative group indicating higher education level due to earlier admission to hospital (P = 0.002). squamous cell tumor was the most frequently detected tumor in both groups (68% and 70.8%, respectively), and there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of histopathologic types (P = 0.846). Neuroendocrine carcinoma, clear cell carcinoma, and carcinosarcoma were detected in five, two, and one cases, respectively. The most common stage was Ib2 (38.5%) in the parametrium-negative group and Ib3 (25%) in the parametrium-positive group. More cases in the advanced stages were found especially in the parametrium-positive group compared to the negative group. Surgery and adjuvant chemoradiotherapy were the most frequently applied treatment regimen in the parametrium-negative group (102 patients (41.8%)). In comparison, surgery and adjuvant chemoradiotherapy were used in 38 patients (79.2%) in the parametrium-positive group, and there was a statistically significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.001) (Table 1).
Table 1

Clinical and Histopathological Risk Factors of Patients

Parametrium-negative (n = 244)Parametrium-positive (n = 48)P value
Age (year), mean ± SD49.9 ± 11.154.6 ± 12.80.010*
Gravida, median (min - max)3 (0 - 9)3 (0 - 10)0.274
Parity, median (min - max)2 (0 - 7)2.5 (0 - 9)0.290
BMI, median (min - max)23.2 (17.3 - 39)23.8 (18.5 - 37.1)0.494
CA-125, median (min - max)16.5 (2.8 - 142)14 (0.6 - 79.5)0.453
Smoke, pack/year12 (0 - 40)13 (0 - 32)0.775
Complaint
  Asymptomatic10 (4%)00.093
  Postcoital bleeding94 (38.5%)16 (33.3%)
  Vaginal discharge70 (28.6%)11 (22.9%)
  PMB48 (19.7%)12 (25%)
  Pelvic pain22 (9%)9 (18.7%)
HPV status
  Known22 (9%)6 (12.5%)0.630
  Unknown222 (91%)42 (87.5%)
Contraception
  Not162 (66.4%)36 (75%)0.447
  OC28 (11.5%)6 (12.5%)
  IUD40 (16.4%)4 (8.3%)
  Condom14 (5.7%)2 (4.1%)
Educational status
  Literate86 (35.2%)6 (12.5%)0.002*
  Not literate158 (64.7%)42 (87.5%)
Histology
  SCC166 (68%)34 (70.8%)0.846
  Adenocarcinoma70 (28.7%)12 (25%)
  Others8 (3.3%)2 (4.1%)
Stage
  Ia28 (3.3%)0NA
  Ib162 (25.4%)8 (16.7%)
  Ib294 (38.5%)4 (8.3%)
  Ib334 (13.9%)12 (25%)
  IIa118 (7.4%)10 (20.8%)
  IIa216 (6.6%)2 (4.2%)
  IIIc1p12 (4.9%)10 (20.8%)
  IIIc2p02 (4.2%)
Primary treatment
  Surgery68 (27.9%)6 (12.5%)0.001*
  Surgery + adjuvant radiotherapy74 (30.3%)4 (8.3%)
  Surgery + adjuvant chemoradiotherapy102 (41.8%)38 (79.2%)

*P < 0.05. SD: standard deviation; BMI: body mass index; PMB: postmenopausal bleeding; HPV: human papillomavirus; OC: oral contraceptive drug; IUD: intrauterine device; SCC: squamous cell cancer.

*P < 0.05. SD: standard deviation; BMI: body mass index; PMB: postmenopausal bleeding; HPV: human papillomavirus; OC: oral contraceptive drug; IUD: intrauterine device; SCC: squamous cell cancer. The mean length of the right and left parametrium in the group with negative parametrium invasion, who had an average follow-up of 131.2 (0.57 - 268.2) months, was 3 cm, while the mean volume of the right and left parametrium was 7.2 (0.52 - 32) cm3 and 6 (0.48 - 34) cm3, respectively. On the other hand, the mean length of the right and left parametrium was 3 (1.5 - 5.5) cm and 3 (1.4 - 7) cm, respectively, while the mean volume of the right parametrium was 5.55 (1.37 - 22) cm3, and the mean volume of the left parametrium was 7.5 (1.35 - 24) cm3 in 48 patients with positive PI. Considering both dimensions and volume of the parametrium removed by surgery, no statistically significant difference was found between the two groups (P values of 0.061, 0.262, 0.391, and 0.468, respectively) (Table 2).
Table 2

Histopathologic Features and Survival Results of the Patientsa

Parametrial invasion absent (n = 244)Parametrial invasion present (n = 48)P value
Left parametrium length (cm)3 (1.5 - 7)3 (1.4 - 7)0.262
Left parametrial volume (cm3)6 (0.48 - 34)7.5 (1.35 - 24)0.468
Right parametrium length (cm)3 (1.5 - 8)3 (1.5 - 5.5)0.061
Right parametrial volume (cm3)7.2 (0.52 - 32)5.55 (1.37 - 22.1)0.391
Tumor diameter (cm)2.05 (0 - 5.3)2.2 (0.6 - 4.6)0.074
Tumor diameter subgroup
  ≤ 2cm81 (91%)8 (9%)0.023*
  > 2cm163 (80.3%)40 (19.7%)
LVSI
  Yes112 (45.9%)32 (66.6%)0.009*
  No132 (54.1%)16 (33.3%)
Deep stromal invasion
  Yes60 (24.6%)26 (54.2%)0.0001*
  No184 (75.4%)22 (45.8%)
Surgical margin
  Yes1 (0.4%)8 (16.7%)0.0001*
  No243 (99.6%)40 (83.3%)
Lymph node involvement
  Yes24 (9.8%)18 (37.5%)0.0001*
  No220 (90.2%)30 (72.5%)
Recurrence
  Yes68 (27.9%)32 (66.6%)0.0001*
  No176 (72.1%)16 (33.3%)
Death
  Yes40 (16.4%)28 (58.3%)0.0001*
  No204 (83.6%)20 (41.7%)
Follow-up, month131.2 (0.57 - 268.2)

*P < 0.05. LVSI: lymphovascular space invasion. aFollow-up time: 131.2 (0.57 - 268.2) months.

*P < 0.05. LVSI: lymphovascular space invasion. aFollow-up time: 131.2 (0.57 - 268.2) months. The mean diameter of the cervical tumor reported histopathologically was 2.05 (0.5 - 3) cm in the parametrium-negative group, and it was 2.2 (0.6 - 4.6) cm in the parametrium-positive group, and there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.074). However, in subgroup analysis (tumor size < 2 cm and > 2 cm), it was found that the parametrial involvement was positive in 40 patients (19.7%), which was higher in the group with a mass greater than 2 cm. There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.023) (Table 2). We found a statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of pathological prognostic risk factors including LVSI, deep stromal invasion (DSI), surgical margin, and lymph node involvement (P values of 0.009, 0.0001, 0.0001, and 0.0001, respectively). Recurrence was detected in 68 (27.9%) patients in the parametrium-negative group and 32 (66.6%) patients in the parametrium-positive group. Forty (16.4%) patients died in the parametrium-negative group, whereas 28 (58.3%) patients died in the parametrium-positive group. There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups regarding recurrence and death (P values of 0.0001 and 0.0001) (Table 2). Median follow-up for DFS was 131.2 (0.57 - 268.2) months. Five-year DFS was 77.4% in the parametrial-negative group and 44.9% in the parametrium-positive group (Fig. 1). The 5-year OS was 90.2% in the parametrium-negative group, and 66.2% in the parametrium-positive group (Fig. 2).
Figure 1

The relationship between disease-free survival and parametrial involvement.

Figure 2

The relationship between overall survival and parametrial involvement.

The relationship between disease-free survival and parametrial involvement. The relationship between overall survival and parametrial involvement.

Discussion

Cervical cancer invades locally through the lymphatic channels and parametrial tissues to the pelvic sidewall. Therefore, the standard treatment approach is en bloc radical surgery, which includes resection of the parametrium with negative surgical margins and the lymphatic system. It is obvious in the literature that, especially the hypogastric nerve is damaged due to resection of parametrium during such a radical extensive surgery, so colorectal disorders, urinary problems may occur, and sexual life can be adversely and permanently affected [15]. In addition, considering the risk factors affecting parametrial involvement, it has been revealed that age is an essential factor in predicting PI, especially in early-stage cervical cancer, and parametrial involvement rates are higher in cervical cancer, especially in elderly patients [16]. However, there have been reports stating the parametrial involvement rates are more common especially in elderly patients due to the shrinkage of the uterus and cervix due to menopausal atrophy, and the easy invasion of the cervical tumor to the paracervical ring by gaining the comparative advantage. It is claimed that the possibility of PI due to atrophic cervix uteri is higher since cervical uteri cancer spreads similarly at all ages [16, 17]. In our study, it is found that the mean age was higher in the parametrial-positive group, and this was statistically significant (P = 0.010) when compared with the parametrial-negative group. At the end of two- and three-dimensional volumetric examination of the parametrium, which is the general aim of our study, it is clear that there is no dimensional difference between the parametrium-negative and positive groups; therefore, it is very clear that the surgeries are performed in a single center by a team experienced in the field of gynecological oncology. Moreover, the volumetric measurements of the right and left parametrial dimensions indicates that we may not have a significant difference in terms of parametrial involvement; so that the same results can be obtained with less radical surgeries, and thus the complications caused by the removal of wider parametrial tissue in radical surgeries may be avoided. Early-stage cervical cancer is currently increasing in importance due to its rising incidence. These patients are treated with radical hysterectomy together with pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy in general. The disease is staged using the FIGO system [4]. However, very various prognoses are observed even in patients at the same stage. Therefore, it is essential to determine the prognostic factors affecting the survival rate in these cases. The most critical factor determining the prognosis of cervical cancer is the stage of the disease. As the stage of the disease increases, the response to treatment decreases. Five-year survival in stage I cervical cancer is approximately 80%, and 10% in stage IV cancer [4, 5]. Moreover, As the stage of the disease increases, the possibility of regional lymphatic metastasis increases. This affects the prognosis of cervical cancer negatively. Ten percent of pelvic and 5% para-aortic nodal spread is detected in stage Ib tumors, whereas 30-35% pelvic and 21% para-aortic nodal spread is seen in stage IIb tumors, respectively [18]. The DFS and OS following radical hysterectomy and pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy for cervical cancer vary depending on the status of lymph nodes, tumor size, parametrial involvement, DSI, surgical margin positivity and lymphovascular stromal invasion [5, 13, 19]. Surgical treatment of early-stage invasive cervical cancer consists of radical hysterectomy and pelvic and para-aortic lymph node dissection. Radical hysterectomy involves the removal of the parametrium and one-third or one-half of the upper part of the vagina. Resection of parametrial tissues is essential in the treatment. Because the most common invasion of cervical cancer is through direct microscopic extension to this region or tumor embolism from the primary lesion to the lymph nodes in parametrial tissues. The incidence of parametrial involvement in histopathological examinations ranges between 6% and 31% [19-21]. In our study, the rate of patients with parametrial involvement was 16.4% (48) in a total of 292 patients with early-stage cervical cancer over 22 years, which is compatible with the reviewed literature. Removal of the parametrium during radical hysterectomy is the most common cause of complications. Bladder dysfunction, sexual dysfunction, and anorectal mobility occur due to partial impairment of perfusion as a result of both autonomic nerve damage and disruption of vascular anatomy. Nerve-sparing radical surgery and reduced radicality have recently been introduced in patients with low risk of parametrial involvement, tumor size below 2 cm, LVSI negative, under 50 years of age, below 10 mm DSI, or stage Ib1 superficial invasion [16, 22, 23] to reduce the complications. In our study, when we analyzed the effect of parametrial dimensions on both two-dimensional and three-dimensional parametrial involvement, no statistically significant difference was found; indicating that longer or larger tissue resection does not affect recurrence and survival. It may be recommended to prefer less radical surgical methods in low-risk groups with negative LVSI, under 50 years of age, with normal cervix sizes, and without DSI. Chemoradiotherapy is recommended in most guidelines, especially in cases with advanced-stage cervix cancer with parametrial involvement, and some publications describe the surgical technique of laterally extended parametrectomy. Despite the difficulties, 2% mortality, and up to 70% morbidity rate of this technique, there are case-based and prospective studies describing it at experienced centers to obtain a negative surgical margin laterally. However, the difficulty in the ligation of large vessels (internal iliac artery and vein), anatomical variations in the pelvic sidewall vessels, fibrosis, and technical difficulty in the dissection of previously radio-chemotherapy applied field should be kept in mind [24, 25]. There have been publications declaring that laterally extended parametrectomy is an appropriate technique to surgically obtain a free margin to eliminate pelvic sidewall recurrences [24]. The hypogastric nerve injury has been reported to a lesser extent after a more conservative surgical operation performed for early-stage cervical uteri cancer in the previous studies. Thus, the morbidity rates are lower [26-30]. Moreover, recurrence rate is 4.5%, and the disease-related mortality is 1.25% [31] in the reported studies. Type 1 and type 3 hysterectomy were compared in a prospective study including 125 patients at stage Ib1 to IIa with tumor sizes ranging from 2 to 4 cm, the recurrence rate after type 1 and type 3 hysterectomy was 24% and 13%, respectively after a follow-up time of 280 months, no statistically significant difference was stated between two groups. Furthermore, 73% of the relapsed patients in the type 1 group and 75% of the patients in the type 3 group survived free of disease specific signs after salvage treatment [29]. Morbidities related to blood loss, urinary and bowel dysfunction were determined to be significantly lower in the type 1 hysterectomy group [29, 32]. The incidence of PI in cases with positive lymph node metastasis varies between 36.4% and 48%, so the lymph node metastasis is accepted as one of the most critical risk factors predicting PI [32, 33]. The incidence of parametrial involvement was reported 28% in the early-staged patients with positive sentinel lymph nodes [34]. In our study, the risk of PI is 16.6% (8/48) in early-staged patients with tumors of 2 cm or less. However, removal of the parametrium following the evaluation of lymph node metastasis before hysterectomy in early-stage cervical uteri cancer surgery is still a matter of debate [25, 35]. In recent years, the benefit of parametrial resection in women with early-stage cervical cancer has been questioned. It has been reported that less than 1% of women with early-stage disease and favorable pathological features (tumor < 2 cm, depth of invasion < 10 mm, and negative pelvic nodes) have parametrial involvement [36]. In the ConCerv study, which was the first comprehensive prospective study in 2021, it was also revealed that in early-stage low-risk patients, after conservative surgeries consisting of cervical conization and simple hysterectomy, no tumor was detected at the surgical margin in the hysterectomy material, and oncological results were equivalent to radical surgery [36]. It has been stated that the results obtained so far in the SHAPE and GOG 278 studies, which are two ongoing studies, are also in favor of the conservative surgical approach [37, 38]. In all ConCerv, SHAPE and GOG 278 studies, it is stated that bladder, bowel, and sexual functions and even quality of life are better with less bleeding, fistula, lymphedema and lymphocyst rates. The current standard treatment for women with early-stage cervical cancer is a radical hysterectomy with removal of the uterus, cervix, upper vagina, and parametrium, as well as pelvic lymph nodes. Conization, with equivalent oncologic results, is an acceptable alternative to radical trachelectomy in women who wish to preserve fertility. This consists of removing the cervix, upper vagina, and parametrium while preserving the uterine fundus, allowing future pregnancy. Although radical hysterectomy and radical trachelectomy result in excellent local tumor control, they can be associated with significant morbidity due to the removal of the parameter involving autonomic nerve fibers associated with bladder, bowel, and sexual function. These radical procedures are also associated with surgical complications such as bleeding, bladder and ureter injury, and fistula formation. Additionally, these procedures require a provider with specialized training in gynecologic oncology surgery, which is not available in most low- and middle-income countries. That is why, considering that more than 85% of cervical cancer is seen in low and moderately developed countries, conization, trachelectomy and simple hysterectomy operations, which are more conservative surgeries, can be applied more easily, especially in cases of early-stage low-risk cervical uteri cancer, and thus, less radical surgery can be performed. Complications are also less common [36, 37, 39-45]. The limitations of our study are being in retrospective nature and possessing varying follow-up time. However, less radical surgical methods can be performed in optimal patients to reduce morbidity and mortality in the near future, particularly as a result of ongoing prospective studies, the HPV vaccine, and the benefits of effective cervical cytological screening methods. The superiority of our research is that it is carried out in a single center and by a team experienced in long-term gynecological oncology. In conclusion the radical surgical approach is necessary to obtain a tumor-free surgical margin in the treatment of early cervical cancer, but complications leading to morbidity and mortality increase during parametrial resection. There has been a recent preference of more conservative surgeries in early-stage cervical cancer. For this purpose, we can say that it is important to adapt the size of the extracted parametrium according to the factors affecting recurrence in cervical cancer in order to obtain more suitable surgical margins with the least complication rate.
  42 in total

1.  Urologic complications of radical Wertheim hysterectomy: incidence, etiology, management, and prevention.

Authors:  T H GREEN; J V MEIGS; H ULFELDER; R R CURTIN
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1962-09       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Factors associated with parametrial involvement in stage IB1 cervical cancer and identification of patients suitable for less radical surgery.

Authors:  Junichi Kodama; Tomoyuki Kusumoto; Keiichiro Nakamura; Noriko Seki; Atsushi Hongo; Yuji Hiramatsu
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2011-06-24       Impact factor: 5.482

3.  Excisional cone as fertility-sparing treatment in early-stage cervical cancer.

Authors:  Anna Fagotti; Maria Lucia Gagliardi; Cristina Moruzzi; Vito Carone; Giovanni Scambia; Francesco Fanfani
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 4.  Nerve-sparing and individually tailored surgery for cervical cancer.

Authors:  Lukas Rob; Michael Halaska; Helena Robova
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 41.316

5.  Less radical surgery for early-stage cervical cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jenny Wu; Teresa Logue; Samantha J Kaplan; Alexander Melamed; Ana I Tergas; Fady Khoury-Collado; June Y Hou; Caryn M St Clair; Dawn L Hershman; Jason D Wright
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Early invasive adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix: criteria for nonradical surgical treatment.

Authors:  Takahiro Kasamatsu; Satoshi Okada; Hitoshi Tsuda; Kenji Shiromizu; Takuro Yamada; Ryuichiro Tsunematsu; Kazuo Ohmi
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 5.482

7.  ConCerv: a prospective trial of conservative surgery for low-risk early-stage cervical cancer.

Authors:  Kathleen M Schmeler; Rene Pareja; Aldo Lopez Blanco; Jose Humberto Fregnani; Andre Lopes; Myriam Perrotta; Audrey T Tsunoda; David F Cantú-de-León; Lois M Ramondetta; Tarinee Manchana; David R Crotzer; Orla M McNally; Martin Riege; Giovanni Scambia; Juan Manuel Carvajal; Julian Di Guilmi; Gabriel J Rendon; Preetha Ramalingam; Bryan M Fellman; Robert L Coleman; Michael Frumovitz; Pedro T Ramirez
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2021-09-07       Impact factor: 3.437

8.  Stage IB1 cervical cancer patients with an MRI-measured tumor size < or = 2 cm might be candidates for less-radical surgery.

Authors:  J Kodama; C Fukushima; T Kusumoto; K Nakamura; N Seki; A Hongo; Y Hiramatsu
Journal:  Eur J Gynaecol Oncol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 0.196

9.  The frequency, causes and prevention of severe urinary dysfunction after radical hysterectomy.

Authors:  N Kadar; N Saliba; J H Nelson
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1983-09

10.  Laterally extended parametrectomy.

Authors:  Mihai Emil Căpîlna; Lászlo Ungár; Alexandra Lavinia Cozlea; Mihai Gheorghe; Mihai Stanca; Balázs Lintner; Andreea Anamaria Moldovan
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Sci       Date:  2021-05-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.